REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAG E Form Approved ) P1.101r1e oonr o 4oer -ns cotiection of in~crmatton ?s estimateo to a~erage i nour ner response. incIldinc the time for ;veyve inci instrumtors. searcn,1rm en stln: data sourle,. gatherin-e and maintaininga the data needed, and comcietinc: and revie-nir the Collemton of inflormation. Secwdco p~ments regardeda this Ourden estimate or any otner aspect of tims coi'ectvon Cýifn io Iatlon. ecluding suggestions 'or reducineCt hs ourder, to ANashrncton Headoun-ters Services. Director ate fr information Operations and Repocrts, 1215 jef-fersocn Davis H19r'nay. Suite 1204. Arlington. VA 22202-4302. and to tim 0+fi ce :if I'anagement and Sudetet. Paperwork Reduction Project (07C.4-0189), Washinotorn CýC2 0503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave -b-;l1k k 22.3 R EJPOaRnTu aDAryTE 1997 3. FRiEnPaOlR,DT ATYEPCE OARNDDDAECORD 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Shaped Actuators and Sensors for Local Control of F49620-93-1--0537 Intelligent Structures 6. AUTHOR(S) Amy Jean McCain Edward F. Crawley AFOSR-TR-97 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Q Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics MIT -- ' Cambridge, MA 02139 ~9. A10. SPONSORING; MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) SPONSORING/ MONITORING AFOSR*~AIAGENCY REPORT NUM BER 110 Duncan Avenue, Suite B115 I\ 1 Bolling AFB, DC -220332-8080 1.SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION! AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTiON CODE Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited '.ABSRACT The properties of the actuator to sensor transfer functions for various shaped strain actuator- cj=ýsensor pairs on a Bernoulli-Euler beam are investigated. Analytical expressions for these transfer Ci functions and their associated dereverberated transfer functions are derived. It is shown that the actuator-sensor pair can be designed such that its derevercerated transfer function will have a desirable corner frequency and high frequency rolloff rate. The analytical and dereverberated transfer functions of noncollocated actuator-sensor pairs are compared to those of the collocated pairs. C~) Finite element models are constructed which add damping, finite actuator thickness, and finite beam and actuator widths to the model. The actuator to sensor transfer functions are calculated to (37) these models, and the effects of the added factors are determined. It is shown that the transfer bending modes of the three dimensional beam delay the rolloff of the actuator to sensor frequency transfer function by at least two decades. Finally, experimental data confirms the results of the three dimensional finite element model. 4. SUBJECT TERMS 115. NiU .13E RA PAGES Actuators, collocated pairs, finite element model, rolloffIII characteristics, Shaped actuators, sensors, transfer functions 16."PFCE CODE 1 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATI-ON OF ABSTRACT Unclaasified Unclassified Unclasifie %S%' 7540-01-280-5500 Stardard Porm 298 (Rev 2-89) S'in Z;93* Shaped Actuators and gensors for Local Control of Intelligent Structures Amy Jean McCain Edward F. Crawley Abstract The properties of the actuator to sensor transfer functions for various shaped strain actuator-sensor pairs on a Bernoulli-Euler beam are investigated. Analytical expres- sions for these transfer functions and their associated dereverberated transfer func- tions are derived. It is shown that the actuator-sensor pair can be designed such that its dereverberated transfer function will have a desirable corner frequency and high frequency rolloff rate. The analytical and dereverberated transfer functions of noncollocated actuator- sensor pairs are compared to those of the collocated pairs. General rules are found which determine the frequency at which the transfer function no longer has an inter- laced pole-zero pattern. Finite element models are constructed which add damping, finite actuator thick- ness, and finite beam and actuator widths to the model. The actuator to sensor transfer functions are calculated for these models, and the effects of the added factors are determined. It is shown that the transverse bending modes of the three dimen- sional beam delay the rolloff of the actuator to sensor frequency transfer function by at least two decades. Finally, experimental data confirms the results of the three dimensional finite element model. 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 15 2 Analytical Models for Collocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs 19 2.1 Modelling of Point and Shaped Actuators and Sensors ......... ... 19 2.2 Wave Solution for Simple Transfer Functions ................... 25 2.2.1 Point Actuator and Sensor .......................... 26 2.2.2 Moment Actuator and Slope Sensor ................... 30 2.2.3 Rectangular Actuator and Sensor ...................... 32 2.2.4 Triangular Actuator and Sensor ...................... 34 2.3 Asymptotic Solution for Point and Shaped Actuator-Sensor Pairs 35 . 2.3.1 Methodology ........ ........................... 35 2.3.2 Correlation of Asymptotes using Modal Residue Solution ........ .............................. 48 2.3.3 Asymptotes for Various End Conditions ................. 52 2.4 Discussion ......... ................................. 54 3 Analytical Models for Noncollocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs 57 3.1 Wave Solution for Simple Transfer Functions ................... 57 3.1.1 Point Actuator and Sensor .......................... 58 3.1.2 Transfer Function Relationship to a Pinned Boundary Condition 60 3.1.3 Moment Actuator and Slope Sensor .................... 63 3.2 Noncollocated Point Actuator-Sensor Pairs .................... 66 3.3 Noncollocated Shaped Actuator-Sensor Pairs ................... 71 3.3.1 Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs ..... ............... 72 3.3.2 Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs ...... ................ 75 7 8 Contents 3.4 Discussion ......... ................................. 82 4 Collocated Shaped Actuator-Sensor Pairs in Realistic Geometries 85 4.1 Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair .......................... 85 4.1.1 Analytical Wave Model ............................. 86 4.1.2 Finite Element Models Using 2-D Beam Elements .......... 87 4.1.3 Finite Element Model Using 3D Brick Elements ........... 93 4.2 Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair ........................... 96 4.2.1 Analytical Wave Model ............................. 96 4.2.2 Two-Dimensional Finite Element Models ................. 98 4.2.3 Three-Dimensional Finite Element Models ............... 102 4.2.4 Experimental Results ............................. 106 4.3 Discussion ........ ................................. 107 5 Conclusions 111 5.1 Analytical Models for Collocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs .......... 111 5.2 Analytical Models for Noncollocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs ...... .. 112 5.3 2D and 3D Solutions for Collocated Shaped Actuator-Sensor Pairs 115 References 117 A Transfer Functions for Collocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs 121 A.1 Transfer Functions for Point Actuator-Sensor Pairs .............. 121 A.2 Transfer Functions for Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs ....... .. 123 A.3 Transfer Functions for Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs .......... 125 A.4 Transfer Function for Quadratic Actuator-Sensor Pair ............ 127 A.5 Cubic Actuator to Sensor Transfer Function ................... 128 List of Figures 2.1 Spatial Shapes of Distributed Actuators and Sensors: (a) Rectangular, (b) Triangular, (c) Quadratic, (d) Cubic ...... ................ 20 2.2 Applied Forces and Moments Modelling Distributed Actuators: (a) Rectangular, (b) Triangular, (c) Quadratic, (d) Cubic ............ 22 2.3 Displacement and Slope Measurements Modelling Distributed Sensors: (a) Rectangular, (b) Triangular, (c) Quadratic, (d) Cubic .......... 23 2.4 Point Actuator-Sensor Pairs on (a) Infinite, (b) Semi-infinite (c) Finite Beam .......... ................................... 27 2.5 Infinite Beam Broken into Two Beams at the Point of Actuation . . 27 2.6 Moment Actuator and Slope Sensor on (a) Infinite, (b) Semi-infinite, (c) Finite beam ........ .............................. 31 2.7 Infinite Beams with (a) Rectangular and (b) Triangular Actuator- Sensor Pairs ......... ............................... 33 2.8 Pinned-Pinned Beam with Point Actuator-Sensor Pair ............ 36 2.9 Transfer Function for Point Actuator-Sensor Pair Centered on a Pinned- Pinned Beam ........ .............................. .38 2.10 Pinned-Pinned Beams with Collocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs (a) Rect- angular (b) Triangular ........ .......................... 40 2.11 Transfer Function for Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned- Pinned Beam, l1 = 6.67%1 ....... ........................ 41. 2.12 Transfer Function for Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned- Pinned Beam, 1, = 6.67%1 . .............................. 42 2.13 Pinned-Pinned Beams with Collocated Actuator-Sensor Pairs (a) Quadratic (b) Cubic ........ ....................... .. 43 2.14 Transfer Function for Quadratic Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned- Pinned Beam ......... ............................... 45 2.15 Transfer Function for Cubic Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned-Pinned Beam .......... ................................... 47 9 10 List of Figures 2.16 Modal Residue Solution vs. Dereverberated Wave Model for a Point Actuator-Sensor Pair Centered on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ......... 49 2.17 Modal Residue Solution and Dereverberated Wave Solution where la = 6.67%1 on Pinned-Pinned Beam (a) Rectangular (b) Triangular . . . 50 2.18 Modal Residue Solution and Dereverberated Wave Solution where l1 = 6.67%1 on Pinned-Pinned Beam (a) Quadratic (b) Cubic .......... 51 3.1 Noncollocated Point Actuator-Sensor Pairs on (a) Infinite, (b) Semi- infinite, (c) Finite beam ........ ......................... 58 3.2 Free-Free Beams with (a) Collocated, (b) Noncollocated Point Actuator- Sensor Pairs .......... ............................... 61 3.3 Noncollocated Moment Actuator and Slope Sensor on (a) Infinite, (b) Semi-infinite, (c) Finite beam ....... .................... 64 3.4 Noncollocated Point Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned-Pinned Beam 66 3.5 Transfer Functions for Collocated and Noncollocated Point Actuator- Sensor Pairs on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ...... ................ 69 3.6 Pinned-Pinned Modeshapes for Beam of Length l = 1 (a) 15th Mode and (b) 17th Mode ........ ............................ 70 3.7 Analytical and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Noncollocated Point Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ......... ... 71 3.8 Noncollocated Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair (a) Sensor Shorter than Actuator (b) Sensor Longer than Actuator ................. 72 3.9 Analytical and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Noncollocated Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned-Pinned Beam; l, = 0.51, .(cid:127)= 0.051 ......... ................................. 74 3.10 Pole-Zero Spacing for Rectangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Func- tions; l = 0.2 ......... ............................... 75 3.11 Pole-Zero Spacing for Rectangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Func- tions; l1 = 0.4 ......... ............................... 76 3.12 Noncollocated Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair (a) Sensor Shorter than Actuator (b) Sensor Longer than Actuator .................... 76 List of Figures 11 3.13 Analytical and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Noncollocated Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ........ 78 3.14 Pole-Zero Spacing for Triangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Func- tions; 1a = 0.2 ......... ............................... 79 3.15 Collocated and Noncollocated Transfer Function for Triangular Actuator- Sensor Pair on Pinned-Pinned Beam ......................... 80 3.16 Function for Triangular Sensor and Actuator Output ............. 81 4.1 Cantilevered Steel Beam with Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair of Zero Thickness ......... .............................. 86 4.2 Analytical and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Rectangular Actuator- Sensor Pair on Cantilevered Beam ...... ................... 87 4.3 Transfer Functions for Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair on Cantilevered Beam: Analytical with No Damping, and 2D FE Model with 1% Modal Damping ......... ................................. 89 4.4 Dereverberated Rectangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Functions for 2D FE Model of Cantilevered Beam with 1% Damping and Analytical Model ......... ................................... 90 4.5 Cantilevered Steel Beam with Finite Thickness of Rectangular Actua- tor .......... ..................................... 90 4.6 Transfer Functions for FE Model with Zero Rectangular Actuator Thick- ness and with Rectangular Actuator Thickness of 7.5 mil on a Can- tilevered Beam ......... .............................. 91 4.7 Analytical Asymptotes and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Vary- ing Rectangular Actuator Thickness on Cantilever Beam: 0 mil, 7.5 mil, 15 ril ......... ................................... 92 4.8 Finite Element Mesh of the Top View of Cantilevered, Steel Beam with Rectangular Actuator ........ .......................... 93 4.9 Rectangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Functions for 2D FE Model with Finite Actuator Thickness and for 3D FE Model ............ 94 4.10 Three-Dimensional Modeshapes near 16000 Hz of Cantilever Beam with Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair ...................... 95 12 List of Figures 4.11 Cantilevered Steel Beam with Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair of Zero Thickness ......... ................................. 97 4.12 Analytical and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Triangular Actuator- Sensor Pair on a Cantilevered Beam with Realistic Geometry . . . . 97 4.13 Transfer Functions for Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair on Cantilevered Beam: Analytical with No Damping, and 2D FE Model with 1% Damp- ing .......... ..................................... 99 4.14 Dereverberated Triangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Functions for 2D FE Model with 1% Damping and Analytical Model ........... 100 4.15 Cantilevered Steel Beam with Finite Thickness of Rectangular Actua- tor ......... ..................................... 100 4.16 Transfer Functions for FE Model with Zero Triangular Actuator Thick- ness and with Triangular Actuator Thickness of 7.5 mil ... ....... 101 4.17 Analytical Asymptotes and Dereverberated Transfer Functions for Vary- ing Actuator Thickness on a Cantilever Beam: 0 mil, 7.5 mil, 15 mil 102 4.18 Top and End View of Three-Dimensional Steel Beam with Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs ........ .......................... 102 4.19 Three-Dimensional Perspective of Steel Beam with Triangular Actuator- Sensor Pairs .......... ............................... 103 4.20 Triangular Actuator to Sensor Transfer Functions for 2D FE Model with Finite Actuator Thickness and for 3D FE Model ............ 104 4.21 Modeshapes of Cantilever Beam with Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair Showing First and Third Mode Transverse Bending ............. 105 4.22 Experimental Transfer Function and FE Model Transfer Function . . 106 4.23 Transfer Function for FE Model of Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pair with d is Active and Inactive ....... ..................... 108 32 4.24 Transfer Function for FE Model of Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pair with d is Active and Inactive ...... ..................... 109 32 List of Tables 2.1 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for Point Actuator-Sensor Pair at Different Locations on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ............... 38 2.2 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for a Pinned-Pinned Beam 53 2.3 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for a Cantilevered Beam 53 . 2.4 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for a Free-Free Beam ........ 53 3.1 Values of k for Poles of Beams with Pinned Boundaries and Zeros of Noncollocated Point Actuator-Sensor Transfer Function ........... 63 3.2 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for Different Placement of Point Actuator and Noncollocated Point Sensor; x, Is Positive ........... 68 3.3 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for Different Placement of Point Actuator and Noncollocated Point Sensor; zx Is Negative .......... 68 3.4 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for Noncollocated Rectangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ............... 72 3.5 Low and High Frequency Asymptotes for Noncollocated Triangular Actuator-Sensor Pairs on a Pinned-Pinned Beam ............... 77 13 Chapter 1 Introduction Modern controlled structures are being designed for high performance, precise appli- cations requiring pointing accuracy and vibration suppression. These specifications typically require control systems, which often include many sensors and actuators, to meet these performance objectives. Aubrun [3], and Hall, et al. [12] have discussed the use of hierarchic control in flexible structures. This included a global control loop, which is a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system, whose transfer function includes the overall perfor- mance objective. The information in the global control loop is obtained from several single input, single output (SISO) local control loops. It is generally true that if damping can be added to the local control loop, the robustness of the global control loop will be improved. This work focuses on the design of the strain actuator to strain sensor transfer function of the local control loop. Collocated and dual actuator-sensor pairs will produce a transfer function with an alternating pole-zero pattern and no associated phase loss. Damping can always be added to the plant transfer function with rate feedback. If rate feedback or any positive real compensator is used on the transfer function of a collocated and dual actuator-sensor pair, stability is guaranteed [5]. 15