ebook img

DTIC ADA544582: Timing of Captopril Administration Determines Radiation Protection or Radiation Sensitization in a Murine Model of Total Body Irradiation PDF

1 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview DTIC ADA544582: Timing of Captopril Administration Determines Radiation Protection or Radiation Sensitization in a Murine Model of Total Body Irradiation

ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 Timing of captopril administration determines radiation protection or radiation sensitization in a murine model of total body irradiation Thomas A. Davisa, Michael R. Landauerb, Steven R. Mogb, Michal Barshishat-Kupperc, Stephen R. Zinsa, Mihret F. Amarea, and Regina M. Dayc aDepartmentofRegenerativeMedicine,NavalMedicalResearchCenter,SilverSpring, Md.,USA;bArmedForcesRadiobiologyResearchInstitute,UniformedServicesUniversityoftheHealthSciences, Bethesda,Md.,USA;cDepartmentofPharmacology,UniformedServicesUniversityoftheHealthSciences,Bethesda,Md.,USA (Received5January2010;revised5January2010;accepted20January2010) Objective. Angiotensin II (Ang II), a potent vasoconstrictor, affects the growth and develop- ment of hematopoietic cells. Mixed findings have been reported for the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on radiation-induced injury to the hemato- poietic system. We investigated the consequences of different regimens of the ACE inhibitor captopril onradiation-induced hematopoietic injury. Materials and Methods. C57BL/6 mice were either sham-irradiated or exposed to 60Co total bodyirradiation(0.6Gy/min).Captoprilwasprovidedinthewaterfordifferenttimeperiods relativetoirradiation. Results. Inuntreatedmice,thesurvivalratefrom7.5Gywas50%at30dayspostirradiation. Captopril treatment for7 dayspriortoirradiationresulted inradiosensitizationwith100% lethalityandarapiddeclineinmaturebloodcells.Incontrast,captopriltreatmentbeginning 1hourpostirradiationandcontinuingfor30daysresultedin100%survival,withimproved recoveryofmaturebloodcellsandmultilineagehematopoieticprogenitors.Innonirradiated controlmice,captoprilbiphasicallymodulatedLinLmarrowprogenitorcellcycling.After2 days,captoprilsuppressedG LG transitionandagreaternumberofcellsenteredaquies- 0 1 centstate.However,after7daysofcaptopriltreatmentLinLprogenitorcellcyclingincreased comparedto untreated controlmice. Conclusion. These findings suggest that ACE inhibition affects hematopoietic recovery following radiation by modulating the hematopoietic progenitor cell cycle. The timing of captopril treatment relative to radiation exposure differentially affects the viability and repopulation capacityof spared hematopoietic stem cells and, therefore, can result in either radiation protection or radiation sensitization. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the ISEH - Society for HematologyandStem Cells. High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) as the result of and microvascular hemorrhage in vital organs, such as a nuclear accident, terrorist event, or as a clinical therapy the brain and gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Of clinical impor- for cancer, has significant hematopoietic toxicity. TBI tance, severe and prolonged cytopenia is a major cause destroys the hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in the bone of morbidity and mortality following myeloablation and marrow compartment, which are critical for blood cell HSC transplantation in the clinical setting [2]. regeneration[1].FollowinglethalTBItothehematopoietic The sensitivity of the hematopoietic system to radiation system,mortalityinmicetypicallyoccursbetween2and4 isbelievedtobeduetotherelativelyrapidcyclingtimesof weeks postirradiation.Deathresultsfromimmunefunction bothshort-termandlong-termreconstitutinghematopoietic impairment, infection, and increased vascular permeability stem cells (ST-HSC and LT-HSC, respectively) [3,4]. Compared with quiescent or slowly cycling cells, rapidly cycling cells are predisposed to increased DNA damage Offprint requests to: Regina M. Day, Ph.D., Department of Pharma- from radiation exposure, resulting in higher levels of cology,UniformedServicesUniversityoftheHealthSciences,BuildingC, apoptosisorsenescence[5].Agentsthatinducequiescence Room2023,4301JonesBridgeRoad,Bethesda,MD20814-4799;E-mail: [email protected] of the HSC population inhibit HSC apoptosis and 0301-472X/10$–seefrontmatter.PublishedbyElsevierInc.onbehalfoftheISEH-SocietyforHematologyandStemCells. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.01.004 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Timing Of Captopril Administration Determines Radiation Protection Or 5b. GRANT NUMBER Radiation Sensitization In A Murine Model Of Total Body Irradiation 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Medical Research Center,Department of Regenerative REPORT NUMBER Medicine,Silver Spring,MD,20910 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Experimental Hematology, Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 270-281 (April 2010) 14. ABSTRACT Objective. Angiotensin II (Ang II), a potent vasoconstrictor, affects the growth and development of hematopoietic cells. Mixed findings have been reported for the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on radiation-induced injury to the hematopoietic system. We investigated the consequences of different regimens of the ACE inhibitor captopril on radiation-induced hematopoietic injury. Materials and Methods. C57BL/6 mice were either sham-irradiated or exposed to 60Co total body irradiation (0.6 Gy/min). Captopril was provided in the water for different time periods relative to irradiation. Results. In untreated mice, the survival rate from 7.5 Gy was 50% at 30 days postirradiation. Captopril treatment for 7 days prior to irradiation resulted in radiosensitization with 100% lethality and a rapid decline in mature blood cells. In contrast, captopril treatment beginning 1 hour postirradiation and continuing for 30 days resulted in 100% survival, with improved recovery of mature blood cells and multilineage hematopoietic progenitors. In nonirradiated control mice, captopril biphasically modulated LinL marrow progenitor cell cycling. After 2 days, captopril suppressed G0LG1 transition and a greater number of cells entered a quiescent state. However, fter 7 days of captopril treatment LinL progenitor cell cycling increased compared to untreated control mice. Conclusion. These findings suggest that ACE inhibition affects hematopoietic recovery following radiation by modulating the hematopoietic progenitor cell cycle. The timing of captopril treatment relative to radiation exposure differentially affects the viability and repopulation capacity of spared hematopoietic stem cells and, therefore, can result in either radiation protection or radiation sensitization. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 13 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 271 senescenceandtherebypreventradiation-inducedstemcell radiation exposure. Mice administered captopril for 7 pool exhaustion. Our laboratory has shown that the isofla- consecutivedays prior toirradiation exhibitedradiosensiti- vone genistein transiently arrests the LT-HSC in the G / zation,whiletreatmentsthatbeganasearlyas1houror24 0 G phases of the cell cycle and reduces radiation-induced hours after irradiation were protective. The sensitizing vs 1 genotoxicity, senescence, and stem cell pool exhaustion protective effects of the two types of regimens were [6,7]. However, prevention of mortality from radiation- reflected in the severity of radiation-induced weight loss induced hematopoietic injury can also be achieved by and in the repopulation rates of hematopoietic progenitor agents that promote proliferation of the ST-HSC to cells. replenish mature blood cells, although at the transient expenseofreducedLT-HSCpools.Theradiationprotective agents granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, interleukins, Materials and methods and thrombopoietin, for example, increase proliferation and differentiation of ST-HSC and promote mature blood Experimental design cell repopulation [4,8,9]. Female C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Therenin-angiotensinsystemiscriticalforregulationof ME, USA) were 12 to 14 weeks of age (17.5(cid:2)21.5 g) at the time of irradiation. Mice were housed in groups of four to five blood pressure and blood volume homeostasis [10], but percageinafacilityaccreditedbytheAssociationforAssessment components of this system also regulate proliferation and and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. maturation of hematopoietic cells. Angiotensin II (Ang II) Animal rooms were maintained at 21(cid:3)C 6 2(cid:3)C, 50% 6 10% directly modulates developmentandproliferation ofhema- humidity,and12-hourlight/darkcycle.Commercialrodentration topoietic progenitor cells (HPC) through Ang II receptors (HarlanTekladRodentDiet8604,HarlanLaboratories,Madison, on the surfaces of these cells [11–14]. Plasma levels of WI, USA) and acidified water (pH 2.5(cid:2)3.0), to control opportu- Ang II are tightly regulated, and the protease angiotensin- nistic infections [21], were freely available. All animal handling converting enzyme (ACE) is required for the maturation procedures were performed in compliance with guidelines from of Ang II from its inactive precursor angiotensin I. Inhibi- theNationalResearchCouncilandwereapprovedbytheInstitu- tion of ACE blocks the formation of activeAng II and can tional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Armed Forces RadiobiologyResearch Institute(Bethesda,MD, USA). reversibly inhibit HSC proliferation in cell culture and in Na¨ıve mice were randomized and assigned to groups that vivo [14–16]. receivedeithernotreatmentorvariousregimensofcaptopriltreat- The literature provides mixed reports for the effects of ment. We previously determined that 7.5-Gy TBI results in 50% AngIIandACEinhibitorsonradiation-inducedhematopoi- lethality within 30 days (LD ) for C57BL/6J mice in Armed 50/30 eticinjury.MiceadministeredAngIIfor2to7daysbegin- Forces Radiobiology Research Institute’s 60Co radiation facility ning the day of irradiation exhibited increased 30-day [6].Asdescribedpreviously[22],miceinthecurrentexperiments survival and improved white blood cell recovery [17,18], received TBI at 0.6 Gy/min. Control mice were sham-irradiated. presumably through increased proliferation and self- Captopril (USP grade; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was renewal of spared multilineage hematopoietic stem and dissolved in acidified water at 0.55 g/L. A previous study estab- progenitor cells. Paradoxically, positive results have also lishedthestabilityofcaptoprilinacidifiedwater[23].Theeffect been reported for hematopoietic radiation protection by ofcaptoprilonwaterintakewasmonitoredfor30days,withand withoutirradiation(Fig.1).Captoprilresultedinanincreaseinthe ACE inhibitors. Early studies showed that the ACE inhib- daily volume of water consumed by nonirradiated mice (control itor captopril failed to provide bone marrow protection in 3.20 6 0.03 mL/day vs captopril treatment 4.00 6 0.20 mL/ rats when administration was initiated 7 days prior to irra- day). Radiation exposure resulted in a reduction in the average diation and continued for 28 days after irradiation [19]. waterconsumptionforapproximately2weeksandwasmitigated However, perindopril, another ACE inhibitor, increased by captopril (Fig. 1). The average captopril consumption was 30-day survival and protected ST-HSC when mice were calculatedbasedonvolumesofwaterconsumedandbodyweights treated for only 4 consecutive days beginning 2 days prior duringthetimecourseoftheexperiments.Nonirradiatedmicehad to irradiation through 2 days postirradiation [20]. This aneffectivedosageof0.1160.01mg/kg/day.Inirradiatedmice protection was shown to be due to the inhibition of Ang given captopril prior toirradiation, theaverage consumption was II maturation, because inhibitors of the Ang II type I 0.1060.02mg/kg/day.Inmicetreatedwithcaptoprilafterirradi- receptorhadsimilarprotectiveeffectsonthehematopoietic ation,theaverageconsumptionwas0.1060.05mg/kg/day. For survival studies, mice were randomly assigned to one of system. seven groups. Two groups were sham-irradiated (nonirradiated: In this article, radiosensitization and radioprotection, handled/manipulatedthesameasirradiatedmice):1)notreatment respectively, are defined as increased sensitivity or (n 5 20) and 2) captopril for 30 days (n 5 20). Five groups increased protection of cells, tissues, or organisms to received a single dose of 7.5-Gy TBI and were treated with or gammaradiation,asaresultofanagentbeingadministered without captopril. The following groups received radiation (day beforeand/orafterradiationexposure.Wedemonstratethat 0 5 day of irradiation): 3) no treatment (n 5 16), 4) captopril captoprilcanhaveeitherradiosensitizingorradioprotective for 7 days before irradiation through 30 days postirradiation effects, depending on the time of administration relativeto (days(cid:2)7throughþ30)(n520),5)captoprilfordays(cid:2)7through 272 T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 Figure1. Effectofcaptoprilondrinkingwaterconsumption.Volumeofwaterconsumedwasmeasuredeachdayforthefull-timecourseoftheexperiment. Theestimatedvolumeofwaterconsumedpermousewascalculated.Captoprilwasadministeredpreirradiationfromday(cid:2)7today0(dayofirradiation). Captopriladministeredpostirradiationwasfromday0(beginning1hourafterirradiation)todayþ30. 