ebook img

Early Solar Physics PDF

305 Pages·1970·4.681 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Early Solar Physics

EARLY SOLAR PHYSICS BY A. J. MEADOWS Senior Lecturer in Astronomy University of Leicester 1966 PERGAMON PRESS OXFORD · LONDON · EDINBURGH · NEW YORK TORONTO · SYDNEY · PARIS · BRAUNSCHWEIG PERGAMON PRESS LTD., Headington Hill Hall, Oxford 4 & 5 Fitzroy Square, London W.l PERGAMON PRESS (SCOTLAND) LTD., 2 & 3 Teviot Place, Edinburgh 1 PERGAMON PRESS INC., Maxwell House, Fairview Park, Elmsford, New York 10523 PERGAMON OF CANADA LTD., 207 Queen's Quay West, Toronto 1 PERGAMON PRESS (AUST.) PTY. LTD., 19a Boundary Street, Rushcutters Bay, N.S.W. 2011, Australia PERGAMON PRESS S.A.R.L., 24 rue des Écoles, Paris 5e VIEWEG & SOHN GMBH, Burgplatz 1, Braunschweig Copyright © 1970 Pergamon Press Ltd. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of Pergamon Press Ltd. First edition 1970 Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 74-103021 Printed in Great Britain by Thomas Nelson (Printers) Ltd, London and Edinburgh This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. 08 006654 2 (flexicover) 08 006653 4 (hard cover) Preface THE growth of solar physics is a vast and intricate subject full of twists and turns. The description of it provided in this book is no more than a brief, selective introduction to the early period. The emphasis here is more especially on the development of solar spectroscopy, and on the relationships which were discovered between the various layers of the solar atmosphere and between the different forms of solar activity. In terms of time, the main concentration is on the years from 1850 to 1900. This is, of course, an arbitrary choice, but it represents, nevertheless, a period during which knowledge of the Sun progressed from the extremely rudimentary to the recognizably modern. The fact that a new type of astronomy was being created received full contemporary recognition. S. P. Langley, writing in 1888, noted that: "Within a comparatively few years, a new branch of astronomy has arisen. ... Its study of the Sun, beginning with its external features (and full of novelty and interest, even as regards those), led to the further enquiry as to what it was made of, and then to finding the unexpected relations which it bore to the earth. . . . This new branch of inquiry is sometimes called Celestial Physics, sometimes Solar Physics and is sometimes . . . referred to as the New Astronomy." To provide some insight into the changes and developments which a single individual might feel forced to make to his views of the Sun during this period, the work of Sir Norman Lockyer is described separately in rather greater detail. This main body of the commentary is contained in Chapter II. Chapter I is a short introduction, setting the scene for the follow- ing period of rapid growth. Chapter III is by way of an epilogue. If it is necessary to distinguish between early and modern solar vii VÜi PREFACE physics, the division may, perhaps, be set most reasonably in 1913, when Bohr proposed the first workable theory of atomic spectra. The third chapter selects two advances during the first decade of the present century—one theoretical and one observa- tional—to show how solar physics was ready to move ahead into the modern era as soon as this vital development in physics occurred. I am much indebted to the following organizations for per- mission to reprint articles in Part 2 of this book: the University of Chicago Press for the chapter by G. E. Hale from Stellar Evolution and for the article by W. W. Campbell in the Astro- physicalJournal (1899); the Smithsonian Institution for the article by G. E. Hale in the Smithsonian Report (1913); the Royal Society for the article by J. Evershed in the Proceedings of the Royal Society (1901). CHAPTER I Ideas of the Sun in the M id-Nineteenth Century THE initial burst of enthusiasm for solar observation, which followed the introduction of the astronomical telescope at the beginning of the seventeenth century, waned fairly quickly. The discoveries made during this early period included observation of sunspots, of faculae and of solar rotation; no further advances of importance in solar astronomy were made subsequently until the latter half of the eighteenth century. This lack of progress may be attributable in part to a certain scarcity of sunspots throughout much of this period, for it was the spots which caused much of the early interest in the Sun, and they, too, were involved in the resurgence of interest in the later eighteenth century In 1774, Alexander Wilson, a professor at Glasgow University, published some observations which seemed to show conclusively that sunspots were neither clouds floating above the solar surface, nor layers of accumulated slag, nor volcanoes—all of which had been suggested—but were, instead, depressions below the normal level of the surface (Wilson, 1774). He obtained this result from a study of the apparent change in appearance of a spot as it crossed the solar disc. "Astronomers will remember that a spot of an extraordinary size appeared upon the sun, in the month of November 1769.. .. on the 22nd day I had a view of the sun through an excellent Gregorian telescope.... I then beheld the spot which at that time was not far from the sun's western limb. . . . Next day being the 23rd, I had a curiosity to see it again.... I now found however a 3 4 EARLY SOLAR PHYSICS remarkable change; for the umbra, which before was equally broad all round the nucleus, appeared much contracted on that part which lay towards the centre of the disc.... I began to suspect that the central part, or nucleus of this spot, was beneath the level of the sun's spherical surface; and that the shady zone or umbra, which surrounded it, might be nothing else but the shelving sides of the luminous matter of the sun, reaching from his surface, in every direction, down to the nucleus; for, upon this supposition, I perceived, that a just account could be given of the changes, of the umbra and of the figure of the nucleus.'f The existence of this Wilson effect was disputed by his in- fluential French contemporary, Lalande, who preferred to believe that spots represented mountains sticking up through the liquid surface of the Sun. Wilson's idea was, however, taken up in England by Sir William Herschel (1795), who developed it into a general description of the solar constitution. He believed the bright surface of the Sun to be the upper side of a layer of lumin- ous clouds; the spots were regions where the clouds had been temporarily dispersed by atmospheric currents, so that the dark, solid body of the true Sun was exposed. In detail, his theory became more complicated, for two cloud layers were actually envisaged : the opening in the upper layer being larger than that in the lower. In this way, the presence of a penumbra round the central umbra of a spot could be explained. Herschel speculated that, since the supposed true surface of the Sun was protected from the heating effects of its luminous envelope by the lower- lying clouds, therefore the solar surface could be inhabited. This last opinion was generally disregarded, but his overall concept of the solar constitution was widely accepted until after the middle of the nineteenth century. ". .. according to the above theory, a dark spot in the Sun is a place in its atmosphere which happens to be free from luminous decompositions; and that faculae are, on the contrary, more copious mixtures of such fluids as decompose each other. The t Note that Wilson refers to the umbra of the spot as its nucleus, and calls the penumbra the umbra. IDEAS OF THE SUN IN THE MID-NINETEENTH CENTURY 5 penumbra which attends the spots, being generally depressed more or less to about half way between the solid body of the sun and the upper part of those regions in which luminous decomposi- tions take place, must of course be fainter than other parts. The sun, viewed in this light, appears to be nothing else than a very eminent, large and lucid planet, evidently the first, or in strictness of speaking, the only primary one of our system; all others being truly secondary to it. Its similarity to the other globes of the solar system with regard to its solidity, its atmosphere, and its diversified surface; the rotation upon its axis, and the fall of heavy bodies, leads us on to suppose that it is most probably also inhabited like the rest of the planets, by beings whose organs are adapted to the peculiar circumstances of that vast globe." Slight modifications were introduced into this scheme from time to time. In 1851, for example, Rev. W. R. Dawes—one of the leading British solar observers—detected small, round spots in the umbra which were even darker than their surroundings. He therefore assumed that the umbra of a spot did not, in fact, represent the true solar surface. It was, instead, an even lower cloud stratum, and only the smaller spots he had discovered pro- vided a true glimpse of the surface (Dawes, 1852). The apparent similarity between the solar and terrestrial atmospheres suggested a comparison between solar and terrestrial meteorology. Sir John Herschel (1847), for example, thought that solar rotation would produce a higher temperature at the equator of the Sun than at the poles. He was thus led to suppose that atmospheric zonation occurred on the Sun, as on the Earth. Sunspots were then comparable with terrestrial cyclones: they represented regions where the cloudy strata of the Sun were penetrated by downward motions of the solar atmosphere. (This contrasted with the opposing view at the time that the clearings were due to an upward motion of the atmosphere as a result of volcanic explosions on the solar surface.) The idea that sunspots could be identified with some kind of vortex motion continued to be more or less influential throughout the next hundred years. 6 EARLY SOLAR PHYSICS The picture of the Sun as a relatively cool, solid body surrounded by layers of luminous clouds gradually disappeared as the full implications of new work, particularly in the field of spectroscopy, were understood. Nevertheless, it lingered on for a surprisingly long time: Sir John Herschel's standard textbook—Outlines of Astronomy—still reproduced Sir William Herschel's scheme at the end of the 1860's. It was apparent from the earliest solar observations that the number of sunspots visible varied with time, but the first detailed, long-term survey of these variations was not undertaken until well into the nineteenth century. In the early 1840's, S. H. Schwabe, an amateur astronomer of Dessau, announced the results from seventeen years observations of sunspot numbers (the paper is reprinted in Part 2). He showed that the number of spots visible on the Sun's surface, instead of varying randomly as had usually been supposed, rose and fell with a period of about ten years. His initial announcement in the Astronomische Nachrichten aroused only slight interest, but Humboldt was struck by his results and published them in the volume of his book Kosmos which appeared in 1851. This work was very widely read, so that the concept of a sunspot cycle quickly became general currency. At about the same time, Lamont (1852) at the University of Munich published an analysis of observations of terrestrial magnetism made in Germany over the previous 15 years. He pointed out that the amplitude of the daily variation was itself variable, with a period of 10£ years. He did not, however, relate this discovery to Schwabe's sunspot cycle (indeed, he later opposed the belief that any such connection existed). Very shortly after- wards, Sir Edward Sabine (1852) began an examination of magnetic observations from Canada. He concentrated on the occurrence of magnetic storms, and found that they varied in frequency and amplitude with a periodicity of about ten years. Unlike Lamont, he recognized the relationship between his results and those of Schwabe for sunspots, and pointed out further that the magnetic fluctuations he had been examining were greatest when sunspot numbers were at a maximum. IDEAS OF THE SUN IN THE MID-NINETEENTH CENTURY 7 . . new and important features have presented themselves in the comparison of the frequency and amount of the disturbances in different years, apparently indicating the existence of a periodical variation, which, either from a causal connection (meaning thereby there being possibly joint effects of a common cause), or by a singular coincidence, corresponds precisely both in period and epoch, with the variation in the frequency and magnitude of the solar spots, recently announced by M. Schwabe as the result of his systematic and long-continued observations." Sabine's identification of the connection between the sunspot and the magnetic periods was published in mid-1852. Within the next few months the same identification was also made on the Continent by Wolf (1852) and, independently, by Gautier (1852) These publications mark the beginning of research into solar- terrestrial relations. As we have remarked, spots were not the only solar features noted by early telescopic observers. Faculae—small bright patches, best seen near the Sun's limb—were recognized at about the same time. Similarly, it was soon observed that the Sun's surface was mottled in appearance rather than uniform. By the middle of the nineteenth century the darkening of the solar disc towards the limb was also well known, although still slightly controversial—Arago, for example, believed that genuine limb- darkening only existed to a very limited extent. This question was to some extent settled when the first good daguerreotype of the Sun was obtained by Fizeau and Foucault in 1845 (at Arago's request). This clearly showed limb-darkening, as well as the umbrae and penumbrae of some spots present (see the reproduc- tion in G. de Vaucouleurs (1961), Plate 1). A few measurements of the overall brightness of the Sun had been made during the eighteenth century (e.g. by Bouguer in 1725 and by Wollaston in 1799). The method used was very elementary —a visual comparison of a candle flame with the Sun in the meridian—and the results were correspondingly inaccurate. There was also considerable doubt as to the magnitude of many of the corrections (such as that for the atmospheric absorption of 8 EARLY SOLAR PHYSICS sunlight) which had to be made. In 1844, Foucault and Fizeau tried to obtain a more refined estimate of the solar brightness by com- paring daguerreotype images of the Sun and incandescent lime- light. Their results, however, proved to be no more reliable than the earlier visual estimates, which were therefore still being quoted at the mid-century. The first quantitative estimate of the heat emitted by the Sun was made by Newton (who also reasoned that the Sun must be red-hot throughout). The first significant measurements, however, were not made until well into the nineteenth century. Then in 1837-8 Sir John Herschel (1847), during his stay at the Cape of Good Hope, carried out some observations with an actinometer. (This consisted essentially of a bowl of water which was exposed to the Sun for a short period of time, and the resulting rise in temperature noted.) About the same time, C. S. M. Pouillet in France began a series of measurements with a pyrheliometer (based on essentially the same principle as the actinometer, though considerably different in appearance). Their results for what was named the solar constant agreed quite well, but were, in fact, only slightly over half the value accepted later in the century. (For a description and comparison of Herschel's and Pouillet's work, see: Young, 1896, chapter 9.) Shortly afterwards, J. D. Forbes (1842) obtained a much higher value, but it was considered at the time to be less reliable. As in the measurements of solar brightness, one of the main experimental difficulties lay in the allowance for atmospheric absorption. An important reason for determining the solar constant was that it could, theoretically, be used to derive a surface temperature for the Sun. The major difficulty, which plagued scientists throughout the nineteenth century, concerned the exact relation- ship between the temperature of a surface and the amount of radiation it emitted. Until the early part of the nineteenth century, Newton's law of cooling had been universally accepted, i.e. the radiation emitted was supposed to be directly proportional to the temperature. Then, however, the French scientists, Dulong and Petit (1817), carried out a series of experiments which showed

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.