ebook img

Desiccation and Rehydration Experiments on Leaves of 43 Pteridophyte Species PDF

2007·6.2 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Desiccation and Rehydration Experiments on Leaves of 43 Pteridophyte Species

American Fern Journal 97(4):175-185 (2007) on Leaves Experiments of and Rehydration Desiccation Species 43 Pteridophyte and Yvonne Siorak Michael Kessler Systematische Botanik, Pflanzenwissenschaften, Abt. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institut fur Germany Untere Karspule D-37073 Gottingen, 2, We and rehydration experiments on the detached leaves of 43 Abstract.— conducted desiccation among pteridophytes. drought adaptation strategies pteridophyte species to assess the variability of homoiohydric We responses from poikilohydric to strategies found complete grades of desiccation mesomorphism xeromorphism. These results suggest that and within the category from to latter wide drought adaptation strategies pteridophytes have repeatedly evolved a variety of not adequately (poikilohydry and xeromorphism at least 12 and 6 times, respectively) that are between homoiohydry and poikilohydry. by simple distinction described a mesomorphism, poikilohydry, xero- homoiohydry, Words.— Key drought adaptation strategies, morphism, rehydration desiccation, humid and habitats most abundant species-rich in Ferns and lycophytes are become number have species also but considerable of Kessler, 2001), a (e.g., Most 1977; Page, 2002). adapted arid conditions (Pickett, 1931; Gaff, to mesomorphic and without any special pteridophytes can be characterized as show numerous variety of However, taxa a drought adaptations to stress. These adaptive drought and desiccation (Table adaptive strategies to stress 1). and detailed plant physiologists, have long attracted the attention of strategies number M Chamb and Quirk Asplenium ceterach (Rouschal, 1938), L. riomes 2003), •, and Pleopeltis poly- particular Polypodium vulgare (Kappen, 1964), in L. Andrews & Windh. and (Pessin, 1924, 1925; relatives podioides E.G. its (L.) on with These focussed taxa studies 1968; Miiller et al, 1981). Stuart, poikilohydry, conspicuous water drought adaptations, especially particularly and physiological phylogenetic and covered only small range of the a no currently and Accordingly, there within lycophytes. is ferns variability sampling of drought adaptation strategies for taxonomically representative documented 19 been in example, poikilohydry has For pteridophytes. 12 pteridophyte genera (Proctor and Pence, 2002), belonging to at least phylogenies of recognized in the independent evolutionary lineages as The morphological, and Smith anatomical, Schneider (2004) et al. (2006). et al. among mechanisms involved poikilohydry differ several and physiological in mechanisms A conspicuous example of contrasting is of these lineages. by rehydrate with one-cell-thick leaves that presented by the filmy-ferns their and polypodioides and 1940 Pleopeltis its water contact (Hartel, b) direct a, CD Table Several plant adaptive 1. strategies to counter drought and among stress, their representation pteridophytes (modified from Levitt, 1958; Benzing, Losch, The 1990; 2001). lower five categories together form the group homoiohydric of strategies. Reaction of leaves Reaction of leaves Strategy Morphological and phenological characters to desiccation rehydration to Fern taxa (examples) Poikilohydric an rapid; leaves up; up rapid roll full recovery; cheilanthoids, when rehydrate water 95% is available, often to water loss water uptake through Hymenophyllum, densely scaly possible without leaf surfaces Pleopeltis and allies, lethal effects some Selaginella Mesomorphic leaves of intermediate thickness, soft to rapid; leaves wither slow; water content most ferns hard, sensitive to desiccation; no special and > strongly develop does not or very J adaptations drought to stress necroses after slight slowly recover to water 2 loss original levels n Xeromorphic leaves thick, hard, narrow, often slow; leaves maintain slow; water uptake some Asplenium, Campv- > longitudinally folded or rolled, with shape and z their mostly through loneurum, some roots abundant sclerenchyma; leaf surfaces thickness; survive Elaphoglossum, waxy with a cover; stomata abundant, moderate water loss Niphidium, some z sunken into the leaf surfaces; venation podium Poly o density high c Succulent leaves or rhizomes thick and spongy, become slow; leaves slow through Lemmaphyllum, z