UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS Determinants of Acceptance and Use of Routine HIS in Developing Countries: The Case of DHIS2 in Kenya BY JOSEPHINE WANGARI KARURI P80/85062/2012 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI AUGUST 2015 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my original work except where due references are cited. It has not been presented for a degree in any other university. No part of this thesis may be reproduced without the prior permission of the author or the University of Nairobi NAME OF STUDENT Josephine Wangari Karuri: Signature: Date: 15 August 2015 This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors. NAMES OF SUPERVISORS Prof. Peter Waiganjo Wagacha: Signature: Date: 15 August 2015 Dr. Daniel Orwa Ochieng: Signature: Date: 15 August 2015 University of Nairobi School of Computing & Informatics P. O. Box 30197 – 00100 GPO Nairobi ii Dedication To our three lovely daughters: Lisa, Anna and Sara. Your unconditional love inspires me to reach for excellence in all spheres of my life. iii ABSTRACT The process of implementing ICT in the healthcare sector of developing countries has in the past been often fragmented and ill-managed, leading to weak systems that provide inaccurate, incomplete and untimely information. The increasing application of ICT to manage these countries’ routine health information systems (HIS) is expected to improve efficiencies, leading to availability of quality health information for monitoring, evaluation and delivery of healthcare services and programs. In 2010, Kenya initiated the process of adoption and implementation of a web-based system (DHIS2) as the national HIS that will facilitate management of routine health information for evidence-based decision making. For maximum benefits to be reaped from this implementation, DHIS2 needs to gain acceptance from all categories of targeted users. This study sought to develop a new technology acceptance model that can better explain the key determinants of acceptance and use of DHIS2 in Kenya. The findings from this case study can be extended to explain acceptance and use of health IT in other similar settings. The overall objective of this research was “to enhance knowledge and understanding of health I.T. adoption by building and validating a technology adoption model to study determinants of acceptance and use of national HIS in a developing country context’. The specific objectives were to: i. To develop a technology adoption model than can predict the complex relationships that affect adoption of routine HIS in a developing country’s healthcare context ii. Validate the model through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using empirical data collected from public health care workers in Kenya iii. Generate the final model and evaluate the strength of the relationships between the exogenous and endogenous constructs, hence deduce the factors that most contribute to the HIS Adoption and Use process iv iv. Cross-validate the extended model across different categories of healthcare workers via multi-group analysis. The study was conducted primarily through the use of quantitative methods, but qualitative data was also collected in the pre-study through conducting Key Informant Interviews (KII) to provide the background and contextual information used in refining the conceptual model. An exploratory study design was subsequently used to determine the existence of relationships between the dependent and independent variables in the model. In the pilot phase of the study, focus group discussions and quantitative analysis of data collected from twenty two DHIS2 users was used to establish the survey instrument’s understandability and Completion Time; test the instrument’s content validity; and also establish the reliability of construct measurement through measures of composite reliability as well as internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Findings from the pilot phase were used to further refine the survey instrument and the conceptual model. In the main phase the study, a questionnaire was administered to health workers through a cross-sectional survey both at national and county / sub-county levels. The total number of valid questionnaires returned was 266 against a target of 250. This number represents slightly more than 20% of the approximately 1100 health workers who have been trained on DHIS2 in Kenya, and these were drawn from at least 10 of Kenya’s 47 counties. The resulting quantitative data was used to empirically test the research model and the associated hypotheses. Data analysis for both the pilot and main survey phases was done in two parts: descriptive analysis of the data was performed using SPSS statistical analysis tool, for the purpose of obtaining the frequencies, means, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis; with the latter two measures being used to test for distribution normality of each indicator’s data. Subsequently Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and specifically Partial Least Square path modeling (PLS), was used for analysis of the conceptual model and testing of the proposed hypotheses. v By the end of the study, a technology adoption model had been adapted, tested and validated to explain HIS adoption in a developing country context. The specific significance of this study is that it: Contributes to research on technology acceptance by extending UTAUT theoretical model Identifies the complex structural and contextual factors that contribute most significantly to adoption of public health IT in developing countries context Tests the validity of UTAUT in the unique context of public health IT in developing countries context Provides public health IT implementers and policy makers with a basis on which to identify factors that can be manipulated to enhance acceptance of such systems in developing countries Key Words: Technology Acceptance; DHIS2; UTAUT; Health Information Systems; Structural Equation Modeling; vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many who have inspired and supported me in this PhD journey. Here I mention only but a few. First and foremost, I would like express my deepest gratitude to my first supervisor, Professor Peter Waiganjo Wagacha, for his trust in me and selfless commitment that prodded me