ebook img

Early Clinical Trial Design Recommendations in Oncology Based on Overall Success across ... PDF

204 Pages·2017·3.55 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Early Clinical Trial Design Recommendations in Oncology Based on Overall Success across ...

Early Clinical Trial Design Recommendations in Oncology Based on Overall Success across Phases I, II, and III Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Amy S. Ruppert Stark, M.A.S. Graduate Program in Biostatistics The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Abigail Shoben, Advisor Dr. Rebecca Andridge Dr. John Byrd Dr. Jason Hsu (cid:13)c Copyright by Amy S. Ruppert Stark 2017 Abstract Conventionally, drug development has spanned three distinct phases, and the success rate for experimental drugs across phases has been less than 15% (Hay, Thomas, Craighead, Economides, and Rosenthal, 2014). Despite increased options for nonstandard early phase designs, lack of familiarity and a perceived increase in complexity have been barriers to their use. Herein, we provide early phase design recommendations for standard and nonstandard designs, considering the trade-offs between performance, design complexity, and ease of implementation. We focus on overall success rate as a performance measure, which quantifies the ability to recognize a favorable drug across phases. Phase I, II, and III trials were simulated for clinical scenarios defined by eight toxicity profiles and two nondecreasing efficacy profiles. Early results showed that correctly selecting the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) greatly impacted overall success rates. Hence, we primarily evaluated phase I dose-finding designs, including the rule-based standard 3+3 design, the CCD, BOIN, mTPI, and mTPI-2 interval designs, and the model-based CRM design. Phase I designs were followed by Simon’s optimal phase II design and a randomized group sequential phase III design. A ii seamless phase I/II SEARS design, integrating toxicity and efficacy data, was also considered. Based on our results, we make the following recommendations for design selection when data informing the shape of the dose-toxicity curve exist. If a large jump in toxicity between dose levels is expected, we recommend the standard 3+3 design, which more often recognized when the MTD had been exceeded and resulted in the highest overall success rates. If gradually increasing toxicity is expected, we recommend a nonstandard design other than the CRM. Nonstandard designs were more aggressive in dosing decisions and MTD estimation than the standard 3+3 design and resulted in higher overall success rates, but the CRM was too aggressive and most frequently overestimated the MTD. If fairly constant and safe toxicity is expected, we recommend the BOIN or CRM designs, which escalated to the highest dose level most frequently and had superior overall success rates. If in addition to a constant and safe toxicity profile, multiple dose levels with favorable efficacy are expected, we recommend a phase I/II SEARS design, which had higher overall success rates and more frequent selection of the lowest dose level with highest efficacy compared to separate phase I and II designs. A phase I/II SEARS design is also recommended if an unconventional nonmonotonic toxicity profile is expected, since overall success rates were 2-3 times higher than when separate phase I and II designs were used. iii Without data informing the shape of the dose-toxicity curve, we recommend nonstandard phase I designs with a modified excessive toxicity rule that more easily eliminates dose levels due to safety concerns. With this modification, the MTD overestimation error decreased and overall success rates were similar or higher with nonstandard designs versus the standard 3+3 design. Among nonstandard designs, we recommend the modified CCD and BOIN designs, since both perform well and are as transparent and simple as the standard 3+3 design to implement. iv To my husband Greg and our daughter Emma. v Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge my advisor, Dr. Abby Shoben, for her time and encouragement that she showed over the past five years. I have grown in multiple areas as a statistical researcher due to her continual guidance. I would like to acknowledge Drs. Jason Hsu, Stan Lemeshow, John Byrd, and Rebecca Andridge for serving on my candidacy and dissertation committees. Additionally, I acknowledge Drs. Doug Wolfe and Rebecca Andridge for coaching me through the first two qualifying exams of my program. I acknowledge Drs. Steve MacEachern, Doug Critchlow, Elizabeth Stasney, and Raj Nagaraja, all who said they were not only happy to see me pursue a PhD but also that I was capable of obtaining it. Those words, spoken in passing, kept me going through the years and were invaluable. I especially want to thank my family and friends for their love and support. Thank you Greg and Emma for being so patient and allowing me to take the time needed to complete this chapter in my life. Thank you Greg for motivating me and believing in me even when I wanted to throw in the towel. Thank you to my parents and my sister for being positive throughout these many years of schooling. I am thrilled to celebrate this achievement with all of you, without whom this winding road would have been ever more bumpy. vi Vita October 8, 1976 ............................Born - Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. Education 1999 .......................................B.S. Secondary Education, Miami University Oxford, OH 2002 .......................................M.A.S. Statistics, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH Professional Experience 1999-2000 ..................................Assistant Editor-Mathematics, Glencoe/McGraw-Hill Publishing Columbus, OH 2001 .......................................Summer Research Intern, Battelle Memorial Institute Columbus, OH 2002-2007 ..................................Research Specialist, Comprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 2007-2010 ..................................Sr. Consulting Research Statistician, Center for Biostatistics The Ohio State University Columbus, OH vii 2010-present ...............................Research Specialist, Division of Hematology The Ohio State University Columbus, OH Publications Research Publications Woyach, J.A., Ruppert, A.S., Guinn, D., Lehman, A.M., Blachly, J.S., Lozanski, A., Heerema, N.A., Zhao, W., Coleman, J., Jones, D., Abruzzo, L., Gordon, A., Mantel, R., Smith, L.L., McWhorter, S., Davis, M., Doong, T.J., Ny, F., Lucas, M., Chase, W., Jones, J.A., Flynn, J.M., Maddocks, K.J., Rogers, K.A., Jaglowski, S.M., Andritsos, L.A., Awan, F.T., Blum, K.A., Grever, M.R., Lozanski, G., Johnson, A.J., and Byrd, J.C. (2017). BTKC481S-mediated resistance to ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(13):1437-1443. Miller, C.R., Ruppert, A.S., Fobare, S., Chen, T.L., Liu, C., Lehman, A.M., Blachly, J.S., Zhang, X., Lucas, D.M., Grever, M.R., Tallman, M.S., Flinn, I.W., Rassenti, L.Z., Kipps, T.J., Sampath, D., Coombes, K.R., and Hertlein, E.K. (2017). The long noncoding RNA, treRNA, decreases DNA damage and is associated with poor response to chemotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncotarget, 8(16):25942-25954. Bond, D., Huang, Y., Ruppert, A.S, Walker, A.R., Dotson, E.K., Roddy, J., Blum, K.A., and Christian, B.A. (2017). Retrospective analysis of bendamustine and rituximab use in indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on initial starting dose. Leukemia & Lymphoma, 58(7):1589-1597. Haverkos B.M., Huang Y., Gru A., Pancholi P., Freud A.G., Mishra A., Ruppert, A.S., Baiocchi, R.A., and Porcu P. (2017). Frequency and clinical correlates of elevatedplasmaEpstein-BarrvirusDNAatdiagnosisinperipheralT-celllymphomas. International Journal of Cancer, 140(8):1899-1906. viii Ranganathan, P., Ngankeu, A., Zitzer, N.C., Leoncini, P., Yu, X., Casadei, L., Challagundla, K., Reichenbach, D.K., Garman, S., Ruppert, A.S., Volinia, S., Hofstetter, J., Efebera, Y.A., Devine, S.M., Blazar, B.R., Fabbri, M., and Garzon, R. (2017). Serum miR-29a is upregulated in acute graft-versus-host disease and activates dendritic cells through TLR binding. Journal of Immunology, 198(6):2500-2512. Flinn, I.W., Ruppert, A.S., Harwin, W., Waterhouse, D., Papish, S., Jones, J.A., Hainsworth, J., and Byrd, J.C. (2016). A phase II study of two dose levels of ofatumumab induction followed by maintenance therapy in symptomatic, previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. American Journal of Hematology, 91(10):1020-1025. Chen, T.L., Gupta, N., Lehman, A.M., Ruppert, A.S., Yu, L., Oakes, C.C., Claus, R., Plass, C., Maddocks, K.J., Andritsos, L.A., Jones, J.A., Lucas, D.M., Johnson,A.J.,Byrd,J.C.,andHertlein,E.(2016). Hsp90inhibitionincreasesSOCS3 transcript and regulates migration and cell death in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncotarget, 7(19):28684-28696. Oakes, C.C., Seifert, M., Assenov, Y., Gu, L., Przekopowitz, M., Ruppert, A.S., Wang,Q.,Imbusch,C.D.,Serva,A.,Koser,S.D.,Brocks,D.,Lipka,D.B.,Bogatyrova, O., Weichenhan, D., Brors, B., Rassenti, L., Kipps, T.J., Mertens, D., Zapatka, M., Lichter, P., Do¨hner H., Ku¨ppers, R., Zenz, T., Stilgenbauer, S., Byrd, J.C., and Plass, C. (2016). DNA methylation dynamics during B cell maturation underlie a continuum of disease phenotypes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nature Genetics, 48(3):253-264. Rogers, K.A., Ruppert, A.S., Bingman, A., Andritsos, L.A., Awan, F.T., Blum, K.A., Flynn, J.M., Jaglowski, S.M., Lozanski, G., Maddocks, K.J., Byrd, J.C., Woyach, J.A., and Jones, J.A. (2016). Incidence and description of autoimmune cytopenias during treatment with ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia, 30(2):346-350. Mikhail, S., Lustberg, M.B., Ruppert, A.S., Mortazavi, A., Monk, P., Kleiber, B., Villalona-Calero, M., and Bekaii-Saab, T. (2015). Biomodulation of capecitabine by paclitaxelandcarboplatininadvancedsolidtumorsandadenocarcinomaofunknown primary. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 76(5):1005-1012. ix

Description:
Early Clinical Trial Design Recommendations in Oncology. Based on Overall Success across Phases I, II, and III. Dissertation .. subgroup analysis from CALGB 19901 and CALGB 10101. Leukemia be committed to the conduct of a randomized phase II screening trial as well as a subsequent phase
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.