DREAMS and DELUSIONS ALSO BY FRITZ STERN The Federal Republic of Germany and the United States: Changing Political, Social, and Economic Relations (co-editor), 1984 Gold and Iron: Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire, 1977 The Failure of Illiberalism: Essays on the Political Culture of Modem Germany, 1972 The Responsibility of Power: Essays in Honor of Hajo Holborn (edited with Leonard Krieger), 1968 The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology, 1974 The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present (editor), 1956, 1973 DREAMS and DELUSIONS The Drama of German History FRITZ STERN Yale University Press New Haven and London Published in 1987 by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Published in 198g by Random House, Ina, New York, and by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Published in 1999 by Yale University Press with a new preface. Copyright © 1987 by Fritz Stem. Preface copyright © 1999 by Fritz Stem. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustra tions, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Number. 98-83185 EBN 0-300-07622-3 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 987654321 To Felix Gilbert in affection and admiration CONTENTS Preface i x Introduction 3 I. THE DREAM OF PEACE 23 i. Einstein’s Germany 25 2. Fritz Haber: The Scientist in Power and in 51 Exile 3. Ernst Reuter: The Making of a Democratic 77 Socialist 4. The Burden of Success: Reflections on 9 7 German Jewry II. THE LURE OF POWER 115 5. Germany 1933: Fifty Years Later 119 6. National Socialism as Temptation 147 viii Contents III. PEACE AND THE RELEASE FROM I95 GREATNESS 7. Germany in a Semi-Gaullist Europe 197 8. Germany and the United States: Visions of 219 Declining Virtue IV. HISTORIANS AND THE GERMAN PAST 241 9. Americans and the German Past: A Century 245 of American Scholarship 10. Capitalism and the Cultural Historian 274 11. The Speech to the Bundestag, June 17, 1987 291 Notes 309 Acknowledgments 329 Index 331 PREFACE History erupts at times, when all at once or in quick succession the darns of custom break, streamlets coalesce, and great tides sweep forward, or when some dramatic surge brings forth a celebratory moment, an event that captures the spirit and reality of a world-historical upheaval. We call such times revolu tion. The drama of German history never included a successful revolution, such as has marked American history or British and French. But in 1989—a uniquely joyous year in our tormented cen tury—the Germans of the old East Germany, the German Demo cratic Republic (G.D.R.), staged such a revolution: successful, peaceful, and, it would seem, destined to be quickly forgotten. In a matter of weeks, the symbols and rulers of oppression through out Eastern Europe came tumbling down. On November 9, a fate ful date in German history for a number of reasons, the Berlin Wall was breached, and for a brief moment, at first encounter, Germans embraced Germans from either side of the Wall; then, on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day in West and East Berlin, Leonard Bernstein conducted a performance of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, with its triumphant concluding Ode to Joy, Schiller’s celebration of peace and fraternity. The revolution of 1989 occurred during the bicentennial of the great French Revolution, when, according to a long-held view, the democratic age first dawned; it was also 150 years after the failed revolutions of 1848, that short, glorious springtime of nations. Ger many’s day of unanticipated freedom was November 9: on that day in 1918, Germany’s imperial regime had been overthrown and a republic proclaimed, amidst the anguish of the nation’s defeat in the Great War; on that day in 1923, Hitler had attempted his first PREFACE X bid for power in the so-called Munich Beer Hall Putsch, a failure that nonetheless transformed him into a national figure; and on that day in 1938, the Nazis had unleashed their full violence against Jews, burning their synagogues, smashing their remaining ; property, herding male Jews into concentration camps. The1 ambiguous overtones of November 9 forbade the commemoration of a people’s peacefill victory on that same date: the very past that in some measure had emboldened East Germans to reach out for freedom made it impossible; it was a gratuitous coincidence that the burden of the past should fall on the day of jubilation. And yet how prophetic: that burden was to weigh on the new Germany to come. To explain the success of activist groups opposing the regime of the German Democratic Republic requires at least brief men tion of connected events that occurred all over Europe, indeed in the world. For once, German developments had the benefit of a propitious international context. The peoples of the so-called satellite countries of the Soviet Union had been in thrall to Soviet type regimes that increasingly took on native hues. Many adapted to this repression in passivity, many colluded, some stood out as dissidents, pitting their wits against the censors of the government, risking their lives against uniformed thugs. This of course had been true in the Soviet Union from its very beginning. The Com munist regimes at the periphery of the Soviet empire lacked legiti macy, even as they staged their great parades of Socialist promise. Then, in 1978, the election of a Polish pope emboldened the Poles, already the most restive of the peoples of the Eastern bloc. Yet the greatest upheaval occurred at the very center, in the Soviet Union itself, with the rise to power of Mikhail Gorbachev, who realized that the regime was mired in decrepitude and corruption and needed its aggiomamento, which he thought could be achieved through glasnost and perestroika, through the controlled opening of the Soviet economy and culture to needed change. In the end, Gorbachev the reformer became an unwilling revolutionary. He sought to manage both domestic reform and international détente; it was not, therefore, a time for Soviet tanks to crush satel lite deviations, as they had in 1956 and 1968. And so—to conclude in risible compression—by 1989 the Poles had negotiated a peace ful transition to a non-Communist regime; the Hungarian govern ment, which for some time had been liberal in this illiberal con