ebook img

DTIC ADA496867: Pregnancy, Birth, and Infant Health Outcomes from the National Smallpox Health Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry, 2003-2006 PDF

0.97 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview DTIC ADA496867: Pregnancy, Birth, and Infant Health Outcomes from the National Smallpox Health Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry, 2003-2006

Pregnancy, Birth, and Infant Health Outcomes from the National Smallpox Health Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry, 2003–2006 M. A. K. Ryan J. F. Seward For the Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry Team Naval Health Research Center Report No. 06-34 . Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Naval Health Research Center 140 Sylvester Road San Diego, California 92106 SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE Pregnancy, Birth, and Infant Health Outcomes from the National Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry, 2003–2006 Margaret A. K. Ryan1and Jane F. Seward,2for the Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy RegistryTeama 1DepartmentofDefenseCenterforDeploymentHealthResearch,NavalHealthResearchCenter,SanDiego,California;and2NationalCenter forImmunizationandRespiratoryDisease,CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention,Atlanta,Georgia WhentheUnitedStatesimplementedcivilianandmilitarysmallpoxvaccinationprogramsin2003,theNational Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry was established to better evaluate outcomes after the inadvertent vaccination of pregnant women. Women were referred to the registry by vaccine administrators,healthcare providers, or state health departmentsorthroughself-referral.Registryprofessionalsactivelyfollowupwith all enrolled women and collect data on pregnancy,birth, andinfanthealthoutcomes.AsofSeptember2006, pregnancy outcome data were available from 376 women. Most (77%) were vaccinated near the time of conception,beforeresultsofastandardpregnancytestwouldhavebeenpositive.Todate,outcomeevaluations havenotrevealedhigher-than-expectedratesofpregnancyloss(11.9%),pretermbirth(10.7%),orbirthdefects (2.8%), compared with those in healthy referent populations. No casesoffetalvacciniahavebeenidentified. TheSmallpoxVaccineinPregnancyRegistrycontinuestoactivelyenrollwomenandfollowinfantandearly- childhoodhealth outcomes. In response to concerns about potential biological posure during pregnancy that often results in fetal or weapons use worldwide, the United States initiated a neonatal death [5, 6]. Fetal vaccinia is postulated to national smallpox vaccination program in early 2003 occurfollowingmaternalviremiaandismanifestedby [1].Thevaccineapprovedforthiseffortwasfirstused skinlesionsandinternalorganinvolvement[5,7].On in 1931, and current stocks were produced as Dryvax thebasis of historicaldata,itisestimatedthattherisk byWyethLaboratoriesinthelate1970sandearly1980s of fetal vaccinia occurring after smallpox vaccination [2].Becausethevaccinehadbeenadministeredtobil- inpregnancyrangesfrom1/10,000to1/100,000[6,8– lions of individuals over nearly half a century, short- 12].Approximately50casesoffetalvacciniahavebeen term adverse health effects on vaccine recipients are reportedintheworld,and3havebeenreportedinthe fairlywelldocumented[2–4].Historically,muchlessis United States [4, 5, 7, 12]. describedaboutexposuretosmallpoxvaccineinpreg- In the absence of clinically apparent fetal vaccinia, nancy and the potential effects on a developingfetus. the risk of pregnancy loss after smallpox vaccination As a live virus product, smallpox vaccine cancause has notbeenestablished.Althoughsomelargereviews fetal vaccinia, a rare but serious complication of ex- arereassuringthatnoincreasedriskexists[8,12],other reports have cited concern that smallpox vaccination Theviewsexpressedinthisworkarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotreflect may be associated with spontaneous pregnancy loss theofficialpolicyorpositionoftheUSDepartmentofDefense,USCentersfor [13–17]. Likewise, the risks of preterm delivery, low DiseaseControlandPrevention,ortheUSgovernment. a Membersarelistedattheendofthetext. birth weight, and other birth problems afterexposure Reprintsorcorrespondence:Dr.MargaretA.K.Ryan,DepartmentofDefense to smallpox vaccine in pregnancy have not been CenterforDeploymentHealthResearch,NavalHealthResearchCenter,Box85122, SanDiego,CA92186-5122([email protected]). defined. ClinicalInfectiousDiseases 2008;46:S221–6 Potential adverse effects on infant health also are a Thisarticleisinthepublicdomain,andnocopyrightisclaimed. concernaftermaternalexposure.Smallpoxvaccination 1058-4838/2008/4606S3-0009 DOI:10.1086/524744 in pregnancy has been associated with club foot mal- SmallpoxVaccinationinPregnancy • CID 2008:46 (Suppl3) • S221 formationsinonereport[18];otherreviewshaverefutedsuch viders during and after pregnancy, primarily through confi- an association [12]. Given that the cause of most congenital dential telephonecontact by registryprofessionals. anomalies is unknown and that some have argued that live Information sheets were provided to enrollees and their virusvaccinesgivenduringpregnancymightcausebirthdefects healthcareproviderstodescribetheknownandunknownrisks [19–22],moreinformationisneededtounderstandtheriskof associated with smallpox vaccine in pregnancy and to answer infant health problems after maternalsmallpox vaccination. frequently asked questions, such as those relatedtotheuseof Because of the risk of fetal vaccinia, smallpox vaccine is vaccinia immune globulin [31]. The information sheet also generallycontraindicatedduringpregnancy.Nonetheless,itwas specified that, in the event of pregnancy loss orotheradverse anticipated that vaccinating large numbers of youngadultsin outcomes, registry professionals would coordinate laboratory the national smallpox vaccine program that started in 2003, testing of fetal or infant specimens(e.g.,skinlesions)forvac- evenwith rigorouspregnancyscreening,wouldresultinsome cinia, if desired. This included viral culture and PCR testing inadvertentvaccineexposurestopregnantwomen[23–25].Ac- by Laboratory Response Network facilities and/or the CDC cordingly,theNationalSmallpoxVaccineinPregnancyRegistry Poxvirus Laboratory[32]. was established to identify exposed women and to obtain in- Expected rates for outcomes examined weredeterminedby formationonpregnancy,birth,andinfanthealthoutcomes.We literature review and by identifying relevant key publications report the findings from the first 3.5 years of the registry. from subject matter experts. We calculated 95% CIs for di- chotomous outcomes on the basis of normal approximation METHODS ofthebinomialdistribution.Foroutcomecellcounts!5,exact CIs were calculated[33]. The National Smallpox Vaccine in PregnancyRegistrywases- Thisresearch,performedunderNavalHealthResearchCen- tablished in concert with the national smallpox vaccine pro- ter Institutional Review Board–approved protocol 2003.0018, gram in early 2003. The registry was developed as a collabo- underworkunit60504,hasbeenconductedincompliancewith rative effort between the US Department of Defense (DoD) all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) human subjects in research. andwasmodeledafterpriorregistriesforinadvertentexposure to vaccines or medications in pregnancy [26]. The establish- RESULTS ment of the registrywas announcedinCDCpublicationsand AsofSeptember2006,pregnancyoutcomedatawereavailable on DoD Web sites [27–29]. for376womenenrolledintheSmallpoxVaccineinPregnancy Womenwereenrolledintheregistryiftheyreceivedsmallpox Registry. Women who had not yet reached the 20th week of vaccine during pregnancy or if they became pregnant within pregnancy at the time of thisreport(np7),enrolledwomen 28daysofvaccination[28].Conventionally,theestimatedges- whohadasecondaryexposurefromthehusband’svaccination tational age (EGA) of a pregnancy is dated from the first day only(np4),andenrolledwomenwhowerelosttofollow-up of the last menstrual period of the cycle in which a woman (np3) are excluded from this report. conceives; dating of EGA is approximated by ultrasound ex- Table1showsthecharacteristicsofthe376womenforwhom aminationwhenthetimingoftheovulatorycycleisuncertain. pregnancy outcome data were available. Consistent with the We used clinical reports of EGA for establishing dates of all pregnancies in the registry. The registry was also designed to include cases of secondary exposure of pregnant women by, Table 1. Characteristicsof376womeninadvertentlyvaccinated against smallpox in