Contents PART ONE: THE ART OF ENDODONTICS 1 Diagnostic Procedures, 2 Stephen Cohen 2 Orofacial Dental Pain Emergencies: Endodontic Diagnosis and Management, 25 Alan H. Gluskin and William W. Y. Goon 3 Nonodontogenic Facial Pain and Endodontics: Pain Syndromes of the Jaws that Simulate Odontalgia, 51 Lewis R. Eversole 4 Case Selection and Treatment Planning, 60 Samuel (). Dorn and Arnold H. Gartner 5 Preparation for Treatment, 77 Gerald Neal Clickman 6 Armamentarium and Sterilization, 110 Robert E. Averbaeh and Donald J, Kleier 7 Tooth Morphology and Access Openings, 128 Richard C. Burns and I.. Stephen Buchanan 8 Cleaning and Shaping the Root Canal System, 179 John D. West, James B. Roane, and Albert C. Goerig 9 Obturation of the Root Canal System, 219 Nguyen Thanh Nguyen, with section by Clifford J. Ruddle 10 Records and Legal Responsibilities, 272 Edwin J. Zinman PART T W O : T H E SCIENCE OF ENDODONTICS 11 Pulp Development, Structure, and Function, 296 Henry O. Trowbridge and Syngcuk Kim 12 Periapical Pathology, 337 James H. S. Simon 13 Microbiology and Immunology, 363 James D. Kettering and Mahmoud Torabinejad 14 Instruments, Materials, and Devices, 377 Leo J. Misercndino, with section by Herbert Schilder 15 Pulpal Reaction to Caries and Dental Procedures, 414 Syngcuk Kim and Henry O. Trowbridge XI Xll Contents PART THREE: RELATED CLINICAL TOPICS 16 Traumatic Injuries, 436 Stuart B. Fountain and Joe H. Camp 17 Root Resorption, 486 Martin Trope and Noah Chivian 18 Endodontic-Periodontal Relations, 513 James H. S. Simon and Leslie A. Werksman 19 Surgical Endodontics, 531 Gary B. Carr 20 The Management of Pain and Anxiety, 568 Stanley F. Malamed 21 Bleaching of Vital and Pulpless Teeth, 584 Ronald E. Goldstein, Van B. Haywood, Harald O. Heymann, David R. Steiner, and John D. West 22 Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth, 604 Galen W. Wagnild and Kathy I. Mueller 23 Pediatric Endodontic Treatment, 633 Joe H. Camp 24 Geriatric Endodontics, 672 Carl W. Newton 25 Endodontic Eailures and Re-treatment, 690 Adam Stabholz, Shimon Friedman, and Aviad Tamse PART FOUR: ISSUES IN ENDODONTICS 26 Ethics in Endodontics, 730 James T. Rule and Robert M. Veatch Answers to Self-Assessment Questions, 737 Daniel B. Green, H. Robert Steiman, and Richard E. Walton PART ONE THE ART OF ENDODONTICS Chapter 1 Diagnostic Procedures Stephen Cohen THE ART AND SCIENCE OF DIAGNOSIS The dictionary* defines diagnosis as "the art of identifying a disease from its signs and symptoms." Although scientific devices can be used to gather some information, diagnosis is still primarily an art because it is the thoughtful interpretation of the data that leads to a diagnosis. An accurate diagnosis is a result of the synthesis of scientific knowledge, clinical expe- rience, intuition, and common sense. To be a good diagnostician a clinician must learn the fun- damentals of gathering and interpreting clinical information. An inflamed or diseased pulp is a common, straightforward, and nonurgent condition. Systematic recording of a patient's presenting signs and symptoms and careful analysis of the find- ings from clinical tests inevitably lead to a correct diagnosis. There arc instances, however, when a patient presents with an acute situation, conflicting signs and symptoms, or inconsis- tent responses to clinical testing. Chapter 2 explores the meth- ods for diagnosing and testing these endodontic riddles. Chap- ter 3 discusses the ostensible toothache of nonodontogenic or- igin. Medical History Even though there are virtually no systemic contraindica- tions to endodontic therapy (except uncontrolled diabetes or a very recent myocardial infarction), a recent and succinct, com- prehensive preprinted medical history is mandatory (see box on p. 3). It is only with such a history that the clinician can determine whether medical consultation or premedication is re- Unless otherwise indicated, the illustrations in this chapter were prepared by Dr. Albert Goerig. *Wehster's ilurd Imem.ahona! Dicuonaiy. Springfield. Mass. 1976. Merriam- Webster Inc. quired before diagnostic examination or clinical treatment is undertaken. Some patients require antibiotic prophylaxis be- fore clinical examination because of systemic conditions like heart valve replacement, a history of rheumatic fever, or ad- vanced AIDS. Patients who daily take anticoagulant medica- tions may need to have the dose reduced or dosing suspended if the clinician is to conduct the thorough periodontal exami- nation, which is integral to a complete endodontic workup. When patients report being infected with communicable dis- eases such as AIDS, hepatitis B, or tuberculosis, dentist and staff need to be especially attentive to the use of protective barriers. In case endodontic therapy is required, the clinician must know what drugs the patient is taking so that adverse drug interactions can be avoided. In such cases, consultation with (he patient's physician is recommended. Patients who present with mental or emotional disorders are not uncommon. Some patients are aware of their disorder and inform the dentist. Oth- ers may have undiagnosed psychological or emotional prob- lems; abnormal or highly inappropriate behavior may suggest the presence of illness. In these cases, too, medical consulta- tion before the diagnostic examination would be in the best interests of patient, doctor, and staff. A brief summary of these consultations with treating physicians and an outline of their suggestions should be recorded and dated in the patient record. Dental History After completing the medical history the clinician should de- velop the dental history. The purpose of a dental history is to create a record of the chief complaint, the signs and symp- toms the patient reports, when the problem began, and what the patient can discern that improves or worsens the condition. The most efficacious way for the clinician to gather this im- portant information is to ask the patient pertinent questions re- garding the chief complaint, and to listen carefully and sensi- tively to the patient's responses. For example, the doctor might begin by simply asking the patient. "Could you tell me about your problem?" To determine the chief complaint, this ques- tion should be followed by a series of other questions, such as "When did you first notice this?" (inception). Affecting fac- tors that improve or worsen the condition should also be de- termined. "Docs heat, cold, biting, or chewing cause pain?" (provoking factors). "Does anything hot or cold relieve the pain?" (attenuatingfactors). "How often does this pain occur?" (frequency). "When you have pain, is it mild, moderate, or severe?" (intensity). The answers to these questions provide the information the dentist needs to develop a brief narrative description of the problem. The majority of patients present with evident problems of pain or swelling, so most questions should focus on these ar- eas. For example, "Could you point to the tooth that hurts or the area that you think is swelling?" (location). "When cold {or heat) causes pain, docs it last for a moment or for several seconds or longer?" (duration). "Do you have any pain when you lie down or bend over?" (postural). "Does the pain ever occur without provocation?" (stimulated or spontaneous). "What kind of pain do you get? Sharp? Dull? Stabbing? Throbbing?" (quality). Questions like these help the clinician establish the location, nature, quality, and urgency of the prob- lem and encourage the patient to volunteer additional infor- mation that completes the verbal picture of the problem. The clinician may be able to formulate a tentative diagnosis while taking a dental history. The examination and testing that fol- low often corroborate the tentative diagnosis. It is then merely a matter of identifying the problem tooth/1'7 In the gathering of a dental history, common sense must pre- vail. The questions outlined here, along with other questions described in Chapter 2, should be asked if the diagnosis is elu- sive. If the clinician can see a grossly decayed tooth while sit- ting and talking with the patient and if the patient points to that tooth, the dental history should be brief because of the obvious nature of the problem. Furthermore, if the patient is suffering from severe distress, with acute symptoms (Chapter 2), the dental history should be brief so the clinician can re- lieve the pain as soon as possible. Pain Because dental pain frequently is the result of a diseased pulp, it is one of the most common symptoms a dentist is re- quired to diagnose.14" The source of the pain is usually made evident by dental history, inspection, examination, and test- ing. However, because pain has psychobiologic components— 4 The art of endodontics physical, emotional, and tolerance—identifying the source is at times quite difficult. Furthermore, because of psychological conditioning, including fear, the intensity of pain perception may not be proportional to the stimulus. When patients present with a complaint of pain that is subsequently determined to be of odontogenic origin, the vast majority of these cases reflect conditions of irreversible pulpitis, with or without partial ne- crosis.19'23 Patients may report the pain as sharp, dull, continuous, in- termittent, mild, severe, etc. Because the neural portion of the pulp contains only pain fibers, if the inflammatory state is lim- ited to the pulp tissue it may be difficult for the patient to lo- calize the pain. However, once the inflammatory process ex- tends beyond the apical foramen and begins to involve the peri- odontal ligament, which contains proprioceptive fibers, the pa- tient should be able to localize the source of the pain. A percussion test at this time to corroborate the patient's percep- tion of the source will be quite helpful. At times pain is referred to other areas within, and even be- yond, the mouth. Most commonly it is manifested in other teeth in the same or the opposing quadrant. It almost never crosses the midline of the