to reach for excellence. This work would not have been completed without his invaluable support and encouragement that never wavered. I am also indebted to my second supervisor, Dr. Daniel Orwa Ochieng, who wholeheartedly shared with me his vast knowledge on technology adoption and got me moving in the right direction. He provided me with never ending support and advice whenever I needed it. Additionally I thank all the other faculty members at University of Nairobi’s School of Computing and Informatics (SCI), especially those who took time to provide my colleagues and I with invaluable tips and guidelines on how to conduct PhD research: Prof. Waema, Dr. Wanjiku Ng’ang’a, Dr. Wausi, Dr. Omwenga and Dr. Omwansa. And to other faculty members who provided support in different capacities, including Dr. Opiyo, Dr. Mwaura, Mr. Ogutu, Mr. Mburu and others. Special thanks to the SCI director, Professor Okello–Odongo, for ensuring that the school provides a most conducive environment for academic excellence. And to my colleagues and fellow sojourners in the PhD journey – thank you for the mutual support and encouragement. I am also greatly indebted to all the different survey respondents who graciously consented to participate in different phases of this study – without their invaluable support this research would never have seen the light of day. Many thanks for the immense support received from MoH officers, both past and present, at the Ministry of Health’s Division of Health Informatics and M&E. We look forward to even greater partnership in the coming days. vii Many thanks too to my friends and family near and far, too many to name individually, who gave me constant support and encouragement throughout this long research journey. And especially to my mum and dad, Mr. & Mrs. Ann and Dedan Karuri, who have unwavering love and faith in us, their children. And special thanks to my three lovely daughters, for their great patience and love, spiced with some gentle nudging to hasten the PhD completion process and resume ‘normal’ life. And to my dear husband, Dr. V. Mark Gacii, thank you for holding down the fort so willingly and so ably while I burnt the midnight oil. Last but most important I thank the Lord Almighty, who gave me the conviction, the faith and the strength I needed to undertake this journey. To Him be all the Glory. viii RESEARCH SUMMARY The World Health Organization (WHO) defines Health Information System (HIS) as a system that integrates data collection, processing, reporting and use of the information necessary for improving health service effectiveness and efficiency through better management at all levels of health services. A national HIS is usually founded on routine data collection systems but complemented by information from other sources such as community surveys, clinical studies, health systems research, census, and other periodic or population-based surveys. The process of implementing national Health Information Systems (HIS) in developing countries has in the past been often paper-based, fragmented and ill-managed, leading to weak systems that provide inaccurate, incomplete and untimely information. The increasing application of ICT to manage developing countries’ routine HIS is expected to improve efficiencies and effectiveness of such systems, leading to availability of quality health information for efficient monitoring, evaluation and delivery of healthcare services and programs in these countries. In 2010, Kenya initiated the process of adoption and implementation of a web-based system (DHIS2) as the national Health Information System that will facilitate management of routine health information for evidence-based decision making. For maximum benefits to be reaped from this implementation, DHIS2 needs to gain acceptance from all categories of targeted users. Researchers agree that one major factor leading to failure of systems implementation is the inadequate understanding of the socio-technical aspects of information technology (IT), particularly how people and organizations adopt IT. Technology acceptance studies have been conducted widely and various models developed in an attempt to predict the critical determinants of technology acceptance, specifically from the users’ perspective. One such model is the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) which reportedly was able to explain up to 69% of user intention to use technology under different settings. These settings did not however include the healthcare domain in a developing country context, with all the unique challenges of implementing ICT under such ix settings. This study undertook a rigorous evaluation of an extended UTAUT model to establish the key factors and their complex relationships in determining the acceptance and use of DHIS2 in Kenya. The findings from this case study can be extending to explain acceptance and use of health IT in other similar settings, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The overall objective of this research was “to enhance knowledge and understanding of health I.T. adoption by building and validating a technology adoption model to study determinants of acceptance and use of national HIS in a developing country context”. The specific objectives were to: i. To develop a technology adoption model than can predict the complex relationships that affect adoption of routine HIS in a developing country’s healthcare context ii. Validate the model through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using empirical data collected from public health care workers in Kenya iii. Generate the final model and evaluate the strength of the relationships between the exogenous and endogenous constructs, hence deduce the factors that most contribute to the HIS Adoption and Use process iv. Cross-validate the model across different categories of healthcare workers via multi-group analysis. The study was conducted primarily through the use of quantitative methods, but qualitative data was also collected in the explorative pre-study through conducting Key Informant Interviews (KII) to provide the background and contextual information used in refining the conceptual model. An exploratory study design was subsequently used to determine the existence of relationships between the dependent and independent variables in the model. x
Description: