ebook img

Curidia magellanica, new species, from Magellan Strait (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ochlesidae) PDF

10 Pages·1991·4 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Curidia magellanica, new species, from Magellan Strait (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ochlesidae)

PROC. BIOL. SOC. WASH. 104(2), 1991, pp. 269-278 CURIDIA MAGELLANICA, NEW SPECIES, FROM MAGELLAN STRAIT (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA: OCHLESIDAE) C. O. Coleman and J. L. Barnard Abstract.—Thenewspecies, Curidiamagellanica,differsfromsimilarspecies, Curidia debrogania and Ochlesodius spinicornis, in the strong development of the pointed projections on peduncular articles 1 and 2 ofantenna 1 and the fourtharticleofantenna2. Thecoxalplatesofpereopods2and 3 ofOchlesodius spinicornisareapicallytruncate,in Curidiamagellanica, roundedandsubacute, respectively. Themaxillipedalpalpismuchlongerinthenewspeciescompared to Curidia debrogania and there are remnants of an articular suture, which might indicate relationships to the genus Ochlesodius. The classic genus Odius is an analogous morph in the Iphimediidae with many characters that might be considered plesiomorphic to the Ochlesidae; it has been relegated to a new family Odiidae by Coleman & Barnard (1991). ThegeneraandspeciesofthefamilyOch- ordinary. Lateral cephalic lobes well devel- lesidae are reviewed for the first time since oped. its description by Stebbing (1910). A new Mouthparts grouped conically. Labrum diagnosisofthefamilyispresentedbyCole- elongate. Mandibular incisors moderately man &Barnard (1991), who also discuss its broad, smooth or weakly crenulate in mid- relationship to many similar families; here, dle,eachend(side)boundedbysmalltooth; a complete description ofthe family is pre- left mandible with spiniform lacinia mobi- sented. Newkeysforidentification andlists lis,rightabsentorrepresentedbysmallcon- ofspecies are provided herein. The lists of ical spine; palp 3-articulate, article 1 elon- speciespresenteachspecieswithitsdescrib- gateornot; rakersabsent; molarverysmall, er and date followed in parentheses by one poorly triturative or simple. Mandibular or more modem references, followed by lobesoflabiumacuminate, innerlobesweak geographical codes for distribution set in or absent. Inner plate ofmaxilla 1 small or brackets; a list of these codes is found in indiscernible, outerplate subconical, spines & Barnard Barnard (1983:181-203). mostly fused to base, palp vestigial though oftenarmedwithlongseta. Lobesofmaxilla Ochlesidae 2 elongate, inner shortened. Inner plate of maxilliped acuminate, outer operculiform; Ochlesidae Stebbing, 1910:581.—Coleman & palp small, 0-2 articulate. Barnard, 1991:259. Anterior coxae acuminate or oddly Description. —Body massive, com- shaped: coxae 1 and 4 shortened relative to pressed, one or more segments usually with long and thin coxae 2 and 3, coxa 3 with largedorsal tooth. Head short from front to posterodorsal buttress forming attachment rear,buttall, partiallyenvelopedbypereon. to pereon; coxa 5 shorter than 4. Gnatho- Rostrum large. Antennae short but thick, pods feeble, gnathopod 1 simple or mi- notlongerthan 5 pereonites, flagellasparse- nutely parachelate, gnathopod 2 simple or lyarticulate,accessoryflagellumabsent.Eyes subchelate, otherwise gnathopod 2 with . 