Table Of Content

Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD Working Group 2 Analytic Support to C2 Acquisition Chair: Suzanne Beers, MITRE Co-Chair: Christina Shapiro, AMSAA Co-Chair: Tylar Temple AMSAA 26 JAN 2012 Unclassified 1 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 26 JAN 2012 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-2012 to 00-00-2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Analytic Support to C2 Acquisition 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION MITRE Corporation,202 Burlington Road,Bedford,MA,01730-1420 REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 23 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD WG Participants • Christina Shapiro, AMSAA • Terrance Peterson, NGB J8 • Tylar Temple, AMSAA • James Rippee, TRAC • Randy Klingaman, DUSA-TE • Charles Brooks, MITRE • Jerry Baird, BAH • Harvey Reed, MITRE • Pat McCormick, Alpha Informatics • Janaki Tambe, LMSS • Andreas Tolk, ODU • Randi VanNyhuis NCCA • Dave Sadlier, MCOTEA • Kevin Sobczak, AMSAA • Roger Spears, Signal CoE • Dick Polin, IDA • Dave Signori, EBR Unclassified 2 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD WG Objectives • Identify examples of analysis tools and methods successfully used to quantify the effectiveness of C2 systems. • Identify analysis methods applicable to phases of the acquisition cycle. • Report findings and actionable recommendations for promoting adequate analysis of C2 systems to inform acquisition decisions. Unclassified 3 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD WG Approach • What are the decisions that need to be informed during the acquisition process? • What types of analyses need to be performed to inform these decisions? • What tools (models, simulations, etc.) can be used to perform these analyses? Unclassified 4 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD Metrics C2 Metrics Framework Derived II" -J Operations M R > I e e I t I Tasks '-, r a I---..__ 1-------\ I t Human ~ C2 Functions c I r--------~ 0 I Information n ( s System of ;-----1------------\ 'Y Systems h C2 System of Systems s s s s s y y y y y y y s s s s s s s Metrics Implemented Unclassified 5 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD Analyses Metrics • Cost • Timeliness (time of arrival, latency) • System Performance • Accuracy (data, representation) • Risk • Completeness • Cost • Range • Schedule • Robustness • Technical • Capacity • Trade Space • Cross Domain Information • Responsiveness • Architecture • Scalable • Trainability/Usability (ease of use) Unclassified 6 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD Four Major Decision Points • Materiel Decision Document (MDD) • Milestone (MS) A • MS B • MS C MDD MS A MS B MS C Unclassified 7 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD MDD Tools/Methods/MS&A • SME Panel • Break mission down to tasks and supporting capabilities/assets • Map capabilities to task sets, available assets to capabilities • Break capability gaps into required attributes • DOTmLPF assessment • Map available and developmental technologies to capability gaps/tasks MDD MS A MS B MS C Unclassified 8 Joint Framework for Measuring C2 Effectiveness Unclassified 23-26 January 2012 | JHU Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD MS A Tools/Methods/M&S • Item-Level M&S • SME Panels • Qualitative Assessments • Vendor Specifications MDD MS A MS B MS C Unclassified 9