leaves; strongly change > their thickness in thinner as they water uptake mostly Pyrrosia response hydration to status dry out and survive through 9 - roots < high water loss Drought- leaves, pinnae, or pinnules are shed in the rapid unknown to intermediate; some Adiantum, deciduous medium dry season, thin to thickness leaves, pinnae, or Nephrolepis, pinnules shed are Phlebodium under water stress Z Impounding leaves arranged in a funnel; water not unknown unknown C is some Asplenium impounded directly as in bromeliads, but mostly stored accumulated in organic material vi REHYDRATION PTERIDOPHYTE SPECIES DESICCATION & IN 43 177 KESSLER & SIORAK: adapted epidermal scales (Miiller h specially from poikilohydric to transition 1981). In other cases, a full et al., For been documented within a single species. homoiohydric behavior has omoio summer lm wide spectrum hide of drought adaptations (Table a these contrasting stress 1) and Tuba, mixed 2002). (Proctor intermediate, or strategies different, and biased sample of studies of physiologically Given taxonomically the among pteridophytes, the aim of the present drought adapation strategies among drought strategies study was assess the variability of stress to and rehydrating excised leaves by experimentally desiccating pteridophytes belonging from 43 pteridophytes stem sections in the case of Selaginella) (leafy Our taxonomic groups and morphological types. basic wide range of to a could be distinguished was adaptive strategies assumption that the different This applies and rehydration (Table desiccation by the reaction of leaves to 1). Wat mo between poikilohydric taxa capable of can only distinguish excised leaves doing and homoiohydric taxa incapable of so. through leaves water absorption provided insights into the study of detached leaves has reliable Historically, and due the and Golovina, 2002) to (Leprince plant physiology in general method whole has been the of choice and weighing plants, drying of difficulty and Pickett with 1924, 1925; experiments ferns (Pessin, desiccation for Manuel Q 1981; Miiller et al., Methods Material and stem Gottingen, Garden University of Botanical of the collection of the living Germany adaptations an obvious variety of to on groups exhibiting with focus forms, a 1* A "1 mesomor •m • 1 4 1 I and one water-impounding, 12 in- two drought-deciduous, xeromo mat An was species intermediate category established tor termediate species. mesomorphic xeromorphic or could not be unambiguously placed in either the No were study. succulent species available for categories. pinnae the case of were conducted with excised leaves, (in Experiments water content of fully Total stem section [Selaginella). large fronds), or Freshly experiment. was determined prior the desiccation hvdrated leaves to were hydrated by wetting their from well-watered plants fully cut leaves em ambient temperatu mas determi Table Desiccation 2. resistance, desiccation and delay, recuperation capacity of excised leaves from 43 species of pteridophytes. Letters in brackets names after the indicate wether whole leaves pinnae stem (L), (P). or sections (S) were studied. Morphological Desiccation resistance Desiccation Recuperation capacity Species categorv (% water contents) delav (hours) (% water contents) Adiantum capillus-veneris L. (L) deciduous 81 2 87 Adiantum macrophyllum Sw. (L) intermediate 99 4 59 Adiantum trapeziforme L. (L) mesophytic 51 2 84 Adiantum villosum L. (L) intermediate 86 3 100 Anemia mexicana Klotzsch (L) poikilohydric 74 2 75 Anemia rotundifolia Schrad. (L) poikilohydric 86 3 90 Anemia tomentosa Sw. (Sav.) (L) poikilohydric > 99 4 67 Asplenium bulbiferum G. Forst. (L) xerophytic 73 6 84 Asplenium daucifolium Lam. (L) intermediate 86 6 54 Asplenium dimorphum n Kunze (L) intermediate 65 > 6 78 Asplenium mannii Hook. (L) mesophytic 30 82 1 Asplenium marinum L. (L) intermediate 81 3 76 Asplenium nidus L. (L) impounding 58 7 57 Asplenium Kunze rutaefolium (L) intermediate 75 5 80 c Asplenium salicifolium L. (L) intermediate 80 7 68 Blechnum brasiliense Desv. (P) mesophytic 47 86 Blechnum cordatum (Desv.) Hieron. > (P) mesophytic 59 90 1 Blechnum occidentale L. (L) mesophytic 68 96 < 1 Blechnum spicant Roth (L.) (L) intermediate O 81 4 — 55 Campyloneurum xalapense Fee (L) xerophytic 81 7 74 Cheilanthes myriophylla Desv. (L) poikilohydric 99 6 38 Cheilanthes notholaenoides Maxon (Desv.) ex Weath. poikilohydric (L) 85 5 96 Elaphoglossum apodum (Kaulf.) Schott ex Sm. mesophytic (L) 60 J. 4 59 Elaphoglossum crinitum Christ (L.) (L) mesophytic C 63 2 49 Elaphoglossum engelii (Karst.) Christ (L) xerophytic 44 7 75 Elaphoglossum erinaceum Moore cc (Fee) T. mesophytic (L) 74 2 66 Elaphoglossum latifolium (Sw.) Sm. (L) intermediate 74 J. 6 49 Hemionitis (Burm.) Moore arifolia T. (L) poikilohydric 96 4 7o ^j 7^ 8° CO O > Table Continued. w 2. n Recuperation Morphological Desiccation resistance Desiccation capacity n > category (% water contents) delay (hours) (% water contents) Species 96 13 91 palmata poikilohydric Hemionitis L. (L) Z Microgramma poikilohydric 95 6 35 piloselloides Copel. (L.) (L) 80 Pecluma M.G. poikilohydric 91 4 eurybasis (C. Chr.) Price (L) 64 deciduous 72 Link 1 Pellaea sagittata (Cav.) (L) 47 intermediate 91 6 Polypodium Fee a australe (L) 36 49 Hook & xerophytic 70 Polypodium scouleri Grev. (L) > H 100 Polystichum lachenense (Hook.) Bedd. intermediate 89 2 (P) O mesophytic 74 4 72 Polystichum platyphyllum (Willd.) C. Presl (P) z mesophytic 46 99 2 Pteris quadriaurita Retz. (P) z 83 mesophytic 86 Selaginella geniculate (C. Presl) Spring (S) 3 99 63 CO Link poikilohydric 2 Selaginella helvetica (L.) (S) a mesophytic 67 93 H 2 Selaginella martinensii Spring. (S) 56 mesophytic 88 2 Selaginella rotundifolia Spring. (S) poikilohydric 90 4 58 Aspl. Selaginella trisulcata (S) G 86 mesophytic 69 Selaginella vogelii Spring. (S) 1 H M n cc AMERICAN FERN VOLUME NUMBER 1»0 JOURNAL: 97 4 (2007) C 105 weight constancy was until achieved. Total water content was then calculated by mass subtracting dry from its the fully hydrated mass. In the and actual desiccation rehydration experiments, different fully hydrated leaves (see above) were placed in a drying oven at 40 C for 20 different time periods (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 18, 24, 30, and 36 hours) and weighed ..., afterwards. These leaves were then wetted and placed closed in plastic bags for one to three days until reaching weight constancy. Water and loss absorption were expressed as the percent value of the total water content of leaves each for species. Leaves were considered be damaged when 50% to lethally at least of showed the lamina made tissue necroses. Replicates each) were only (five of three species {Aciiantuni capillus-veneris L., BJechnum brasiliense Desv., and mo We calculated the following parameters: desiccation resistance, the percentage of the total water contents that could be lost before leaves were damaged; lethally desiccation delay, the time until the leaves became lethally damaged; recuperation capacity (resatu ration), the percentage of the original water contents that was regained at the point of desiccation resistance. RlvSDLTS me Table For example, (Fig. lethal desiccation were reached 1, 2). levels in different species after 1 to 36 hours and water losses of 30-99%, at as determined from the desiccation delay and desiccation resistance parameters, respectively (Table was not possible discern groups 2). It to distinct of species could be assigned that to specific drought adaptation strategies (Fig. 2). Because excised pinnae stem were or sections only used for a few, usually related species (five and six species, respectively), no formal was possible lest whether of these samples differed systematically from species studied with entire leaves, but visual inspection of the results show no apparent trends. The three species with measurements showed five replicate each re- producible with measurements patterns, having on average a coefficient of much 12%, which variation of lower than the variation observed between is species (54%). Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the desiccation and rehydration behavior number of a large of pteridophyte species with consistent method. a In the interpretation of the results should be borne in it mind experiment was that the conducted on detached and leaves, that the absolute values of the dehydration behaviors therefore do not correspond to the values and of entire intact living plants. This especially relevant the is for ability of the plants rehydrate, because to of the difficulty of accurately determining the health status of leaves based only on external visual As examination. a result of using excised some were leaves, leaves certainly REHYDRATION PTERIDOPHYTE SPECIES 181 KESSLER & SIORAK: DESICCATION & IN 43 Ad Adiantum anturn i 100 100 100 capilluS'Veneris villosum 80 80 60 60 40 40 20- 20 » . 6 g 12 6 9 12 100 100 100 ' palmata Elaphoglossum Hemionitis Cheilanthes 100- 100 100 100 \ i myriophylla folium lati 80- 80 80 Campyloneurum s 60 c 60 60 CD . xalapense 40 40 40 o o 20 - 20 20 J L X - ^ 1 i I 6 12 6 9 12 6 9 12 6 9 1? T \ Pedum Microgramma J a eurybasis 100 _ 100 100 V 100 pHoselloides 80 80 60 60 \ < V \ 40 \^ 40 *s \ 20 20 1 s \ •<-\ r\ 1 i .i_ . - 6 9 12 6 9 12 Polystichum 100 100 100 100 platyphyllum 80 60 40 20 6 9 12 time (h) pinnae stem sections and rehydration responses of detached leaves, or leafy Desiccation Fig. 1. were chosen represent the range of Species to pteridophyte species. 20 selected Selciginella) of (in Dashed show water the and rehydration experiments. lines observed responses to the desiccation when continuous represent the water content after redydration. content desiccated, lines 1H2 AMERICAN FERN JOURNAL: VOLUME NUMBER 97 4 (2007) poikilohydric 100 * v * myriophylla C. helvetica S. palmata H. • • CD xalapense O C. 80 t E. folium lati 03 t scouleri (36h) P. 70 • (f) if) CD 60 xeromorphic A n/dt/s O 50 CD O P. quadriaurita O 40 mannii A. Q 30 mesomorphic 20 10 15 Desiccation delay (h) Desiccation Fig. 2. resistance versus desiccation delay of 43 pteridophyte Deciduous species. species are indicated by triangles, the water-impounding species by a squares, and species of Anemia by small arrows. remaining All species are indicated by circles. For the sake of only clarity, some distinctive species mentioned in the text are labelled with names. more damaged severely by handling the than others, affecting their re- cuperation capacity. This evident where, is in Fig. Cheilanthes 1, e.g., myriophylla showed wide a variation of measurements, suggesting some that individual leaves might have been more damaged A strongly than others. general pattern observed most was for species the gradual decline in desiccation and resistance recuperation capacity with increasing desiccation The time. of these declines first clearly reflects the gradual loss of water over whereas time, the second one presumably reflects the physiological or anatomical damage due and longer to stronger desiccation reduces that the ability of the leaves to rehydrate. Despite these unavoidable methodological shortcomings, the present study comparable previous to desiccation is experiments with used ferns that also detached leaves (Pessin, 1924, 1925; and Manuel, Pickett 1926; 1931; Rouschal, Iljin, 1938; Hartel, 1940 a, b; Kappen, 1964; Stuart, 1968; Midler Quirk and et ai, 1981; Chamber, 1981; Proctor, 2003). REHYDRATION PTEKIDOPHYTE KESSLER & SIORAK: DESICCATION & IN 43 SPECIES 183 and high gradual Perhaps the most important result of our study is the among the responses desiccation and rehydration the species inability in to Some showed could be examined. species patterns that easily attributed to Examples included Asplenium mannii drought adaptation "classic" strategy. a water (mesomorphic) that died quickly after relatively limited loss of (30%), most Hemionitis palmata (poikilohydric) that survived loss of (96%) of its and water and tolerated desiccation for a long period of time (13 hours), Polypodium (xeromorphic) dried out most slowly (desiccation scouleri that = showed and delay 36 hours). However, most species intermediate patterns and considering species together there were complete grades of desiccation all homoiohydric and within rehydration responses from poikilohydric to species The mesomorphic xeromorphic from species. cline of the category to latter been documented within mesomorphic and xeromorphic behaviors has also Kappen by single species (1964). we As an example of variability within a given drought adaptation strategy can compare the poikilohydric taxa Anemia and the cheilanthoid ferns One Anemia been shown has experi- {Cheilanthes Hemionitis). species of , and and our mentally be poikilohydric (Proctor Pence, 2002), field to shows number these experience with of other species in Bolivia also that a and up under drought behave as poikilohydric species: their leaves roll stress by become and brownish, but the plants can be readily rehydrated brittle (M experiment much and had lower desiccation resistance arrows black in Fig. a 2) which well-documented be desiccation delay than cheilanthoid ferns are to and Quirk poikilohydric (Pickett and Manuel, 1926; 1931; Hevly, 1963; Iljin, we Among Chamber, unambiguously poikilohydric species the 1981). 