270 PROCEEDINGSOFTHEBIOLOGICALSOCIETYOFWASHINGTON produced carpus and/or merus; articles 3- fashionthattheanteriorcoxaehaveajagged 6 ofgnathopod 1 slender, elongate, apical appearance. The dorsal keel ofthe six an- setae usually strap-shaped or grossly feath- teriorthoracicsegmentsalsoisfoundinsev- ered. Article 2 of pereopods 5-7 well ex- eralmembersofAcanthonotozomatidaeand panded, with posteroventral lobe. Gills on in the genus Dikwa (Dikwidae), but in all coxae 2-7, narrow, or apically geniculate; ofthose, one or more ofpereonites 1-6 has oostegites narrow and broad together in a dorsal tooth. same species, thus narrow on coxae 2 and See Coleman & Barnard (1991) for ad- 5 but broad on coxae 3-4 or also broad on ditional comments on more remote taxa. coxa 2 in another species. Pleopods ordi- nary. Epimera toothed or not. Key to the Genera ofOchlesidae Urosomites separate. Uropods 1-3 bira- mousbutouterramiofuropods2-3 shorter 1 Palp ofmaxilliped 2-articulate . . . than inner; peduncle ofuropod 3 elongate, Ochlesodius thus longer than urosomites 2-3 together, - Palp ofmaxilliped 0-1 articulate .. 2 innerrami ofuropod 3 aslongas orslightly 2. Body keel dorsally flattened, with shorterthanpeduncle, flattened, lanceolate, plaques, pereonites with lateral outer ramus 1-articulate. Telson entire or plaques, telson linguiform, lateral weakly incised, variable in size and shape. margins curled upward Meraldia Variables.—Body narrowing dorsally to - Bodykeeldorsallyknife-like,pereo- thin continuous keel or segments forming nites smooth laterally, telson flat 3 . . flattened dorsal pedestals. Antennae cus- 3. Palp ofmaxilliped absent .... Ochlesis pidate or not. Epistome and labrum highly - Palp ofmaxilliped 1-articulate . . . variable, broad or narrow, long or short, Curidia incisedorentire. Coxaevariable. Dactylsof pereopods3-7elongate{Ochlesisinnocens), Key to the Species ofOchlesidae orshort{Ochlesislenticulosus).Telsonshort or elongate, leaf-shaped or long and trun- 1. Body keel dorsally flattened, with cate. plaques, pereonites with lateral — Relationship. Ochlesidae difler from plaques, telson linguiform, lateral Iphimediidaein(1)theproducedmerusand margins curled upward carpus ofgnathopod 2; (2) the reduction of Meraldia meraldi the maxillipedal palp to fewer than 3 arti- - Body keel dorsally knife-like, per- cles; (3) the reduced antennal flagella; (4) eonites smooth laterally, telson flat theslenderkeel-likenarrowingofthedorsal 2 margin of pereonites 1-6, which also lack 2. Coxae 1-3 not tapering, blunt or teeth; and (5) the peculiarthough internally truncateapically,palpofmaxilliped diverseformsoftheanteriorcoxae, inwhich with 2 articles Ochlesodius spinicornis . coxa 4 is strongly shortened, coxa 1 is dis- - Coxae 1-3 tapering, rounded or at- parately shortened, and coxa 4 occurs in tenuate apically, palp ofmaxilliped grotesque shapes. The shortened condition with 0-1 article 3 ofcoxa 1 is ofincremental degree, in that 3. Coxa 4 not excavate posteriorly, the shortened coxa 1 of Iphimediidae re- body with at least one large dorsal mains within the smooth parabola formed tooth 4 by the lower edges ofcoxae 4, 3, 2, and 1, - Coxa 4 excavate posteriorly, body whereasin Ochlesidae, coxae 2 and 3 are of lacking large dorsal teeth 7 equal length; no parabolic curve with coxa 4. Epimeron 3 with tooth 5 4 is possible because itis shortened in such - Epimeron 3 lacking tooth 6 VOLUME NUMBER 104, 2 271 5. Pleonites2-3 onlywithdorsalrugae Marine, Caribbean Sea, Belize, 6 m, and Ochlesis innocens Magellan region, 92-101 m, 2 species. - Pleonites 2-3 with strong dorsal tooth Ochlesis lenticulosa 6. Pereonite 7 and pleonites 1-2 with Meraldia Barnard & Karaman strongdorsaltooth, teethpresenton Meraldia Barnard & Karaman, 1987:857 antennae 1-2 Ochlesis carinata {Ochlesis meraldi J. L. Barnard, 1972, - Only pleonite 3 with strong dorsal original designation). tooth, teeth absent on antennae 1- —As 2 Ochlesis eridunda Diagnosis. in key. 7. Antennae and epimeron 3 lacking Species.