ebook img

doctor of phil in agronom doctor of philosophy in agronomy sophy y PDF

90 Pages·2014·1.48 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview doctor of phil in agronom doctor of philosophy in agronomy sophy y

AAAAAAggggggrrrrrroooooo pppppphhhhhhyyyyyyssssssiiiiiioooooollllllooooooggggggiiiiiiccccccaaaaaallllll ttttttrrrrrraaaaaaiiiiiittttttssssss ffffffoooooorrrrrr ddddddrrrrrroooooouuuuuugggggghhhhhhtttttt ttttttoooooolllllleeeeeerrrrrraaaaaannnnnncccccceeeeee iiiiiinnnnnn ppppppeeeeeeaaaaaarrrrrrllllll mmmmmmiiiiiilllllllllllleeeeeetttttt ((((((PPPPPPeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnniiiiiisssssseeeeeettttttuuuuuummmmmm ggggggllllllaaaaaauuuuuuccccccuuuuuummmmmm LLLLLL......)))))) BBByyy AAARRRVVVIIINNNDDD KKKUUUMMMAAARRR YYYAAADDDAAAVVV 222000111000AAA888DDD(((RRR))) TTThhheeesssiiisss sssuuubbbmmmiiitttttteeeddd tttooo ttthhheee CCChhhaaauuudddhhhaaarrryyy CCChhhaaarrraaannn SSSiiinnnggghhh HHHaaarrryyyaaannnaaa AAAgggrrriiicccuuullltttuuurrraaalll UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy iiinnn pppaaarrrtttiiiaaalll fffuuulllfffiiilllmmmeeennnttt ooofff ttthhheee rrreeeqqquuuiiirrreeemmmeeennntttsss fffooorrr ttthhheee dddeeegggrrreeeeee ooofff DDDDDDOOOOOOCCCCCCTTTTTTOOOOOORRRRRR OOOOOOFFFFFF PPPPPPHHHHHHIIIIIILLLLLLOOOOOOSSSSSSOOOOOOPPPPPPHHHHHHYYYYYY IIIIIINNNNNN AAAAAAGGGGGGRRRRRROOOOOONNNNNNOOOOOOMMMMMMYYYYYY CCCCCCOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEGGGGGGEEEEEE OOOOOOFFFFFF AAAAAAGGGGGGRRRRRRIIIIIICCCCCCUUUUUULLLLLLTTTTTTUUUUUURRRRRREEEEEE CCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSS HHHHHHAAAAAARRRRRRYYYYYYAAAAAANNNNNNAAAAAA AAAAAAGGGGGGRRRRRRIIIIIICCCCCCUUUUUULLLLLLTTTTTTUUUUUURRRRRRAAAAAALLLLLL UUUUUUNNNNNNIIIIIIVVVVVVEEEEEERRRRRRSSSSSSIIIIIITTTTTTYYYYYY HHHHHHIIIIIISSSSSSAAAAAARRRRRR ------ 111111222222555555 000000000000444444 ((((((HHHHHHAAAAAARRRRRRYYYYYYAAAAAANNNNNNAAAAAA)))))) 222000111333 CERTIFICATE – I This is to certify that thesis entitled, “Agro physiological traits for drought tolerance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)” submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Agronomy to the Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar is a bonafide research work carried out by Mr. Arvind Kumar Yadav, Admn. No. 2010A8D(R) under my guidance and supervision and that no part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree. The assistance and help received during the course of investigation have been fully acknowledged. [DR. ANIL KUMAR] MAJOR ADVISOR Scientist (Department of Agronomy) College of Agriculture CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar-125004 CERTIFICATE-II This is to certify that thesis entitled, “Agro physiological traits for drought tolerance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)” submitted by Mr. Arvind Kumar Yadav, Admn. No. 2010A8D(R) to the Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Agronomy, has been approved by the Student's Advisory Committee after an oral examination on the same, in collaboration with an External Examiner. MAJOR ADVISOR EXTERNAL EXAMINER DEAN, POST-GRADUATE STUDIES HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT Acknowledgement ====================== Gratitude’s can not be seen or expressed, it can only befelt deep in heart and is beyond description. Although, thanks are poor expression of debt of gratitude one feel, yet there is no better way to express. It is my profound privilege to express my deepest sense of gratitude indebtedness to Dr. Anil Kumar,Scientist and chairmen of my advisory committee who conceived, detailed and shaped the problem and provided intellectual stimulation, continuing exhortation and suggestion guidance throughout the present study, without which it would have remained a chimera. His scholarly suggestion, prudent admonitions, immense interest, constant help and affectionate behaviour has been a beacon light for me for which. I will always remain highly indebted to him. I owe my deep and fervent thanks to my advisory committee members Dr. Jagdev Singh, AD (crops) in Directorate of Research; Dr. R. S. Malik, Sr. Scientist, Department of Soil Science; Dr. K. D. Sharma,Scientist,Department ofPlant Physiology;Dr.J. S. Hooda,Sr. ScientistofDepartmentGenetics & Plant Breeding for their willing cooperation and sagacious guidance rendered during the course of