head. However, referred pain is not necessarily limited to other teeth. It may, for example, be ipsi- laterally referred to the preauricular area, or down the neck, or up to the temporal area. In these instances the source of cxtraorally referred pain almost invariably is a posterior tooth. Ostensible toothache of nonodontogenic origin (i.e., resulting from neurologic, cardiac, vascular, malignant, or sinus dis- eases) is described in Chapter 3. Patients may report that their dental pain is exacerbated by lying down or bending over. This occurs because of the in- crease in blood pressure to the head, which increases the pres- sure on the confined pulp. The dentist should be alert for patients who manifest emo- tional disorders as dental pain. If no organic cause can be dis- covered for what appears as dental pain, the patient should be referred for medical consultation. Patients with atypical facial pain of functional rather than organic cause may begin their long journey through the many specialties of the health sci- ences in the dentist's office. If the dentist can determine the onset, duration, frequency, and quality of the pain and the factors that alter its perception, and if the dentist can reproduce or relieve the pain by clinical testing, then surely the pain is of odontogenic origin. The pa- tient will usually gain immeasurable psychological benefit if the clinician provides caring and sincere reassurance that, once the source is discovered, appropriate treatment will be pro- vided immediately to stop the pain. EXAMINATION AND TESTING The inspection phase of the extraoral and intraoral clinical examination should be performed in a systematic manner. A consistent step-by-step approach, always following the same procedure, helps the clinician develop good working habits and minimizes the possibility of inadvertently overlooking any part of the examination or testing. The extraoral visual examina- tion should begin while the clinician is taking the patient's den- tal history. Talking with the patient provides an opportunity to observe the patient's facial features. The clinician should look for fa- cial asymmetry (Fig. 1-1, A) or distensions that might indi- cate swelling of odontogenic origin or a systemic ailment. The patient's eyes should be observed for the pupillary dilation or constriction that may indicate systemic disease, premedication, or fear. Additionally, the patient's skin should be observed for any lesion(s) and, if there is more than one, whether the le- sions appear at random or follow a neural pathway. After a careful external visual examination the clinician should, with the aid of a mouth mirror and the blunt-ended handle of another instrument, begin an oral examination to look for abnormalities of both hard and soft tissues. With a head lamp and good magnification the lips, cheek pouch, tongue, palate, and throat should be briefly examined (Fig. 1-1, B). Because it is easier to observe abnormalities when tis- sues are dry, the liberal use of 2x2 inch gauze, cotton rolls, and a saliva ejector is strongly recommended (Fig. 1-1, C). During the visual phase of the examination the clinician should also be checking both the patient's oral hygiene and the integ- rity of the dentition. Poor oral hygiene and/or numerous miss- ing teeth may indicate that the patient has minimal interest in maintaining a healthy dentition. Visual inspection of the teeth begins with drying the quad- rant under examination and looking for caries, toothbrush abra- sion (Fig. 1-1, D) (cervical lesions occasionally are over- looked), darkened teeth (Fig. 1-1, £), observable swelling (Fig. 1-1, F), fractured or cracked crowns (Fig. 1-1, G), and defective restorations. The clinician should observe the color and translucency of the teeth. Are the teeth intact or is there evidence of abrasion, attrition, cervical erosion, or developmental defects in the crowns? A high index of suspicion must prevail during examination for numerous types of soft-tissue lesions.8,20 This also means looking for unusual changes in the color or contour of the soft tissues. For example, the clinician should look carefully for lesions of odontogenic origin such as sinus tracts (fistulas) (Fig. 1-2, A) or localized redness or swelling involving the at- tachment apparatus. The presence of a sinus tract may indi- cate that periapical suppuration has resulted from a pulp that has undergone complete necrosis in at least one root. The sup- purative lesion has burrowed its way from the cancellous bone through the cortical plate and finally to the mucosal surface. All sinus tracts should be traced with a gutta-percha cone (Fig. 1-2, JS to E) to locate their source, because occasionally the source can be remote.13 All observable data indicating an abnormality should be re- corded on the treatment chart while the information is still fresh in the clinician's mind. If a tooth is suspected of requiring en- dodontic treatment, it should be assessed in terms of its re- storability after endodontic treatment, its