—Meraldia meraldi (J. L. Bar- significant teeth ....Ochlesis levetzowi nard, 1972) southern Australia [785]. - Antennae and epimeron 3 with sig- Marine,PearsonIslands,SouthAustralia, nificant teeth 8 35 m, 1 species. 8. Teeth of antennae small, palp of maxilliped absent Ochlesis alii Ochlesis Stebbing - Teeth ofantennae medium to large, palp ofmaxilliped 1-articulate .... 9 Ochlesis Stebbing, 1910:581 {Ochlesis in- 9. Palp ofmaxilliped shorter than ba- nocens Stebbing, 1910, monotypy). solateral margin ofouter plate, fla- Diagnosis.—As in key. gellum of antenna 1 as long as ar- Removal—Ochlesis meraldi J. L. Bar- ticles 1-2 of peduncle, coxa 3 nard, 1972, to Meraldia. expanded distally from coxa 4, an- Species.—OchlesisaliiJ. L. Barnard, 1970 terodorsalhumpofcoxae3-4 small, (?(9. innocensIDofPirlot, 1936 and?Schel- pereonite 7 longer than pereonites lenberg, 1938), Hawaii and Indonesia [381 4-6 together, teeth of antennae of + ?640]; O. carinatus Ledoyer, 1986, Wal- medium length . . . Curidia debrogania ters Bank, bathyal [725wB]; O. eridunda J. - Palp of maxilliped longer than ba- L. Barnard, 1972, southern Australia [785]; solateral margin ofouter plate, fla- O. innocens Stebbing, 1910, southeastAus- gellumofantenna 1 aslongasarticle tralia [781]; O. lenticulosus K. H. Barnard, 1 ofpeduncle, coxa 3 not expanded 1940 (Griffiths 1974b, 1974c, 1975), south- distally from coxa 4, anterodorsal em Africa [743]; O. levetzowi Schellenberg, hump ofcoxae 3-4 large, pereonite 1953 (Griffiths 1974a, 1974c), southernAf- 7 not longerthan pereonites 5-6 to- rica [743]. gether, teeth ofantenna long Marine, Indo-Pacific from Hawaii to Curidia magellanica southern Australia and southern Africa, 0- 200 m, 6 species. Curidia Thomas Curidia Thomas, 1983:127 {Curidia debro- Ochlesodius Ledoyer gania Thomas, 1983, original designa- tion). OchlesodiusLedoyer, 1982:48 {Ochlesodius spinicornis Ledoyer, 1982, original des- Diagnosis.—Like Ochlesisbutmaxilliped ignation). with 1-articulate palp. Species.—C. debrogania Thomas, 1983, Diagnosis.—As in key. — western Caribbean [471]; C. magellanica Species. Ochlesis spinicornis Ledoyer, Coleman & Barnard, herein, Magellan re- 1982, Madagascar [698]. gion [864]. Marine, Glorieuses, 26 m, 1 species. 272 PROCEEDINGSOFTHEBIOLOGICALSOCIETY OFWASHINGTON on right mandible; pars molaris small, cup- Curidia magellanica, new species likeweaklytriturative;palp 3-articulate, ar- Figs. 1-4 ticle 1 slightly expanded distally, 0.82 as USNM Material. —B.o\otypQ, 253546, long as article 2, article 2 longest, article 3 female 2.4 mm, with setose oostegites; 0.91 as long as article 2, curved ventrally, USNM 253547, 34 paratypes. with linearcomb row, apicallywith 3 short Type locality.-Eltanin St. 958 (52°56'S setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 21): slender, long 75°00'W), Magellan region of south Chile; andnarrowapices. Maxilla 1 (Fig. 2a): inner 5 Feb 1964; depth range 92-101 m; gear: 5' plate small, outer plate styliform with 5-6 Blake trawl. spine-like setae distomedially; palp uniar- Etymology.—ThQ species name refers to ticulate, short with long seta distally. Max- the type locality. illa 2 (Fig. 2b); innerplate widerthan outer Description.—Body strongly compressed platewith 8 setaedistally; outerplatelonger laterally, sharply ridged dorsally as shown thaninnerplatewith 1 setaedistally. Max- in Fig. la; pereonite 1 forming a rostrum- illiped (Fig. 2c): inner plate slender, long like anterior process; pereonite 2 shortest; (70%ofouterplate), spine-likesetaapically, pereonite 7 longest, posterodorsal margin row ofsetae on medial margin; outer plate forming a tooth; pleonites 1 and 2 postero- rounded distally with several setae subapi- lateral margin roundly produced, postero- cal; palppresent, uniarticulate (remnants of ventralangleofepimeraproduced, postero- former articular suture visible under high dorsal margin slightly produced; pleonite 3 magnification), 1 long and 1 short incon- withdorsalhump, posteroventralmarginof spicuous setae terminally. epimeron 3 with pointed tooth, urosomite Gnathopod 1 (Figs, la, 3a): coxa much 1 longest; urosomite 2 shortest. Head par- shorter than coxa ofpereopod 2 (65%), ta- tially hidden by pereonite 1, eyes with 17 pering distally; basis elongate, slightly lon- to 22 ommatidia, lateral cephalic lobe gerthanischiumandmerustogether;carpus pointed anteriorly; rounded epistomal pro- andpropodussubequalinlengthandwidth; cess between antennae 2. propoduswith some setae distally; dactylus Antenna 1 (Fig. lb): article 1 broad, lon- with some plumose setae andone stoutseta gerthan 2, withventromedial acute process posteriorly. Gnathopod2(Figs, la, 3b): coxa exceeding first third offirst flagellar article; elongated, rounded distally, anteroproxi- article 2 with similarprocessexceedinghalf mal angle overlapping coxa 1; basis elon- offirstflagellararticle; article 3 shorterthan gate, ischium shorter than merus; postero- flagellar article 1; accessory flagellum ab- distalangleofmerusbearingprocess;carpus sent; flagellum consisting of three articles, longer than propodus, increasing in width article 1 longest with aesthetascs ventrally. distally, withsetaeonposterodistalprocess; Antenna 2 (Fig. Id): subequal in length to dactylusstout, bifidwithclawanteriorly(see antenna 1;article2withsubacuteglandcone; detail ofFig. 3b). articles 2 and 3 subequal in length; article Pereopod3 (Fig. 3c): anteroproximalpart 4 with long acute medial process almost ofcoxa rounded, overlapping coxa 2, pos- reachingdistal marginofpedunculararticle teromarginal rounded process, coxa taper- 5; article 5 as long as flagellum; flagellum ing distally to subacute tip; basis slightly consisting of3 articles. increasing in width distally; ischium short Labrum(Fig. 1c): elongated, taperingdis- and broad; merus with anterodistal acute taUy; epistome forming keel-like process. process (carpusto dactylus missing). Pereo- Mandible (Fig. 2d, e): styliform; incisor pod 4 (Fig. 4a): coxa broad, anteriorly and simple, very small, with cutting edge, slen- posteriorly excavate, overlapping coxa 3 derlaciniamobilis onleft mandible, absent proximally; basis simple; merus similar in VOLUME NUMBER 104, 2 273 Fig. 1. Holotype ofCuridia magellanica n. sp., female 2.4 mm. a, lateral habitus; b, antenna 1; c, labrum; d, antenna 2. shape as to pereopod 3; carpus increasing marginally; dactylus stout with terminal in width distally with some spine-like setae claw. Pereopod 5 (Figs, la, 4e): coxa very posteromarginally, anterodistal angle broad, anteroproximal comer produced, slightly produced; propodus longer than overlappingcoxa4; basisbroadwith incon- merus, with some spine-like setae postero- spicuous ridge on lateral face, overlapping 274 PROCEEDINGSOFTHE BIOLOGICALSOCIETY OFWASHINGTON Fig. 2. HolotypeofCuridia magellanican. sp., female, 2.4 mm. a, maxilla 1; b, maxilla2; c, maxilliped;d, leftmandible; e, right mandible; f, partofhypopharynx. ischium andmerus with posterodistal lobe; anteroproximally lobate; basis similar in merus broad with posterodistal process shapetopereopod 5 butslightlylonger, me- (carpus to dactylus damaged during dissec- rus broad with acute posterodistal process; tion). Pereopod6 (Figs, la, 4b): coxabroad- carpus longer than merus, increasing in er than long, slightly excavate posteriorly, width distally, posterodistal angle slightly VOLUME NUMBER 104, 2 275 Fig. 3. HolotypeofCuridiamagellanican. sp.,female,2.4mm.a,pereopod 1;b, pereopod2,detailshowing dactyluswith claw; c, pereopod 3; d, uropod 1; e, uropod 2; f, uropod 3, from ventral side. produced; propodus longest with some pods 5 and 6 butbroader, anteromarginally spine-like setae anteromarginally; dactylus sinuoid; ischium, merus, carpus and dac- stout with terminal claw. Pereopod 7 (Figs, tylus as for pereopod 6. la, 4c): coxa small, with posteromarginal Gills present on coxae 2-7 slender, weak- excavation; basis similarin shape to pereo- ly sac-like but on pereopod 7 as long as 276 PROCEEDINGSOFTHEBIOLOGICALSOCIETYOFWASHINGTON Fig. 4. HolotypeofCuridia magellanican. sp., female, 2.4 mm. a, pereopod 4; b, pereopod 6; c, pereopod 7; e, pereopod 5. Paratype, ovigerousfemale, 2.9 mm. d, telson. broad. Oostegites on coxae 2-4 broadly ex- beyonduropods2and 3,peduncleelongate, panded distally rounded, oostegite ofcoxa longerthan rami, with row ofspiniform se- , 5 short and slender. tae dorsolaterally; rami subequal in length, Uropod 1 (Figs, la, 3d): slightly reaching somespine-likesetaeonbothmargins.Uro- VOLUME 104, NUMBER 2 277 pod 2 (Figs, la, 3e): peduncle subequal to pared to Curidia debrogania and there are inner ramus, length of outer ramus % of remnantsofanarticularsuture,whichmight inner ramus, rami with spine-like setae on indicate relations to the genus Ochlesodius. both margins. Uropod 3 (Figs, la, 3f): pe- duncle stout; innerramus longerthan outer Literature Cited ramus. Telson (Fig. 4d, from paratype): en- tire, elongate, tapering distally. Barnard, J. L. 1970. Sublittoral Gammaridea (Am- Descriptive «or^.—Because the mandib- phipoda) ofthe Hawaiian Islands.—Smithson- ular palp and telson were damaged on the ian Contributionsto Zoology 34:1-286. phoalroattyyppee,ovdiegsecrrioputsiofnesmalaere2.t9akmemn.from a ol.ilao,1g9Py7a2r1.t03IG.:a—1-mS3mm3ai3r.tihsdoenainanAmCponhtirpiobudtaioonfsAutostZroa-- Discussion.—The, Ochlesidae consist of , & C. M. Barnard. 1983. Freshwater Am- theapomorphicgeneraMeraldiaBarnard& phipoda ofthe world, I. Evolutionary patterns Karaman (1987) and Ochlesis Stebbing andII.Handbookandbibliography.Mt.Vernon, p(1l9e1s0i)omloarcpkhiincggaenmuasxiClulriipdeidaaTlhpoamlpasan(1d98t3h)e Vs,ii&frigciGan.tiiaoS,n.HoKafayrfgiaaemmlamdna.Arsisod1ce9i8aa7nt.esA,Rmexpvihixispi+oon8ds3a0in(pCpcrl.uass-- with an uniarticulate palp. The plesiomor- tacea) Part. 3.—Proceedings of the Biological phic genus Ochlesodius Ledoyer (1982), Society ofWashington 100:856-875. bearinga2-articulatemaxillipedalpalp,was Barnard,K.H. 1940. Contributionstothecrustacean faunaofSouthAfrica.XII.Furtheradditionsto placed with the Iphimediidae by Ledoyer the Tanaidacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda, to- (1982). This genus should be moved to the gether with keys for the identification of the Ochlesidae, which seem to be related to the hitherto recorded marine and fresh-water spe- Iphimediidae (compare Bousfield 1978). cies.