pregnancy. for example, close contact with partners who were recently vaccinated. Characteristic Value Womenwerereferredtotheregistrybyvaccineadministra- Ageatvaccination,meanyears(range) 23.2(17–41) tors, obstetric providers, other health care providers, state Vaccinatedaspartofmilitaryservice 365(97.1) healthdepartments,DoDVaccineHealthcareCenters,theMil- VaccinatedwhiledeployedoutsideofUnitedStates 91(24.2) itary Vaccine Agency, the CDC Clinical Information Line, or Nohistoryofpriorsmallpoxvaccination 354(94.1) the US Food and Drug Administration; through the Vaccine Nohistoryofpreviouspregnancies(primigravid) 199(52.9) AdverseEventReportingSystem[30];orthroughself-referral. Vaccinatedbefore4weeksEGA 289(76.9) Registry professionalsactivelysoughtcasesbycommunicating Receivedothervaccinationsinthispregnancya 260(69.1) with vaccination and obstetric clinics and shared a standard NOTE. Dataareno.(%)ofwomenunlessotherwiseindicated.EGA,es- formforcasereporting.Thedata-collectionformincludedde- timatedgestationalage. tailsaboutvaccinationandsmallpoxvaccine“take,”aswellas a Receiptofothervaccinationsinpregnancyisbasedontheregistrystan- dardofexposurewithin28daysbeforestartofEGAoranytimefromcon- details about pregnancy diagnosis. Consent was requested to ceptiontotheendofpregnancy.Ifpreconceptionexposuresareexcluded, follow up with registry participants andtheirhealthcarepro- 162cases(43.1%)hadothervaccinationsinpregnancy. S222 • CID 2008:46 (Suppl3) • Ryanetal. USexperiencesince2002,mostwomen(97.1%)receivedsmall- spontaneouslossratemaybemoreappropriatelycalculatedon poxvaccineaspartoftheirmilitaryservice,andtheremaining the basis of the number of intrauterine pregnanciesthatwere 11 women were vaccinated as civilian health care workers. not electively terminated, yielding a loss rate of 11.9%. Pop- Ninety-fourpercentofwomenhadnohistoryofpriorsmallpox ulationreferencesforexpectedratesofpregnancylossarealso vaccination. Prior smallpox vaccination was confirmed byre- shown in table 2 [36–41]. Figure 1 illustrates pregnancy out- view of personalhistoriesandbyvaccinationrecordsshowing comes, including losses, by timing of maternal exposure to receipt of the 15-jab inoculation that is consistentwithrevac- smallpoxvaccine.Thelargestpercentageoffetallosses(20.6%) cination. Among military women, 72% served in the Army, occurred among women vaccinated between 4 and 7 weeks 17% served in the Air Force, and 10% served in the Navy or EGA.Fetaltissuewasavailablefrom5lossesforvacciniatesting; Marine Corps. Some women (np91) were vaccinated while results of all such testing were negativefor vaccinia virus. on military duty outside of the United States, and many Birth and infant health outcomes are summarized in table (np260)receivedothervaccinationsinconjunctionwiththe 2. The percentage of preterm births (10.7%) among registry smallpoxvaccine.Othervaccinationsreportedbyregistrypar- births, the average birth weight of singleton registry infants ticipants included anthrax (np228), hepatitis A or B (np (3320 g), and the percentage of infants with low birthweight 50), typhoid (np46), influenza (np34), yellow fever (np (9.1%) may be compared with nationaldatashownintable2 18), meningococcal (np14), tetanus or tetanus-diphtheria [42]. Nearly half (47.9%) of all infants borntowomeninthe (np8), measles-mumps-rubella (np7), polio (np2), and Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry were male; this may pneumococcal (np1) vaccines. becomparedwiththecurrentUSnationalproportionofmale Most women (77%) in the registry were vaccinated before births [43]. 4 weeks EGA, the time after which resultsofastandardpreg- Finally,importanthealthoutcomesareshownintable2for nancytestshouldbepositive.Figure1showsthatmostwomen all live-born infants evaluated through the end of infancy or were vaccinatedvery near the estimatedtime of conception. 12 months of age. Two infants in the registry died of sudden Pregnancyoutcomesaresummarizedintable2.Among376 infantdeathsyndrome(SIDS),at7weeksand9weeksofage, pregnant women, 5 had twin pregnancies, for a total of 381 respectively. The expected rate of SIDS is 4.7 per 10,000 live fetal outcomes. Five ectopic pregnancies represented 1.2% of births[44,45].BothinfantswhodiedofSIDSfromtheregistry all pregnancies reported to the registry. The 18 elective preg- had postmortem testing for vaccinia virus, and all testresults nancyterminationsrepresented4.7%ofallfetaloutcomes.No were negative. registry participants cited their inadvertent smallpoxvaccina- Seven infants (2.8%) had diagnoses of major birth defects, tionasareasonforpursuingelectiveterminationofpregnancy. as defined by the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Population references for ectopic pregnancy and elective ter- [46]. Their diagnoses included ventricular septal defects (2 mination are also shown in table 2 [34, 35]. cases),atrialseptaldefect(1case),pulmonaryvalvestenosis(1 Forty-twospontaneousfetallosseswereidentifiedinthereg- case), isolated gastroschisis (1 case), isolated omphalocele (1 istry.Althoughtheserepresent11.0%ofallfetaloutcomes,the case), and omphalocele with Beckwith-Weidemannsyndrome Figure 1. Pregnancyoutcomesaccordingto estimatedgestationalage (EGA)at the time of maternalsmallpoxvaccination.wk, week. SmallpoxVaccinationinPregnancy • CID 2008:46 (Suppl3) • S223 Table 2. Pregnancy, birth, and infant health outcomes among those enrolled in the Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry,2003–2006. Percentage Referencevalue(s) Outcome Value (95%CI) (source) Fetaloutcomes(np381) Ectopicpregnancy 5 1.3(0.2–2.4) 1–2[34] Electiveabortion 18 5.8a(3.2–8.3) 24.6[35] Spontaneousabortion(lossbefore20weeksEGA) 37 9.7(6.7–12.7) 9–30[36–40] Stillbirth(lossafter20weeksEGA) 5 1.0b(0.0–2.1) 0.3–0.7[41] Fetalvaccinia 0 0.0(0.0–0.9) 0.01–0.001[4] Livebirthoutcomesc(np309) Pretermbirth(before37weeksEGA) 33 10.7(7.3–14.1) 12.3[42] Lowbirthweight(!2500g) 28 9.1(5.9–12.3) 7.9[42] Meanbirthweight,g 3320 … 3325[42] Malesexofinfant 148 47.9(42.3–53.6) 52[43] Infanthealthoutcomesd(np249) Suddeninfantdeathsyndrome 2 0.8(0.0–2.9) 0.05[44,45] Majorbirthdefectse 7 2.8(0.8–4.8) 3–5[46] NOTE. Dataareno.ofcases,unlessotherwiseindicated.EGA,estimatedgestationalage. a Standardreportingforthismetricistheratioofelectiveabortionsto100livebirths. b Standardreportingforthismetricistheproportionofsingletonstillbirthsamongallsingletonlivebirthsplusstillbirths. Onesetofstillborntwinsandalllive-borntwinswereexcludedfromthiscalculation. c Notethat7casesinlatepregnancyatthetimeofthisreporthadnobirthoutcomesavailable. d Infanthealthoutcomesreportedforthosewithfollow-upthroughendofinfancyor12monthsofage. e Amajorbirthdefectisonethataffectssurvival,requiressubstantialmedicalcare,resultsinmarkedphysicalor psychologicalhandicaps,orinterfereswithababy’sprospectforaproductiveandfulfillinglife[46]. (1 case).Theobservedprevalenceofbirthdefects(2.8%)may cinia,theresultsarevaluableinanumberofways.Asevaluated be compared with national data, also shown in table 2 [46]. in early 2003, established smallpox vaccine screening and ed- At all follow-up contacts, registry participants were asked ucation practices appeared to havepreventedmanyexposures about other indicatorsofinfanthealth,includingskinlesions. in pregnancy [28]. The rate of inadvertent exposure during Many infants (44%) had some indication of skin findings at pregnancy amongwomenofreproductiveagevaccinateddur- birthorinearlyinfancy;mostwereconsideredtobebirthmarks ing the first stage of the civilian and DoD programs was ∼1 or benign rashes, and none had diagnoses of fetal vaccinia. per 1000 women, substantially lower than the ∼8 per 1000 womenand12per1000womenestimatedtobeinadvertently DISCUSSION exposedtosmallpoxvaccineinthecivilianhealthcareworker population and in the general population, respectively, in the The Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry was successfully absence of screening and education [28]. Therefore, most established in 2003 to evaluate inadvertent vaccine exposures in pregnancy. The effort has been important in providing a women who were vaccinated were in the very early stages of better understanding of potential adverse effects of smallpox pregnancy,when pregnancyis typicallynot yet recognized. vaccinationinavulnerablepopulation.Withnearly400women Theregistrymaybemostvaluablewithregardtoconclusions enrolled, there have been no cases of fetal vaccinia identified. about pregnancy losses.Themostfrequentlyexpectedadverse Other adverse outcomes of pregnancy, birth, and infant de- outcome in any cohort of pregnancies is spontaneous