ebook img

DTIC ADA563325: The Changing Face of Disability in the US Army: The Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom Effect PDF

0.19 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview DTIC ADA563325: The Changing Face of Disability in the US Army: The Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom Effect

The Changing Face of Disability in the US Army: The Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom Effect Abstract CPTJeanneC.Patzkowski,MD, Orthopaedic disorders account for significant disability among MC,USA adults in the United States. Previous studies have demonstrated CPTJessicaC.Rivera,MD long-term disability in military personnel with musculoskeletal conditions. However, these studies focused primarily on battlefield- COLJamesR.Ficke,MD injured service members and did not evaluate the entire population. JosephC.Wenke,PhD The goal of this study was to determine and compare the disabling conditions of the entire United StatesArmy during peacetime and war. We identified the conditions leading to separation from military service before and during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. During war, more soldiers are found to be unfit for duty, and they have more conditions per individual that make them unfit. Orthopaedic conditions account for the greatest number of soldiers separated from military service at both time points studied (ie, January through March 2001, January through March 2009). Back pain and osteoarthritis are the two most common causes of separation from military service; these conditions are FromtheUnitedStatesArmy responsible for the most disability during peacetime and war. InstituteofSurgicalResearch (Dr.PatzkowskiandDr.Wenke)and theSanAntonioMilitaryMedical Center(Dr.Patzkowski,Dr.Rivera, Musculoskeletalconditionscause portdifficultyperformingroutineac- andDr.Ficke),FortSamHouston, significant disability and ac- tivities of daily living without assis- TX. countforsubstantialhealthcarecosts tance due to a medical condition; Thisstudywasconductedundera inthecivilianpopulationintheUnited more than half of these are due to protocolreviewedandapprovedby theBrookeArmyMedicalCenter States.1-4 The World Health Organi- musculoskeletal conditions.6 Muscu- InstitutionalReviewBoard,andin zation reports that musculoskeletal loskeletal conditions account for accordancewiththeapproved disordersaccountforthethirdgreat- most occupational injuries sustained protocol.Theopinionsorassertions estnumberofdisability-adjustedlife- intheUnitedStates.7Suchconditions containedhereinaretheprivate viewsoftheauthorsandarenotto years globally, that is, potential life are more severe and cause signifi- beconstruedasofficialoras yearslostastheresultofthemortal- cantlymoredaysofworklostdueto reflectingtheviewsofthe ity and morbidity of disease. Ische- injury than any other nonfatal work DepartmentoftheArmyorthe mic heart disease and cerebrovascu- siteinjuries.Musculoskeletalinjuries DepartmentofDefense. lar disease, respectively, account for cause substantial disability within JAmAcadOrthopSurg2012; the greatest and second greatest the entire population and detract 20(suppl1):S23-S30 number of disability-adjusted life- from the productivity of the civilian http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/ years.5IntheUnitedStates,nearly50% workforce. JAAOS-20-08-S23 ofadultsaged≥18yearsreportamus- The burden of musculoskeletal in- Copyright2012bytheAmerican culoskeletal condition.6 Twenty-nine jury affects the military population AcademyofOrthopaedicSurgeons. millionadultsintheUnitedStatesre- aswell,intheformofinjuryanddis- 2012,Vol20,Supplement1 S23 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED AUG 2012 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-2012 to 00-00-2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER The Changing Face of Disability in the US Army: The Operation 5b. GRANT NUMBER Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom Effect 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Army Institute