strategic importance, and its periodontal prognosis. Palpation When periapical inflammation has developed as an exten- sion of pulpal necrosis, the inflammatory process may burrow its way through the facial cortical bone and begin to affect the overlying mucopcriosteum. Before incipient swelling becomes clinically evident, it may be discerned by both the clinician and the patient using gentle palpation with the index finger (Fig. 1-3, A). The index finger is rolled while it presses the mucosa against the underlying bone. If the mucoperiostcum is inflamed, this rolling motion wiil reveal the existence and de- gree of sensitivity caused by the periapical inflammation. To improve tactile skill and learn the full extent of normal Diagnostic procedures 5 FIG. 1-1 A, Swelling around the right mandible can be readily observed by the clinician while preparing the dental history. B, The Designs for Vision fiberoptic headlamp along with 2'/2 to 3'/2 x magnification allows the clinician to examine the soft tissues and teeth without any shadows. C, A thorough tissue examination is facilitated by drying with cotton rolls, 2 X 2 inch gauze, and a saliva ejector. The initial examination of the teeth and surrounding tissues is conducted with the patient's mouth partly open. With good illumination and mag- nification, as shown in Fig. 1-1 B, changes in color, contour, or texture can be determined by a careful visual examination. D, Class V caries lesion, or abrasion, not always detectable radiographically, can be observed. E, Tooth discolored following a traumatic incident. Al- though the tooth appears necrotic, vitality tests should still be conducted because the pulp could remain vital, F, Intraoral swelling from periapical disease usually appears around the mucobuccal fold; however, the entire mouth must be thoroughly examined because swelling from periapical disease may occur in unusual locations (e.g., the palate). G, With careful visual examination the clinician may observe crown fractures that may not appear in radio- graphs. 6 The art of endodontics FIG. 1-2 A, Sinus tract (fistula). B, When a sinus tract is detected, it should always be traced with a gutta-percha cone to its source. In this case, the sinus tract appeared between the first and second premolars. C, The source of the sinus tract was the lateral incisor, as the gutta- percha probe indicates. D, Gutta-percha cone used to trace a sinus tract discovered on the palate. E, An occlusal jaw radiograph revealed that the sinus tract crossed the midline. The source was a cuspid. F, After numerous unsuccessful dermatologic treatments, this patient consulted a dentist. G, The dentist discovered the source. range to be expected, the clinician is urged to perform palpa- tion testing routinely. Other techniques involving extraoral bidigital or bimanual palpation (e.g., palpating lymph nodes or the floor of the mouth) arc described in complete detail by Rose and Kaye.18 Occasionally a patient is able to point to a particular facial area that felt tender when shaving or applying makeup. The clinician can follow up by palpating in the mucofacial fold, which may help pinpoint the source of the tenderness. If a site that feels tender to palpation is discovered, its location and ex- tent should be recorded as well as whether or not the area is soft or firm. This provides important information on the pos- sible need for an incision and drainage. If a mandibular tooth is abscessed, it is prudent also to pal- pate the submandibular area bimanually to determine whether any submandibular lymph nodes have been affected by exten- sion of the disease process (Fig. 1-3, B). Finally, the cervical lymph nodes should be palpated bidig- itally to discern any swollen or firm lymph nodes. The use Of extraoral and intraoral palpation helps the clini- cian determine the furthest extent of the disease processes. Percussion The percussion test may reveal whether there is any inflam- mation around the periodontal ligament. The clinician should remember that the percussion test does not. give any indication Diagnostic procedures 7 FIG. 1-3 Palpation. A, Bilateral intraoral digital palpation aids the clinician in detecting comparative changes in contour or consistency of the soft tissue and underlying bone. A "mushy" feeling detected during palpation around the mucolabial fold may be the first clinical evidence of incipient swelling. B, Bi- manual extraoral palpation to tactilely search for the extent of lymph node involvement when there is a mandibular dental in- fection. The clinician should palpate the submandibular nodes (as shown here), the angle of the mandible, and the cervical chain of nodes. of the health or integrity of the pulp tissues; it indicates only whether there is inflammation around the periodontal ligament. Before the test, the patient should be instructed that making a small audible sound or raising a hand is the best way to let the clinician know when a tooth feels tender, different, or painful with percussion. Before tapping