ebook img

e-Book - Arnold & Porter LLP PDF

58 Pages·2011·1.62 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview e-Book - Arnold & Porter LLP

First Half of 2011 in Review: Developments In European Competition Law That Every In-house Counsel Should Know 30 June 2011 First Half of 2011 in Review: Developments In European Competition Law That Every In-house Counsel Should Know Thursday, 30 June 2011 Table of Contents (Click on topic) Presentation Slides ..............................................................................................................Tab 1 Moderator/Speaker Biographies ........................................................................................Tab 2 Susan Hinchliffe, Axel Gutermuth, Luc Gyselen Advisories By the Attorneys of Arnold & Porter ...............................................................Tab 3 ƒƒDiscovering of leniency submissions in private damage actions in Europe The Pfleiderer judgment: dawn of a new era or nothing new under the sun? Tab 1: Presentation Slides First Half of 2011 in Review: Developments In European Competition Law That Every In-house Counsel Should Know 30 June 2011 1 Speakers Susan Hinchliffe Axel Gutermuth Luc Gyselen 2 Susan Hinchliffe Partner, London, Arnold & Porter LLP 3 Cartels: An Update on Public And Private Enforcement 4 Development of the Commission’s Fining Policy  Settlements: – Washing powder producers benefit from additional 10 percent reduction in fines  Parental liability: – Reduction of ArcelorMittal‘s cartel fine from €230.4m to €45.7m – Upcoming cases of interest: Parental liability in the context of joint ventures and a challenge under the ECHR! 5 Development of the Commission’s Fining Policy  Strong defence of Commission policy: – ArcelorMittal decision defended strongly by Almunia: • Fines resulted in excessive and non-recoverable fines for the subsidiaries • Not anticipated that the fining guidelines would require revision – High fines are warranted/use of ITP applications – Compliance policies will not be taken into account – No plans to penalize individuals for cartel conduct 6 Access to EU Cartel Records  Two significant cases in the last six months taking the jurisprudence in both the US and the EU one step further: – Re. TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation – Case C-360/09 Pfleiderer v. Bundeskarellamt 7

Description:
Jun 30, 2011 Reduction of ArcelorMittal's cartel fine from €230.4m to €45.7m. – Upcoming .. Internal competition compliance review of client's worldwide.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.