DR AMY McGRATH

272 Pages·2012·1.6 MB·English

A compendium of
the voices of others
compiled by
Dr Amy McGrath OAM PhD
Centenary Medal for Electoral Reform
(President H.S. Chapman Society)

Published by
Towerhouse Publications
2012
Previous publications:
Forging of Votes
Frauding of Votes
Corrupt Elections (H.S. Chapman Society papers)
Frauding of Elections
The Stolen Election 1987
Chains of Marxian Republics
For these and other works please refer to my website:
www.amymcgrath.com.au
Contact:
This book will be issued free of charge in the public interest.
If postage is involved, a donation for the cost will be welcome.
Apply to Tower House Publications:
PO Box 39, Brighton le Sands, Sydney NSW 2216.
Enquiries to Australia:
02 9599 7915
“The work of Dr. Amy McGrath has been a major catalyst for
electoral reform in Australia in modern times. As a regular
witness before parliamentary inquiries, and as a public advocate,
she has been the subject of both adoration and vilification.
The updating of her landmark book, The Frauding of Votes?
underlies growing national concern – and the necessity for
urgent reform.”
By Bob Bottom
Author of seven best-selling books
on organised crime and corruption.
Bob Bottom’s special preface for this book provides a definitive insight
into what he sees as the need for a royal commission not just into
the true extent of electoral fraud, but into the conduct
and effectiveness of electoral authorities.