the investigation. I extend my thank to, Dr. Jagdev Singh, Professor and Head Department of Agronomy for providing me the necessary facilities during the course of investigations. Words are scarce to express my ardent sentiments to my seniorsnamelyDr.Shispal, Dr.Amit,Dr. Devendra, Dr Rajpaul, Dr. Arvind, Kuldeep Singh, Yogendra, Manoj, Mahaveer, Kailash and my friends Ramdhan,Rakesh,Sunil,Mukesh,Niranjan,and Deepak for their timely help and moral support. I wish to accord my thanks to my juniors Rakesh, Lalu, Babu, Vikash, Rajan, Ajay, Lokesh, Manbeer, Deepin, AnoopandAshwanifor rendering methe needy help for completion of a great milestone in my career. This account will be incomplete without gratitude of my adorable father Shri. Ramswroop and mother Smt. Vimla Devi, grandfather Shri. Ghashi Ram, brothers Mahesh & Akhilesh for their constant encouragement, blessing and inspiration at every stage of my study without which this piece of work could not have been a reality. Last but far from the least, I bow my head in extreme regard to the almighty “Khatu Shyam ji”whoseblessing enabled me to reach this destination. Hisar December,2013 (Arvind Kumar Yadav) CONTENTS CHAPTER NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. I INTRODUCTION 1-3 II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 4-12 III MATERIALS AND METHODS 13-23 IV EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 24-59 V DISCUSSION 60-67 VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 68-71 BIBLIOGRAPHY i-viii LIST OF TABLES Table Description Page No. No. 1. Physical and chemical properties of the soil of experimental field before 15 sowing 2. Croppinghistory of the experimental field 15 3. Schedule of cultural practices carried out during the experiment 17 4. Effect of different treatments on phenological events in pearl millet 25 genotypes 5. Effect of different treatments on phenological events in pearl millet 26 genotypes 6. Effect of environment on plant population (000 ha-1) of pearl millet 28 genotypes 7. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on plant height 28 (cm) of pearl millet 8. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on plant height 29 (cm) of pearl millet 9. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on total number of 30 tillers plant-1at harvest inpearl millet 10. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on leaf area plant-1 31 (cm2) at 20 and 40 DAS in pearl millet 11. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on leaf area plant-1 31 (cm2)at 60 DAS andatharvest inpearl millet 12. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on dry matter 32 accumulation (g plant-1) of pearl milletat 20 and 40 DAS 13. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on dry matter 33 accumulation (g plant-1) of pearl milletat 60 DAS andatharvest 14. Periodical changes in the dry matter partitioning (g plant-1) among 34 different plant parts of pearl millet genotypes as affected by the environment 15. Periodical changes in the dry matter partitioning (g plant-1) among 35 different plant parts of pearl millet genotypes as affected by the environment 16. Effect of environment on the periodical changes in the root length (cm) of 39 pearl millet genotypes 17. Effect of environment on the periodical changes in the root length (cm) of 39 pearl milletgenotypes 18. Root dry weight (g plant-1) of pearl millet genotypes as affected by 40 different environment 19. Root dry weight (g plant-1) of pearl millet genotypes as affected by 41 different environment 20. Leaf area index of pearl millet genotypes at 20 and 40 DAS as affected by 42 the environment 21. Leaf area index of pearl millet genotypes at 60 DAS and harvest as 43 affected by the environment 22. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on leaf area 44 duration (days) of pearlmillet 23. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on leaf area 44 duration (days) of pearl millet 24. Net assimilation rate (mg dm-2 day-1) among different pearl millet 45 genotypes as affected by the environment 25. Net assimilation rate (mg dm-2 day-1) among different pearl millet 45 genotypes as affected by the environment 26. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on crop growth 46 rate (g m-2day-1) of pearl millet 27. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on crop growth 47 rate (g m-2day-1) of pearl millet 28. Periodical changes in the relative growth rate (mg g-1 day-1) of pearl 48 millet genotypes under different environment 29. Periodical changes in the relative growth rate (mg g-1 day-1) of pearl 48 millet genotypes under different environment 30. Effect of environment on leaf water potential (MPa) of different pearl 49 millet genotypes 31. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on relative water 50 content (%) of pearl millet 32. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on canopy 51 temperature depression (-0C) of pearl millet 33. Effect of environment on effective tillers plant-1 and earhead length (cm) 52 of pearl millet genotypes at harvest 34. Earhead girth (cm) and test weight (g) among pearl millet genotypes as 53 affected by different environment 35. Interaction effect between environment and genotypes on grain and stover 54 yields (q ha-1) of pearl millet 36. Interaction effect betweenenvironment and genotypes on biological yield 55 (q ha-1) and harvest index (%) of pearl millet 37. Effect of environment on tiller conversion index and grain chaff ratio of 56 pearl millet genotypes 38. Effect of environment on Zinc and Iron content inthe grain of pearl millet 57 genotypes 39. Effect of environment on soil moisture (cm) use pattern of pearl millet 59 genotypes in 0-90 cm soil profile LIST OF FIGURES Fig No. Description Page No. 1. Weekly meteorological data during the crop seasonof 2011 14 2. Weekly meteorological data during the crop season of 2012 14 3. Layout plan of experiment 16 4. Per cent contribution from different plant parts in total dry matter 36 accumulation of pearl millet genotypes at 20 DAS 5. Per cent contribution from different plant parts in total dry matter 36 accumulation of pearl millet genotypes at 40 DAS 6. Per cent contribution from different plant parts in total dry matter 37 accumulation of pearl millet genotypes at 60 DAS 7. Per cent contribution from different plant parts in total dry matter 37 accumulation of pearl millet genotypes at harvest 8. Seasonal soil moisture (cm) use pattern under different environment 58 in 0-90 cm soil profile CCHHAAPPTTEERR--II IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN The biggest challenge for agriculture at present and in future is to meet the food and fibre needs of the ever increasing world population. Increasing the production of cereals is, therefore, of paramount importance. Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is generally grown under rainfed condition in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Pearl millet is pre- dominantly grown in North-West India and West Africa. It is cultivated on about 30 m ha in more than 30 countries of five continents viz., Asia, Africa, North America, South America and Australia. Though the majority of crop areais inAfrica (about 18 m ha) and Asia (>10 m ha), pearl millet cultivation is being expanded in some of the non-traditional areas such as Brazil,West Asia,North Africa and Central Asia. Increased and stabilized production of pearl millet is essential for the well being of millions of people living in these regions. India is a pioneer country of world in pearl millet production. In India, annual planting area under pearl millet is 8.69 million hectares producing nearly 8.74 million tonnes of grain (Anonymous, 2012-13). It is primarily grown on marginal and sub-marginal lands of Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Haryana. With the advent of pearl millet hybrids in mid-sixties, the pearl millet cultivation received a fillip. As a result, the productivity almost tripled from around 350 kg in mid sixties to around 1156 kg ha-1 in 2012. In Haryana, area under pearl millet is 4.38 lakh hectares with total production of 8.98 lakh tonnes and productivityof2050kgha-1(Anonymous, 2012-13). It is the most drought tolerant crop among cereals and millets. Much of the increased demand for balance human diet and animal ration has to come from staple food crops and roughage as they are major and cheap source of the nutrients. Pearl millet is one of the important choice as its grains are rich in protein, fat, minerals and vitamins. The crop is mostly confined to low fertile water deficit soils. Because of its remarkable ability to withstand and grow in harsh environment, reasonable and nearly assured harvests are obtained. It