—AnnalsoftheSouthAfricanMuseum32: Ledoyer (1986) points at the similarity be- 381-543. Bousfield, E. L. 1978. A revised classification and tween OchlesisandOdius, aniphimediid"a phylogeny of amphipod crustaceans.—Trans- laquelle ils [the ochlesids] pourraient etre actions ofthe Royal Society ofCanada 4:343- rattaches." On the contrary, Coleman & 390. Barnard (1991) moved Odius to the new Coleman, C. O., &J. L. Barnard. 1991. Revision of afcatmeirlsyiOndcioidmameobnecwaiutshethitehOacshlmeosirdeaechaanrd- AIpmhpihmiepdoidiad)a.e—anPrdocseiemdilianrgsfamoiflitehse(CBriuosltoagciecaa:l SocietyofWashington 104:253-268. does not fit well in the Iphimediidae. Griffiths, C. L. 1974a. The Amphipoda ofsouthern The new species is relegated to the genus Africapart2.TheGammarideaandCaprellidea Curidia owing to its uniarticulate maxilli- ofSouthWestAfricasouthof20°S.—Annalsof pedal palp by which it is separated from the South African Museum 62:169-208. Ochlesodius spinicornis Ledoyer, 1982. Al- p.ar1t937.4Tb.heTGhaemmAamrpihdiepaoadnadoCfapsroeultlhiedrenaoAffrNiac-a though the body shape of the new species tal.—Annalsofthe South African Museum 62: is similar to Curidia debrogania and Och- 209-264. lesodiusspinicornis, thenewspeciesisclear- . 1974c. The Amphipoda ofsouthern Africa ly distinguished from those species by the part4.TheGammarideaandCaprellideaofthe Cape Province east ofCape Agulhas.—Annals strong development ofthe pointed projec- ofthe South African Museum 65:251-336. tions in the peduncular articles 1 and 2 of . 1975. The Amphipoda of southern Africa antenna 1 and the fourth article ofantenna part5.TheGammarideaandCaprellideaofthe 2. The coxal plates ofpereopods 2 and 3 of Cape Province west ofCape Agulhas.—Annals Ochlesodius spinicornis are apically trun- ofthe South African Museum 67:91-181. Ledoyer, M. 1982. Crustaces amphipodes gamma- cate, in Curidia magellanica rounded and riens families des Acanthonotozomatidae a subacute, respectively. The maxillipedal Gammaridae.—Faune de Madagascar 59(1):I- palpismuchlongerinthenewspeciescom- 598. 278 PROCEEDINGSOFTHE BIOLOGICALSOCIETYOFWASHINGTON . 1986. Crustaces amphipodes gammariens H.M.C.S. "Thetis."—Australian Museum, families des Haustoriidae a Vitjazianidae.— Memoir4, 2:565-658. Faunede Madagascar 59(2):599-l112. Thomas,J.D. 1983. Curidiadebrogania,anewgenus Pirlot, J. M. 1936. Les amphipodes de I'expedition and species ofamphipod (Crustacea: Ochlesi- duSiboga.Deuxiemepartie. . . . II.-Lesamphi- dae) from the barrier reefs of Belize, Central podesdelamerprofonde. III. Lesamphipodes America.—Proceedings ofthe Biological Soci- littoraux. 1. Lysianassidae. . . Gammaridae.— ety ofWashington 96:127-133. Siboga-Expeditie 33e:237-328. Schellepnibsercgh,enA.Fa1zi9f3i8k.s.L—itKouranlgelAiampShviepnosdkeanVdeetsetnrso-- (COC) Fachbereich 7, Zoomorphologie, Universitat Oldenburg, Postfach 2503, k.ap1s9a5k3.adeEmrigeannszuHnangdelninzgurarA(m3p)h16i(p6)o:d1e-n1f0a5.una D-2900, Oldenburg, F.R.G.; (JLB) NHB- Sudwest-AfrikasnebstBemerkungenuberBru- 163, Department ofInvertebrate Zoology, traumbildung.—Mitteilungen aus dem Zoolo- National Museum of Natural History, gischen Museum in Berlin 29:107-126. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Stebbing, T. R. R. 1910. Crustacea. Part V. Am- 20560. phipoda. Scientific results trawling expedition

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.