INDEX
INtRODuCtION: ....................................................................................i
SECtION 1: tHE FABIAN REVOLutION ..........................................1
SECtION 2: ONE WORLD GOVERNMENt ......................................17
SECtION 3: tHE HARVESt OF COMMuNISM ...............................51
SECtION 4: PLOt tO CREAtE A NEW WORLD ORDER ...............83
SECtION 5: SECRECY BY tREAtY ..................................................99
SECtION 6: AGENDA 21 ...................................................................131
SECtION 7: FABIAN tREACHERY IN AuStRALIA .....................167
CONCLuSION: ....................................................................................245
WOLVES IN SHEEP‘S CLOTHING
introduCtion
ALABAMA ADOPtS FIRSt OFFICIAL
StAtE BAN ON uN AGENDA 21
Monday June 4, 2012
When Alabama Adopted the first official State ban of the United
Nations’ Agenda 21, it became the first State in the U.S.A. to adopt a
tough law to protect private property, and due process by prohibiting
any government involvement with, or participation in, a controversial
United Nations scheme known as Agenda 21.
Activists from across the political spectrum celebrated the measure’s
approval as a significant victory against the UN “sustainability” plot,
expressing hope that similar sovereignty-preserving measures would
be adopted in other states as the nationwide battle heats up.
The Alabama Senate Bill (SB) 4771 legislation, known unofficially
among some supporters as “The Due Process for Property Rights” Act,
was approved unanimously by both the State House and Senate. After
hesitating for a few days, late last month Republican Governor Robert
Bentley finally signed it into law the wildly popular measure – but only
after heavy pressure from activists forcing his hand.
Virtually no mention of the law was made in the establishment press.
But analysts said the measure was likely the strongest protection
against the UN scheme passed anywhere in America so far. The law,
aimed at protecting private property rights, specifically prevents all
state agencies and local governments in Alabama from participating
in the global scheme in any way.
The law states: “The State of Alabama and all political subdivisions
may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately
or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights, without due
process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in,
or traceable to, Agenda 21.” It adds a brief background on the UN
plan, hatched at the 1992 ‘Earth Summit’ in Rio de Janeiro.
the official synopsis of the law explains: the people of Alabama,
acting through their elected representatives – not un bureaucrats
i
WOLVES IN SHEEP‘S CLOTHING
– have the authority to develop the state’s environmental and
development policies. therefore, infringements on the property
rights of citizens linked to “any other international law, or
ancillary plan of action that contravenes the Constitution of the
united State or the Constitution of the State of Alabama,” are
also prohibited under this new measure.
Of course, as the law points out, the UN has enlisted a broad array
of non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations in its
effort to foist Agenda 21 on the world – most notably a Germany
based group called ICLEI, formerly known as the International Council
of Local Environmental Initiatives. But the new measure takes direct
aim at that problem too: “The State of Alabama, and all political
subdivisions, may not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of
money, or receive funds contracting services, or giving financial aid to
or from any such entities, as defined in Agenda 21 documents.
NB: Under ICLEI, 220,000 acres were taken from producing food to
advance “Alabama Wild” parkland.
ii
INTRODUCTION
EMPIRE
By Niall Ferguson
tHE RISE AND FALL OF tHE BRItISH WORLD ORDER
AND tHE LESSONS FOR GLOBAL POWER
Hertog Professor of Financial History
at the Stern School of Business, New York university
and Senior Research Fellow of Jesus College, Oxford
The British Empire was the largest in history: the nearest thing to
world domination ever achieved. By the eve of the second world war,
approximately a quarter of the world’s land and the same proportion
of the population were under some form of British rule. Yet for today’s
generation, the British Empire seems a great modernizing force.
The time is ripe for a reappraisal. In Empire, Niall Ferguson’s
most popular and ambitious work yet, he boldly recasts the British
Empire as one of the world’s greatest modernizing forces.
In this important new work, fully illustrated with 125 colour images
throughout, Ferguson argues that the British Empire was the driving
force behind what he calls ‘Anglobalization – the transformation of
the world economy along British lines. For better or for worse, the
world we know today is in large measure the product of Britain’s Age
of Empire.
Nearly all the key features of the twenty-first century world – the
spread of capitalism, the communitarian revolution, the notion of
humanitarianism and the institution of parliamentary democracy – can
be traced back to the extraordinary expansion of Britain’s economy,
population and culture from the seventeenth century until the mid-
twentieth.
On a vast and vividly coloured canvas, Empire shows how the British
Empire gave rise to modernity, mobilizing a formidable array of pirates
and pioneers, missionaries and mandarins, bankers and robber barons.
Displaying the originality and rigor that have made him the brightest
light among British historians, Ferguson also shows that the story of
the Empire has many lessons for the world today – in particular for the
United States as it stands on the brink of a new era of imperial power,
based once again on economic and military supremacy.
iii
WOLVES IN SHEEP‘S CLOTHING
A dazzling tour de force, Empire is a remarkable reappraisal of the
prizes and the pitfalls of global empire.
The difficulty with the achievements of empire is that they are much
more likely to be taken for granted than the sins of empire. It is,
however, instructive to try to imagine a world without the British
Empire. But while it is just about possible to imagine what the world
would have been like without the French Revolution or the First World
War, the imagination reels from the counterfactual of a world without
the British Empire. As I travelled around the Empire’s remains in the
first half of 2002 I was constantly struck by its ubiquitous creativity…
It is of course tempting to argue that it would all have happened
anyway, albeit with different names. Perhaps the railways would have
been invented and exported by another European power, perhaps the
telegraph cables would have been laid across the sea by someone else
too. Maybe, as Cobden claimed, the same volumes of trade would
have gone on without bellicose empires meddling in commerce.
Maybe too the great movements of population that transformed the
cultures and complexities of whole continents would have happened
anyway.
Yet there is reason to doubt that the world would have been the same
or even similar in the absence of the Empire. Even if we allow for the
possibility that trade, capital flows and migration could have been
‘naturally occurring’ in the past three hundred years, there remain the
flows of culture and institutions. And here the fingerprints of Empire
seem more readily discernible and less easy to wipe away.
When the British governed a country – even when they only influenced
its government by flexing their military and financial muscles – there
were certain distinctive features of their own society that they tended
to disseminate. A list of the more important of these runs as follows:
1. The English language
2. English forms of land tenure
3. Scottish and English banking
4. The Common Law
5. Protestantism
6. Team Sports
iv