preg- velopment have been observed at rates consistent with those nancy loss, and, as such, pregnancy loss may be one of the expected in the United States and previously described [34– most importantindicatorsofhazardousexposureinthespec- 46]. Although active vaccination of civilians for publichealth trum of adverse reproductive health outcomes [48]. Without preparedness is not ongoing in the United States,assmallpox active registry follow-up, mostpregnancy-lossdatawouldnot vaccinecontinuestobeusedinthemilitaryandvaccineremains have been captured, and it is unlikelythattestingforvaccinia available for postevent response [47], these registry data will would have been performed on loss cases. The relatively low be importantin directing public health policy decisions. rateofobservedpregnancylossesmay,therefore,beconsidered Although the modest numbers ofenrolleesintheSmallpox a reassuringfinding within the registry. VaccineinPregnancyRegistrydonotallowfordefinitivecon- Itremainsimportanttoconsiderlosses,andalladverseout- clusions about many important outcomes, such as fetal vac- comes,inrelationtothetimingofexposureinpregnancy.Given S224 • CID 2008:46 (Suppl3) • Ryanetal. that fetal development is so dynamic, there are some periods such as spontaneous abortion can vary greatly, dependingon of pregnancy that represent more vulnerabletimesforcertain the method of ascertainment[36]. adverse outcomes. For this reason, the timing of maternal The Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry continues to smallpox vaccination was explored in relation to pregnancy activelyenrollandfollowupwithwomenwhohavebeenvac- losses. There were no statistically significant associations be- cinatedinpregnancy,aswellastofollowtheirchildren’shealth tween timing of exposure and the pregnancy outcomes ex- outcomes.Mostvaccinationsarenowoccurringamongmilitary amined. However, the small number of cases in which vacci- personnel, although small numbers of civilians may continue nation occurred later than 4 weeks EGA limited such toreceivesmallpoxvaccineforpublichealthpreparedness.The firstinfantsborntoregistryparticipantsreached3yearsofage interpretations. Follow-up of the registry will continue toad- in 2006. Registry professionals have collected health and de- dress the issue of exposure timing. velopmentalinformationaboutthesechildrenatleastannually Birth outcomes are other important metrics for evaluating so that, in the future, even more challenging questionsabout potential hazardous exposures in pregnancy. In the Smallpox the long-term effects of smallpox vaccination in pregnancy Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry, the expected rates of all out- might be explored. comes examined fell within the 95% CIs of observed rates, includingmeasuresoflowbirthweightandpretermbirth.The SMALLPOX VACCINE IN PREGNANCY proportion of registry infants who were male was within the REGISTRY TEAM expected range, and this may also be considered a reassuring finding, because a reduced proportion of male infant births From the US Department of Defense: Ava Conlin, Brianna may reflect occult hazardous exposures in a population [49]. Alexander, Rosha Aran-Loach, Katherine Campbell, Shirley Finally, adverse infant health outcomes are of unique im- Chow, Renata Engler, John Grabenstein, Gia Gumbs, Mary portance,becausetheyrepresentsomeofthemostvisibleand Minor, Peter Napolitano, Brian Pierce, Jessica Rubin, Cheryl costly negative reproductive health outcomes. The absence of Rudy-Goodness, Tyler Smith, Kathy Snell, Christina Spooner, cases of fetal vaccinia in the Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Victor Stiegman,Jennifer Strickler,and JeannetteWilliams. Registrytodateisnotunexpected,giventhelowestimatedrisk From the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: for fetal vaccinia. Although 7 infants with birth defects were MariaCano,SandraS.Chaves,SonjaS.Hutchins,KristinKen- yan, Sheryl B. Lyss, and Joseph Mulinare. identified,theratesanddistributionofthesebirthdefectswere notoutsideofexpectedranges[46].The2casesofSIDS,how- Acknowledgments ever, were unexpected occurrenceswithinthissmallcohortof infants. Given the uncertain etiology of most SIDS cases and We gratefullyacknowledgethesupportofalloftheprofessionalswho the uncertain effects of maternal smallpox vaccination, these havecontributedtotheSmallpoxVaccineinPregnancyRegistry,especially thewomenandfamilieswhosharetheirhealthinformationwiththereg- cases may illustrate the important value of the registry’s co- istry.Wealsogreatlyappreciatetheassistanceofthefollowingstafffrom ordinationofvacciniatestinginhelpingtoevaluateanunusual theCentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention:LouisaChapman,Riduan association. Joesef,SusanGoldstein,KarenBroder,IngerDamon,RussellRegnery,and SherifZaki;professionalsfromtheUSDepartmentofDefenseCenterfor The following limitationsshouldbeconsideredwheninter- Deployment Health Research; the US Department of Defense Vaccine pretingthesedata.First,themajorityofwomenwerevaccinated HealthcareCentersNetwork;theMilitaryVaccineAgency;andtheHenry M.JacksonFoundationfortheAdvancementofMilitaryMedicine. early in pregnancy, before 4 weeks EGA. This period of preg- Financialsupport. TheworkreportedherewassupportedbytheUS nancyincludesweeksbeforetheembryoimplants;thus,trans- Department of Defense and the US Department of Health and Human mission of vaccinia virus from mother to embryo would be Services.ThisresearchwasperformedunderNavalHealthResearchCenter institutionalreviewboard–approvedprotocol2003.0018,underworkunit unlikely.Smallnumbersofcaseslimitedourabilitytoexamine 60504. possibleeffectsofsmallpoxvaccineexposurelaterinpregnancy, Supplementsponsorship. Thisarticlewaspublishedaspartofasup- when maternal viremia may be more likely to resultintrans- plement entitled “Posteradication Vaccination against Smallpox,” spon- soredbytheNationalCenterforImmunizationandRespiratoryDiseases, missionacrosstheplacentaandwhenoutcomesmayalsodiffer. CoordinatingCenterforInfectiousDiseases,CentersforDiseaseControl We could not determine the capture rate of all eligible cases andPrevention(CDC),andbytheCoordinatingOfficeforTerrorismPre- fortheregistry.Therateofcaptureofmilitarycases,however, ventionandEmergencyResponse,CDC. Potentialconflictsofinterest. M.A.K.R.andJ.F.S.:noconflicts. isbeingevaluatedthroughaseparateeffort,outsideofthescope of this report. There are limitations to relying on prior References publications and subject matter experts when defining “ex- pectedrates” ofpregnancy,birth,andinfanthealthoutcomes. 1. USDepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.Declarationregarding administrationofsmallpoxcountermeasures.Billingcode4150–24.24 Wecould notassess theextenttowhichourstudypopulation Jan2003. differed from those of other studies, and rates of outcomes 2. FennerF,HendersonDA,AritaI,JezekZ,LadnyiID.Smallpoxand SmallpoxVaccinationinPregnancy • CID 2008:46 (Suppl3) • S225 itseradication.Historyofinternationalhealth,vol.6.Geneva:World SmallpoxVaccineinPregnancyRegistry.MMWRMorbMortalWkly HealthOrganization,1988. Rep2003;52:256. 3. RotzLD,DotsonDA,DamonIK,BecherJA,AdvisoryCommitteeon 28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Women with smallpox Immunization Practices. Vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine recommenda- vaccineexposureduringpregnancyreportedtotheNationalSmallpox tionsoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonImmunizationPractices(ACIP). Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry—United States, 2003. MMWR Morb MMWRRecommRep2001;50(RR-10):1–25. MortalWklyRep2003;52:386–8. 4. ConoJ,CaseyCG,BellDM,CentersforDiseaseControlandPreven- 29. USDepartmentofDefenseMilitaryVaccineAgency.Smallpoxvacci- tion.Smallpoxvaccinationandadversereactions:guidanceforclini- nation program: pregnancy considerations. Available at: http://www cians.MMWRRecommRep2003;52(RR-4):1–28. .smallpox.mil/event/pregnancy.asp.Accessed22January2008. 5. Lynch FW. Dermatologicconditionsofthefetuswithparticularref- 30. SingletonJA,LloydJC,MootreyGT,SaliveME,ChenRT.Anoverview erencetovariolaandvaccinia.ArchDermSyphilol1932;26:997–1019. of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as a sur- 6. Levine MM, Edsall G, Bruce-Chwatt LJ. Live-virus vaccine in preg- veillancesystem.VAERSWorkingGroup.Vaccine1999;17:2908–17. nancy:risksandrecommendations.Lancet1974;2:34–8. 31. NapolitanoPG,RyanMA,GrabensteinJD.Pregnancydiscoveredafter 7. Hood CK, McKinnon GE. Prenatal vaccinia. Am J Obstet Gynecol smallpoxvaccination:isvacciniaimmuneglobulinappropriate?AmJ 1963;85:238–40. ObstetGynecol2004;191:1863–7. 8. Suarez VR, Hankins GD. Smallpox and pregnancy: from eradicated 32. PienBC,SaahJR,MillerSE,WoodsCW.Useofsentinellaboratories diseasetobioterroristthreat.ObstetGynecol2002;100:87–93. by clinicians to evaluate potential bioterrorism and emerginginfec- 9. LaneJM,MillarJD,NeffJM.Smallpoxandsmallpoxvaccinationpolicy. tions.ClinInfectDis2006;42:1311–24. AnnRevMed1971;22:251–72. 33. AgrestiA.Categoricaldataanalysis,2nded.Hoboken,NJ:JohnWiley 10. WeilengaG,vanTongerenHA,FergusonAH,vanFijeselTG.Prenatal &Sons;2002. infectionwithvacciniavirus.Lancet1961;1:258–60. 34. ZaneSB,KiekeBAJr,KendrickJS,BruceC.Surveillanceinatimeof changinghealthcarepractices:estimatingectopicpregnancyincidence 11. Green DM, ReidSM,RhaneyK.Generalizedvacciniainthehuman intheUnitedStates.MaternChildHealthJ2002;6:227–36. foetus.Lancet1966;1:1296. 35. Strauss LT, Herndon J, Chang J, Parker WY, Bowens SV, Berg CJ. 12. GreenbergM,YankauerA,KrugmanS,OsbornJJ,WardRS,Dancis Abortion surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR SurveillSumm J. Effect of smallpox vaccination duringpregnancyontheincidence 2005;54:1–31. ofcongenitalmalformations.Pediatrics1949;3:456–67. 36. WilcoxAJ,WeinbergCR,O’ConnorJF,etal.Incidenceofearlyloss 13. MacArthur P. Congenital vaccinia and vaccinia gravidarum. Lancet ofpregnancy.NEnglJMed1988;319:189–94. 1952;12:1104–6. 37. VenturaSJ,HamiltonBE,SuttonPD.Revisedbirthandfertilityrates 14. BieniarzJ,DabrowskiZ.Effectofsmallpoxvaccinationinpregnancy. for the United States, 2000 and 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003;51: PolTygLek1956;11:2183–8. 1–18. 15. EngstromL.Smallpoxvaccinationduringpregnancy.ActaMedScand 38. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Suppl1966;464:139–46. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based registerlinkagestudy. 16. SaxenL,CantellK,HakamaM.Relationbetweensmallpoxvaccination BMJ2000;320:1708–12. and outcome of pregnancy. Am J Public Health Nations Health 39. SaraiyaM,BergCJ,ShulmanH,GreenCA,AtrashHK.Estimatesof 1968;58:1910–21. theannualnumberofclinicallyrecognizedpregnanciesintheUnited 17. LuisiM.Smallpoxvaccinationandpregnancy.AmJObstetGynecol States,1981–1991.AmJEpidemiol1999;149:1025–9. 1977;128:700. 40. HammersloughCR.Estimatingtheprobabilityofspontaneousabor- 18. Naderi S. Smallpox vaccination during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol tioninthepresenceofinducedabortionandviceversa.PublicHealth 1975;46:223–6. Rep1992;107:269–77. 19. Harley JD, Gillespie AM. A complicated case ofcongenitalvaccinia. 41. AnanthC,AnanthCV,LiuS,KinzlerWL,KramerMS.Stillbirthsin Pediatrics1972;50:150. theUnitedStates,1981–2000:anage,period,andcohortanalysis.Am 20. HanshawJB,DudgeonJA.Evidencefortheviraletiologyofcongenital JPublicHealth2005;95:2213–7. defects.MajorProblClinPediatr1978;17:10–6. 42. MartinJA,HamiltonBE,SuttonPD,VenturaSJ,MenackerF,Munson 21. ApuzzioJ,GaneshV,IffyL,Al-KhanA.Varicellavaccinationduring ML.Births:finaldatafor2003.NatlVitalStatRep2005;54(2):1–116. earlypregnancy:acauseofinuteromiliaryfetaltissuecalcifications 43. MathewsTJ,HamiltonBE.Trendanalysisofthesexratioofbirthin andhydrops?InfectDisObstetGynecol2002;10:159–60. theUnitedStates.NatlVitalStatRep2005;53(20):1–17. 22. YazbakFE,YazbakK.Livevirusvaccinationnearapregnancy:flawed 44. BeckwithJB.Definingthesuddeninfantdeathsyndrome.ArchPediatr policies,tragicresults.MedHypotheses2002;59:283–8. AdolescMed2003;157:286–90. 23. WhartonM,StrikasRA,HarpazR,etal.Recommendationsforusing 45. Byard RW, Krous HF. Sudden infant death syndrome:overviewand smallpox vaccine in a pre-event vaccination program.Supplemental update.PediatrDevPathol2003;6:112–27. recommendationsoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonImmunizationPrac- 46. NationalBirthDefectsPreventionNetwork.Birthdefectssurveillance tices(ACIP)andtheHealthcareInfectionControlPracticesAdvisory data from selected states, 1998–2002. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Committee(HICPAC).MMWRRecommRep2003;52(RR-7):1–16. Teratol2005;73:758–853. 24. WilcoxAJ,BairdDD,DunsonD,McChesneyR,WeinbergCR.Natural 47. Nishiura H. Smallpox during pregnancy and maternal outcomes. limitsofpregnancytestinginrelationtotheexpectedmenstrualperiod. EmergInfectDis2006;12:1119–21. JAMA2001;286:1759–61. 48. LawsonCC,GrajewskiB,DastonGP,etal.Workgroupreport:imple- 25. GrabensteinJD,WinkenwerderW.USmilitarysmallpoxvaccination mentinganationaloccupationalreproductiveresearchagenda—decade programexperience.JAMA2003;289:3278–82. oneandbeyond.EnvironHealthPerspect2006;114:435–41. 26. KennedyDL,UhlK,KwederSL.Pregnancyexposureregistries.Drug 49. Davis DL, Gottlieb MB, Stampnitzky JR. Reduced ratio of male to Saf2004;27:215–28. femalebirthsinseveralindustrialcountries:asentinelhealthindicator? 27. CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention.Noticetoreaders:National JAMA1998;279:1018–23. S226 • CID 2008:46 (Suppl3) • Ryanetal. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB Control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. Report Date (DD MM YY) T 2. Report Type 3. DATES COVERED (from - to) 17 10 06 New 2003-2006 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. Contract Number: Pregnancy, Birth, and Infant Health Outcomes from the National Smallpox 5b. Grant Number: Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry, 2003-2006 5c. Program Element: 6. AUTHORS 5d. Project Number: Margaret A. K. Ryan & Jane F. Seward for the Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy 5e. Task Number: Registry Team 5f. Work Unit Number: 60504 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Health Research Center P.O. Box 85122 San Diego, CA 92186-5122 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 8. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAMES(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Report No. 06-34 Commanding Officer Commander Naval Medical Research Center Navy Medical Support Command 503 Robert Grant Ave P O Box 240 10. Sponsor/Monitor's Acronyms(s) Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500 Jacksonville, FL 332212 0140 NMRC/NMSC 11. Sponsor/Monitor's Report Number(s) 12 DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Will be approved for public release with distribution unlimited AFTER accepted for publication and released from journal embargo period. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Published in: Clinical Infectrious Diseases, 2008,15(46), (Suppl 3) S22-16 14. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) Background: Little information is available to describe the risks of smallpox vaccine administered in pregnancy, with the exception of known, rare cases of fetal vaccinia. When the United States implemented a smallpox vaccination program in 2003, the Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry was established to better evaluate outcomes after the inadvertent vaccination of women in pregnancy. Methods: The Registry developed a modified Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System report to collect information from pregnant women after smallpox vaccination. Military healthcare providers were engaged to identify cases, since most smallpox vaccines were administered to military service members. Registry professionals actively follow all enrolled women through and after pregnancy. Results: As of September 2006, pregnancy outcome data were available from 376 women followed by the Registry. Most (77%) were vaccinated near the time of conception, before a standard pregnancy test would have been positive. Evaluations of outcomes to date have not revealed higher-than-expected rates of pregnancy loss (11.9%), preterm birth (10.7%), or birth defects (2.8%), when compared to healthy referent populations. No cases of fetal vaccinia have been identified. Conclusions: Close follow-up of women inadvertently vaccinated against smallpox during pregnancy, to date, has not revealed pregnancy, birth, or infant health problems attributable to smallpox vaccine exposure. The Smallpox Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry continues to actively enroll and follow women and infant and early childhood health outcomes. 15. SUBJECT TERMS smallpox vaccine, vaccinia, pregnancy, reproductive health 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES Commanding Officer a. REPORT b.ABSTRACT b. THIS PAGE UNCL 6 UNCL UNCL UNCL 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (INCLUDING AREA CODE) COMM/DSN: (619) 553-8429 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.