of Surgical Research,3698 Chambers Pass,Fort Sam REPORT NUMBER Houston,TX,78234-6315 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT Orthopaedic disorders account for significant disability among adults in the United States. Previous studies have demonstrated long-term disability in military personnel with musculoskeletal conditions. However, these studies focused primarily on battlefieldinjured service members and did not evaluate the entire population. The goal of this study was to determine and compare the disabling conditions of the entire United States Army during peacetime and war. We identified the conditions leading to separation from military service before and during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. During war, more soldiers are found to be unfit for duty, and they have more conditions per individual that make them unfit. Orthopaedic conditions account for the greatest number of soldiers separated from military service at both time points studied (ie, January through March 2001, January through March 2009). Back pain and osteoarthritis are the two most common causes of separation from military service; these conditions are responsible for the most disability during peacetime and war. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 8 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 TheChangingFaceofDisabilityintheUSArmy:TheOperationEnduringFreedomandOperationIraqiFreedomEffect ability. Recent studies performed at willberelatedtocombatinjury,train- tions for each time period studied our institution indicate that muscu- inginjury,andnon-battlefieldinjuries, were grouped into categories consis- loskeletal injuries account for most whilethehealthissuespresentduring tent with Veterans’ Administration combatwounds,demandthegreatest peacetimepersist.ThesumofPEBre- Schedule for Rating Disabilities numbers of hospital resources, and sults collected during a time of war codes(Table1).Unfittingconditions representtheprimarysourceofboth therebyencompassesthegeneralhealth not related to the musculoskeletal separation from military service and issuesfoundinthemilitarypopulation system were analyzed based on the long-termdisability.8-10 asawhole,alongwiththeconditions anatomicsystemaffected.Orthopae- Disability within the US Army is resultingfromwarwoundsandtrain- dic unfitting conditions were further determined by the Army Physical ing. separated into anatomic regions for EvaluationBoard(PEB),anadminis- Inthisstudy,wedescribethepeace- data analysis. The disability rating trative body consisting of medical timedistributionofdisablingdiseasein for each unfitting condition was de- personnelandArmyofficerswhode- theUSArmyandattempttodetermine termined, and the average disability terminewhetheranillorinjuredsol- howtheArmy’sparticipationinOper- rating associated with each category dierisabletoperformhisorherjob. ation Enduring Freedom and Opera- of conditions was calculated. The The PEB result includes whether the tion Iraqi Freedom has changed this impact factor for each unfitting con- soldier is fit for duty. A soldier who distribution.Wehypothesizedthator- dition was calculated as the product is found to be unfit may be removed thopaedic conditions account for the ofthefrequencyoftheconditionand from active-duty service through mostcommonunfittingconditionsdur- theaveragepercentdisability.8 medical retirement or separation ingpeacetimeandwarandthatcondi- Thepercentageofsoldierswitheach basedontheseverityoftheunfitting tions such as traumatic brain injury unfittingconditionandtheaveragedis- condition or conditions, or the sol- (TBI), posttraumatic stress disorder ability ratings between the two time dier may petition to continue on ac- (PTSD), and orthopaedic trauma ac- pointswerecompared.TheFisherex- tiveduty. countforthegreatestnumberofunfit- acttestwasusedtodeterminewhether Unfitting conditions are grouped tingconditionsduringwar. thepercentageofunfittingconditions by region of the body or systems af- changed,andunpairedStudentttests fectedandarecodedusingtheVeter- were used to determine whether the ans’ Administration Schedule for Methods mean disability ratings changed be- Rating Disabilities code.11 Each un- tween time points. Statistical signifi- fitting condition is also assigned a ThePEBdatabasewasqueriedforall cancewasdefinedasP<0.05. percent disability rating. This rating soldiers who were medically retired isameasureofthewayinwhichthe or separated in January through condition detracts from the soldier’s March 2001, before the wars began, Results ability to perform his or her job and and in January through March of determines eligibility for disability 2009, when both conflicts were well In the first quarter of 2009, 3,143 benefits. established.(Thesedataareincluded soldiers were medically retired or Theconditionsthatresultinmedical in the US Army PEB database and separated, compared with 1,673 in retirementorseparationfromthemil- werestudiedthroughanInstitutional thefirstquarterof2001.Thisdiffer- itaryrepresentthehealthconcernsof Review Board–approved protocol at encerepresentsan88%increasedur- the military population as a whole. ourinstitutionandtheVeterans’Ad- ing war, despite an increase of only During peacetime, these conditions ministration.Thesedataarenotpub- 2.7% in total Army population in likely represent the distribution of liclyavailable.)Onlythelistofunfit- thesametimeperiod.Thenumberof health problems seen in the active tingconditionsleadingtoseparation unfitting conditions per subject in- young civilian population. It is ex- or retirement was provided; demo- creasedfromapproximately1to1.7, pected that, during a time of war, a graphic data and medical histories yielding an additional 3,670 total greaternumberofunfittingconditions were not analyzed. Unfitting condi- unfitting conditions among soldiers Dr.Fickeoranimmediatefamilymemberservesasaboardmember,owner,officer,orcommitteememberoftheAmerican OrthopaedicFootandAnkleSociety,AmericanAcademyofOrthopaedicSurgeons,SocietyofMilitaryOrthopaedicSurgeons,and AirliftResearchFoundation.Dr.WenkeoranimmediatefamilymemberhasreceivedresearchorinstitutionalsupportfromBionova Medical.Neitherofthefollowingauthorsnoranyimmediatefamilymemberhasreceivedanythingofvaluefromorownsstockina commercialcompanyorinstitutionrelateddirectlyorindirectlytothesubjectofthisarticle:Dr.PatzkowskiandDr.Rivera. S24 JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofOrthopaedicSurgeons CPTJeanneC.Patzkowski,MD,MC,USA,etal Table1 DefinitionofCategoriesofUnfittingConditionsintheUSArmy Category Description Nonorthopaedicunfittingconditions Blood Anyconditionofthebloodorhematopoieticsystem Cancer Anymalignancy Cardiovascular/peripheralvascular Disordersresultingfromillnessorinjurytotheheartorperipheralvasculardisease disease Ear/hearing Lossofhearingorotherinjurytotheearand/orvestibularorgans Endocrinology Diseaseoftheendocrinesystemresultinginanunfittingcondition Eye/vision Lossofsightorotherinjurytotheeyeorocularmuscles Femalereproductive Anypathologyofthefemalereproductivetractresultinginanunfittingcondition Gastrointestinal Diseaseofthegastrointestinalsystemresultinginanunfittingcondition Genitourinary Diseaseofthegenitourinarysystemresultinginanunfittingcondition Infection Infectionatanysiteinwhichtheinfectionitselfisthecauseofanunfittingcondition Skin Anydermatologicdiseaseorinjurytotheskin,includingburns Neurologic Anycentralorperipheralneurologicdisorder,excludinginjurytoaperipheralnerve Psychiatric Diagnosisofanypsychiatriccondition Posttraumaticstressdisorder Diagnosisofposttraumaticstressdisorder Respiratory Diseaseoftherespiratorysystemresultinginanunfittingcondition Rheumatologic Diseaseduetoarheumatologiccause,resultinginanunfittingcondition Traumaticbraininjury Diagnosisoftraumaticbraininjury Orthopaedicunfittingconditions Amputation Anylossoflimborpartofalimb,excludingisolatedamputationsofthefingersortoes Backpain/vertebralcondition Backpainresultingfromnondiscogeniccausesanddisordersofthevertebrae Degenerativeorherniateddisk Backpainresultingfromdiscogeniccauses,includingnerverootsymptoms Footandankle Anyconditioncausingpainorlossoffunctionofthefootand/orankle,includingosteoarthritis Fibromyalgia Diagnosisoffibromyalgiainwhichfibromyalgiaitselfisanunfittingcondition Knee Anyconditioncausingpaininorlossoffunctionoftheknee Miscellaneous Allotherdisordersresultinginanunfittingconditionnototherwiseclassified Muscle Anyconditionresultinginphysicalmusclelossordecreaseinmusclefunction Osteoarthritis Arthritisofajointresultingfromdegenerativeorposttraumaticconditionsandexcluding inflammatoryarthropathies Otherlowerextremity Allotherlowerextremitydisordersresultinginanunfittingconditionnototherwiseclassified Peripheralnerve Injurytoaperipheralnerveresultinginnervepainorlossoffunction Totaljointarthroplasty Anyshoulder,hip,orkneereplacement Otherupperextremity Allotherupperextremitydisordersresultinginanunfittingconditionnototherwiseclassified who appeared before the PEB in TBI increased dramatically, whereas eral nerve, and lower and upper 2009. Orthopaedic diagnoses ac- the percentage of unfitting condi- extremities (Table 4). A significant counted for most conditions at both tions such as cancer, infection, and reduction was noted in the percent- time points (75% in 2001, 64% in respiratory disorders decreased (Ta- age of soldiers with knee disorders. 2009)(Table2). ble3).Significantincreaseswereseen Although the percentage of soldiers Thepercentageofsoldiersfoundto inthepercentageofsoldiersfoundto foundtobeunfitbecauseofosteoar- be unfit because of nonorthopaedic be unfit as the result of amputations thritis (OA) decreased from 2001 to conditions did not change signifi- and back pain, including vertebral 2009, the absolute frequency of sol- cantly between time points for most conditions and degenerative/herni- dierswithOAincreased,from602in conditions. However, the percentage ated disks, as well as disorders re- 2001to987in2009. of psychiatric disorders, PTSD, and lated to the foot and ankle, periph- At both time points, OA and back 2012,Vol20,Supplement1 S25 TheChangingFaceofDisabilityintheUSArmy:TheOperationEnduringFreedomandOperationIraqiFreedomEffect Table2 CharacteristicsofUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoardResultsa ParameterEvaluated Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 Increase(%) TotalUSArmypopulation 1,384,812 1,421,668 2.7 Soldiersmedicallyretiredor 1,673 3,143 88 separatedthroughthePEB Unfittingconditionspersoldier 1.01 1.69 67 Percentageoforthopaedic 75% 64% N/A unfittingconditions N/A=notapplicable,PEB=PhysicalEvaluationBoard aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwerestudiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard– approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandtheVeterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. Table3 NonorthopaedicUnfittingConditionsa Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 UnfittingCondition Frequency %(n=1,673) Frequency %(n=3,143) PValue Blood 3 0.18 4 0.13 NS Cancer 15 0.9 16 0.51 <0.05 Cardiac/PVD 30 1.79 53 1.69 NS Ear/hearing 11 0.66 50 1.59 <0.05 Endocrine 21 1.26 47 1.50 NS Eye/vision 8 0.48 34 1.08 <0.05 Femalereproductive 5 0.30 12 0.38 NS Gastrointestinal 31 1.85 64 2.04 NS Genitourinary 13 0.78 28 0.89 NS Infection 10 0.60 7 0.22 <0.05 Skin 11 0.66 79 2.51 <0.0001 Neurologic 55 3.29 221 7.03 NS Psychiatric 78 4.66 277 8.81 <0.0001 PTSD 5 0.30 627 19.95 <0.0001 Respiratory 106 6.34 116 3.69 <0.0001 Rheumatologic 10 0.60 28 0.89 NS TBI 11 0.66 249 7.92 <0.0001 NS=notstatisticallysignificant,PTSD=posttraumaticstressdisorder,PVD=peripheralvasculardisease,TBI=traumaticbraininjury aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwerestudiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard– approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandtheVeterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. pain were the most common overall throughthefirstquarterof2009,the and other upper extremity condi- unfitting conditions, and orthopae- average percent disability increased tions (Table 7). At both time points, dicconditionsaccountedfor5ofthe for PTSD and psychiatric disorders, mostoftheconditionswiththehigh- top10conditions(Table5).In2009, butitdidnotchangesignificantlyfor est average percent disability were OA and back pain were far more any other nonorthopaedic condition nonorthopaedic in nature (Table 8). prevalent than PTSD; TBI; amputa- (Table 6). The average percent dis- Amongorthopaedicconditions,only tion; conditions of the foot, ankle, ability significantly increased for all amputation and total joint arthro- and lower extremity; and peripheral orthopaedic conditions, with the ex- plasty were found in the top 10 at nervedisorders. ceptionofamputation,fibromyalgia, both time points. Cancer, infection, From the first quarter of 2001 other lower extremity conditions, TBI, cardiac/peripheral vascular dis- S26 JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofOrthopaedicSurgeons CPTJeanneC.Patzkowski,MD,MC,USA,etal Table4 OrthopaedicUnfittingConditionsa Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 UnfittingCondition Frequency %(n=1,673) Frequency %(n=3,143) PValue Amputation 1 0.06 33 1.05 <0.0001 Backpainb 376 22.47 1,348 42.89 <0.0001 Footandankle 54 3.23 324 10.31 <0.0001 Fibromyalgia 14 0.84 31 0.99 NS Knee 62 3.71 32 1.02 <0.0001 Miscellaneous 25 1.49 74 2.35 NS Muscle 43 2.57 110 3.50 NS Osteoarthritis 602 35.98 987 31.40 <0.05 Otherlowerextremity 25 1.49 197 6.27 <0.0001 Peripheralnerve 30 1.79 134 4.26 <0.0001 Totaljointarthroplasty 4 0.24 12 0.38 NS Otherupperextremity 27 1.61 83 2.64 <0.05 NS=notstatisticallysignificant aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwerestudiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard– approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandtheVeterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. bBackpainincludesconditionsofthevertebralcolumn,herniatednucleuspulposus,anddegenerativediskdisease.Itdoesnotinclude disordersofthespinalcord. ease, rheumatologic conditions, and Table5 genitourinary conditions were among the top 10 disability ratings MostFrequentUnfittingConditionsintheFirstQuarterof2001andthe FirstQuarterof2009a atbothtimepoints.However,ortho- paedic conditions were responsible RankOrder 2001 2009 for very high impact factors at both 1 Osteoarthritis Backpain time points. Back pain and OA re- 2 Backpain Osteoarthritis sultedinthefirstandsecondhighest 3 Respiratory PTSD impact factors in 2001 and the sec- 4 Footandankle/LE Footandankle/LE ond and third highest, respectively, 5 Psychiatric Psychiatric in2009(Table9). 6 Knee TBI 7 Neurologic Neurologic Discussion and 8 Muscle Peripheralnerve Conclusions 9 GI Respiratory 10 Cardiac/PVD Muscle Ourresultsconfirmthatorthopaedic disorderscausethemajorityofunfit- GI=gastrointestinal,LE=lowerextremity,PTSD=posttraumaticstressdisorder, PVD=peripheralvasculardisease,TBI=traumaticbraininjury ting conditions in the US Army re- aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwere gardless of the presence or absence studiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard–approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandthe Veterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. ofcombatoperations.Despiteavery small increase in the overall popula- tion, there was a large increase in PEBin3,143soldiers.Consideredin mostcommonunfittingconditionsat the number of soldiers separated the context of the entirety of both each time point were orthopaedic through the PEB. The number of wars, these findings suggest that the disorders.Backpain,OA,andcondi- unfitting conditions per soldier in- total additional wartime burden of tions of the foot, ankle, and lower creased, as well. In one 3-month pe- disease in the form of disabling con- extremity were among the five most riod alone, >3,600 additional unfit- ditions approaches or exceeds the prevalentunfittingconditionsduring ting conditions were reported to the tensofthousands.Fiveofthetop10 peacetime and war. As expected, 2012,Vol20,Supplement1 S27 TheChangingFaceofDisabilityintheUSArmy:TheOperationEnduringFreedomandOperationIraqiFreedomEffect conditions that could reasonably be Table6 anticipated to be the result of war ChangeinAveragePercentDisabilityforNonorthopaedicUnfitting trauma (eg, PTSD, TBI, orthopaedic ConditionsFrom2001to2009a trauma) all increased from their pre- UnfittingCondition Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 PValue war frequencies, whereas other non- orthopaedic conditions remained Blood 10 13 NS mostly unchanged. Despite large in- Cancer 82 75 NS creases in the occurrence of PTSD, Cardiac/PVD 36 44 NS TBI, and orthopaedic trauma, back Ear/hearing 12 8 NS painandOAwerefarmorecommon Endocrine 19 14 NS than these other three diagnoses at Eye/vision 21 35 NS bothtimepoints. Femalereproductive 12 23 NS The average percent disability as- Gastrointestinal 38 27 NS sociatedwithorthopaedicconditions Genitourinary 32 43 NS increased for most impairments but Infection 51 50 NS hasremainedunchangedforthema- Skin 24 21 NS jority of nonorthopaedic conditions. Neurologic 32 30 NS However, the highest disability rat- Psychiatric 26 37 <0.0001 ings are typically assigned to nonor- PTSD 26 50 <0.0001 thopaedic conditions. Only amputa- Respiratory 27 30 NS tions and total joint arthroplasty Rheumatologic 34 46 NS were represented in the top 10 at ei- TBI 49 39 NS ther time point (ie, first quarter 2001, first quarter 2009). The large NS=notstatisticallysignificant,PTSD=posttraumaticstressdisorder,PVD=peripheral increase in the average percent dis- vasculardisease,TBI=traumaticbraininjury ability for amputations is likely the aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwere studiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard–approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandthe result of the increased severity of in- Veterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. juriessustainedincombat.However, because there was only one soldier with an amputation in the group porting only service members evacu- ysis of the effect of musculoskeletal from 2001, it is difficult to draw an ated from theater because of battle- conditions on the US population.6 adequatecomparison.Ingeneral,the field injury demonstrated that OA, Basedontheresultsofthe2005Na- average percent disability was low nerve injuries, and back conditions tional Health Interview Survey, the for orthopaedic conditions. How- are among the most frequent dis- reviewers found that >107 million ever, the combination of their dis- abling conditions.8-10 Of soldiers adultsintheUnitedStatesreporteda ability rating and frequency led to evacuated with a primary diagnosis musculoskeletalcondition,represent- very high impact factors for these of penetrating chest or abdominal ing nearly 50% of the population conditionscomparedwiththenonor- wounds with associated extremity aged≥18years.Incomparison,28% thopaedic disorders. Back pain and injuries,theprimaryunfittingcondi- reported circulatory conditions and OA account for the top two impact tion was orthopaedic in 76% of 24% reported respiratory condi- factorsduringpeacetimeandaresec- thosewhopresentedtothePEB. tions. Three of the four most com- ond only to PTSD during war. Al- Our results are consistent with mon medical conditions reported though back pain and OA are the those in the civilian literature. The were musculoskeletal in nature, in- most common disabilities, their dis- large burden of musculoskeletal dis- cluding low back pain, chronic joint ability ratings are relatively low ease on the adult population of the pain, and arthritis. Low back pain (17% and 12%, respectively). The UnitedStateshasbeendemonstrated wasthemostcommonmusculoskele- calculated PTSD impact factor is previously,includinghundredsofbil- tal condition reported, found in 62 highbecauseoftheaverage50%dis- lionsofdollarsindirectandindirect million adults (ie, 28% of the adult ability rating. Back pain and OA costs,difficultywithdailytasks,and population). Young adults aged 18 combined affect nearly four times substantialresourceutilization.1,3,4 to 44 years were found to be sub- moresoldiersthandoesPTSD. In 2008, the United States Bone stantiallyaffectedbymusculoskeletal Previousresultsfromourcenterre- and Joint Decade published an anal- conditions, with 38% reporting at S28 JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofOrthopaedicSurgeons CPTJeanneC.Patzkowski,MD,MC,USA,etal and more than half of these condi- Table7 tions were musculoskeletal. Muscu- ChangeinAveragePercentDisabilityforOrthopaedicUnfitting loskeletal conditions also accounted ConditionsFrom2001to2009a for the greatest number of lost work UnfittingCondition Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 PValue days and bed days among American Amputation 40 76 NS adults. Indirect costs, primarily in Backpainb 13 17 <0.05 the form of lost wages resulting Footandankle 11 15 <0.0001 from musculoskeletal disorders, tal- lied $340 billion from 2002 through Fibromyalgia 24 27 NS 2004. Direct costs of medical care Knee 14 18 <0.05 fortheseconditionswasestimatedto Miscellaneous 2 13 <0.0001 be$510billion.6 Muscle 6 24 <0.0001 Thisstudyhasseverallimitations.It Osteoarthritis 6 12 <0.0001 isretrospective,anditwasnotpossi- Otherlowerextremity 14 15 NS bletofullyinvestigatethemedicalhis- Peripheralnerve 10 17 <0.05 tory of each soldier separated from Totaljointarthroplasty 30 81 <0.05 active-dutyservice.Therefore,itisnot Otherupperextremity 19 22 NS possibletocommentonthefrequency NS=notstatisticallysignificant of posttraumatic OA compared with aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwere degenerativeOAortoprovideamean- studiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard–approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandthe ingfulassessmentoftheseverityofin- Veterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. bBackpainincludesconditionsofthevertebralcolumn,herniatednucleuspulposus,and dividualunfittingconditions.Thistopic degenerativediskdisease.Itdoesnotincludedisordersofthespinalcord. warrants further study. Additionally, thestudyreliesontheassumptionthat Table8 the3-monthperiodschosenwererep- resentativeoftheirrespectivetimepe- ConditionsWiththeHighestAveragePercentDisabilityin2001and 2009a riods. Each individual soldier is re- ferredtothePEBwhenheorshehas RankOrder Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 reachedthemaximummedicalbenefit 1 Cancer Totaljointarthroplasty oftreatment,andthistimingisunique 2 Infection Amputation toeachsoldier.Furthermore,thepath- 3 TBI Cancer way to the PEB is self-reported, and 4 Amputation Infection theremaybebiasrelativetotheassess- 5 GI PTSD mentofdisability.Overall,theperiod 6 Cardiac/PVD Rheumatologic chosenlikelyisadequatelyrepresenta- 7 Rheumatologic Cardiac/PVD tive of both the war and peacetime 8 GU GU populations. 9 Neurologic TBI 10 Totaljointarthroplasty Psychiatric Summary GI=gastrointestinal,GU=genitourinary,PTSD=posttraumaticstressdisorder, PVD=peripheralvasculardisease,TBI=traumaticbraininjury aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwere Review of nearly 5,000 PEB records studiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard–approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandthe clearly demonstrates that orthopae- Veterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. dic unfitting conditions account for thegreatestnumberofsoldierssepa- least one. Of the young adults who werefoundtohavealargeimpacton rated from active-duty service and reported a medical condition, >20% a patient’s ability to perform activi- for the highest military-related dis- reportedchronicjointpainorarthri- ties of daily living and go to work. ability costs during both peacetime tis and nearly 28% reported back More than 29 million adults (ie, and war. Although the time periods pain in the lumbar region, with 13%ofthepopulation)reporteddif- analyzed are short compared with nearly 15% reporting neck pain. ficulty performing activities of daily the overall length of the wars, it is These musculoskeletal conditions living due to a medical condition, clear that more soldiers are found to 2012,Vol20,Supplement1 S29 TheChangingFaceofDisabilityintheUSArmy:TheOperationEnduringFreedomandOperationIraqiFreedomEffect Table9 RankofUnfittingConditionsbyImpactin2001and2009a Jan–Mar2001 Jan–Mar2009 RankOrder UnfittingCondition Impactb UnfittingCondition Impactb 1 Backpain 4,888 PTSD 31,350 2 Osteoarthritis 3,612 Backpain 22,916 3 Respiratory 2,862 Osteoarthritis 11,844 4 Psychiatric 2,028 Psychiatric 10,249 5 Neurologic 1,760 TBI 9,711 6 Cancer 1,230 Foot/ankle/LE 7,815 7 GI 1,178 Neurologic 6,630 8 Cardiac/PVD 1,080 Respiratory 3,480 9 Foot/ankle/LE 948 Muscle 2,640 10 Knee 868 Amputation 2,508 GI=gastrointestinal,LE=lowerextremity,PTSD=posttraumaticstressdisorder,PVD=peripheralvasculardisease,TBI=traumaticbrain injury aThesedataareincludedintheUSArmyPhysicalEvaluationBoarddatabaseandwerestudiedthroughanInstitutionalReviewBoard– approvedprotocolatourinstitutionandtheVeterans’Administration.Thesedataarenotpubliclyavailable. bFrequency×averagepercentdisability be unfit for duty during war than Rosemont,IL,AmericanAcademyof References OrthopaedicSurgeons,2008. during peacetime and that the total burdenofindividualunfittingcondi- 7. DepartmentofHealthandHuman Services,CentersforDiseaseControland tions increases substantially during 1. CentersforDiseaseControland Prevention,NationalInstitutefor war. Each unfitting condition is a Prevention(CDC):Prevalenceandmost OccupationalSafetyandHealth:Worker commoncausesofdisabilityamong source of morbidity and disability HealthChartbook,2004.Availableat: adults:UnitedStates,2005.MMWR thatmayaffectthewoundedsoldiers MorbMortalWklyRep2009;58(16): http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004- 421-426. 146/pdfs/2004-146.pdf.Accessed long after their military service has February3,2012. ended. 2. StewartWF,RicciJA,CheeE, MorgansteinD:Lostproductivework 8. CrossJD,FickeJR,HsuJR,MasiniBD, In contrast to our hypothesis, al- timecostsfromhealthconditionsinthe WenkeJC:Battlefieldorthopaedic though conditions expected from UnitedStates:ResultsfromtheAmerican injuriescausethemajorityoflong-term ProductivityAudit.JOccupEnviron disabilities.JAmAcadOrthopSurg combat operations did increase sub- Med2003;45(12):1234-1246. 2011;19(suppl1):S1-S7. stantially, back pain and OA con- 3. StewartWF,RicciJA,CheeE, 9. MasiniBD,WatermanSM,WenkeJC, tinue to be the largest force sub- MorgansteinD,LiptonR:Lost OwensBD,HsuJR,FickeJR:Resource tractors for the US Army during productivetimeandcostduetocommon utilizationanddisabilityoutcome peacetime and war. The impact of painconditionsintheUSworkforce. assessmentofcombatcasualtiesfrom JAMA2003;290(18):2443-2454. OperationIraqiFreedomandOperation these conditions is high, resulting in 4. YelinE,CallahanLF;NationalArthritis EnduringFreedom.JOrthopTrauma significant disability and resource DataWorkGroups:Theeconomiccost 2009;23(4):261-266. utilization. andsocialandpsychologicalimpactof 10. OwensBD,KraghJFJr,MacaitisJ, musculoskeletalconditions.Arthritis Musculoskeletal injuries must be SvobodaSJ,WenkeJC:Characterization Rheum1995;38(10):1351-1362. recognized early by military health- ofextremitywoundsinOperationIraqi 5. ReginsterJY,KhaltaevNG:Introduction FreedomandOperationEnduring care providers to allow optimum andWHOperspectiveontheglobal Freedom.JOrthopTrauma2007;21(4): managementandrehabilitation,with burdenofmusculoskeletalconditions. 254-257. Rheumatology(Oxford)2002;41suppl the goal of decreasing the long-term 11. VeteransBenefitsAdministration 1:1-2. disability of each soldier. Further re- References:BookC,scheduleforrating 6. AmericanAcademyofOrthopaedic disabilities.Title38CodeofFederal search efforts should be directed to- Surgeons:TheBurdenofMusculo- Regulations.Availableat:http:// wardidentificationandmitigationof skeletalDiseasesintheUnitedStates: www.benefits.va.gov/warms/ Prevalence,SocietalandEconomicCost. bookc.asp#d.AccessedFebruary3, military-specific risk factors for de- 2012. velopmentofbackpainandOA. S30 JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofOrthopaedicSurgeons

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.