Drug Misuse prelim:Layout 1 05/10/2007 16:27 Page 1 Drug misuse and dependence UK guidelines on clinical management Recommended citation Department of Health (England) and the devolved administrations (2007). Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK Guidelines on Clinical Management. London: Department of Health (England), the Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland Executive Produced by the Department of Health (England), the Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland Executive. Last updated September 2007 (NHS England Gateway reference: 8828). The text of this document may be reproduced without formal permission or charge for personal or in-house use. If your require further copies of this book, contact DH Publications Orderline / Prolog, quoting reference UKCG07. Email: [email protected] Tel: 08701 555 455 Fax: 01623 724 524 Textphone: 08700 102 870 (8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday). Copies are available in electronic form at www.dh.gov.uk/publications and from the National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse at www.nta.nhs.uk/publications Contents CONTENTS CHAPTER 4: PSYCHOSOCIAL COMPONENTS OF TREATMENT...............35 4.1 Key points...........................................35 WORKING GROUP MEMBERS 4.2 Principles of psychosocial AND OTHER CONTRIBUTORS....................5 interventions.......................................35 Members of the working group.......................5 4.3 Psychosocial interventions – User and carer representatives.........................5 evidence and models...........................37 Observers........................................................6 4.4 Psychosocial interventions and Secretariat.......................................................6 different drugs of misuse ...................40 Reviews...........................................................6 4.5 Competencies to deliver Other contributors...........................................6 psychosocial interventions...................40 4.6 NICE guideline on psychosocial FOREWORD.................................................7 interventions.......................................41 Who are the Clinical Guidelines for?................7 4.7 References..........................................42 What are the 2007 Clinical Guidelines?...........7 Why update the Clinical Guidelines?...............7 CHAPTER 5: PHARMACOLOGICAL NICE and the 2007 Clinical Guidelines.............7 INTERVENTIONS.......................................43 The status of the Clinical Guidelines................8 5.1 Key points...........................................43 Regulation and inspection...............................8 5.2 Prescribing..........................................43 The process for developing the 5.3 Induction onto methadone and 2007 Clinical Guidelines..................................9 buprenorphine treatment....................45 References....................................................10 5.4 Supervised consumption.....................50 5.5 Assessing and responding to CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION...................11 progress and failure to benefit............52 1.1 Key points...........................................11 5.6 Opioid maintenance prescribing..........54 1.2 Drug treatment is effective .................11 5.7 Opioid detoxification...........................57 1.3 Drug misuse and drug treatment.........12 5.8 Naltrexone for relapse prevention........59 1.4 The impact of drug misuse 5.9 Benzodiazepines.................................60 on families and communities...............13 5.10 Stimulants ..........................................61 1.5 Models of drug treatment...................13 5.11 References..........................................62 1.6 References..........................................14 CHAPTER 6: HEALTH CHAPTER 2: CLINICAL GOVERNANCE.....17 CONSIDERATIONS....................................65 2.1 Key points...........................................17 6.1 Key points...........................................65 2.2 Principles of clinical governance..........17 6.2 Blood-borne infections........................65 2.3 Doctors’ training.................................19 6.3 Preventing drug-related deaths...........71 2.4 Non-medical prescribing......................19 6.4 Alcohol...............................................72 2.5 Confidentiality, information 6.5 Tobacco..............................................73 sharing and child protection................21 6.6 References..........................................74 2.6 Involving patients................................23 2.7 Involving carers...................................23 CHAPTER 7: SPECIFIC TREATMENT 2.8 References..........................................23 SITUATIONS AND POPULATIONS............75 7.1 Key points...........................................75 CHAPTER 3: ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS 7.2 Criminal justice...................................75 OF TREATMENT PROVISION....................25 7.3 Prisons................................................77 3.1 Key points...........................................25 7.4 Pregnancy and neonatal care..............80 3.2 Assessment, planning care and 7.5 Mental health.....................................83 