on the teeth with the handle of a mouth mir- ror, the clinician is advised to use the index finger to percuss teeth in the quadrant being examined (Fig. 1-4, A). Digital per- cussion is much less painful than percussion with a mouth mir- ror handle. The teeth should be tapped in a random fashion (i.e., out of sequence) so the patient cannot anticipate when "the tooth" will be percussed. If the patient cannot discern a difference in sensation with digital percussion, the handle of a mouth mirror should be used to tap on the occlusal, facial, and lingual surfaces of the teeth (Fig. 1-4, B). Using the most appropriate force for percussing is one of the skills that the clinician will develop as part of the art of endodontic diagno- sis. Percussing the teeth too strongly may cause unnecessary pain and anxiety for the patient. The clinician should use the chief complaint and dental history as a guide in deciding how strongly to percuss the teeth. The force of percussion need be only great enough for the patient to discern a difference be- tween a sound tooth and a tooth with an inflamed periodontal ligament. The proprioceptive fibers in an inflamed periodontal ligament, when percussed, help the patient and the clinician locate the source of the pain. Tapping on each cusp can, on occasion, reveal the presence of a crown fracture. A positive response to percussion, indicating an inflamed periodontal ligament, can be caused by a variety of factors (e.g., teeth undergoing rapid orthodontic movement, a recent high restoration, a lateral periodontal abscess, and, of course, partial or total necrosis of the pulp). However, the absence of a response to percussion is quite possible when there is chronic periapical inflammation. Mobility Using the index fingers, or preferably the blunt handles of two metal instruments, the clinician applies alternating lateral forces in a facial-lingual direction to observe the degree of mo- FIG. 1-4 Percussion test to determine whether there is any apical periodontitis. If the patient has reported pain during mastication, the percussion test should be conducted very gently. A, First only the index finger should be used. The teeth should be percussed from a facial as well as an incisal direction. B, If the patient reports no tenderness when the teeth are per- cussed with the finger, a more definitive, sharper percussion can be conducted with the han- dle of the mouth mirror. 8 The art of endodontics bility of the tooth within the alveolus (Fig. 1-5). In addition, tests for the degree of depressibility arc performed by press- ing the tooth into its socket and observing if there is vertical movement. First-degree mobility is barely discernible move- ment; second-degree is horizontal movement of 1 mm or less; third-degree is horizontal movement of greater than 1 mm, of- ten accompanied by vertical mobility. Tooth movement usu- ally reflects the extent of inflammation of the periodontal lig- ament. The pressure exerted by the purulent exudate of an acute apical abscess may cause some mobility of a tooth. In this sit- uation the tooth may quickly stabilize after drainage is estab- lished and the occlusion adjusted. There are additional causes for tooth mobility—including advanced periodontal disease, horizontal root fracture in the middle or coronal third, and chronic bruxism or clenching. Radiographs Radiographs are essential aids in endodontic diagnosis. Un- fortunately, some clinicians rely exclusively on radiographs in their attempt to arrive at a diagnosis. This obviously can lead to major errors in diagnosis and treatment.2 Because the ra- diograph is a two-dimensional image of a three-dimensional object, misinterpretation is a constant risk, but with proper an- FIG. 1-5 The degree of mobility can be most effectively de- termined by applying lateral forces with a blunt-handled in- strument in a facial-lingual direction. gulation of the cone, accurate him placement, correct process- ing of the exposed film (Fig. 1-6), and good illumination with a magnifying glass, the hazards of misinterpretation can be substantially minimized. The full benefit of periapical radio- graphs for diagnostic purposes can be achieved if the technique described here is employed. After correct film placement, either bisected-angle or long- cone methods are effective for film exposure. It is important to expose two diagnostic films. By maintaining the same ver- tical cone angulation and changing the horizontal cone angu- lation 10 to 15 degrees for the second diagnostic film, the cli- nician can obtain a three-dimensional impression of the teeth that will aid in discerning superimposed roots and anatomic landmarks. (Refer to Chapter 5 for further discussion of this phase of dental radiology.) The state of pulpal health or pulpal necrosis cannot be de- termined radiographically; but any of the following findings should arouse suspicion of degenerative pulp changes: deep carious lesions, deep and extensive restorations, pulp caps, pulpotomies, pulp stones, extensive canal calcification, root re- sorption, radiolucencies at or near the apex, root fractures, thickened periodontal ligament, and periodontal disease that is radiographically evident. Radiographic interpretation Interpretation of good-quality diagnostic radiographs must be done in an orderly and consistent manner. With good illu- mination and magnification the clinician can detect nuances of change that may reveal early pathologic changes in or around the tooth. First, the crown of each tooth and then the root(s) are carefully observed, then the root canal system, followed by the lamina dura, bony architecture, and finally the anatomic landmarks that may appear on the film. When posterior teeth are being investigated, a bite-wing film provides an excellent supplement for finding the extent of carious destruction, the depths of restorations, the presence of pulp caps or pulpoto- mies, and dens invaginatus or evaginatus. Generally it is true that the deeper the caries and the more extensive the restora- tion the greater is the probability of pulpal involvement. Fol- lowing the lamina dura usually reveals the number and curva- ture of the roots. A root canal should be readily discernible; if the canal appears to change quickly from dark to light, this indicates that it has bifurcated or trifurcated (Fig. 3-7, A). The presence of "extra" roots or canals in all teeth (Fig. 1-7, B) is FIG. 1-6 A, An improperly exposed or poorly processed radiograph like this one is difficult or impossible to interpret. B, The condition of the crown, roots, and surrounding tissue can be seen only with a properly prepared radiograph. Diagnostic procedures 9 much more common than was previously believed. If the out- line of the root seems unclear or deviates from where it ought to be, an extra root should be suspected.24 Accordingly, at least one canal (or root) more than the radiograph shows must always be suspected until clinically proved otherwise. Three- rooted mandibular molars (Fig. 1-7, B) and maxillary premo- lars as well as two-rooted canines will be found with greater frequency as the examiner's dental anatomic acumen, index of suspicion, and diagnostic sophistication improve. A necrotic tooth does not cause radiographic changes at the apex until the periapical pathosis has destroyed bony trabecu- le at their junction with the cortical plate.21 Thus a great deal of bone destruction may occur before any radiographic signs are evident. A radioluccnt lesion need not be at the apex of the root to indicate pulpal inflammation or degeneration. Tox- ins of pulp tissue degeneration exiting from a lateral canal can cause bone destruction anywhere along the root. Conversely, a lateral canal can be a portal of entry for potentially harmful toxins in teeth with advanced periodontal disease (Fig. 1-8). If periodontal bone loss extends far enough apically to expose the foramen of a lateral canal, the toxins from the periodontal disease can gain entry into a vital healthy pulp via the lateral canal and cause irritation, inflammation, and even pulpal ne- crosis in a sound tooth. Periodontal disease extending to the apical foramen definitely causes pathologic pulpal changes (see Chapter 18). Pulp stones (Fig. 1 -9, A) and canal calcifications are not nec- essarily pathologic; they can be mere manifestations of degen- erative aging in the pulpal tissue. However, their presence may cause other insults to the pulp and may increase the difficulty of negotiating the root canals. The incidence of calcifications in the chamber or in the canal may increase with periodontal disease, extensive restorations, or aging. As the percentage of the population categorized as elderly increases, clinicians FIG. 1-7 A, A sudden change from dark to light indicates bifurcation or bifurcation of the root canal system (arrow), as shown by B, premolar with a bifurcated root canal system and a mandibular first molar with three roots. FIG. 1-8 A and B, Radiolucent lesions indicates pulp degeneration. These radiographs illus- trate how toxins of pulp tissue degeneration may exit from a lateral canal, causing bone de- struction along the side. Conversely, this lateral canal could be a portal of entry for toxins that might destroy the pulp and create a periapical lesion. 10 The art of endodontics FIG. 1-9 A, Pulp stones and the extent and depth of restorations can be detected more clearly with a bite-wing film. B, Periapical osteosclerosis, possibly caused by a mild pulp irritant. C, Dens in dente. D, Internal resorption, once detected, must be treated promptly before it perforates the root. E, Horizontal root fractures can usually be detected with a good-quality radiograph. F, Vitality tests on a tooth with an immature apex may yield erroneous results. should be more attuned to detecting pulp stones and calcifica- tion of the canal space30 (see Chapter 24). Internal resorption (Fig. 1-9, D) (occasionally seen after a traumatic injury) is an indication for endodontic therapy. The inflamed pulp, expanding at the expense of the dentin, must be removed as soon as possible lest a lateral perforation oc- cur. Untreated internal resorption leading to root perforation increases the probability of eventual tooth loss (see Chapter 16). Radiographs are important for identifying teeth with imma- ture apices (Fig. 1-9, F) and teeth with lingual development grooves (Fig. 1-10). The clinician must have this information before conducting thermal and electric pulp tests because teeth with immature apices often cause erroneous readings with vi- tality testing (Chapter 23). Root fractures may cause pulpal degeneration. Fractures of the root can be difficult to detect on a radiograph. Vertical root fractures (Fig. 1-11, A and B) are seldom identified with the radiograph except in advanced stages of root separation. Most horizontal root fractures can be readily identified with prop- erly exposed and processed radiographs; however, horizontal fractures may be confused with linear patterns of bone trabe- cule. The two phenomena can be differentiated by noting that the lines of bone trabeculae extend beyond the border of the root, whereas a root fracture often causes a thickening of the periodontal ligament. Finally, the clinician must realize that there are occasions when periapical, bite-wing, and panoramic films may not suf- fice. Other types of cxtraoral films, described in greater detail in Chapter 5, may be necessary (especially when there has been a traumatic incident) before a diagnosis can be made. Radiographic misinterpretation A dental humorist once claimed that if a clinician looked at a radiograph long enough he would find whatever he was looking for. This overstatement suggests a sound rule for radiographic interpretation: be wary—but not necessarily disbelieving—of what appears to be obvious radiographically. Radiographic in- terpretation is often quite subjective, as illustrated by a study of more than 250 cases in which the same endodontists interpreted Diagnostic procedures 11 FIG. 1-10 A, Lingual development groove. The radiograph shows the canals of both central incisors to be distinctly different. Arrows point to the groove traced along the root. B, Silver cone in the sulcular defect tracing the groove toward the apex. C, Although the tooth was vital, only extraction could resolve this problem. In the near future, lasing these grooves may allow these types of teeth to be retained. FIG. 1-11 Vertical fractures arc rarely evident radiographically until there is advanced root separation. A, Distal root with vertical fracture. B, Following extraction, the fracture can be seen (arrow). the same radiographs at intervals of 6 to 8 months. The three endodontists in this study agreed with themselves only 72% to 88% of the time.10 In an earlier study six endodontists all agreed with each other less than half the time.9 The radio- graphic phenomena that caused misinterpretations were these: 1. Radioluccncy at the apex (Fig. 1-12). At first glance this might appear to be a periapical lesion. However, a pos- itive response to vitality tests, an intact lamina dura, the absence of symptoms and probable cause, and the ana- tomic location clearly show it to be the mental foramen. Only the confirmed absence of pulp vitality will reveal which tooth is the source of the periapical lesion (Fig. 1-13). 2. Well-circumscribed radiolucency at or near the apex (Fig. 1-14, A-C). At first glance (Fig. 1-14, B) it might appear to be a periapical lesion. However, changing the horizontal angulation and exposing a second radiograph show the lesion to have moved (Fig. 1-14, C). Because the tooth was asymptomatic with lack of probable cause and because of a positive response to vitality tests and anatomic location, this was positively identified as the nasopalatine canal. 3. The periapical radiolucency over the lateral incisor sug- gests the incisor is the source of the lesion, but vitality testing showed it was the canine that was nonvital. En- dodontic treatment remineralized the radiolucency over the lateral incisor (Fig. 1-15). 14 The art of endodontics A FIG. 1-15 A, The periapical radiolucency over the lateral incisor might indicate the lateral incisors as the source of the lesion. Thermal and electric pulp tests indicated that the lateral incisor was vital and the canine was necrotic. B, Endodontic treatment completed for the canine. C, Six months after endodontic treatment the canine has completely remineralized over the apex of the lateral incisor. (Courtesy Dr. John Saponc.) FIG. 1-16 Preparing teeth for thermal and electric pulp test- ing. A, Before testing, the teeth should be isolated with a cot- ton roll and dried with gauze. B, Air should not be used to dry the teeth because room temperature air may cause thermal shock. Air drying could also spray saliva on the clinician. FIG. 1-17 Thermal test with heat. A, Temporary stopping is heated over a flame until it becomes soft and begins to bend. B, Temporary stopping applied to the dried tooth (lightly coated with cocoa butter to prevent sticking).