74-99% measured water losses (desiccation resistance) of (Table This 2). corresponds well with previous studies which have documented values of up 95% 94% water Notholaena marantae R. Br. 1931), in to loss in (Iljin, 97% and polypodioides Polypodium Pleopeltis vulgare (Losch, 2001), in (M % 1938). two Looking with unusual the desiccation behavior of the taxa strategies, at deciduous species [Adiantum capillus-veneris, Pellaea sagittata; triangles in mesomorphic and was intermediate between poikilohydric species. Fig. 2) low The difference between these groups therefore found in their response to is pinnae water content, with deciduous species shedding their leaves or leaf when There some species with mixed poikilohydric/ they are too dry. are also Windham. Our deciduous such Argyrochosma nivea field strategies, as (Poir.) Andes shows beginning experience with species in the Bolivian that at the this wet of the dry season dried-out plants can be readily rehydrated in plastic had Several months the end of the dry season, leaves apparently bags. later at naked died and pinnules had been shed, leaving only the rachises (M. Kessler, know would deciduousness pteridophytes be interesting to in pers. obs.). if It from associated with an active recovery of nutrients or assimilates the is AMERICAN FERN VOLUME NUMBER 184 JOURNAL: 97 4 (2007) which would leaves, represent a distinct advantage over mesomorphic species that loose all tissue once the leaves are too dry. Considering the other unusual impounding strategy, the only species, A. nidus, behaved xeromorphic like taxa. In conclusion, our study confirms the notion of Proctor and Tuba (2002) that plants have evolved a wide variety of drought adaptive strategies that are not adequately described by a simple distinction between homoiohydry and The number poikilohydry. which large of cases in poikilohydry has independently evolved in pteridophytes, 12 times and more at least likely may often, suggests that different physiological mechanisms have been A developed same to achieve the adaptive response. similar case can be made xeromorphic which for adaptations, appear have evolved independently to at A dozen least half a times (M. Kessler, unpubl. comparative study data). of the adaptive efficiency of these different evolutionary cases might yield interesting insights into the physiological constraints and among possibilities present pteridophytes. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Wo thank Leuschner and G. D. Hertel, Dept. of Plant Ecology, Univ. of Gottingen. providing for laboratory and M. Schwerdtfeger and facilities, the gardeners of the Botanical garden of the Univ. of Gottingen for providing plant material. Ruth Kirkpatrick, Kluge, and two anonymous Jiirgen reviewers provided useful comments on the study and manuscript. Literature Cited Gael, IX F. 1977. Desiccation-tolerant vascular plants of Southern Africa. Oeoologia 31:95-109. Hartel, O. 1940a. Physiologische Studien an Hymenophyllaceen Zellphysiologische Untersu- I. chungen. Protoplasma 34:117-147. HARTEL, O. 1940b. Physiologische Studien an Hymenophyllaceen und Wasserhaushalt Resistenz. II. Protoplasma 43:490-515. Hevly, R. H. 1963. Adaptations of cheilanthoid ferns to desert environments. Arizona Acad. Sci. J. 2:164-175. and Hietx, P. O. Briomes. 1998. Correlation between water relations and within-canopy distribution of epiphytic ferns in a Mexican cloud forest. Oecologia 114:305-316. W. Ii.liN, S. 1931. Austrocknungsresistenz des Fames Notholaena marantae Protoplasma R. Br. S. 8:322-330. Kappen, L. 1964. Untersuchungen uber den Jahresverlauf der Frost-, Hitze- und Austrocknungsre- sistenz von Sporophyten einheimischer Polypodiaceen (Filicinae). Flora 155:123-166. M. 2001. Pteridophyte species richness Andean Kk.ssi.i-r, in forests in Bolivia. Biodiv. Conserv. 10:1473-1495. and Leprince, O. E. A. Golovina. 2002. Biochemical and biophysical methods quantifying for phenomena desiccation seeds and in vegetative tissues. Pp. 111-146, M. Black and H. W. //? and Pritchard, eds. Desiccation Survival in Plants, Drying Without Dying. CABI Publishing, New York. Losch, R. 2001. Wasserhaushalt der Pflanze. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim. Muller, L., G. Starneckkk and S. Winkler. 1981. Zur Okologie epiphytisoher Fame in Siidbrasilien. Saugschuppen. Flora 171:55-63. Page, C. N. 2002. Ecological strategies in fern evolution: a neopteridological overview. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 119:1-33.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.