0(n520),6)captoprilfordaysþ1(beginning24hoursafterirra- calculated based on the total number of viable, nucleated cells diation)throughþ7(n520),and7)captoprilfordays0(begin- per femur and on the number of colonies scored per number of ning1hourafterirradiation)throughþ30(n520).Survivalwas cellsplated. monitoredfor30daysafterTBI. For hematological and tissue analysis, micewere randomized Cell-cycle analysis ofLin(cid:2) andLSKþ cells intooneoffivegroups.Twogroupsweresham-irradiated(nonir- Lin(cid:2) bone marrow cells were isolated using mouse Lin(cid:2) cell radiated): 1) no treatment and 2) captopril-treated. The dose of magneticcellsorting(MACS)CellSelectionKitsaccordingtomanu- irradiation for hematology or tissue analysis was either 7.5 Gy facturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA). Cell- or 6 Gy, and groups were: 3) no treatment, 4) captopril for days cycleanalysiswasperformedasdescribedpreviously[22].Lin(cid:2)cells (cid:2)7through0,and5)captoprilforday0throughthedayoftissue wereincubatedfor30minutesat4(cid:3)CwithR-phycoerythrin(cid:2)Sca-1 harvest. and allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-mouse CD117 (cKit; anti- Micewere anesthetized with pentobarbital andblood was ob- bodies from BD-Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA). After surface tainedbycardiacpuncture,asdescribedpreviously[6].Complete stainingwascomplete,Lin(cid:2)cellswerewashed,fixedwith0.5mL bloodcountswithdifferentialswereobtainedusingaBakerAdvia 1.4%paraformaldehydeinphosphate-bufferedsalinefor1hourat 2120 Hematology Analyzer (Siemens, Tarrytown, NY, USA). 4(cid:3)C, and then incubated with an equal volume of 0.2% Triton-X Separatemicewereusedateachtimepoint(n55(cid:2)6pergroup). overnight. Fixed, permeabilized Lin(cid:2) cells were stained with For determination of microhemorrhage, gross necropsies were Ki-67(cid:2)fluorescein isothiocyanate (BD Pharmingen) for 2 hours. performedonmiceatthetimeofdeathoratthestudytermination Cellswerewashedandresuspendedinstainingbuffercontaining2 endpoint(day10orday14)(n56(cid:2)10pergroup).Organs,espe- mg/mL7-aminoactinomycin-D(Sigma).Lin(cid:2)andgatedLSKþcells ciallytheGItractandbrain,werescreenedforhemorrhage,either (Lin(cid:2) Sca-1þcKitþ) were analyzed for Ki-67 expression and 7- petechiae or ecchymoses. Tissues with hemorrhage were immer- aminoactinomycin-Dincorporationbyperformingfour-colorparam- sion fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin with ionized zinc etersortingusingaCoulterEliteflowcytometer(Coulter,Hialeah, (Z-Fix;AnatechLtd,BattleCreek, MI,USA). FL,USA). Hematopoietic progenitor colony-forming cellassays Statistical analysis Femoralbonemarrowcellswereisolatedasdescribedpreviously Fisher’s exact test wasused for analysis of survivaldata. Weight [22].Unfractionatedbonemarrowcellswereplatedinmultipoten- datawereanalyzedusingone-wayanalysisofvarianceandDunn’s tialmethylcelluloseculturemedium(MethocultGFM3434;Stem- test, using SigmaStat, 3.1 (Point Richmond, CA, USA). Hema- CellTechnologies,Vancouver,BC,Canada)at1to5(cid:4)104cells tology, clonogenic CFU assays, and cell-cycle results are ex- perdish.Coloniesderivedfromcolony-formingunitgranulocyte- pressed as the mean 6 standard error of mean. Statistical erythroid-macrophage-megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM), colony- significance between the paired results was determined using forming unit granulocytic-macrophage (CFU-GM), blast-forming one-way analysis of variance followed by Holm-Sidak or Tukey unit erythroid (BFU-E), and colony-forming unit macrophage postanalysis. A value of p # 0.05 was considered significant. (CFU-M)werescoredafter8to12daysofincubationinahumid- Mean survival time (MST) of decedents over 30 days was deter- ifiedenvironment,5%CO asdescribedpreviously[22].Absolute minedbytheKaplan-Meiersurvivalanalysis,usingSingleGroup 2 numbers of clonogenic CFU progenitor cells per femur were statisticsintheSigmaStat,3.1software. T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 273 Figure2. Treatmentofmicewithcaptoprilfollowinghigh-doseirradiationisradioprotective,whereastreatmentpriortoirradiationhasaradiosensitization effect.Micewereuntreatedorwereadministeredcaptopril(0.1mg/kg/day)intheirdrinkingwaterbeforeand/orafterexposureto7.5Gy60Cogammatotal bodyirradiation(TBI).(A)Thepercentageofmicesurvivingat30daysisshown.Resultsrepresentatotalof16to20micepergroup.*p!0.05from untreatedirradiatedmice.**p!0.001fromuntreatedirradiatedmice.(B)Graphof30daysurvival. Results Administration of captopril prior to irradiation resulted in radiosensitization. When captopril administration began 7 Effectofcaptoprilregimenson30-daysurvivalfollowing days before irradiation (day (cid:2)7) and continued until the 7.5-Gy TBI dayofirradiation(day 0),none (0%) ofthe mice survived, We previously showed that for female C57BL/6J mice the and the MST was 17 days (95% CI, 16(cid:2)18). Mice pre- LD was 7.52 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI], treated with captopril for 7 days before irradiation and 50/30 7.44(cid:2)7.59) in our 60Co facility [24]. We used this dose continuing through day 30 postirradiation (day þ30) also ofirradiationtodeterminetheeffectsofcaptopriltreatment exhibited radiosensitization, with 15% survival (p ! 0.05 either before, after, or before and after irradiation. In compared to untreated irradiated mice) and an MSTof 21 untreated irradiated mice that received 7.5 Gy, 30-day days (95% CI, 20(cid:2)22). In marked contrast, mice that survival was again 50%. The MST of decedents was 20 received captopril only after irradiation exhibited a protec- days (95% CI, 15(cid:2)25) (Fig. 2A, B). The timing of tiveeffectagainsthematopoieticinjury.Thirty-daysurvival mortality was consistent with acute hematopoietic injury. was 85% for mice that were administered captopril 274 T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 Figure2. (Continued.)(C)Time-dependentchangeinbodyweightinnonirradiatedcontrolmiceormicethatreceivedcaptoprilintheirdrinkingwater beforeand/orafterexposureto7.5Gy60CoTBI.Datarepresentthechangeinbodyweight6standarderror.(n520micepergroup).Statisticalfindings arenotedinthetext. beginning 24 hours after irradiation (day þ1) and We examined the effects of two captopril regimens on continuing for 7 days (p ! 0.05 from untreated irradiated hematopoieticrecoveryfrom7.5-GyTBI.Groupsofmice mice). The MST of the three mice that died was 23 days received1)notreatment,2)captoprilfor7dayspriortoirra- (95% CI, 19(cid:2)26). Mice administered captopril beginning diation(day(cid:2)7through0),3)orcaptoprilafterirradiation 1 hour (day 0) after irradiation and continuing through beginning1hourpostirradiation(day0)andcontinuingfor day þ30 exhibited 100% survival for 30 days (p ! 0.001 either 2 hours or 2, 7, 10, or 14 days after irradiation. compared to untreated irradiated mice). Completebloodcountanalyseswereperformedonseparate The radiation sensitization or protection induced by groupsofmiceat2hours,and2,7,10,and14dayspostir- captopril was reflected in the body weights of the mice radiation.Arapiddeclineofallmaturebloodcelltypeswas (Fig. 2C). Radiation in untreated mice resulted in signifi- observed following irradiation (Fig. 3A). In mice that cant weight loss observable within 1 day postirradiation, received captopril prior to irradiation, a loss of red blood with a nadir w13 to 20 days postirradiation. Mice that cells occurred earlier and was more pronounced during received captopril prior to irradiation, either days (cid:2)7 the entire time coursewhen compared to untreated irradi- through 0 or days (cid:2)7 through þ30, exhibited greater ated mice. The decline in red blood cells was reflected by weight loss than untreated irradiated mice. In mice admin- decreased levels in hematocrit and hemoglobin compared istered captopril before irradiation, the reduction in body withuntreatedirradiatedmice(datanotshown).Reticulo- weight occurred for an extended time, and was significant cyte recovery was also reduced in mice given captopril between days 16 and 28 postirradiation (p ! 0.05 beforeirradiationandwassignificantonday14postirradi- compared to untreated irradiated mice). In contrast, mice ation. This modest decline in circulating erythroid cells is treated with captopril after radiation exposure (days consistentwithsubstantialradiosensitizationofcommitted 0 through þ30) maintained higher average body weights erythroidprogenitorcells.Failureofplateletrecoverywas compared with untreated irradiated mice. The increased also observed on day 14 postirradiation in the group of weight was significant between days 9 and 20 when mice receiving captopril from day 7 through day 0. In compared to untreated irradiated mice (p ! 0.05). Capto- contrast, treatment of mice with captopril starting 1 hour pril treatment in the absence of radiation had no effect on afterirradiationresultedinreducedradiation-inducedloss body weight when compared to untreated control mice. of red blood cells, significant on day 14. Administration of captopril postirradiation also significantly improved Captopril administration affects mature blood cell reticulocyte recovery on day 14 and platelet recovery on recovery following irradiation days10to14postirradiation. We hypothesized that protection from radiation-induced Radiation-induced hematopoietic injury can lead to hematopoieticinjurybycaptopriltreatmentpostirradiation hemorrhage (petechiae and ecchymoses) and microhemor- was associated with enhanced hematopoietic progenitor rhage in multiple organs, including the brain and GI tract cell activity resulting in accelerated blood cell recovery. [4]. Hemorrhages associated with acute radiation injury T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 275 Figure 3. Effect of captopril administration on radioprotection. Mice received no treatment or were administered captopril in their drinking waterbefore(day(cid:2)7today05dayofirradiation)orafter(day0[starting 1hourafterirradiation]today30)exposureto7.5Gy60Cogammatotal bodyirradiation.(A)Peripheralbloodwhitebloodcells(WBC),redblood cells (RBC), reticulocytes, lymphocytes, platelets, and absolute neutro- phils from irradiatedmice,sampleswere taken at 2 hours(indicated on day 0), 2, 7, 10, or 14 days postirradiation. Control blood cell levelsin untreated, nonirradiated mice are also indicated for blood cell types, except for lymphocytes (3.84 (cid:4) 103 6 0.4) and WBC (4.4 (cid:4) 103 6 0.5). Data show meanvalues 6standard error of mean, n 55(cid:2)6 mice per group. *p ! 0.05 compared with radiation alone cell counts at the sametimepoint.(B)Histologicalcomparisonofbrainmicrohemorrhages in the subcortical cerebrum (100(cid:4) magnification) and cerebellar cortex (200(cid:4) magnification) of mice at day 14 postirradiation. Representative photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin(cid:2)stained tissue for mice treatedwithcaptoprilpriorto(upperpanelswithhemorrhage)orfollowing (lower panels, normal brain) radiation exposure. The microhemorrhages areindicatedbyarrowsandoccurperiventricularlyinthesubcorticalcere- brum;ventricles(V)andcorpuscallosum(CC)areidentifiedfororienta- tion. Microhemorrhages also occurred perivascularly in the cerebellar cortex extending from thewhite matter (WM) through the granular (G) andpiriform/Purkinje(P)layers,abuttingthemolecular(M)layer. areascribedtolossofplateletsbelowathresholdlevel[25]. TBI, there is an immediate proliferative demand on func- We examined the effects of 7.5 Gy 60Co on brain and GI tionally spared LT- and ST-HSC to repopulate the ablated hemorrhaging on days 10 and 14 postirradiation. No pete- hematopoietic system [7]. Sustained hyperproliferation chiae were detected on day 10. However, on day 14, 60% and differentiation signals can result in fewer HSC self- of untreated irradiated mice had grossly observable brain renewing divisions and can lead to exhaustion of the HSC hemorrhages (4 were classified as mild; 2 were classified pool and marrow repopulating failure. The molecular as minimal; n 5 10). The sensitization or protection of mechanisms preserving HSC require a balance between blood cells by captopril was reflected by the presence or proliferation, differentiation, and self-renewal. These inter- absence of gross hemorrhage and intracerebral microhe- related processes and mechanisms are important and not morrhages. All mice treated with captopril prior to irradia- fullyunderstood.Basedonourpostirradiationsurvivalfind- tion (days (cid:2)7 through 0) exhibited brain hemorrhages (4 ings, we hypothesized that spared HSC are substantially mild, 6 minimal; n 5 10) (Fig. 3B). In contrast, none of less abundant and/or have an impaired repopulating poten- the mice treated with captopril postirradiation (starting on tial in mice receiving captopril before irradiation as day 0) exhibited brain hemorrhages (n 5 6). Evidence of compared to mice treated with captopril postirradiation. gross vascular or microvascular hemorrhage in the GI tract To assess the kinetics of marrow repopulation, we exam- was not observed in any group (data not shown). inedtotalbonemarrowcellularityandquantifiedassayable HPC production (in vitro CFU clonogenic assays) using Captopril effects on bone marrow recovery marrow obtained from mice treated with radiation alone Radiation-induced stress can compromise the hematopoi- and in the two captopril-radiation regimens described etic repopulation potential of HSC. Following high-dose here. Mice that received captopril before irradiation died 276 T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 withgreaterbonemarrowprogenitor/stemdepletion,which 2daysofcaptopriltreatment.However,asimilarG toG / 1 2 resulted in impaired marrow repopulation and decreased M/S cell-cycle progression was detected in the LSKþ after survival (radiosensitization). On day 14 postirradiation, 2 or 7 days of captopril treatment (Fig. 5B). mice receiving captopril prior to irradiation (days (cid:2)7 through 0) exhibited reduced nucleated cellularity in the femoralbonemarrowcomparedwithmiceintheuntreated Discussion radiation-only group. This indicated a gross deficit in total Components of the renin-angiotensin system have been hematopoietic cell production in the marrow compartment investigatedforhematopoieticradiationprotectionbecause (Fig.4A). Nosignificant differences inthe number oftotal of the role of this system in hematopoietic cell regulation. nucleated cells were observed between the radiation-only BecauseACEinhibitorsareusedextensivelyinthegeneral group and the captopril postirradiation treatment groups. population, it is critical to understand the effects of these Next, we characterized the types of hematopoietic drugs on radiation-induced hematopoietic injury because progenitors present in each treatment group to assess the radiotherapyisacommontherapeuticmodalityfortreating rapid loss of CFU and their subsequent expansion in the cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma [28,29]. Paradoxically, marrow compartment following radiation-induced hemato- both ACE inhibitors and Ang II peptides have been shown poieticinjury.Atday5,butnotday14,postirradiation,the to provide protection of the hematopoietic system number of total marrow CFU was significantly reduced in [16,18,20]. Here, we demonstrate that treatment of mice mice pretreated with captopril when compared with withtheACEinhibitorcaptoprilresultedineitherradiation untreated irradiated mice (Fig. 4B, C). We also observed protectionorradiationsensitization,dependingonthetime specific reductions in CFU-M populations. In contrast, of captopril administration. Captopril treatment in nonirra- mice treated with captopril postirradiation exhibited diatedmicehadabiphasiceffectonthecyclingofST-HSC a significant increase in myeloid CFU progenitor cell with transient quiescence after 2 days of treatment, fol- production (CFU-GM and CFU-M) and total CFU at 5 lowed by increased proliferation by 7 days of treatment. days postirradiation (Fig. 4B). Trends were observed for Our experiments demonstrate that captopril administration improved recovery of CFU-GEMM and BFU-E, but these beginning 1 hour or 24 hours after irradiation and did not reach significance. At day 14 postirradiation, there continuing for 7 to 30 days increased survival. Therefore, was a significant increase in the total CFU in mice treated captopril-induced radiation protection correlated with tran- with captopril postirradiation compared with mice that sient quiescence (increased G ) of the ST-HSC population 0 receivedradiationalone(Fig.4C).Trendstowardincreased and prevention of stem cell pool exhaustion. However, levels of CFU-GM and CFU-M progenitor cell activity when captopril was initiated 7 days before irradiation and were also observed in mice that received captopril treat- continued either to the time of irradiation or for an addi- ment postirradiation. tional 30 days postirradiation, a significant increase in mortality was observed compared to untreated irradiated Effectofcaptopriloncirculatinghematopoieticcellsand mice. In this case, radiation sensitization was correlated marrow-derived HPC with increased cycling (increased G /M) of the ST-HSC 2 ResultsfrommaturebloodcellcountsandCFUassayssug- population at the time of radiation exposure. gestedthatcaptoprilaffectedthesensitivityand/orrecovery HSC quiescence sustains long-term hematopoiesis by ofhematopoieticcellsandtheirprecursors.Otherinvestiga- protectingtheHSCpool fromradiation-inducedinjury and tors showed that Ang II directly regulates the growth and fromprematureexhaustionunderconditionsofhematopoi- development of hematopoietic cells through angiotensin eticstress.Ontheotherhand,prematureentryofHSCinto receptors on the surface of hematopoietic cells themselves the cell cycle following radiation exposure exhausts the [26,27]. To investigate the effect of captopril on the HPC stemcell pool and leads to hematological failure [30]. The cell-cycle profile, total Lin(cid:2) and Lin(cid:2) HPC (Lin(cid:2) Sca-1þ G /M phases of the cell cycle, as well as increased rate of 2 cKitþ [LSKþ]) femoral bone marrow cells were isolated cellcycling,areassociatedwithincreasedsensitivitytoradi- fromnonirradiatedmiceafter2or7daysofcaptopriltreat- ation[5,7].ExaminationoftheresponseofHPCinnonirra- ment and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate(cid:2)labeled diated mice indicated that 2 days of captopril Ki-67 and 7-aminoactinomycin-D. Whereas 72% of bone administration resulted in HPC transiently withdrawing marrow Lin(cid:2) cells were active in the cell cycle in control from the cell cycle with increased percentages of cells in mice, the Lin(cid:2) cells from mice that received 2 days of theG /G phases.However,inmicethatreceivedcaptopril 0 1 captopril treatment exhibited a significant decrease in the for 7 days, the HPC re-entered the cell cycle, resulting in percentage of cells that were actively proliferating. This higher percentages of cells in the radiation-sensitive G /M 2 decrease was followed by a stronger G to G /M/S transi- phasesofthecycle.Therefore,exposureofthemorerapidly 1 2 tion after 7 days of captopril treatment (Fig. 5A). In cycling cells to radiation resulted in greater damage to the contrast to what was observed for Lin(cid:2) cells, the majority cells. This was reflected by the significant decreases in oftheLSKþremainedintheG phaseofthecellcycleafter CFU of multilineage progenitor cells observed at 5 days 0 T.A.Davisetal./ExperimentalHematology2010;38:270–281 277 Figure4. Effectofcaptoprilonnucleatedcellbonemarrowreconstitutioninirradiatedmice.Micewereuntreatedirradiated,6.0Gytotalbodyirradiation (TBIcontrolgroup);pretreatedwithcaptopril(0.1mg/kg/day)for7consecutivedaysbeforeirradiation;orirradiatedandthengivencaptopril(0.1mg/kg/ day)for14consecutivedays.Atdays5and14postirradiation,femoralbonemarrowcellswerecollected.(A)Totalnumberofnucleatedleukocytescellsper femurpostirradiation.Thenumberofassayablemultilineageandlineage-specificcolony-formingprogenitorcellsweredeterminedfrombonemarrowcells collected at day 5 (B) and day 14 (C) postirradiation. Multipotential (colony-forming unit granulocyte-erythroid-macrophage-megakaryocyte [CFU- GEMM]),myeloid(CFUgranulocytic-macrophage[CFU-GM],CFUmacrophage[CFU-M]),anderythroid(blast-forminguniterythroid([BFU-E])bone marrowcolony-formingcellsweredetermined.Forallpanels,resultsrepresentmean6standarderrorofmeanofsixmice.*p!0.05,comparedwith TBI-treated group. For comparison purposes, the bone marrow cellularity of untreated nonirradiated micewas 20.37 (cid:4) 106 nucleated leukocytes/femur (datanotshown). postirradiation,whichultimatelyresultedinincreasedhema- and increased susceptibility to radiation therapy. This may topoietic failure. These findings suggest that HSC from haveledtoimpairedlong-termrepopulatingpotential,hema- captopril-pretreated mice exhibit a higher activated state topoietic exhaustion, bone marrow failure, and decreased that is associated with a loss of HSC cell-cycle quiescence survival.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.