ebook img

Developmental Plasticity. Behavioral and Biological Aspects of Variations in Development PDF

277 Pages·1981·4.098 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Developmental Plasticity. Behavioral and Biological Aspects of Variations in Development

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SERIES SERIES EDITOR Harry Beilin Developmental Psychology Program City University of New York Graduate School New York, New York LYNN S. LIBEN. Deaf Children: Developmental Perspectives JONAS LANGER. The Origins of Logic. Six to Twelve Months GILBERTE PIERAUT-LE BONNIEC. The Development of Modal Reasoning: Genesis of Necessity and Possibility Notions TIFFANY MARTINI FIELD, SUSAN GOLDBERG, DANIEL STERN, and ANITA MILLER SOSTEK. (Editors). High-Risk Infants and Children: Adult and Peer Interactions BARRY GHOLSON. The Cognitive-Developmental Basis of Human Learning: Studies in Hypothesis Testing ROBERT L. SELMAN. The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding: Developmental and Clinical Analyses RAINER H. KLUWE and HANS SPADA. (Editors). Developmental Models of Thinking HARBEN BOUTOURLINE YOUNG and LUCY RAU FERGUSON. Puberty to Manhood in Italy and America SARAH L. FRIEDMAN and MARIAN SIGMAN. (Editors). Preterm Birth and Psychological Development LYNN S. LIBEN, ARTHUR H. PATTERSON, and NORA NEWCOMBE. (Editors). Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span: Theory and Application W. PATRICK DICKSON. (Editor). Children's Oral Communication Skills EUGENE S. GOLLIN. (Editor). Developmental Plasticity: Behavioral and Biological Aspects of Variations in Development In Preparation GEORGE E. FORM AN. (Editor). Action and Thought: From Sensorimotor Schemes to Symbolic Operations Developmental Plasticity Behavioral and Biological Aspects of Variations in Development Edited by EUGENE S. GOLLIN Department of Psychology University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado 1981 ACADEMIC PRESS A Subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanouich, Publishers New York London Toronto Sydney San Francisco This volume is based, in part, on a continuing program in biobehavioral development conducted by the Developmental Psychology Area of the Psychology Department in the University of Colorado COPYRIGHT © 1981, BY ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 111 10003 United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (LONDON) LTD. Oval Road, London 24/28 NW1 7DX Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Developmental plasticity. (Developmental psychology series) Includes bibliographies and index. 1. Adaptability (Psychology) 2. Adaptation (Physiology) 3- Developmental psychology. k. Learning, Psychology of. 5. Psychology, Comparative. I. Gollin, Eugene S/ II. Series. [DNLM: 1. Child development. 2. Learning. WS 105 DU8917] BF713.DU6 155.2*2 80-2331 ISBN 0-12-289620-3 AACR2 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 81 82 83 84 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 List of Contributors Numbers in parentheses indicate the pages on which the authors' contributions begin. DAVID CHISZAR (71), Department of Psychology, University of Col- orado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 ROBERT DOOLING (135), Rockefeller University Field Research Center, Millbrook, New York 12545 EUGENE S GOLLIN (231), Department of Psychology, University of Col- orado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 JERRE LEVY (175), Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 LEWIS P. LIPSITT (35, 101), Department of Psychology, Brown Univer- sity, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 GERALD E. McCLEARN (3), College of Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 PETER MARLER (135), Rockefeller University Field Research Center, Millbrook, New York 12545 STEPHEN TOULMIN (253) Committee on Social Thought, Univer- sity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 JOHN S WERNER (35, 101), Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 STEPHEN ZOLOTH (135), Rockefeller University Field Research Center, Millbrook, New York 12545 ix Preface Developmental scientists in the behavioral and biological areas are faced with a twofold problem. First, they must strive to comprehend the enormous diversity in form and function that exists among organisms of different species, among members of the same species, and within individuals over the course of ontogenesis. The second problem confronting developmental- ists is that against this background of diversity there is the figure of species and individual integrity. How are the themes of diversity and integrity that characterize living systems to be reconciled? The contributors to this volume are in general agreement that both diversity and integrity are phenotypic ex- pressions of developmental processes, and that the task is to explore the con- straints on and opportunities for variation in the course of development. In this volume these themes are examined from a variety of theoretical viewpoints and research contexts. In Chapter 1 McCleam reviews the broad evolutionary landscape and the specific genetic mechanisms implicated in biological and behavioral