$25.00 ISBN 978-0-292-79143-5 ,!7IA2J2-hjbedf!:p;M;p;k;K Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 1 # 1 DINARCHUS, HYPERIDES, AND LYCURGUS Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 2 # 2 THE ORATORY OF CLASSICAL GREECE TranslatedwithNotes (cid:1) MichaelGagarin,SeriesEditor volume 5 Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 3 # 3 D I N A RC H U S, H Y P E R I D E S, A N D LY C U RG U S Translated by Ian Worthington, Craig R. Cooper, & Edward M. Harris university of texas press, austin Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 4 # 4 (cid:1) Copyright 2001bytheUniversityofTexasPress Allrightsreserved PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica Firstedition,2001 Requestsforpermissiontoreproducematerialfrom thisworkshouldbesenttoPermissions,University ofTexasPress,Box7819,Austin,TX78713-7819. (cid:2)(cid:1) Thepaperusedinthisbookmeetstheminimum ansi/nisoz r requirementsof 39.48-1992( 1997) (PermanenceofPaper). LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData Dinarchus,Hyperides,andLycurgus/translatedby IanWorthington,CraigR.Cooper&EdwardM. Harris. p. cm.—(TheoratoryofclassicalGreece v.5) Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex. isbn 0-292-79142-9(hardcover:alk.paper)— isbn 0-292-79143-7(pbk.:alk.paper) 1.Speeches,addresses,etc.,Greek—Translations intoEnglish. 2.Dinarchus—Translationsinto English. 3.Hyperides—TranslationsintoEnglish. 4.Lycurgus—TranslationsintoEnglish. I.Worth- ington,Ian. II.Cooper,CraigR.(CraigRichard), 1960– III.Harris,EdwardMonroe. IV.Title. V.Series. pa d 3633. 56 2001 (cid:3) 885 .0108—dc21 00-012082 Thisbookhasbeensupportedbyanendowment dedicatedtoclassicsandtheancientworld,funded bygrantsfromtheNationalEndowmentforthe Humanities,theGladysKriebleDelmasFounda- tion,theJamesR.Dougherty,Jr.Foundation,and theRachaelandBenVaughanFoundation,andby giftsfromMarkandJoAnnFinley,LucyShoe Meritt,AnneByrdNalle,andotherindividual donors. Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 5 # 5 CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii SeriesIntroduction ix OratoryinClassicalAthens ix TheOrators xii TheWorksoftheOrators xv GovernmentandLawinClassicalAthens xvii TheTranslationofGreekOratory xxiv Abbreviations xxv NoteonCurrency xxv BibliographyofWorksCited xxvi SupplementaryBibliographyforVolume5 xxvii DINARCHUS(IanWorthington) 1 IntroductiontoDinarchus 3 Bibliography 10 1.AgainstDemosthenes 11 2.AgainstAristogeiton 45 3.AgainstPhilocles 53 HYPERIDES(CraigR.Cooper) 59 IntroductiontoHyperides 61 1.InDefenseofLycophron 69 2.AgainstPhilippides 80 3.AgainstAthenogenes 87 4.OnBehalfofEuxenippus 102 5.AgainstDemosthenes 115 6.TheFuneralOration 128 Fragments 137 Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 6 # 6 dinarchus, hyperides, & lycurgus vi LYCURGUS(EdwardM.Harris) 153 IntroductiontoLycurgus 155 1.AgainstLeocrates 159 Fragments 204 Index 219 Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 7 # 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ThisisthefifthvolumeinaseriesoftranslationsofTheOratoryof Classical Greece. The aim of the series is to make availableprimarily for those who do not read Greek up-to-date, accurate, and readable translationswithintroductionsandexplanatorynotesofallthesurviv- ing works and major fragments of the Attic orators of the classical bc period (ca. 420–320 ): Aeschines, Andocides, Antiphon, Demos- thenes,Dinarchus,Hyperides,Isaeus,Isocrates,Lycurgus,andLysias. Thisvolumeisdevotedtoatriooforators,Dinarchus,Hyperides,and Lycurgus, who together represent a good range of the materialfrom thelastdecadesofourperiod. Onbehalfofallthetranslators,IwouldliketothankAlanBoege- hold,whoreadthevolumeforthePressandmademanyhelpfulcom- mentsandsuggestions.Letmealsoacknowledgeonceagainthehelp and support of the University of Texas Press, especially Director Joanna Hitchcock, Humanities Editor Jim Burr, Managing Editor CarolynWylie,andCopyeditorNancyMoore. —M.G. Forthis,myswansongonDinarchusIwouldthink,IthankMichael Gagarin for his comments and eye for detail and also mywifeTracy forhercontinuedsupport. —I.W. Iwouldliketoextendmythankstomycolleaguesandfriendsinthe Department of Classics at the UniversityofWinnipegfortheircon- tinued support and especially to Michael Gagarin for the manysug- gestionshemadetoimprovethistranslation. —C.R.C. Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 8 # 8 dinarchus, hyperides, & lycurgus viii IwouldliketothankmyfriendFrederickNaidenforreadingoverthe entiretranslationwithasharpeyeandsavingmefromseveralmistakes andMichaelGagarinforhiscarefulattentiontoeachandeveryword of the translation. In a day when philological expertise is rare, he maintainedthehigheststandardsofourprofession. —E.M.H. Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 9 # 9 SERIES INTRODUCTION GreekOratory By MichaelGagarin oratory in classical athens From as early as Homer (and undoubtedly much earlier) the Greeksplacedahighvalueoneffectivespeaking.EvenAchilles,whose greatnesswasprimarilyestablishedonthebattlefield,wasbroughtup to be ‘‘a speaker of words and a doer of deeds’’ (Iliad 9.443); and Athenian leaders of the sixth and fifth centuries,1 such as Solon, Themistocles,andPericles,wereallaccomplishedorators.MostGreek literary genres—notably epic, tragedy, and history—underscorethe importance of oratory by their inclusion of set speeches.Theformal pleadingsoftheenvoystoAchillesintheIliad,themessengerspeeches in tragedy reporting events like the battle of Salamis in Aeschylus’ PersiansorthegruesomedeathofPentheusinEuripides’Bacchae,and thepowerfulpoliticaloratoryofPericles’funeralorationinThucydi- desarebutafewofthemostnotableexamplesoftheGreeks’never- ending fascination with formal public speaking, which was to reach itsheightinthepublicoratoryofthefourthcentury. In early times, oratory was not a specialized subject of study but waslearnedbypracticeandexample.Theformalstudyofrhetoricas an‘‘art’’(techn¯e)began,wearetold,inthemiddleofthefifthcentury inSicilywiththeworkofCoraxandhispupilTisias.2Thesetwoare 1All dates in this volume are bc unless the contrary is either indicated or obvious. 2SeeKennedy1963:26–51.Cole1991haschallengedthistraditionalpicture, arguingthattheterm‘‘rhetoric’’wascoinedbyPlatotodesignateanddenigrate anactivityhestronglyopposed.Cole’sownreconstructionisnotwithoutprob-