Dynamics Reported Expositions in Dynamical Systems Board of Editors H. Amann (Zurich), P. Brunovsky (Bratislava), S. N. Chow (Atlanta), C. K R.T. Jones (Providence), U. Kirchgraber (Zurich), H. Matano (Tokyo), J. Mawhin (Louvain-la Neuve), R.D. Nussbaum (NewBrunswick), C. Robinson (Evanston), H.O. Walther (Munchen), E. Zehnder (Zurich) Advisory Board L. Arnold, H. Broer, A. Coppel, B. Fiedler, J. Grasman, E. Hairer, J. Henrard, R.A. Johnson, H. Kielhofer, A. Lasota, M. Misiurewicz, R. Moeckel, R.E. O'Malley, KJ. Palmer, H.O. Peitgen, F. Przytycki, K Rybakowski, D.G. Saari, J.A. Sanders, A.N. Sharkovsky, J. Scheurle, K Schmitt, A. Vanderbauwhede, J. Waldvogel, J. A. Yorke Dynamical Systems are a rapidly developing field with a strong impact on applica tions. Dynamics Reported is a series of books of a new type. Its principal goal is to make available current topics, new ideas and techniques. Each volume contains about four or five articles of up to 60 pages. Great emphasis is put on an excellent pre sentation, well suited for advanced courses, seminars etc. such that the material becomes accessible to beginning graduate students. To explain the core of a new method contributions will treat examples rather than general theories, they will de scribe typical results rather than the most sophisticated ones. Theorems are accompa nied by carefully written proofs. The presentation is as self-contained as possible. Authors will receive 5 copies of the volume containing their contributions. These will be split among multiple authors. Authors are encouraged to prepare their manuscripts in Plain TEX or LA TEX. Detailed information and macro packages are available via the Managing Editors. Manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to the Managing Editors: C. K. R. T. Jones H. O. Walther Division of Applied Mathematics Mathematics Brown University Ludwig-Maximilians University Providence, Rhode Island 02912 W -8000 Munich USA Federal Republic of Germany e-Mail: [email protected] e-Mail: Hans-Otto. Walther @mathematik. U. Kirchgraber uni-muenchen.dbp.de Mathematics Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland e-Mail: [email protected] C.K.R.T. Jones U. Kirchgraber H.O. Walther (Managing Editors) Dynamics Reported Expositions in Dynamical Systems New Series: Volume 2 With Contributions of H. S. Dumas Chr. Genecand 1. Henrard 1. Komornfk Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest ISBN-13: 978-3-642-64755-0 e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-61232-9 DOl: 10.1007/978-3-642-61232-9 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved. whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcast ing, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publicatiDn or parts thereof is permitted 'only under the provisiDns of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993 Softcover reprint of the hardcover I st edition 1993 Typesetting: Camera-ready by authors with Springer TEX in-house system 4113140 -5 432 I 0 -Printed on acid-free paper Preface DYNAMICS REPORTED reports on recent developments in dynamical systems. Dynamical systems of course originated from ordinary differential equations. Today, dynamical systems cover a much larger area, including dynamical pro cesses described by functional and integral equations, by partial and stochastic differential equations, etc. Dynamical systems have involved remarkably in recent years. A wealth of new phenomena, new ideas and new techniques are proving to be of considerable interest to scientists in rather different fields. It is not surprising that thousands of publications on the theory itself and on its various applications are appearing. DYNAMICS REPORTED presents carefully written articles on major sub jects in dynamical systems and their applications, addressed not only to special ists but also to a broader range of readers including graduate students. Topics are advanced, while detailed exposition of ideas, restriction to typical results - rather than the most general ones - and, last but not least, lucid proofs help to gain the utmost degree of clarity. It is hoped, that DYNAMICS REPORTED will be useful for those enter ing the field and will stimulate an exchange of ideas among those working in dynamical systems. Christopher K.R.T Jones U rs Kirchgraber Hans-Otto Walther Managing Editors Table of Contents Transversal Homoclinic Orbits near Elliptic Fixed Points of Area-preserving Diffeomorphisms of the Plane Chr. Genecand 1. Introduction................ 1 2. Elements of the Theory of Minimal States . . "_ 9 3. A Priori Lipschitz Estimates for Minimal Orbits 10 4. First Perturbation: Isolation and Hyperbolicity of Minimal Periodic Orbits . . . . . . . . . . 14 5. Second Perturbation: Nondegeneracy of Homoclinic Orbits. 18 6. Application to Mather Sets 23 7. Special Classes of Diffeomorphisms 24 References . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Asymptotic Periodicity of Markov and Related Operators J. K omornz'k Introduction 31 1. Basic Notions and Results 32 2. The Reduction Procedure 40 3. Asymptotic Periodicity of Constrictive Marcov Operators 46 4. Weakly Almost Periodic Operators . . . . . . . . . . 52 5. Asymptotic Periodicity of Power Bounded Operators . . 57 6. Asymptotic Periodicity of Operators on Signed Measures 62 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 A Nekhoroshev-Like Theory of Classical Particle Channeling in Perfect Crystals H. Scott Dumas 1. Introduction................. 69 2. Background and Outline of Main Results . . . . 70 2.1 Sketch of the Development of Nekhoroshev Theory 70 2.2 Brief Description of the Physics of Particle Channeling in Crystals 74 2.3 Outline of Main Results . . . . . . . 76 3. Formulation of the Channeling Problem 77 3.1 The Perfect Crystal Model. . . . . . 77 VIII Table of Contents 3.2 The Channeling Criterion . . . . . . . 79 3.3 Transformation to Nearly Integrable Form 79 4. Construction of the Normal Forms 80 4.1 Description of Methods . . . . . . . . 81 4.2 Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 4.3 Near Identity Canonical Transformations via the Lie Method 83 4.4 Statement of the Analytic Lemma 85 4.5 The Iterative Lemma . . . . 87 4.6 Technical Estimates .... 92 4.7 Proof of the Analytic Lemma 94 5. The Generalized Continuum Models 97 5.1 Resonant Zones and Resonant Blocks 97 5.2 Geometric Considerations . . 98 5.3 The Spatial Continuum Model 100 5.4 Channeling . . . . 105 6. Concluding Remarks 111 References . . . . . 112 The Adiabatic Invariant in Classical Mechanics J. Henrard Introduction ........ 117 Part I The Classical Adiabatic Invariant Theory l. Introduction . 119 2. Action-Angle Variables 121 3. Perturbation Theory 124 4. The Adiabatic Invariant 127 5. Explicit Approach to Action-Angle Variables. 129 6. Extension of Perturbation Theory to the Case of Unbounded Period 132 Part II Transition Through a Critical Curce l. Introduction . 134 2. Neighborhood of an Homoclinic Orbit . 136 3. The Autonomous Problem Close to the Equilibrium 138 4. The Autonomous Problem Close to the Homoclinic Orbit 142 5. Traverse from Apex to Apex 145 6. Probability of Capture 149 7. Time of Transit 153 8. Change in the Invariant 157 Part III The Paradigms l. Introduction . 161 2. The Pendulum. 163 3. The Second Fundamental Model 167 4. The Colombo's Top . 173 5. Dissipative Forces 178 Table of Contents IX Part IV Applications 1. Introduction . . . . . 180 2. Passage Through Resonance of a Forced Anharmonic Oscillator 182 3. Particle Motion in a Slowly Modulated Wave 186 4. The Magnetic Bottle . . . . . . . . . . 191 5. Orbit-Orbit Resonances in the Solar System 197 6. Spin-Orbit Resonance in the Solar System 204 Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Appendix 1: Variational Equations . . . . 211 Appendix 2: Fixing the Unstable Equilibrium and the Time Scale 212 Appendix 3: Mean Value of Ri('l/Ji,Ji,)...) 1 s:; i s:; 2 . . . . . . . . 214 Appendix 4: Mean Value of R3('l/J3, h,)...) . . . . . . . . . . .. 216 Appendix 5: Estimation of the Trajectory Close to the Equilibrium 218 Appendix 6: Computation of the True Time of Transit . . .. 221 Appendix 7: The Diffusion Parameter in Non-SYl.llmetric Cases. 224 Appendix 8: Remarks on the Paper "On the Generalization of a Theorem of A. Liapounoff", by J. Moser (Comm. P. Appl. Math. 9, 257-271, 1958) 226 References. . 230 List of Contributors 237 Transversal Homoclinic Orbits near Elliptic Fixed Points of Area-preserving Diffeomorphisms of the Plane Chr. Genecand Abstract. Extending a result due to E. Zehnder [27], we prove that generically, an area-preserving analytic diffeomorphism of the plane has transversal homo clinic orbits and nondegenerate Mather sets in every neighboThood of a stable elliptic fixed point. "Generically" Tefers to a topology defined by means of the Taylor coefficients of the mapping at the fixed point whose ordeT is higher than a prescTibed aTbitrary integeT, all lower coefficients being held fixed. The proof makes use of the Aubry-MatheT theory fOT monotone twist mappings. 1. Introduction 1.1 Results and Interests of this Paper. One of the most important purposes of the theory of dynamical systems is to define and check different types of stability for stationary and periodic solutions. In this paper, we go in the opposite direction: starting from "stable solutions" of 2-dimensional systems - stable in the sense of Lyapunov: nearby starting solutions do not escape -, we prove a general result of so-to-speak "enclosing instability", i.e. of instability in annular regions arbitrarily close to these stable solutions. To make such a result interesting, we restrict the problem in two ways: first we require analyticity of the systems considered; secondly we concentrate on such systems which are "conservative", i.e. which preserve some real quantity, called "energy" or "Hamiltonian (function)". Do these two quite strong restrictions not make the systems particularly "neat" in some sense? Does, for instance, the conjunction of conservativity, ana lyticity and Lyapunov stability not force such systems to be "locally integrable" , in the sense that the stable solutions had to be imbedded in a continuous foliation of invariant cylinders? We show that the answer is negative: such a "neat", e.g. locally integrable, structure is quite exceptional, even for conservative, analytic, stable systems. (Already the presence of isolated orbits prevents integrability, see Siegel [25], Riissmann [23].) The general case is not only not integrable, it even exhibits a very "wild" and "chaotic" behaviour in any neighborhood of the stable solution, namely in the so-called "regions of instability" surrounding it. 2 Chr. Genecand We show this, in fact, not for the considered 2-dimensional systems them selves, but, for convenience, for their time-one-maps, which are, in this case, area-preserving analytic difJeomorphisms defined in the neighborhood of a sta ble, say elliptic, fixed point ("elliptic" means that the eigenvalues at the fixed point lie on the complex unit circle without the points ±1). In this set-up, as it is well-known (see [16]), there are, generally, invariant curves surrounding the fixed point arbitrarily closely. Our result marks an upper limit of this famous property, inasmuch as it shows that, generally, these invari ant curves do not form a continuous family as in the integrable case. Rather they alternate with rings containing no invariant curve in their interior, the so-called "rings of instability". The chaotic behaviour in one of these rings can be illus trated by the fact that any two orbits contained in its interior come somewhere arbitrarily close one to the other. In other words, there is a complete mixing of the interior of such rings of instability. Such a non-integrability result for local dynamical systems or diffeomorphisms is not new, but takes place in an already long history beginning 100 years ago with Bruns, Poincare [20,21]' then Birkhoff [4, 5], and culminating 50 years ago with Siegel [24, 25] and others ([15], ... ). Here the existence of unstable regions is proven by showing existence, generi cally, of so-called transversal homoclinic orbits. These are orbits which are asymptotic in both directions to some hyperbolic periodic orbit (i.e. the eigenval ues are real and =f. ±1), whose stable and unstable invariant manifolds intersect transversally at it. See Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Transversal Homoclinic Orbits. In the immediate neighborhood of such orbits, the diffeomorphism actually behaves in a "chaotic" way; in particular, there are subsystems conjugate to so-called "Bernoulli shifts" with infinitely many symbols (see [27], § 8). We now formulate the result more precisely, except for the analytic topol ogy and for some slight additional condition on the eigenvalue which will be introduced later. Theorem. Generically (for some analytic topology), area-preserving, analytic dif feomorphisms defined near an elliptic fixed point have transversal homoclinic orbits in each neighborhood of this point. Transversal Homoclinic Orbits 3 In this form, without specification of the topology, this result is not new, since it has been proven already 20 years ago by Zehnder in [27J. However, his topology was less fine than ours, in the following respect. To obtain existence of the necessitated hyperbolic periodic orbits, Zehnder used a bifurcation method which constrained him to move the eigenvalue A at the fixed point (IAI = 1, A2 =I- 1) close to some resonant value AO = e27rip/q with rational p/q. After having done so infinitely many times with an increasing sequence of q's (in order to obtain periodic and homo clinic - orbits in every neighborhood of the fixed point), it may be that one ends up with an eigenvalue Aoo = e27ria with irrational a of Liouville type, and this could lead one to believe that the arithmetic properties of the eigenvalue are decisive for the result. Our main contribution consists in showing that this is not the case: to prove the result, we need not change the eigenvalue A in any way, nor even any coeffi cient of the Taylor expansion at the fixed point up to a fixed integer ;::: 4: only the Taylor coefficients of higher order are changed, and as little as one wants. As a consequence, for ~ given concrete diffeomorphism,the property of having transversal homoclinic orbits arbitrarily close to the fixed point, and thus also the integrability resp. non-integrability of this diffeomorphism, can not be decided if merely a finite number of its Taylor coefficients at the fixed point are known: this information depends always on the knowledge of the whole Taylor expansion. This is the main point cleared up in this paper. Further interests of this paper lie, besides in the result itself, - and perhaps even more - in the methods used to prove it, which are roughly described now. First, the mentioned refinement of Zehnder's result is made possible by the use of a quite recent theory which solves the question of existence of the desired periodic and homoclinic orbits. This is the so-called theory of minimal states or orbits, developed simultaneously and independently by Aubry and Mather in the early eighties. It allows us to obtain the desired orbits as "minimal orbits" for a simple variational principle coming from the solid state physics, which will be exposed in Sect. 2. The difficulty in using this theory is that it is a global theory, while our prob lem is of local nature. It is therefore necessary to prove some a priori Lipschitz estimates for minimal orbits, which allow then to localize the latter into some annuli which are relevant for us. These Lipschitz estimates are derived in Sect. 3, and they are of interest by themselves. After having obtained, in this way,' existence of the desired orbits, we still have to make them nondegenerate, i.e. to make the periodic orbit hyperbolic, and then the homo clinic orbit transversal. This is done essentially by means of elementary perturbation theory, and it necessitates two formulae having their own interest, namely: - for the first perturbation, which makes the minimal periodic orbit to a hy perbolic minimal orbit: a "monotone correspondence formula for generating functions", relating, in a monotone way, perturbations of two different so called "generating functions" one the other. Generating functions will be defined in 1.2 and in Sects. 2 and 3. See Sect. 4 for this formula.