NOT FAA POLICY OR GUIDANCE LIMITED RELEASE DOCUMENT 24 SEPTEMBER 2013 DOT/FAA/AR-xx/xx Obsolescence and Life Federal Aviation Administration Cycle Management William J. Hughes Technical Center Aviation Research Division for Avionics Atlantic City International Airport New Jersey 08405 DISCLAIMER This draft document is being made available as a “Limited Release” document by the FAA Software and Digital Systems (SDS) Program and does not constitute FAA policy or guidance. This document is being distributed by permission by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The research information in this document represents only the viewpoint of its subject matter expert authors. The FAA is concerned that its research is not released to the public before full editorial review is completed. However, a Limited Release distribution does allow exchange of research knowledge in a way that will benefit the parties receiving the documentation and, at the same time, not damage perceptions about the quality of FAA research. NOT FA A POLICY OR GUIDANCE LIMITED RELEASE DOCUMENT 24 SEPTEMBER 2013 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer's names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. This document does not constitute FAA certification policy. Consult your local FAA aircraft certification office as to its use. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/AR-xx/xx 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Obsolescence and Life Cycle Management for Avionics September 2013 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Chris Wilkinson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Honeywell Aerospace 7000 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, MD 21046 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFACT-11-C-00006 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Aviation Authority Final FAA William J Hughes Technical Center August 2011 to November 2013 Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes The Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Aviation Research Division COR was Charles Kilgore. 16. Abstract This research identifies ways to identify and mitigate obsolescence risks in avionics and to provide related aviation safety input to the FAA for the development of regulations, policy, guidance and training. Obsolescence and obsolescence management of avionics products is a technically challenging and costly financial problem with many adverse business impacts for both the avionics suppliers and their customers. Obsolescence is not unique to the aerospace industry but has special problems because of the typically long life cycle of aircraft and a requirement to comply with airworthiness regulations that makes continuous change complex and costly. Obsolescence is the inevitable consequence of the dependence of aerospace on a supply base whose major markets are outside of aerospace and whose technology lifecycles are much shorter than those other markets. Aerospace has a continual demand for technological progress in aircraft system capabilities and safety improvements, but on a much longer timescale than the technology turnover timescale of the supply base. Obsolescence is and always will be an inevitable occurrence and therefore the goal of obsolescence and lifecycle management is to minimize the recurring cost impacts and the disruption of supply to customers whilst maintaining continued airworthiness and regulatory compliance. This report describes the current state of obsolescence management in the aerospace industry, the processes, standards and tools now being used and the underlying causes. The report addresses the identification, mitigation and avoidance of issues related to obsolescence in systems, software, and airborne electronic hardware development, the related design assurance and certification considerations and optimal methods for life cycle maintenance and technical refreshment. The report identifies known and emerging obstacles, problems, issues and gaps in existing standards and guidance, proposes standards and assurance techniques that may minimize the impact of obsolescence, and suggests how manufacturers can pro-actively plan and manage the life cycle of their products. The report describes the extant research on numerical methods for obsolescence risk assessment and related economic modeling and provides recommendations on further public guidance and standards that would assist industry and users in adapting to a dynamic environment. The report suggests some industry and regulatory practices that could promote best practice, reduce costs and inconvenience, and improve the product lifecycle planning process. Finally the report suggests some relevant research topics that are not well addressed presently and should be considered for future work. The report suggests that the obsolescence problem cannot be solved only by engineering methods, but also requires pro-active measures and risk-awareness planning by both customers and suppliers. Obsolescence is complex mix of engineering, economic and business issues with many associated uncertainties. These uncertainties arise from the supply base and customer base, which requires marketing, engineering and economic planning and analysis using numerical risk assessment methods that measure uncertainty. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Airborne electronic hardware, obsolescence, life cycle management, This document is available to the U.S. public through the life cycle plan, avionics sustainment, COTS, intellectual property, National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, continued airworthiness Virginia 22161. 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 206 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks the following individuals for their thoughtful suggestions and comments. Barbara Lingberg (FAA) Chuck Kilgore (FAA) Robin Sova (FAA) Gary Horan (FAA) Bob Manners (Lumark Technologies, Inc., Contractor for the FAA) Bill Haselrick (Honeywell) i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ II LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ IV LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... VIII 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 2. LITERATURE SEARCH ................................................................................................... 3 3. CURRENT INDUSTRY PRACTICE ................................................................................ 4 3.1. Responses to Obsolescence 8 3.2. Obsolescence in the General Aviation Industry 9 3.3. Military Obsolescence 10 3.4. The Causes of Obsolescence 11 3.5. Obsolescence of Systems 12 3.5.1. Legislation Induced Obsolescence 13 3.5.2. Regulation and Mandate Induced Obsolescence 14 3.5.2.1. Avionics 15 3.5.2.2. Engine Equipment 16 3.6. Obsolescence of System Software 16 3.7. Obsolescence of Hardware Components 17 3.8. Obsolescence of Tools and Platforms 18 3.9. Obsolescence of Manufacturing and Repair Facilities 19 3.10. Obsolescence Management Tools and Resources 19 3.10.1. Component Obsolescence Information Services 20 3.10.2. Obsolete Component Sources 22 3.10.3. Standards, Guides and Other Documents 23 4. KNOWN AND EMERGING ISSUES ............................................................................. 24 4.1. Components Obsolescence Forecasting 24 4.1.1. Predictions Uncertainty 24 4.2. Last Time Buy Estimation and Inventory Management 25 4.3. Optimum Resolution Method Selection 26 4.4. Performance Based Logistics Risk Assessment 27 4.5. Design Patterns 27 4.6. Customer Notification Period of System EOL and Continued Support 28 ii 4.7. Maintaining Software and HDL Tools and Platforms 28 4.8. Maintaining Manufacturing and Repair Capability 28 4.9. Compliance Auditing 28 4.10. PCN Processing 29 4.11. Security 29 5. EXISTING R&D ............................................................................................................... 30 5.1. Economic and Life Cycle Modeling 30 5.1.1. Estimating Life Time Buy Quantity 31 5.1.2. Life Cycle Cost Estimation 31 5.1.3. Selection and Timing of Resolution Options 32 5.2. Component Obsolescence Forecasting 33 5.2.1. Demand Side Methods 33 5.2.2. Supply Side Methods 34 5.3. Design Methods for Obsolescence and Mitigation 34 5.3.1. Mitigating Software Obsolescence 35 6. STANDARDS AND ASSURANCE ................................................................................ 36 6.1. Product Sunset Notification 36 6.2. Modifications and Continued Airworthiness 37 6.3. Rulemaking Procedures 38 7. HIGH VALUE APPROACHES ....................................................................................... 39 8. SHARED ISSUES ............................................................................................................ 42 8.1. Electronic Component Market Segments 44 8.2. Electronic Device Organizations 46 9. USING COTS IP ............................................................................................................... 48 9.1. Definition of COTS IP 49 9.2. Similarities Between COTS IP Assurance and Assurance of COTS Electronic Components 50 9.3. COTS IP Usage 51 9.3.1. A Suggested Approach to COTS IP Assurance 53 9.3.2. Representative Mapping of RTCA/DO-254 Data Items and Supplier Documents 56 9.4. Additional Considerations 58 9.4.1. Advanced Methods 58 9.4.1.1. Run-Time Methods 59 9.4.1.2. Model-Based Verification 59 9.4.1.3. Functional Failure Path Analysis 59 9.4.1.4. COTS IP Research Questions 60 10. FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................ 61 11. FUTURE WORK .............................................................................................................. 62 12. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................. 64 iii 13. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 66 APPENDIX A - OBSOLESCENCE CAPABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT ............................... 76 APPENDIX B - GENERIC PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE PLAN .................................................... 78 APPENDIX C - LITERATURE SEARCH RESULTS ................................................................ 84 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 – Capability Maturity Levels 7 Figure 2 – Honeywell Obsolescence Management Process 8 Figure 3 – Obsolescence Fishbone Diagram 12 Figure 4 – Life Cycle Curve 18 Figure 5 – FreeScale Life Cycle Coding Scheme [43] 21 Figure 6 – The Flow of Components between Electronic Device Organizations 43 Figure 7 – Global Semiconductor Market Share, 2011 (Military includes aerospace) [127] 45 Figure 8 - Process Map 55 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 – High Value Approaches 40 Table 2 – Global Market Forecast for Semiconductors ($Billions) [127] 45 Table 3 – Electronic Device Organizations Primary Concerns 46 Table 4 – DO-254 [41] Appendix A Objectives/Supplier Evidence 56 Table 5 – Configuration Management Hardware Control Categories (DO-254 Table 7-1 [41]) 58 Table 6 – Additional DO-254 Objectives [41] 58 Table 7 – Possibilities for Combined Research Topics 62 iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AEH Airborne Electronic Hardware AIRE Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AMPL Approved Manufacturers and Parts List ANSP Air Navigation Service Provider AOG Aircraft on Ground APU Auxiliary Power Unit AQEC Aerospace Qualified Electronic Components ARMS Advanced Reconfigurable Manufacturing for Semiconductors ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit ATM Air Traffic Management B2B Business to Business (e.g., for electronic data interchange) BB Bridge Buy BFE Buyer Furnished Equipment BGA Ball Grid Array (e.g., for an electronic component package) BOM Bill of Materials BSI British Standards Institute CAST Certification Authorities Software Team CCA Circuit Card Assembly CFR Code of Federal Regulations in the United States CIA Change Impact Analysis CM Configuration Management CMM Capability Maturity Model COTS Commercial off the Shelf COTS IP Commercial off the Shelf Intellectual Property (i.e., Software HDL defining the function of a programmable logic device) CPDLC Controller-Pilot Data Link Communication DAH Design Approval Holder DAL Design Assurance Level DoD Department of Defense (U.S.) DLA Defense Logistics Agency (U.S.) DLS Data Link Services DMEA Defense Micro-Electronics Activity (U.S.) DMSMS Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages EASA European Aviation Safety Authority ECMP Electronic Components Management Plan ECS Environmental Control System EHCOE Electronic Hardware Center of Excellence EIA Electronic Industries Association EOL End of Life EOS End of Support E.U. European Union EUIR European Upper Flight Information Region FAA Federal Aviation Authority v FFPA Functional Failure Path Analysis FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array GA General Aviation GIDEP Government-Industry Data Exchange Program HAL Hardware Abstraction Layer HCx Hardware Control (e.g., for a Configuration Management Category) HDL Hardware Description Language, e.g. VHDL, Verilog HLR High Level Requirements HMI Hazardously Misleading Information ICA Instructions for Continued Airworthiness ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization IEC International ElectroTechnical Commission IECQ International ElectroTechnical Commission Quality (e.g., for an Assessment System For Electronic Components) IFR Instrument Flight Rules IHS Information Handling Services (a commercial component information provider) IP Intellectual Property implemented in HDL ITRS International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors LCC Life Cycle Cost LOTE Life of Type Evaluation LLR Low Level Requirements LRU Line Replaceable Unit LSD Last Ship Date LTB Last Time Buy or Life Time Buy MAB Multi-Arm Bandit MOCA Mitigation of Obsolescence Cost Analysis MRI Material Risk Index MRO Maintenance and Repair Organization MSL Moisture Sensitivity Level (of integrated circuits) or Mean Sea Level NAS National Airspace System NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System (U.S.) NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking NRE Non-Recurring Engineering (Cost) OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer PBL Performance Based Logistics PCN Process or Product Change Notice PD Programmable Device PLD Programmable Logic Device (an electronic component whose function is defined by software HDL) QA Quality Assurance QML Qualified Manufacturer List (for military grade components) RNAV Area Navigation (originally random navigation) RoHS Restriction of (the Use of Certain) Hazardous Substances (in Electrical and Electronic Equipment) RTCA, Inc. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (former name) vi
Description: