ebook img

doctor of philosophy in agronomy PDF

161 Pages·2015·1.4 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview doctor of philosophy in agronomy

Evaluation of precision-conservation agriculture based practices for resource use efficiency and carbon footprints in maize-wheat cropping system By RAM DHAN JAT (2011A9D) Thesis submitted to Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DDOOCCTTOORR OOFF PPHHIILLOOSSOOPPHHYY IINN AAGGRROONNOOMMYY CCOOLLLLEEGGEE OOFF AAGGRRIICCUULLTTUURREE CCCCSS HHAARRYYAANNAA AAGGRRIICCUULLTTUURRAALL UUNNIIVVEERRSSIITTYY HHIISSAARR –– 112255000044 ((HHAARRYYAANNAA)) 2015 CERTIFICATE-I This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Evaluation of precision-conservation agriculture based practices for resource use efficiency and carbon footprints in maize-wheat cropping system” submitted for the degree of Ph. D in the subject of Agronomy of the Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar is a bonafide research work carried out by Mr. Ram Dhan Jat under my supervision and that no part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree. The assistance and help received during the course of investigation have been fully acknowledged. Dr. R.K. Nanwal Major Advisor Department of Agronomy CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. CERTIFICATE-II This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Evaluation of precision-conservation agriculture based practices for resource use efficiency and carbon footprints in maize-wheat cropping system” submitted by Mr. Ram Dhan Jat to the Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Ph. D in the subject of Agronomy has been approved by the student's advisory committee after an oral examination on the same. MAJOR ADVISOR (R K Nanwal) HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT EXTERNAL EXAMINER DEAN, POST-GRADUATE STUDIES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT “No bird can soar too high if it soars with its own wings……….”. So I express my deep sense of gratitude with reverence to Dr. R.K. Nanwal, Professor, Department of Agronomy, CCS HAU, Hisar, the major advisor of my advisory committee for sagacious guidance and intellectual stimulation throughout the present study and in preparation of this manuscript. His scholarly suggestions, prudent adomitions, sustained interest, ungrudging help and affectionate behaviour have been a fountain of great inspiration to me. I owe my heartiest and sincere acknowledgements to Dr. M.L. Jat, Sr. Cropping system agronomist, CIMMYT India, New Delhi, (external member)for his very active interactions, suggestions and feedback. I am grateful to my Co-Major Advisor, Dr. Jagdev Singh, Professor and Head, Department of Agronomy for his continued support and encouragement throughout the whole period of my research. His timely guidance and suggestions cannot pass without mention. I esteem it a privilege to record my profound sense of gratitude to Dr.G. S. YADAV(Dean, PGS nominee), Professor, Department of Entomologyand also tothe members of my advisory committee,Dr PS Sangwan , Department of Soil Science, Dr Raj Singh, Department of Ag. Meteorology for providing enthusiastic encouragement, valuable guidance, suggestions and ready help during the entire course of investigation. My esteem and special acknowledgements are to Dr. R. K. Pannu, Dean, Collage of agriculture, Dr. R. P. Narwal, Ex. Director Reaserch and Dr. Satish Kumar, Associate Dean PGS and all other member of the faculty. Disction is not enough to express my cordial appreciation to Dr R. K. Malik, Senior Agronomist and CSISA objective-1 Leader, CIMMYT India, Dr. H.S. Jat, Scientist, (CSISA) CIMMYT India, Dr R. K. Jat, Scientist (BISA) CIMMYT India, Dr. Tek Sapkota, PDF, CIMMYT India, Dr. Dalip Bishnoi, Scientist, CCS HAU, Hisar, Mr. Anil Kumar Bana, Department of Agriculture, Gove. of Punjab, Dr. Ajay,Scientist, (CSISA) CIMMYT India, Dr. S.L. Jat, Scientist, DMRandDr B. R. Komboj,CCS HAU, Hisarfor their everlasting support and help during the research work and preparation of the manuscrip. I sincerely acknowledge with heartfelt to all my friends, especially Kamla,Dr H. R. Nitharwal, Dr R. L. Choudhary,R. S. Dadarwal,A.K.Yadav, J.M.Sutaliya, Kailash Ji, Love, Babu, Kajod,Suresh, Vipin Ji, Rajiv Ji, Parbhat Ji, Vijay, Vikash Ji, Kapil, Mithlesh and Kiran whose cooperation and help in various ways brought this task to completion. I wish to express my deepest sense of gratitude to my revered parents for their unconditional support in the difficult path of life. Every bit ofwhat I am today, I owe it all to them. They are truly reflection of god to me. Setting them as idol, I hope to follow in their footsteps and give meaning to life. I owe special thanks to my brother Laxman Ram Jat and my sisters Prem and Santosh for his good wishes bestowed on me to brighten my future. The most cordial appreciation goes to my beloved spouse Mrs. Prem Sunda and my Daughter Ms. Neha Sunda & Son Master Ankit Sunda and I feel pleasure to express my love and affection to my nephews Hanshu, Kavita, Guda and Aditay whose smiles paved a way full of roses for me and will go on motivating me for a delightful future. Financial assistance rendered by CIMMYT-CCAFSin the form of fellowship and supporting my doctorial research is thankfully acknowledged All may not have been mentioned, but none is forgotten. Last but not least, a million thanks to Almighty GOD, JAI BAJRANG BALI, who made me this task and made every job a success. Place: Hisar R. D. Jat Date:21st August 2015 CONTENTS CHAPTERS TITLE PAGES I INTRODUCTION 1-3 II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 4-14 III MATERIALS AND METHODS 15-39 IV RESULTS 40-115 V DISCUSSION 116-127 VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 128-132 BIBLIOGRAPHY i-xii APPENDICES (COST OF DIFFERENT INPUTS) I-IV LIST OFTABLES Table Particulars Page No. No. 3.1 Monthly variations in weather conditions during June 2012 to May 2013. 16 3.2 Monthly variations in weather conditions during June 2013 to May 2014. 17 3.3 Physico-chemical properties of soil at the experimentalsite. 18 The amount of different crops residue (t ha-1) retained/ incorporated on the 22 3.4 surface after grain harvest. Nutrient applied (kg/ha) in maize crop under different nutrient management 24 3.5 practices 3.6 Schedule of field operationsduring experimentation in maize. 25 Nutrient applied (kg/ha) in maize crop under different nutrient management 27 3.7 practices 3.8 Schedule of field operations during experimentation in wheat. 28 3.9 Schedule of field operations during experimentationin green gram. 30 Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on No. of 41 4.1 Plants/m. r. l. of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on plant height 42 4.2 (cm) of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on dry matter 43 4.3 accumulation (g/plant) of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on leaf area 44 4.4 (cm2/plant) of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on leaf area index 45 4.5 (LAI) of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on crop growth 47 4.6 rate (CGR) (g/plant/day) of maize. Effect of tillage, residue legume and nutrient management on relative growth 48 4.7 rate (RGR) (mg/g/day) of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on net 49 4.8 assimilation rate (NAR) (mg/cm2/day) of maize. Effect oftillage, residue, legumeand nutrient management onmaize 50 4.9 phenological stages. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on yield attributes 52 4.10 of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on yield attributes 53 4.11 of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on yield 54 4.12 performance of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on maize nutrient 55 4.13 uptake. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on economics of 57 4.14 maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on carbon 58 4.15 sustainability index (CSI) of maize. Table Particulars Page No. No. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on energy 60 4.16 indicators of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on nutrient use 61 4.17 efficiency and water productivity of maize. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on Plant height 63 4.18 (cm) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on dry matter 64 4.19 accumulation (g/m2) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on leaf area 65 4.20 (cm/plant) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on leaf area index 66 4.21 (LAI) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on crop growth 68 4.22 rate (CGR) (g/m2/day) of wheat. Effect oftillage, residue, legumeand nutrient management on relative growth 69 4.23 rate (RGR) (mg/g/day) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on net 70 4.24 assimilation rate (NAR) (mg/cm2/day) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on yield attributes 71 4.25 of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on wheat yields 73 4.26 and harvest index. Effect of Tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on nutrient 74 4.27 uptake of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on economics of 75 4.28 wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on carbon 77 4.29 sustainability index (CSI) of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on energy 78 4.30 indicators of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on nutrient use 80 4.31 efficiency and water productivity of wheat. Effect of tillage, residue legume and nutrient management on yield attributes 81 4.32 of green gram. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on green gram 83 4.33 yield and harvest index. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on economics of 84 4.34 green gram. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on carbon 86 4.35 sustainability index (CSI) of green gram. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on energy 87 4.36 indicators of green gram. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on nutrient use 89 4.37 efficiency and water productivity of green gram. Table Particulars Page No. No. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrientmanagement on grain yield (t 90 4.38 ha-1) of maize, wheat and green gram and system productivity (wheat equivalent) during 2012-13 and 2013-14. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on cost of 93 4.39 production (× 103INR/ha) of the maize-wheat-green gram system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on gross return 95 4.40 (× 103INR/ha) of the maize-wheat-green gram system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on net returns 96 4.41 (× 103INR/ha) of the maize-wheat-green gram system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on B:C ratio of 98 4.42 the maize-wheat-green gram system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on total nutrient 99 4.43 uptake [(NPK kg/ha), (mean of 2012-13 and 2013-14)]. 4.44 Rainfall (cm) during maize-wheat-green gram system. 101 Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on irrigation water 101 4.45 applied(cm ha-1) in maize-wheat-green gram cropping system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on total water 102 4.46 input (irrigation + rainfall) (cm ha-1) in maize-wheat-green gram cropping system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on irrigation 103 4.47 (WPI) water productivity (kg grain m−3water) in maize-wheat- green gram cropping system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on input (WPI+R) 104 4.48 water productivity (kg grain m−3water) in maize-wheat- green gram cropping system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on carbon 105 4.49 sustainability index (CSI) of maize-wheat-green gram system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on energy-use 107 4.50 efficiency and NPK productivity of maize-wheat-green gram system. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on soil physical 111 4.51 properties after completion of study. Effect oftillage, residue, legumeand nutrient management on soil penetration 112 4.52 resistance after completion of study. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on chemical 114 4.53 parameters of soil after completion of study. Effect of tillage, residue, legume and nutrient management on available NPK 115 4.54 status after completion of study. LIST OF FIGURES Fig. No. Particulars Page No. 3.1 Monthly variations in weather conditions during June 2012 to May 2013 17 3.2 Monthly variationsin weather conditions during June 2013 to May 2014 18 3.3 Layout of plan of experiment 20 4.1 Effect of tillage, residue and legume on grain yield (t ha-1) of maize, wheat 91 and green gram and system productivity (wheat equivalent) during 2012-13 and2013-14 4.2 Effect of nutrient management on grain yield (t ha-1) of maize, wheat and 91 green gram and system productivity (wheat equivalent) during 2012-13 and 2013-14 4.3 Effect of tillage, residue and legume on cost of production (× 103INR/ha) of 94 the maize-wheat-green gram system 4.4 Effect of nutrient management on cost of production (× 103INR/ha) of the 94 maize-wheat-green gram system 4.5 Effect of tillage, residue and legume on net returns (× 103INR/ha) of the 97 maize-wheat-green gramsystem 4.6 Effect of nutrient management on net returns (× 103INR/ha) of the maize- 97 wheat-green gram system 4.7 Soil penetration resistance (M Pa) 110 ABBREVIATIONS CGR : Crop growth rate CSI : Carbon sustainability index CT : Conventional tillage CT-WR : Conventional tillage-with residue CT-WOR : Conventional tillage-without residue DAS : Days after sowing GHG : Green house gases GMD : Grand mean diameter LAI : Leaf area index MJ : Mega joule MWD : Mean weight diameter NAR : Net assimilation rate NUE : Nitrogen-use efficiency PB-WR : Permanent bed-with residue PB-WOR : Permanent bed-without residue R : Crop residue RGR : Relative growth rate RUE : Resource use efficiency SOC : Soil organic carbon SOM : Soil organic matter ZT : Zero tillage ZT-WR : Zero tillage-with residue ZT-WOR : Zero tillage-without residue CT : Convention Tillage CT+GG : Convention Tillage with green gram PB : Permanent bed PB+GG : Permanent bed with green gram CTF : Conventional till flat NTF : No till flat NTB : No till

Description:
Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar is a bonafide research Scientist, CCS HAU, Hisar, Mr. Anil Kumar Bana, Department of Agriculture, Gove. of Punjab, Dr. increase in economic yield of maize being 19.2 and 28.9% with furrow irrigated raised bed.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.