is primarily grown for food and dry fodder, though a significant portion of pearl millet is also used for non-food purposes such as poultry feed and alcohol extraction. Micronutrient malnutrition arising from dietary deficiency of one or more essential micronutrients affects two-third of world’s population (White and Broadley, 2009; Stein, 2010). The mineral elements most commonly lacking in human diets are iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), which rank fifth and sixth, respectively, among the top ten risk factors contributing to burden of disease, especially in the developing countries (WHO, 2002). A preliminary study conducted with a limited number of 27 pearl millet genotypes at ICRISAT had shown high 1 levels and large variability for both iron (40 to 580 ppm) and zinc content (10 to 66 ppm) in pearl millet grains (Jambunathan and Subramanian, 1988). These values were much higher than those in other cereals. It is also the cheapest source of these micronutrients as compared to other cerealsand vegetables. The usual effect of drought on the development of a plant is the lowered production of biomass and/or a change in the distribution of this biomass among the different organs. The drought resistance of a cultivated plant reflects its capacity to limit the impact on the economic yield of these changes in biomass production and distribution. This capacity will depend on the development phase affected by water deficit as well as on the intensity and the length of the drought. Drought intensity and length also affect development stages such as initiation of panicles, earing or flowering which, in cereals are generally sensitive to water deficit. The average productivity of pearl millet in India as well as Haryana is low as compared to the potential yield of existing cultivars. Good quality seed of better hybrids are not available to the farmers and is one of the main reason for a big gap between the actual yield and their potential yield. Improved genotypes play an important role in augmenting the yield of crop. Recently, many composites and hybrids of pearl millet with high yielding potential have been evolved and released for general cultivation in different parts of India. Hybrid HHB 67 ‘Improved’ has been released for general cultivation in the marginal areas in millet growing areas of Haryana and adjoining states (Anonymous, 2005). The high yielding hybrids/composites of pearl millet are highly responsive to irrigation (Verma, 1993; Khippal and Hooda, 2002). Irrigation has been recognized as a basic necessity for sustaining high productivity of crops in arid and semi arid regions prone to water deficit. The need is greater in most parts of India where rainfall is seasonal and not assured. Water stress causes decrease in the rate of photosynthesis and increase in respiration, thus plant growth is decreased. Adequate water supply is one of the basic inputs for securing higher crop yields. At the same time, it has been one of the most limiting factors in crop production on account of several reasons. Firstly, water is required in huge quantity. Secondly, it needs to be applied several times throughout the crop season on account of continuous process of evaporation. Thirdly, it affects the crop yield directly as well as indirectly by influencing their responses to other inputs including fertilizers and various management practices. The irrigated pearl millet hybrid exhibited the significant differences in terms of number of days to different phenological events (5 leaf stage, panicle initiation, flag leaf, boot stage, 50% flowering, milk stage, dough and physiological maturity stages (Kumar et al., 2005). Crop growth in terms of plant height, dry matter accumulation, tillers plant-1 and number of effective tillers plant-1 were more in pearl millet hybrid MH-179 in comparison to WCC-75 (Jangir et al., 1998). Pusa 605 hybrid gave maximum plant and more dry matter plant-1 as compared to ICMH 356 2

Description:
This is to certify that thesis entitled, “Agro physiological traits for drought tolerance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)” submitted for the degree of. Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Agronomy to the Chaudhary Charan Singh. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar is a bonafide res
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.