ebook img

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 353 689 EA 024 635 TITLE Distribution of State-Administered ... PDF

898 Pages·2012·28.21 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview DOCUMENT RESUME ED 353 689 EA 024 635 TITLE Distribution of State-Administered ...

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 353 689 EA 024 635 TITLE Distribution of State-Administered Education Funds. Fourteenth Annual Report (A Report Required by Section 406A, General Education Provisions Act, as Amended), Submitted by the U.S. Secretary of Education to the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources and House Committee on Education and Labor. INSTITUTION Department of Education, Washington, DC. Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation. PUB DATE May 91 NOTE 1,631p.; Document consists primarily of statistical Ili tables; these tables may not reproduce well in paper copy due to small type. PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) General (140) Reports EDRS PRICE MF13/PC66 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Categorical Aid; Educational Finance; Elementary Secondary Education; *Federal Aid; *Federal Programs; *Financial Support; *Grants; Resource Allocation; *State Federal Aid ABSTRACT Under the authority of Section 406A of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), the U.S. Department of Education (ED) collects information on how funds are distributed under federal education programs that are administered by the states. ED collected information from the 50 states and the District of Columbia for the fiscal year 1983. This report provides information on the state distribution of subgrants under the following state-administered federal education programs: Chapter 1 Formula Grants to Local Education Agencies; Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies for Neglected or Delinquent Children; Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies to Meet the Special Educational Needs of Migratory Children; Chapter 1 State Administration; Chapter 1 Aid to States for Education of Handicapped Children in State-Operated and State-Supported Schools; Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), Handicapped Grants to States Program; Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), Preschool Grants for Handicapped Children; Federal, State, and Local Partnership for Educational Improvement (Chapter 2); Dwight D. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Education, State Grant Program; Carl D. Perkins Vocational Education Act, Basic Grants to States; Adult Education Act, Grants to States; Transition Program for Refugee Children, Formula Grants to State Education Agencies; The Emergency Immigrant Education Act; and Library Services and Construction Act (LSCA), Grants to State Library Agencies. The following information is provided for each program: (1) the allocation and reported amount granted by state; (2) nationally, the types of agencies receiving funds, including the percent of reported subgrants and reported subgrant funds going to each type of agency; and (3) nationally, the size of reported subgrants. Forty-six tables are included. Appendices contain subgrant amounts for each program, by agency and type, and subgrant amounts for the Library Services and Construction Act, by state. (LMI) Distribution of State-Administered Education Funds Fourteenth Annual Report (A Report Required by Section 406A, General Education Provisions Act, As Amended) Submitted by the U.S. Secretary of Education to the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources House Committee on Education and Labor U.S. Department of Education May 1991 U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 011(ce of Educatfonat Research and improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC; VIOn.s document has been reproduced as recefveo from the person or orgam2a1.0n ong.nanng .1 C M.nor cnangeS have been made to (morove fl reproduction ouahh, Points of new or optmons stated (n ?Ns doco ment do not neCesSanly represent othcfat OE RI pOSttOn or POI.Cv NA% U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF PLANNING, BUDGET & tVALUATION ) BESTCOPY AVAILABLE Distribution of State-Administered Education Funds Fourteenth Annual Report (A Report Required by Section 406A, General Education Provisions Act, As Amended) Submitted by the U.S. Secretary of Education to the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources House Committee on Education and Labor U.S. Department of Education May 1991 n. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fourteenth Annual Report to Congress on the Distribution of State-Administered Federal Education Program Funds Under the authority of Section 406A of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), the U.S. Department of Education (ED) collects information on how funds are distributed under Federal education programs that are administered by the States, including Chapter 1 Formula Grants to Local Education Agencies (LEAs); Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies for Neglected or Delinquent Children; Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies to Meet the Special Educational Needs of Migratory Children; Chapter 1 State Administration; Chapter 1 Aid to States for Education of Handicapped Children in State-Operated and State-Supported Schools; Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), Handicapped Grants to States Program (EHA has since been replaced by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)); Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), Preschool Grants for Handicapped Children; Federal, State, and Local Partnership for Educational Improvement (Chapter 2); Dwight D. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Education, State Grant Program; Carl D. Perkins Vocational Education Act, Basic Grants to States; Adult Education Act, Grants to States; Transition Program for Refugee Children, Formula Grants to State Education Agencies; The Emergency Immigrant Education Act; and Library Services and Construction Act (LSCA), Grants to State Library Agencies.' ED collected information from the 50 States and the District of Columbia. Grant information for Puerto Rico and ancillary areas was not collected. The reader is cautioned that a caveat appears throughout this report stating that the information reported by the States under GEPA 406A is not always complete or accurate for all States and for all programs. The Department of Education as well as the Congress have expressed concern regarding the quality of the reported information, and a bill introduced in the 101st Congress (FIR5115) proposed changes to GEPA that are directed towards improving the content and quality of the required information. While this bill did not become law, ED is working with the Congress and other interested parties to improve the data collected under GEPA 406A. Information for Federal appropriation year FY 1988, which corresponds roughly to the 1988- It is important to note that under GEPA 406A, the States are 89 school year, is reported here. required to report the "grant for 1988-89 school year and summer" (0M13 No. 1880-0518). Although the funding for the 1988-89 subgrants is based primarily on the FY88 appropriation, some funding may come from unobligated funds from earlier appropriation years (since the Tydings Amendment allows for State-administered Federal education program monies to be carried over from one year to the next). Therefore, for each program, the total grant amount for all recipients in school year 1988- 89 reported by a State will not necessarily equal the State allocation for FY88. Program titles used in this rrnort are those in effect for FY 1988. The State-reported data may not be complete or accurate for all States and for all programs. I Under Chapter 1 Formula Grants to LEAs, we found that: The vast majority of subgrants (99 percent) and of subgrant dollars (nearly 100 percent) went to public school districts. Public school districts also may receive funds indirectly, through intermediate agencies or cooperative arrangements. About 1 percent of Chapter 1 funds were distributed through this arrangement. Although some Chapter 1 subgrants were small- -about 6 percent were for under $10,000, 43 percent of the subgrants were for $100,000 or more. Under Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies for Neglected or Delinquent Children, we found that: Sixty-seven percent of the subgrants and 95 percent of the subgrant funds went to State agencies or institutions. Few subgrants--about 11 percent--were under $5,000. Thirty-four percent of the subgrants were for $10,000 to $49,999, and 33 percent were for $100,000 or more. Under Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies to Meet the Special Educational Needs of Migratory Children, we found that: Three States -- California, Florida, and Texas -- received about 62 percent of the program funds. The majority of subgrants (90 percent) went to public school districts, which also received most of the funds (87 percent). Few subgrants (6 percent) were for under $10,000. Thirty-six percent of the subgrants were for $10,000 to $49,999. Under Chapter 1 State Administration, we found that: States received $36.9 million in Chapter 1 State Administration funds, and virtually all the funds went to State agencies. The State-reported data may not be complete or accurate for all States and for all programs. ii 5 Under three Handicapped programs--Chapter 1 Aid to States for Education of Handicapped Children in State-Operated and State-Supported Schools; Education of the Handicapped Act, Handicapped Grants to States Program; and Education of the Handicapped Act Preschool Grants for Handicapped Children, we found that: Public school districts received a majority of the subgrants under each of the three programs, and a majority of the subgrant dollars under the Handicapped Grants to States Program and Preschool Grants for Handicapped Children. A considerable amount of funding under these programs flowed to intermediate agencies, which, in turn, may provide services to children in public school districts. The percent ranged from 10 percent of Preschool Grants for Handicapped Children subgrant dollars to 18 percent of Chapter I Handicapped subgrant dollars. About one-third of the subgrants for each of the three programs for handicapped children were for $10,000 to $49,999. Thirty-three percent of the Handicapped Grants to States Program subgrants were for $100,000 or more. Under Federal, State, and Local Partnership for Educational Improvement (Chapter 2), we found that: The majority of formula subgrants (97 percent) and discretionary subgrants (93 percent) went to public school districts. Chapter 2 formula subgrants were relatively small--37 percent were under $5,000. Under the Dwight D. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science, State Grant Program we found that: Most of the subgrants under the Elementary/Secondary Formula Grants portion of the program went to public school districts (97 percent), as did the subgrant funds (88 percent). About 8 percent of the subgrant funds for this purpose area went to intermediate agencies; these agencies may, in turn, provide funds or services to additional public school districts. The State-reported data may not be complete or accurate for all States and for all programs. Hi Formula Grants portion of Subgrants under the Elementary/Secondary 78 percent were under the program tended to be very small- -about $1,000. $5,000, and about 32 percent were under Act, Basic Grants to States, we found that: Under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational Education of the subgrants and Public school districts received at least 70 percent dollars in each of six program areas over one-half of the subgrant Equity, Program (Handicapped, Disadvantaged, Adult Training, Sex Improvement, and Consumer and Homemaking). to universities Between 17 and 39 percent of the subgrant dollars went (This ranged from 17 percent and colleges in the eight program areas. Parents.) for Disadvantaged to 39 percent for Single tended to be small. For six of the program areas, the subgrants subgrants were Seventy percent of the Consumer and Homemaking of the Handicapped, under $5,000, and between 30 and 43 percent Improvement Disadvantaged, Adult Training, Sex Equity, and Program subgrants were under $5,000. found that: Under the Adult Education Act, Grants to States, we subgrants and 63 Public school districts received 71 percent of the percent of the subgrant funds. $10.000. About 35 percent of the subgrants were for less than Formula Grants to State Education Under the Transition Program for Refugee Children, Agencies, we found that: districts in 46 Program funds were received by 1,285 public school States and the District of Columbia. under Subgrants tended to be small; 72 percent of the subgrants were $5,000. found that: Under the Emergency Immigrant Education Program, we Texas- - Five States -- California, Florida, Illinois, New York, and received about 77 percent of the program funds. for all States and for all programs. The State-reported data may not be complete or accurate iv Under the Library Services and Construction Act, Grants to State Library Agencies, we found that: Sixty-four percent of the Title I subgrants and 42 percent of the Title I subgrant funds went to local libraries. An additional 42 percent of Title I subgrant funds went to State agencies/State libraries for Statewide public library services. Local libraries received 33 percent of the Title III subgrants and 26 percent of the subgrant funds. State agencies/State libraries received 22 percent of the Title III subgrants and 54 percent of the subgrant funds. For Title I, 40 percent of the subgrants were for $10,000 to $49,999, while for Title III, 31 percent of the subgrants were for $10,000 to $49,999. Twenty-five percent of the Title I subgrants and 35 percent of the Title III subgrants were for less than $5,000. The State-reported data may not be complete or accurate for all States and for all programs. v I PREFACE This report is the fourteenth annual response of the Secretary of Education to the requirements of Section 406A of the General Education Provisions Act, as amended. The legislation requires States to submit, by December 30 of each year, a list of all subgrants and contracts made during a given fiscal year with funds from State-administered Federal education programs. This report provides information for Federal appropriation year FY 1988, which corresponds roughly to the 1988-89 school year. Questions about the report may be addressed to the GEPA Coordinator, Office of 1:lanning, Budget and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20202. The State-reported data may not be complete or accurate for all States and for all programs. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary vii Preface Introluction I. 1 Chapter 1 Formula Grants to Local Education Agencies 5 II. 5 Overview of the Program 5 Findings Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies For Neglected or Delinquent HI. 9 Children Overview of the Program 9 Findings 9 Chapter 1 Formula Grants to State Education Agencies to Meet the Special Educational IV. Needs of Migratory Children 15 Overview of the Program 15 Findings 15 Chapter 1 State Administration 21 V. Overview of the Program 21 21 Findings Programs for the Handicapped 27 VI. Overview of the Programs 27 28 Findings Federal, State, and Local Partnership for Educational Improvement (Chapter 2) 39 VII. Overview of the Program 39 Findings 39 Dwight D. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Education, State Grant Program 47 VIII. 47 Overview of the Program 48 Findings ix t

Description:
Adult. Single. Granted capped taged. Training. Parents. Sex. Equity. Correc- tonal. Program SAINT CLAIR COUNTY. 863,519 8.670.024. 1.363.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.