DNA Repair of Cancer Stem Cells Lesley A. Mathews•Stephanie M. Cabarcas Elaine M. Hurt Editors DNA Repair of Cancer Stem Cells 2123 Editors Dr.LesleyA.Mathews Dr.ElaineM.Hurt DivisionofPre-ClinicalInnovation MedImmune NationalCenterforAdvancingTranslationalSciences OncologyResearch NationalInstitutesofHealth Gaithersburg,Maryland Rockville,Maryland USA USA Dr.StephanieM.Cabarcas DepartmentofBiology GannonUniversity Erie,Pennsylvania USA ISBN978-94-007-4589-6 ISBN978-94-007-4590-2(eBook) DOI10.1007/978-94-007-4590-2 SpringerDordrechtHeidelbergLondonNewYork LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2012943246 © SpringerScience+BusinessMediaDordrecht2013 Nopartofthisworkmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmittedinanyformorby anymeans,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,microfilming,recordingorotherwise,withoutwritten permissionfromthePublisher,withtheexceptionofanymaterialsuppliedspecificallyforthepurposeof beingenteredandexecutedonacomputersystem,forexclusiveusebythepurchaserofthework. Printedonacid-freepaper SpringerispartofSpringerScience+BusinessMedia(www.springer.com) Preface Inrecentyears,thestridesmadeinunderstandingandelucidatingboththeoriginsand biological mechanisms responsible for driving cancer progression have been quite impressive. Specifically, themomentumthathascoincidedwiththediscoveryand investigation of cancer stem cells (CSCs), tumor-initiating cells (TICs) or cancer- initiatingcells(CICs)hasbeenenormous.Theinvestigationofeveryaspectofthis deadlyandlethalsubpopulationhasbroughtattentiontoitspotentialinatherapeutic lightwhichwehopecantranslateintotheclinic.Thecancerstemcellhypothesiswas firstdescribedwithdatafrommodelsofhumanleukemiabyJohnE.Dickfromthe UniversityofToronto.Theheterogeneityofhumanleukemiaandthepresenceofstem cellsincancerwasfurthertranslatedintosolidtumorsbyAl-Hajjetal. whenthey publishedaprovocativepaperinProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences discussingtheabilitytodistinguishtumorigenic(tumor-initiating)cancercellsfrom thenontumorigeniccounterpartbasedontheexpressionofcellsurfacemarkers.The groupreportedthataslittleas100cellsofthisspecificpopulationwereabletoforma solidtumorwheninjectedintothemammaryfatpadofimmunocompromisedmice. Themostcriticalaspectofthisstudywasthedatademonstratingthateventensof thousandsofcellsofthenontumorigeniccancerstemcelldepletedfractionfailedto produceatumor. Since this study, these cells have been heavily investigated and are now known to be the most aggressive cells within a solid tumor discovered to date. In recent years, many groups have demonstrated that in addition to being the most aggres- sive cells, they are highly resistant to current chemotherapy and radiation regimes employedintheclinic. Theresistantnatureofthesecellshasledmanylabsdown thepathofdevelopingnewtherapiestoeradicatethemfrompatients.Aninteresting observationamongourlabandotherswasthatisolatedCSCsexpresshigherlevels ofDNArepairgenes,andfurthermore,leadtoincreasedexpressionofcrucialgenes and pathways that contribute to their drug resistant characteristics. Thus, we have assembledaremarkablegroupofexpertsinbothCSCsandDNArepairtodiscuss their research in light of the role of DNA repair genes and pathways in the CSC population.Thecommonendgoalistocontributetotheknowledgebaseandlead thefieldininvestigatingandstudyingadditionalmechanismsforpotentialtherapies beingdesignedtotargetthisaggressivepopulationofcells. The concept of DNA repair conferring survival and progression is the overall themeofthisbook,andwebelieveprovidesauniquecontributiontotheCSCfield in regards to developing new strategies to target this highly metastatic and resis- tantpopulation.Wehopethisbookcanprovideafoundationandsupporttofuture v vi Preface scientists and clinicians working in the field of cancer resistance and cancer stem cells. LesleyMathews StephanieM.Cabarcas 1. Al-HajjM,WichaMS,Benito-HernandezAetal(2003)Prospectiveidentification oftumorigenicbreastcancercells.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA100(7):3983–3988 2. MathewsLA,CabarcasSM,HurtEMetal(2011)IncreasedexpressionofDNA repairgenesininvasivehumanpancreaticcancercells.Pancreas40(5):730–739 3. MathewsLA,CabarcasSM,FarrarWL(2011)DNArepair:theculpritfortumor- initiatingcellsurvival?CancerMetastasisRev30(2):185–197 Contents 1 IntroductiontoCancerStemCells ............................... 1 ChengzhuoGao,RobertE.HollingsworthandElaineM.Hurt 2 DNARepairPathwaysandMechanisms .......................... 19 ThomasS.Dexheimer 3 ResistanceandDNARepairMechanismsofCancerStemCells: PotentialMolecularTargetsforTherapy.......................... 33 AamirAhmad,YiweiLi,BinBaoandFazlulH.Sarkar 4 DNARepairinNormalStemCells ............................... 53 OlgaMomcˇilovic´ andGeraldSchatten 5 DNARepairMechanismsinGlioblastomaCancerStemCells ....... 89 MonicaVenere,JeremyN.RichandShidengBao 6 DNARepairMechanismsinBreastCancerStemCells ............. 105 HongYinandJonathanGlass 7 DNARepairMechanismsinOtherCancerStemCellModels ....... 125 MihokoKai 8 Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells inTumor Progression, Metastasis, Epithelial-MesenchymalTransitionandDNARepair............... 141 NagarajS.NagathihalliandErikaT.Brown 9 TargetingCancerStemCellEfficientDNARepairPathways: ScreeningforNewTherapeutics ................................. 157 LesleyA.Mathews,FrancescoCreaandMarcFerrer 10 TheFutureofDNARepairandCancerStemCells................. 173 StephanieM.Cabarcas Index ............................................................ 177 vii Chapter 1 Introduction to Cancer Stem Cells ChengzhuoGao,RobertE.HollingsworthandElaineM.Hurt Abstract Awealthofdatapointstotheexistenceofasubsetoftumor-initiatingcells that have properties similar to stem cells, termed cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs arethoughttobeattheapexofacellularhierarchy,wheretheyarecapableofdif- ferentiatingintotheothercellsfoundwithinatumor.Theymayalsoberesponsible for both patient relapse due to their relative resistance to chemotherapy as well as metastasis.Inrecentyears,muchresearchhasfocusedonthesecells,theirproper- ties and potential targets within these cells for cancer treatment. This chapter will introducetheCSCtheory,discussimportantpropertiesofthesecells,andhighlight theneedtotargetthemforimprovedpatientoutcome. 1.1 TheEtiologyofCancer Many hypotheses have been put forth through the years that attempt to explain the etiology of cancer. They have come from divergent fields of study; pathology, molecularbiologyandgeneticsbuttheyallattempttoexplainhowanormaltissue can go from homeostatic equilibrium to something that grows without the checks andbalancesthatgovernnormalbiology.Thesetheoriesinclude,butarenotlimited to, a viral basis of disease, clonal expansion, and the cancer stem cell hypothesis. While each of these theories attempts to explain the etiology of cancer, it is most likelythatsomeoftheseindependenttheoriesworktogethertogiverisetonotonly tumors,buttumorsthatareabletoevadetreatmentstrategies. E.M.Hurt((cid:2)) MedImmune,LLC.,OncologyResearchMedImmune,Gaithersburg,MD20878,USA e-mail:[email protected] C.Gao·R.E.Hollingsworth OncologyResearch,MedImmune,LLC.,Gaithersburg,MD20878,USA L.A.Mathewsetal.(eds.),DNARepairofCancerStemCells, 1 DOI10.1007/978-94-007-4590-2_1,©SpringerScience+BusinessMediaDordrecht2013 2 C.Gaoetal. 1.2 TheCancerStemCellHypothesis Since the early pathologists could look at tissues microscopically the origins and progressionofcancerhasbeenpondered. Itwasnotedthatadvancedtumorsoften presentedwithdiverseareasofdifferentiation,proliferation,invasionandvascularity. ItwasduringthistimeofearlymicroscopicinspectionthatledCohnheim,astudent ofVirchow, to propose his embryonal rest hypothesis ([1] and references therein). Cohnheim had noted that cancer tissues, teratomas in particular, had many of the samepropertiesasembryonictissue.Thisleadhimtospeculatethatcarcinogenesis occurs from dormant remnants of the embryo that are later reactivated. However, thistheorywaslargelyignored.Thespiritofthishypothesisreappeardinthe1970s whenBarryPierceetal.examineddifferentiationinteratomas(reviewedin[1])and determinedthatastemcellwasresponsibleforinitiationoftheteratomas.Theythen furtheredtheseobservationsintoatheorythatallepithelialcancersariseasaresult ofdifferentiation-pausedadulttissuestemcells[2]. Ontheheelsofthishypothesis, camesomeofthefirstevidencethatleukemias mayhaveaCSCorigin.JohnDickandcolleaguesshowedthatasub-populationof acutemyelogenousleukemia(AML)cells, whichsharedaphenotypewithnormal hematopoieticstemcells,couldconfercancerwhentransplantedintoimmunocom- promised mice. Furthermore, the cells that did not have the stem cell-phenotype couldnottransferAMLtorecipientmice[3,4].Severalyearslater,CSCswereiden- tifiedinbreastcancer[5],followedbyamyriadofsolidmalignancies(discussedin moredetailbelowin“1.4IdentificationofCSCs”). 1.3 PropertiesandCellofOriginofCSCs Cancerstemcellsaresonamedbecausetheysharemanyofthesamepropertiesasnor- malstemcells.Theyarecapableoftumorigenesis,self-renewalandcandifferentiate toformtheheterogeneouscelltypespresentintumors(Fig.1.1a).Thesefunctional propertiesledtotheCSCmoniker;however,manyarguethat“tumor-initiatingcells” wouldbeabetterdescriptionofthesecells. Forthepurposesofthisbook, wewill refertothesecellsasCSCs,whereaCSChasbeendefinedas“acellwithinatumor that possess the capacity to self-renew and to cause the heterogeneous lineages of cancercellsthatcomprisethetumor”[6].IthasalsobeenobservedthatCSCsarerel- ativelyresistanttochemotherapyandthereforemayberesponsibleforpatientrelapse following treatment (Fig. 1.1b, discussed in detail in Chap. 3). Thus, the CSC hy- pothesisattemptstoexplainseveralobservationsoftumors,includingthefrequency atwhichtumorcellscangiverisetonewtumors,thegenerationofcellswithmultiple geneticalterations,andtheheterogeneityofcelltypespresentwithintumors. In theory, cancer arises from a single cell that has somehow subverted normal growth restrictions. However, experimental evidence has shown a requirement of manycellsinordertoseedatumor. Forexamplethegrowthoftumorcellsinim- munocompromisedmice,typicallyrequiresthat1–10millioncellsareimplantedin 1 IntroductiontoCancerStemCells 3 Fig. 1.1 Schematic representation of CSC-driven tumor formation. (a) CSCs can either divide symmetrically(self-renewal)togiverisetotwoCSCsortheycandivideasymmetrically(differen- tiation)givingrisetooneCSCandonedifferentiatedprogeny.Theabilitytogiverisetoatumor, toself-renewalanddifferentiateintotheheterogeneouscellpopulationsfoundinthetumorarethe definingcharacteristicofaCSC.ThedifferentiatedprogenyofaCSCareoftenmoreproliferative thantheCSCitself,buttheyhaveafinitereplicativecapacity.(b)CSCsareresistanttoconventional therapies,includingchemotherapyandradiation.Thesetreatmentscaneliminatethemorerapidly dividingdifferentiatedcellsbutleavebehindtheCSC(discussedinmoredetailinChap.3).Once treatmentisstopped,theremainingCSCscanbegintodivideagainandformanewtumorresulting inpatientrelapse ordertoseetumorformation.Thisobservationhasmanypossibleexplanations,in- cludinginjurytocellsuponinjection,therequirementfortherightmicroenvironment (andthedifferenceofthisbetweenhumanandmouse), aswellastherequirement tohaveavarietyofcelltypespresentinordertoefficientlyinducetumorformation. However, even in experiments where human cancer patients were reinjected with theirowntumorcellsatdifferentsiteswithintheirbodies,ittooklargenumbersof cellsinorderforanewtumortoestablish.Again,thiscouldbeconsistentwiththe role of the tumor microenvironment, this time from one site to another; it is also consistentwiththenotionthatonlyasmallproportionofcellsarecapableofgiving rise to a tumor. The idea that only a small proportion of the cells found within a tumorarecapableofgivingrisetoatumorisconsistentwiththeCSChypothesis. ThefrequencyofCSCsinmostcaseshasbeenreportedtobelow(typicallylessthan 5 %) except in the case of melanoma where a variety of cells were shown to have equallyhightumorigenicity[7,8]. The origin of the cancer stem cell is still under debate. The requirement for multiplegeneticinsultsinordertodrivetumorformationhasbeenrecognizedfora longtime[9]. Itissuggestedthatinorderforacelltolivelongenoughtosustain 4 C.Gaoetal. thegeneticinsultsrequiredtodrivetumorformation,itislikelythatanormaladult stem cell is the originator of a CSC phenotype. Mathematical models support this theory[10].Furthermore,theleukemicstemcells(LSCs)ofCMLpatientsexpress BCR-ABL,thecommontranslocationthatdrivescellulartransformation[11].This provides experimental evidence that CSCs sustain the genetic insults that are seen todrivecarcinogenesis.TheidentificationinCSCsofoncogenicdrivermutationsis alsobeginningtoemergeforsolidtumors. Forexample, theTMPRSS:ERGfusion hasbeenfoundinprostateCSCs[12]. However,itisstillpossiblethatamoredifferentiatedcellundergoesthesegenomic rearrangements and additionally picks up further mutations that impart the ability to self-renew as well as differentiate. Indeed fibroblasts can acquire the properties ofpluripotentstemcellswiththeactivationofjustafewgenes[13–15].Moreover, itwasrecentlyshownthatacatastrophiceventinthecellcanleadtomanygenetic alterationsatasingletime[16].Itmayalsobethatenvironmentalcuescantrigger CSCpropertiesevenindependentofDNArearrangements.Forexample,ithasbeen noted that cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a normal developmental process that promotes cancer invasion and metastasis, can acquire characteristics of CSCs [17]. These ilines of evidence suggest that a cell does not need to be long-lived in order to sustain many genetic alterations and that CSC propertiescanbebestowedbybiologicalprocesses,andwouldthereforearguethat anycellmaybethefodderforCSCs. 1.4 IsolationofCSCs Currently, there are several commonly used approaches for the isolation of cancer stemcells,including:(1)sortingofasidepopulation(SP)byflowcytometrybased onHoechstdyeefflux,(2)sortingofCSCsbyflowcytometrybasedoncellsurface marker expression, (3) enriching of CSCs by non-adherent sphere culture and (4) sortingofCSCsbyflowcytometrybasedonaldehydedehydrogenase(ALDH)ac- tivity (Fig. 1.2). All of these approaches enrich for CSCs to varying degrees, and eachofthemhasitsownadvantagesandlimitations,whichwillbediscussedbelow. 1.4.1 SidePopulations Goodell and colleagues, while analyzing murine bone marrow cells, discovered a smallanddistinctsubsetofwholebonemarrowcellsthatwereunstainedbyHoechst 33342, a vital dye [18]. This Hoechst 33342 low population is termed SP. They foundthattheSPhadthephenotypicmarkersofmultipotentialhematopoieticstem cells and were able to repopulate the bone marrow. Following their work, the SP has been extended to a variety of cancer types, including leukemia [19, 20], ovar- ian cancer [21], hepatocellular carcinoma [22], brain tumors [23–25], lung cancer [26,27],thyroidcancer[28],nasopharyngealcarcinoma[29],mesenchymaltumors