development. Next Werner and Lipsitt describe the sensory apparatus available to neonatal human beings. Chiszar, in Chapter 3, details the similarities and differences between ethological theories and learning theories and considers developmental plasticity in interdisciplinary contexts. The acquisition of behavior patterns during early postnatal develop- ment is examined by Lipsitt and Werner from a traditional learning theory point of view in Chapter 4, and in the following chapter the same general phenomenon is approached by Marler, Zoloth, and Dooling from ethological and comparative vantage points. The role played by asymmetry in general and by cerebral asymmetry in particular in the generation of individuality is examined by Jerre Levy in Chapter 6. In Chapters 7 and 8 Gollin and Toulmin, respectively, explore epistemological, theoretical, and methodo- logical questions that arise from a consideration of developmental plasticity. xi I EVOLUTIONARY AND GENETIC BACKGROUND A recurrent theme in this book is the adaptive significance of organismic change and the adaptive value of morphogenetic stabilization. Neither of these aspects of Jiving systems is understandable without a consideration of the proliferation of life forms during the history of the planet. It is the task of evolutionary theorists to trace that history, to order it, and to render it into a tale that makes sense. In the following chapter, McClearn portrays in drama- tic fashion the vastness of the time scale that serves as the evolutionary stage. It is a heroic story fashioned by brilliant, albeit temporary, successes and many, many failures. The factors that contribute to success in the sense of survival and to failure in the sense of extinction are, of course, the subject matter of many scientific disciplines. To understand how selective processes work to favor the vigor and prosperity of some organisms and the waning or demise of others requires knowledge about how hereditary mechanisms coact with environmental forces to produce particular phenotypes in the course of individual development, for it is upon the phenotypic arrangements that the selective pressures are exerted. In this chapter, the ground plan for phenotypic variability is presented. Developmental plasticity must be con- sidered within the structure provided by that ground plan. 1 1 Evolution and Genetic Variability GERALD E. McCLEARN Introduction People differ from starfish and from squirrels and from elephants. Further- more, people, starfish, squirrels, and elephants differ one from the other. These observations are so obvious that they might be judged trite, but im- plications of the genetic perspective on this intra- and interspecific variability are of fundamental importance. In terms of variance analysis, one might conceive of the total variability of all organisms. The within-species term would represent the subject matter of individual differences, and the between-species term would be the province of evolutionary biology. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a frame- work for thinking about variability in the developmental sciences. The picture is necessarily painted with the broadest of strokes, and the interested reader is directed to the cited references for more fine-grained expositions. Contemporary Variability between Species As a beginning, let us regard our species in an evolutionary perspective. Together with the gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, and gibbons, collec- tively of the family Pongidae, we Hominidae constitute the superfamily Hominoidea. Together with the superfamily Cercopithecoidea (the Old World monkeys, including 13 genera) and the superfamily Ceboidea (New World monkeys, 10 genera), we Hominoidea compose the suborder An- thropoidea. All together, we Anthropoidea number about 140 species. The suborder Prosimii — which includes the treeshrews, lemurs, and tarsiers—has 3 DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY Copyright © 1981 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. ISBN 0-12-289620-3 4 GERALD Ε. McCLEARN about 53 species. The Anthropoidea and the Prosimii make up the order Primates, a group of mammals characterized most notably by mobile digits on hands and feet, a shortened snout, frontally placed eyes, a tendency toward upright posture, and a brain that is large relative to body size (see Jolly, 1972; Le Gros Clark, 1965). Thus, we see that about 193 species are in the immediate phylogenetic neighborhood of humankind. For a more comprehensive picture, we note that primates belong to the class Mammalia, which also includes the orders Monotremata (such as the duck-billed platypus), Marsupialia (kangaroo, opossum, and anteater), Lagomorpha (rabbit), Dermoptera (flying lemur), Chiroptera (bat), Insecti- uora (shrew), Fissipeda (dog, cat), Rodentia (mouse, rat), Pinnipedia (seal), Artiodactyla (pig, deer, hippopotamus), Perissodactyla (horse, rhinoceros), Proboscoidea (elephant), and several others. All of these mammals belong to the subphylum Vertebrata. This is to say, they have backbones. Our species constitutes only a small part of all vertebrates; there are, in fact, about 55,000 vertebrate species. Approximately 4300 are mammalian species, about 3000 are amphibian species, 6000 are reptiles, 11,000 are birds, and the bony fishes come in the enormous variety of 28,000 species. Thus, even though diversity of species is a commonplace observation, common knowledge does not give one an adequate view of the range of diversity of living things. We do not encounter even a small sample of this diversity in the ordinary course of events. Even a trip to the zoo can only whet the intellec- tual appetite. No zoo can stock all 55,000 vertebrate species! If this number of vertebrates is awesome, consider that there are about 1,055,000 specific types of creatures without backbones—among others, the jellyfishes, crabs, spiders, insects, oysters, flatworms, roundworms, sponges, and starfishes of the world. These invertebrates surpass us vertebrates in species number almost 20 to 1. Particularly unlikely to be the object of everyday observation are single- celled organisms, but the fact that they are small does not mean that they are unimportant either qualitatively or quantitatively. It has been estimated that there are about 100 octillion living cells in the world today—that is, 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (Hockett, 1973). Of these 100 octillion cells, perhaps as many as 99 octillion, and at least as many as 90 octillion, are tied up in single-celled organisms (bacteria, algae, and so on). We, the metazoan, multicellular animals, are in a decided minority. We should note further that the preceding discussion has concerned only the animal kingdom. We have not even considered the plants, which also exist in dazzling diversity. How different are human beings and squirrels? In view of the enormous diversity of living things, the answer to this question will depend on the measuring stick used to assess variability. If a visitor from Mars were to ex- 1. EVOLUTION AND GENETIC VARIABILITY 5 amine a squirrel and a man, many similarities would be observed. It would be found that both are responsive to similar kinds of energies; our sense organs work according to the same basic principles and have similar sensitivities. If the human being and the squirrel were dissected, the specimens would look remarkably alike except for the difference in size. In both cases, the Martian investigator would find a little pump for blood, an inflatable bellows to transfer oxygen from the surrounding environment into the blood stream, a bean-shaped organ for waste disposal, and so on. These are remarkable similarities. If one's frame of reference were the whole array of over a million living animal species, one would conclude that squirrels and human beings are not very different at all. However, there are differences between human beings and squirrels— differences in size, hair covering, complexity of behavioral processes, and so on. Whether species are alike or different is thus a matter of perspective. There is no absolute yardstick with which to measure interspecies distance. The apparent distance will shrink or expand depending upon our emphasis on the similarities or the differences—whether we are emphasizing the theme of all living beings, or the variety of specific forms the living assume. Evolutionary Variability The variability of living beings represents only differences among the sur- vivors of the winnowing process called natural selection. Many more species have become extinct than are alive today. To consider the full range of vari- ability, therefore, we need to turn to the evolutionary sequence that has culminated in the species that are our contemporaries. The evolutionary scale in Figure 1.1 begins 5 billion years ago when the sun started glowing. Matters of professional interest to biologists or psychol- ogists began about 3.5 billion years ago when life originated. Life evidently began in the oceans when exposure of a particular set of atmospheric ingre- dients to high temperatures and lightning produced the forerunners of amino acids—the building blocks of protein. Amino acids gradually accumulated in the ocean, making it a dilute organic soup. In this soup, combinations of organic constituents formed, and one of these yielded a molecule that could replicate itself. At that point, life was off and running (see Orgel, 1973). Shortly thereafter, a matter of only a few million years, another funda- mental development occurred. In the presence of the energy from sunlight, photosynthesis permitted the building up of carbohydrates from the car- bon dioxide that was accumulating in the atmosphere. Photosynthesizing organisms were self-feeding; moreover, and of profound ultimate impor- tance to us, they produced oxygen as a waste product. Oxygen, which was Λ IQ CO s "Ο ω 3 r-f «λ a „9ί ω < CD S' CD οο «λ "1 ^ Ε 8-1 Ι--. çd -· -^3 3.ill? I- s Sülls OO Q. (Λ (Λ (Λ<Λ <Λ ( Ui// i II 10 |fäleozoic|me|ce I O -η co <Ο CQ CD S. ig C I ! S- present. e h t o t o g a 2 p years b rs billion a 5 e y m of fro ns scale g-CD < 2. Ο Ο Ν Ό Oq Φ CT) ^ g 1' η ^ Ξ.3 2 Ο JCO χ Sä itco i a I Λ00 CD \ I 3 billio Evolutionär],; time -! ξ I 1. 1. re u g Fi 4 _ I co I d' I15

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.