treatment............................................25 7.6 Young people.....................................85 3.3 Delivery of treatment..........................28 7.7 Older current and ex-drug 3.4 Drug testing........................................29 misusers..............................................89 3.5 General health assessment at 7.8 Pain management for drug presentation and in treatment.............31 misusers..............................................90 3.6 References..........................................33 7.9 Hospital admission and discharge .......91 7.10 References..........................................93 3 Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management ANNEXES..................................................97 A1 Doctors’ job titles and involvement in drug treatment................................97 A2 Cardiac assessment and monitoring for methadone prescribing..................98 A3 Writing prescriptions.........................100 A4 Travelling abroad with controlled drugs................................................108 A5 Interactions.......................................109 A6 Marketing authorisations..................111 A7 Drugs and driving..............................114 A8 Injectable opioid treatment...............116 A9 Policy considerations for under-18s.........................................119 A10 Useful documents.............................123 A11 Contacts...........................................125 GLOSSARY..............................................128 4 Working group WORKING GROUP Dr Brian Kidd MEMBERS AND OTHER Consultant psychiatrist, NHS Tayside Substance Misuse Services and Clinical senior lecturer in CONTRIBUTORS addiction psychiatry, University of Dundee Dr Judith Myles Members of the Clinical Guidelines Senior lecturer in addictions, St George’s on Drug Misuse and Dependence University of London, and consultant psychiatrist Update 2007 Working Group and clinical lead in addictions, South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust Professor John Strang (chair) Professor of the addictions. Director of the Dr Rossana Oretti National Addiction Centre, Institute of Consultant psychiatrist, Community Addiction Psychiatry. Honorary consultant psychiatrist and Unit, Cardiff and the Vale NHS Trust clinical director, addictions, South London and Dr Duncan Raistrick Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Consultant psychiatrist, Leeds Addiction Unit Jayne Bridge Dr Roy Robertson Nurse consultant, Drug and Alcohol Directorate, Edinburgh GP and reader, Division of Community Mersey Care NHS Trust Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Dr Dominic Connolly Neil Steventon(representing carers) Addiction psychiatrist, Community Addictions Assist 2000 Services, Tyrone and Fermanagh Hospital Heather Walker(representing Royal Dr Edward Day Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain) Senior clinical lecturer in addiction psychiatry, Chief pharmacist, North East London Mental Department of Psychiatry, University of Health Trust Birmingham Ian Wardle Dr Michael Farrell(representing Royal College Chief executive, Lifeline Projects of Psychiatrists) Consultant psychiatrist, South London and Dr Nat Wright Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, and reader in Clinical director for substance misuse, HMP addiction psychiatry, National Addiction Centre, Leeds, Leeds Primary Care Trust Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London Dr Deborah Zador Dr Clare Gerada(representing Royal College of Consultant physician in addictions, South General Practitioners) London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, General practitioner (London practice) and and visiting senior lecturer, National Addiction primary care lead for drug misuse Centre, Institute of Psychiatry Dr Eilish Gilvarry Conflicts of interests Consultant psychiatrist in addictions, Members of the working group registered any Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust potential conflicts of interests with the National Simon J Greasley(representing Association of Treatment Agency. Nurses in Substance Abuse) Clinical nurse specialist, The Kakoty Practice, User and carer representatives Barnsley Service user and carer representatives were Dr Linda Harris supported and advised by national groups of Clinical director, Wakefield Integrated Substance user and carer representatives respectively. Misuse Services Service user representatives John Howard(representing service users) Eliot Albert Reading User Forum (RUF) Sharyn Charlton Dr Jenny Keen Andy Cornish Clinical director, Primary Care Drug Misuse James Grieve Services, Derby Gary Sutton 5 Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management Carer representatives Misuse and South London and Maudsley NHS Patricia Boydell Foundation Trust Dot Inger Steve Taylor Linda Moore National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse Teresa Seymour Christine Tebano Reviews Jane White A series of reviews was commissioned by the NTA to advise the working group. In addition to Observers some obtained from members of the working Yael Bradbury-Birrell group, reviews were provided by: Standards and Fitness to Practise Directorate, Dr Neena Buntwal and Dr Sarah Welch General Medical Council Countywide Specialist Substance Misuse Service Annette Dale-Perera (Gloucestershire) National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse Dr James Bell Dr Nadine Harrison The Langton Centre, Surry Hills, Australia Primary and Community Care Directorate, the Dr Franjo Grotenhermen Scottish Government Nova-Institut, Hürth, Germany Sherife Hasan Sarah Larney, Benjamin Phillips, Effat Crime and Drug Strategy Directorate, Home Merghati Khoei, Bradley Mathers and Kate Office Dolan John Lenaghan National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Department for Social Justice and Local University of New South Wales, Sydney Government, Welsh Assembly Government Dr Soraya Mayet Rob Phipps and Ian McMaster National Addiction Centre, London Department of Health, Social Services and Public Dr Louise Sell Safety, Northern Ireland Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health NHS Dr Stephen Pilling Trust Substance Misuse Directorate National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Dr Kim Wolff National Institute for Health and Clinical King’s College London, National Addiction Excellence Centre, Institute of Psychiatry Dr Mary Piper and David Marteau Prison Health Policy Unit, Department of Health Other contributors Dr Mark Prunty The working group sought some specific expert Department of Health, England advice from beyond its membership and asked some of these experts to help draft or revise Deborah Smith sections of the Clinical Guidelines. Experts Public Health and Wellbeing Directorate, the included: Scottish Government Dr Andrew Marsh and Richard Evers Marion Walker Toxicology Unit, Kings College Hospital, London National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse and Berkshire Healthcare NHS Professor Graham Foster Foundation Trust Centre for Gastroenterology, Queen Mary, University of London Dr Sarah Watkins Department for Public Health and Health The working group would also like to thank the Professions, Welsh Assembly Government many people who responded during the consultation on the draft update to the Clinical Secretariat Guidelines, and the many others who Dr Emily Finch contributed informally during the development National Treatment Agency for Substance of the 2007 Clinical Guidelines. 6 Foreword FOREWORD (cid:1) changes in contractual arrangements for general practitioners who provide drug treatment. Who are the Clinical Guidelines for? Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK Guidelines on NICE and the 2007 Clinical Guidelines Clinical Management– hereafter referred to as In 2004, the National Institute for Health and the 2007 Clinical Guidelines – is intended for all Clinical Excellence (NICE) was charged with clinicians, especially those providing developing a suite of guidelines and technology pharmacological interventions for drug misusers appraisals on various aspects of the treatment as a component of drug misuse treatment. and care of drug misusers. The 2007 Clinical Guidelines were developed concurrently with the What are the 2007 NICE suite of guidance on drug misuse Clinical Guidelines? treatment and NICE had observer status on the This document updates and replaces Drug working group. Misuse and Dependence – Guidelines on Clinical NICE published technology appraisals in January Management (UK health departments 1999) – 2007 on: hereafter referred to as the 1999 Clinical Guidelines. It has the same status across the UK (cid:1) methadone and buprenorphine maintenance as the 1999 Clinical Guidelines. (cid:1) naltrexone for relapse prevention. The 2007 Clinical Guidelines provide guidance NICE published its final clinical guidelines in July on the treatment of drug misuse in the UK. They 2007 on: are based on current evidence and professional consensus on how to provide drug treatment for (cid:1) opioid detoxification the majority of patients, in most instances. (cid:1) psychosocial interventions for drug misuse. The 2007 Clinical Guidelines do not provide rigid NICE also produced public health guidance on protocols on how clinicians must provide drug community-based interventions to reduce treatment for all drug misusers. Neither does this substance misuse among vulnerable and guidance override the individual responsibility of disadvantaged children and young people (NICE, clinicians to make appropriate decisions in the 2007). circumstances of the individual patient, in The working group considered NICE clinical consultation with the patient (and guardians and guidelines and technology appraisals in drafting carers if appropriate). In instances where the 2007 Clinical Guidelines. The working group clinicians operate outside the framework of this interpreted and incorporated the NICE suite of guidance, they should be able to demonstrate guidance as appropriate, but the 2007 Clinical the rationale for their decisions. Guidelines cover the management and Why update the Clinical Guidelines? treatment of drug misusers in a more wide- ranging manner. These Clinical Guidelines and UK guidelines for the clinical management of NICE guidance should be taken together with drug misuse were last revised in 1999. Since other key documents to provide a then there have been substantial developments comprehensive picture of current clinical in the evidence for drug treatment and clinical guidelines on the treatment of drug misuse. practice. These include: It is important to note the different status of (cid:1) greater recognition of and investment in the NICE in England and Wales, Northern Ireland importance of drug treatment and a massive and Scotland. expansion in the numbers receiving treatment in the UK In England and Wales health professionals (and their organisations) are expected to take NICE (cid:1) an expanded evidence-base and resulting guidance on health technologies and on clinical policy and practice guidance practice fully into account when exercising their (cid:1) consensus on doctor competencies in clinical judgement. NICE guidance on public substance misuse treatment (RCPsych and RCGP, health covers England only. In relation to the 2005) main types of guidance relating to drug misuse, 7 Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management Table 1 lists what NHS organisations are The status of the Clinical Guidelines expected to do. The 2007 Clinical Guidelines replace the NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) previous 1999 Clinical Guidelines. They have no provides advice to NHSScotland on the suitability specific statutory status. However, any clinician for Scotland of NICE advice and the status of not fulfilling the standards and quality of care in NICE advice in Scotland varies according to the appropriate treatment of drug misusers as product type. For NHS QIS-validated NICE set out in these guidelines will have this taken multiple technology appraisals, NHSScotland will into account if, for any reason, their take account of the advice and evidence from performance in this clinical area is assessed. NHS QIS and ensure that recommended medicines and treatment are made available to The General Medical Council states (GMC, meet clinical need. This status applies to the 2006): NICE multiple technology appraisals on (cid:1) You should be familiar with relevant methadone and buprenorphine, and naltrexone. guidelines and developments that affect your NICE single technology appraisals and clinical work. guidelines currently have no formal status in (cid:1) You must keep up to date with, and Scotland and are for information only in adhere to, the laws and codes of practice NHSScotland. relevant to your work. In Northern Ireland the Department for Health, (cid:1) You must provide effective treatments Social Services and Public Safety reviews NICE based on the best available evidence. guidance for its applicability to Health and Personal Social Services (HPSS) and decides There are separate, defined legal obligations in whether it should be endorsed for relation to the prescribing of controlled drugs implementation. NICE health technology which clinicians should act in accordance with. appraisals endorsed by the Department will be In addition, doctors need to ensure that they act treated as essential within the Quality Standards within Home Office licensing arrangements for for Health and Social Care. The NICE clinical the prescription of diamorphine, dipipanone or practice guidelines and public health guidance cocaine for the management of drug misuse. that have been endorsed will be regarded as standards that the HPSS are expected to achieve Regulation and inspection over time. As in England and Wales, it is In England, the Healthcare Commission (HC) is expected that endorsed NICE guidance will help the inspection body for NHS and independent health and social care professionals in their work health care. It uses national guidance in this but it does not override clinical responsibility for context: NICE guidance is used in the HC annual making decisions in specific circumstances. health check, its programmes of review, and in audit and assessment work. The joint HC and NTA Improvement Reviews of drug treatment also take into account NICE guidance and the Type of NICE Recommendations for NHS Clinical Guidelines when setting criteria and guidance organisations benchmarking local commissioning partnerships Clinical Review current management of and providers. guideline clinical conditions and consider the resources and time needed to Inspection and investigation of Welsh NHS implement the guideline bodies and private and voluntary provision rest with Healthcare Inspectorate Wales. Technology Fund and resource medicines and appraisal treatment recommended usually In Scotland, there are different organisational within three months of NICE arrangements for the governance of different issuing guideline NHS and independent services. NHS boards are Public health Review current practice and responsible and accountable for the quality of guideline consider the resources and time NHS services provided directly or secured by (England) needed to implement the guideline contract. Services in the independent healthcare sector required to register with the Scottish Table 1: Expectations of NHS organisations in England Commission for the Regulation of Care (‘the and Wales in relation to NICE guidance 8 Foreword Care Commission’) are regulated by it and are evidence-base for a range of drug misuse expected to provide care and treatment that treatment-related issues, including: prison drug reflects the relevant NHS QIS standards, and treatment; drugs and driving; injectable opioid reflects good practice based on relevant treatment; methadone and buprenorphine dose research-based studies, audit reports, standards, induction; drug testing and its use in practice; guidelines and evidence-based treatments. drug treatment for young people; treatment of substance misuse in pregnancy; cardiac The Regulation and Quality Improvement assessment and monitoring for methadone Authority (RQIA) is the independent health and prescribing. Reviewers were asked to provide social care regulatory body responsible for recommendations to be considered by the monitoring and inspecting the availability and working group and to rate both their quality of health and social care services recommendations and the evidence behind delivered by Health and Personal Social Services them in line with established systems. (HPSS) bodies and the independent sector in Northern Ireland. The working group also considered the key messages from NICE guidance and other The process for developing relevant research and guidance. The working the 2007 Clinical Guidelines group then, by a process of consensus, came to a view of the best available evidence from In 2006, the Department of Health (England) whatever source. The working group considered and the authorities of the devolved rating its recommendations and the evidence administrations tasked the National Treatment supporting them in line with common current Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA) with practice for guidelines. However, it decided supporting an independent working group to against this on the basis that the Clinical update Drug Misuse and Dependence – Guidelines have traditionally – and usefully – Guidelines on Clinical Management(UK health provided consensus opinion which draws departments, 1999). It was agreed that it would extensively on clinical experience as well as on still be sensible to issue a single set of guidelines published research. By doing this it is able to for the whole of the UK that would provide a make recommendations on important subjects skeleton framework of best practice from which beyond those with a substantial research the devolved administrations could develop their evidence base and in a way that is of practical own guidance on locally appropriate variations use to clinicians. The strength of the working in policy and practice. The terms of reference of group’s recommendations and its opinion on the the working group were to update the 1999 quality of the supporting evidence is indicated by Clinical Guidelines in 2007. judicious wording of the recommendation and The chair of the 1999 (and 1991) guidelines of the accompanying text. working group, Professor John Strang, was Members of the clinical guidelines working invited to again chair the group. The NTA group were fully involved in the consultation convened and provided a secretariat for the process, which was conducted by the NTA. All independent working group and separate user consultation responses were collated and fed and carer advisory groups. back to the group at regular intervals during the The working group included members who consultation period. The group was asked to brought a wide range of individual expertise, comment on key issues arising and their advice continuity with previous guidelines, and taken into account when redrafting the representation of key groups of stakeholders. document. A meeting of the working group was These included addiction psychiatrists, general held to discuss topics that were the focus of practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, service user most consultation comment, or where more and carer representatives. The service user and discussion or consensus was required. Issues carer representatives were supported by their amended or clarified as a result of the own advisory groups. Government departments, consultation process included child protection the NTA and others had observer status. and blood-borne infections. Greater emphasis has been put on child protection and clinicians’ Development of the updated guidelines began responsibilities to maximise opportunities to with the commissioning of a series of reviews to identify and prevent harm to both the children advise the working group on the current of drug-misusing parents and young drug 9 Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management misusers themselves. In relation to blood-borne infections, much greater detail on hepatitis C has been included and information has been added on bacterial infections that may be an increasing problem in drug misusers. The 1999 Clinical Guidelines noted that “there is currently, with some exceptions, a limited amount of rigorous reviews in this area”. Although the evidence base for drug misuse treatment has improved, the working group found that, in many areas of drug treatment, evidence was either lacking or was based on research from countries other than the UK. References GMC (2006) Good Medical Practice: Guidance for Doctors. London: General Medical Council. NICE (2007) Community-Based Interventions to Reduce Substance Misuse Among Vulnerable and Disadvantaged Children and Young People. Public Health Intervention Guidance 4. London: NICE. RCPsych and RCGP (2005) Roles and Responsibilities of Doctors in the Provision of Treatment for Drug and Alcohol Misusers. Council Report CR131. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists and Royal College of General Practitioners. UK health departments (1999) Drug Misuse and Dependence – Guidelines on Clinical Management. London: The Stationery Office. 10