國立中興大學農藝學系 Department of Agronomy National Chung Hsing University 碩士學位論文 Master Thesis 高爾夫球場草坪除草劑減量施用效果評估及伏速隆之 土壤環境流向分析 Evaluation of the effect of herbicide application at reduced rate in golf turf and the fate analysis of flazasulfuron in soil environment 指導教授:王慶裕博士(Dr. Ching-Yuh Wang) 研究生:蔡耀賢 (Yao-Hsien Tsai) 中華民國一百零三年一月 Jan, 2014 摘要 本研究針對高爾夫球場草坪除草劑種類進行篩選及評估其減量 施用效果,利用不同除草劑及濃度,調查草坪草本草之藥害以及草坪 雜草控制藥效,以進一步評估減量施用效果。於 2012 年 2、4、6、8 及 10 月分別針對 (百慕達草(bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.)與馬尼拉芝(Manila grass (Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr.))草坪草施用 伏速隆(flazasulfuron)、合速隆(halosulfuron)、百速隆(pyrazosulfuron)、 快克草(quinclorac)及水田推薦用藥本達隆(bentazon),以比較減量施用 藥劑之效果,處理濃度分別是推薦用量全量(100%)、67%、50%以及 不處理做為對照組。百慕達草只有在較低溫季節,可能出現了些微傷 害及黃化,但不足以影響本草生長與品質。馬尼拉芝則在各季節皆未 出現明顯的藥害及黃化。此外,五種除草劑對草坪雜草皆能有效控制, 處理後三週雜草傷害,會隨著光照與溫度的增加,雜草控制效果明顯 上升。在減量施用效果上,發現大多數除草劑於減量至 67%用量下與 全量(100%)施用效果相同,已能有效控制雜草,結果顯示以伏速隆最 具減量施用的潛力。 本研究分析伏速隆施用於球場後之流向,結果顯示伏速隆經噴施 後大部分會附於草坪本草,而少部分則會進入土壤層。高爾夫球場約 2-3 天進行草坪割刈,而伏速隆經植株葉片吸收後會累積於葉片中, 頻繁的割草可能減少伏速隆殘留於百慕達草植株內。在伏速隆處理後 i 已無法偵測出伏速隆。高爾夫球場在 4 月由於降雨頻繁伏速隆殘 留十分微量,僅在施藥後 3 天於 10-20 cm 土壤層發現約有 0.23 ppm 伏速隆的殘留,9 月在 0-10 cm 及 10-20 cm 的土壤層皆有偵測到伏速 隆的殘留,且有 0-10 cm 土層向 10-20 cm 土層轉移累積的現象。溫室 的土壤管柱試驗均為粘質壤土對於伏速隆的吸附性相對較強,但亦有 部分會隨水分移動而進入 10-20 cm 土層。伏速隆為推薦用量相對較 少之除草劑,由於球場水池水量相當大,以及排水管道為流動的水, 故稀釋作用下水中伏速隆的含量低於偵測極限。本研究另針對伏速隆 之化學水解、微生物降解及光降解進行分析,其中以化學水解的影響 最大。 ii Abstract In order to select herbicides effective for weed management in grass turfs of the Golf course, with reduced rates, five herbicides were tested and the possibility of herbicide application at reduced rate was also estimated. In 2012, five herbicides including flazasulfuron, halosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, quinclorac and bentazon, at the rates of 100%, 67% and 50% of their recommended rate were applied on two grassturf, i.e., Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.), and Manila grass (Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr.), and these experimental results showed that no toxic effect of tested herbicides on Manila grass and only a slight injury appeared on Bermuda grass. At the recommended rates of 5 herbicides, weeds in two grassturfs were effectively controlled 3 weeks after treatment. In general, the application rate of herbicide reduced to 67% of the recommended rate still kept the effect similar to that of the full rate. Flazasulfuron residue analysis after application showed that most of the flazasulfuron was absorbed by shoot of Bermuda grass and existed in two soil layers. Due to the frequent mowing in Glof course, flazasulfuron in Bermuda grass was rapidly left away from this turf grass. In addition, the frequent rainfall after herbicide application lead to the fast dissipation of flazasulfuron, only 0.23 ppm flazasulfuron was found in 10-20 cm soil layer 3 days after treatment. Detection of flazasulfuron in 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm soil layer in September in golf court showed that flazasulfuron leached from 0-10 cm soil layer to 10-20 cm soil layer. On the other hand, soil column experiment in greenhouse confirmed that a part of flazasulfuron move downward with water. Field assessment found that there was no flazasulfuron in pond and water drainage holes beside the iii experimental plots in golf court, which probably resulted from the low-dosage of flazasulfuron applied and water dilution. Exploration of the fate of flazasulfuron revealed that chemical hydrolysis, microbial degradation and photolysis are able to degrade flazasulfuron, especially the chemical hydrolysis. iv 目錄 頁次 中文摘要……….……..…..……………………………..…….i Abstract………………………………….……………………..iii 目錄………………………………..……………………….…..v 表目錄…………..………………...………….………………..vi 圖目錄…………..…………………………………..………... ix 壹、緒言………..……………………………………………….1 貳、前人研究…..……………………………………………….5 參、材料與方法……………………………………………….16 肆、結果與討論……………………………………………….30 一、暖季環境下草坪除草劑種類篩選及其減量施用效果評估....30 (一)除草劑篩選…………………………..…………………30 (二)除草劑減量施用效果評估……………………..………...43 二、伏速隆在土壤環境之流向評估……………….…..….….71 (一)伏速隆於高爾夫球場土壤環境之流向….….….……....….71 (二)伏速隆於溫室土壤管柱之流向.….….…….….….………83 (三)伏速隆之降解….….…….….….……….…….….…..….90 伍、參考文獻………………………………………………...100 v 表目錄 頁次 Table 1. Changes of weed flora in two kinds of grass turfs three weeks after five herbicide applications at the recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 (control plant) to 5 (dead plant due to herbicide action) was shown in parentheses.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------32 Table 2. Table 2. Injury indices of two turf grasses three weeks after five herbicides application at recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rates of bentazon, flazasulfuron, halosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, and quinclorac were 2.5 L/ha, 0.6, 0.3, 1.5, and 1.0 kg/ha, respectively.------------------------------------------------------------------------------35 Table 3. Relative etiolation area of two occurred in grasse turfs three weeks after five herbicide application at recommended rate. The recommended rates of bentazon, flazasulfuron, halosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, and quinclorac were 2.5 L/ha, 0.6, 0.3, 1.5, and 1.0 kg/ha, respectively.--------------------------------------------------38 Table 4. Injury indices of weeds in two grass turfs three weeks after five herbicide application at recommended rate. The recommended rates of bentazon, flazasulfuron, halosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, and quinclorac were 2.5 L/ha, 0.6, 0.3, 1.5, and 1.0 kg/ha, respectively. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------40 Table 5. Relative coverage of weeds in two grass turfs three weeks after five herbicide application at recommended rate. The recommended rates of bentazon, flazasulfuron, halosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, and quinclorac were 2.5 L/ha, 0.6, 0.3, 1.5, and 1.0 kg/ha, respectively.--------------------------------------------------42 Table 6. Injury indices of two turf grasses three weeks after bentazon application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rate of bentazon was 2.5 L/ha.-----------------44 Table 7. Injury indices of two turf grasses three weeks after flazasulfuron application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rate of flazasulfuron was 0.6 kg/ha.----------54 Table 8. Injury indices of two turf grasses three weeks after halosulfuron application vi at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rate of halosulfuron was 0.3 kg/ha.-----------46 Table 9. Injury indices of two turf grasses three weeks after pyrazosulfuron application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rate of pyrazosulfuron was 1.5 kg/ha.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------48 Table 10. Injury indices of two turf grasses three weeks after quinclorac application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rate of quinclorac was 1.0 kg/ha.--------------49 Table 11. Relativen area of two etiolation occurred in grasses turfs three weeks after bentazon application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rates of bentazon was 2.5 L/ha.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------51 Table 12. Relativen area of two etiolation occurred in grasses turf three weeks after flazasulfuron application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rates of flazasulfuron was 0.6 kg/ha.-----------------------------------------------------------52 Table 13. Relativen area of two etiolation occurred in grasses turf three weeks after halosulfuron application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rates of halosulfuron was 0.3 kg/ha.------------------------------------------------------------53 Table 14. Relativen area of two etiolation occurred in grasses turf three weeks after pyrazosulfuron application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rates of pyrazosulfuron was 1.5 kg/ha.---------------------------------------------------------54 Table 15. Relativen area of two etiolation occurred in grasses turf three weeks after quinclorac application at different percentages of recommended rate. Injury index ranging from 0 to 5 was recorded. The recommended rates of quinclorac was 1.0 kg/ha.----------------------------------------------------------------------------56 Table 16. Flazasulfuron residues in two soil layers (0 to 10 cm and 10 to 20 cm) in cool season and warm season. Ocarbon and pH of two soil layers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------79 vii Table 17. Basic physicochemical properties of soils collected from soil profile at 0-10 cm depth in Golf course.----------------------------------------------------------------80 Table 18. Basic physicochemical properties of soils collected from soil profile at 10-20 in Golf course.--------------------------------------------------------------------80 Table 19. Flazasulfuron residue in the water collected from pond, water drainage holes and inlet hole of 5th & 8th faiway at the Hongsi Golf Course after application of flazasulfuron at 7.5 μg/cm2(≒0.75 kg/ha) on grass turf. Detection limit of flazasulfuron in water sample was 5 pg/ml. Experiment was carried out from April to May ----------------------------------------------------------------------82 Table 20. Flazasulfuron residue in the water collected from pond, water drainage holes and inlet hole of 5th & 8th faiway at the Hongsi Golf Course after application of flazasulfuron at 7.5 μg/cm2(≒0.75 kg/ha) on grass turf. Detection limit of flazasulfuron in water sample was 5 pg/ml. Experiment was carried out from September to October.------------------------------------------------------------82 Table 21. Basic physicochemical properties of soils used for soil column experiment in greenhouse.----------------------------------------------------------------------------89 viii
Description: