Dealing with Uncertainties Second, Enlarged Edition Manfred Drosg Dealing with Uncertainties A Guide to Error Analysis Second, Enlarged Edition Prof.Dr.ManfredDrosg UniversitätWien FakultätfürPhysik Strudlhofgasse4 A-1090Wien,Austria [email protected] ISBN978-3-642-01383-6 e-ISBN978-3-642-01384-3 DOI10.1007/978-3-642-01384-3 SpringerDordrechtHeidelbergLondonNewYork LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2009933277 (cid:2)cSpringer-VerlagBerlinHeidelberg2007,2009 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.Allrightsarereserved,whetherthewholeorpartofthematerialis concerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseofillustrations,recitation,broadcasting, reproductiononmicrofilmorinanyotherway,andstorageindatabanks.Duplicationofthispublication orpartsthereofispermittedonlyundertheprovisionsoftheGermanCopyrightLawofSeptember9, 1965,initscurrentversion,andpermissionforusemustalwaysbeobtainedfromSpringer.Violationsare liabletoprosecutionundertheGermanCopyrightLaw. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfromtherelevantprotective lawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. Coverdesign:WMXDesignGmbH,Heidelberg Printedonacid-freepaper SpringerispartofSpringerScience+BusinessMedia(www.springer.com) I dedicate this book to my American friends; in particular to those I met in New Mexico, and to Peter Weinzierl, who patronized me by arranging for me, with the magnificent support of R.F. Taschek, former P-Division leader of LANL, to become the first foreign postdoctoral fellow in said division. Preface Aninnovativeapproachtouncertaintiesbasedontheeasilyunderstoodround- ing uncertainty is introduced in this edition facilitating the understanding of the nature of a (scientific) uncertainty; in particular it is clear from the very beginning that measurements are not the cause of the phenomenon uncer- tainty. At the same time this choice provides an excellent example for the importance of the shape of the uncertainty distribution. Several recent devel- opments have centered on the determination of such shapes because of their importance in finding confidence levels. Thus, more attention is paid to the shape of uncertainty distributions throughout this edition. In recent years the term uncertainty has become generally accepted and the controversial term error appears to be finally outdated. Consequently, a criticalreviewofthetextwasnecessarytofullycomplywiththisdevelopment. Stressing the usually disregarded distinction between measurement and experimental uncertainty made it necessary to deal to some extent with the modeluncertainty.Someadditionalthoughtsoncountinguncertaintiesshould make it easier for the reader to deal with this interesting subject. Added emphasis on linear regression of transformed data should be welcomed by some readers. Asubstantialincreaseofthenumberoffiguresshouldbehelpfulinunder- standingsomeofthepointsmoreeasily.Theabundanceofpracticalexamples and problems was praised by many readers. Consequently, I added more of them. They reflect mypersonal experiences inthis field. Because ofthis plen- itude I can encourage readers to skip Examples or Problems if these are too alien to their knowledge. There should be others that are better suited. SeveralreadershavepointedoutmistakeswhichIcorrectedinthisedition. I am very thankful to them and am encouraging new readers to follow suite ([email protected]).Veryvaluableinput wasreceivedfrom Dr. Robert C. Haight, Los Alamos National Laboratory. I am indebted to him. My very good colleague Prof. Gerhard Winkler was again available for discussions that helped this project a lot. I thank him sincerely. Vienna, March 2009 Manfred Drosg Preface to the First Edition For many people uncertainty as it occurs in the scientific context is still a matter of speculation and frustration. One of the reasons is that there are several ways of approaching this subject, depending upon the starting point. The theoretical part has been well established over centuries. However, the application of this knowledge on empirical data, freshly produced (e.g., by an experiment) or when evaluating data, can often present a problem. In some cases this is triggered by the word “error” that is an alternative term for uncertainty. For many the word error means something that is wrong. However,aswillbeshown,anuncertaintyisjustonecharacteristicofscientific dataanddoesnotindicatethatthesedataarewrong.Toavoidanyassociation with something being wrong, the term error is avoided in this book whenever possible, and the term uncertainty is used instead. This appears to be in agreement with the general tendency in modern science. The philosopher Sir Karl Popper made it clear that any scientific truth is uncertain. Usually, uncertainty is mentally associated only with measured data for which an “error analysis” is mandatory, as many know. This makes peoplethinkthatuncertaintyhasonlytodowithmeasurements.However,all scientific truths, even predictions of theories and of computer models, should beassigneduncertainties.Whereastheuncertaintyofmeasureddataisrather easy to determine, it is too difficult, if not impossible, to establish reliable uncertainties for theoretical data of either origin. Thus, this book deals mainly with uncertainties of empirical data, even if much of it is applicable in a more general way. In particular, I want to promote a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of uncertainty and to removeatleasttwomajorhurdlesenroute.Oneistoemphasizetheexistence of internal uncertainties. Usually only external uncertainties are considered because they are the direct result of the theoretical approach. The former are the result of a deductive approach to uncertainties, whereas the latter are obtained inductively. The other hurdle is the so-called systematic error. The conflicting nomenclature of this term is cause of many misunderstandings. It is used both for correlated (or systematic) uncertainties and for systematic X Preface to the First Edition deviations of data. The latter just means that these data are wrong, that is, thattheyshouldhavebeencorrectedforthatdeviation.Thereareevenbooks in which both meanings are intermingled! Not using the term error will make such misconceptions less likely. So I speak of uncorrelated uncertainty instead of random error, and of correlated uncertainty (and of systematic deviation, respectively) instead of systematic error.Inaddition,itwillbeshownthatthesetwotypesofuncertaintiesareof the same nature. Thus, a remark taken from a more recent book like “there is no evidence that you cannot treat random and systematic errors the same way” is self-evident. Myfirstinterestinthesubjectofthisbookgoesbackto1969,whenNelson (Bill)JarmieatLosAlamosNationalLaboratory,USA,whowasapioneerin accurate measurements of cross sections, introduced me to various subtleties inthis field.Iamindebted to himformanyinsights. Notsurprisingly, quitea few examples deal with nuclear physics. In this field (and in electronics) I am most experienced and, even more important, uncertainties of data based on radioactive decay can easily be determined both deductively and inductively. The essence of this book is found already in work sheets that I prepared for undergraduate students in an advanced practical physics course when it became clear that nothing like it was available in either German or English books. This lack is the reason for not including a reference list. Students and colleagues have contributed by asking the right questions, my colleague Prof. Gerhard Winkler by way of enlightening discussions and very valuable suggestions, and M.M. Steurer, MS, by reporting a couple of mistakes. My sincere thanks to all of them. I sincerely urge my readers to contact me at [email protected] whenever they can report a mistake or want to suggest some additional topic to be included in this book. Any such corrections or additions I will post at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Manfred.Drosg/uncertaintybook.htm. Vienna, September 2006 Manfred Drosg
Description: