Culture, Relevance, and Schooling: Exploring Uncommon Ground PDF
Preview Culture, Relevance, and Schooling: Exploring Uncommon Ground
Culture, Relevance, and Schooling Exploring Uncommon Ground Edited by Lisa Scherff and Karen Spector ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD EDUCATION A division of ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham (cid:129) New York (cid:129) Toronto (cid:129) Plymouth, UK 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb ii 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM Published by Rowman & Littlefield Education A division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rowmaneducation.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright © 2011 by Lisa Scherff and Karen Spector All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scherff, Lisa, 1968- Culture, relevance, and schooling : exploring uncommon ground / Lisa Scherff and Karen Spector. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-60709-888-1 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-60709-889-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-60709-890-4 (electronic) 1. Education—Social aspects—United States. 2. Education—Parent participation— United States. 3. Critical pedagogy—United States. I. Spector, Karen. II. Title. LC191.4.S34 2011 306.430973—dc22 2010043443 ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb iiii 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM Contents Foreword The Legitimacy of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy: Resolved or Unresolved v Alfred W. Tatum Acknowledgments xiii Introduction Spatial, Discursive, and Embodied Borders 1 Karen Spector and Lisa Scherff Vignette Making Culture Visible through Experience and Understanding 5 Kenan L. Metzger 1 Collective Cultural Relevancy through Hybrid Communities of Practice 11 Angela Calabrese Barton and Corey Drake 2 Seeing Relevance: Using Photography to Understand How School, Curricula, and Pedagogies Matter to Urban Youth 39 Kristien Zenkov 3 Expanding Notions of Culturally Responsive Education with Urban Native Youth: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy for Equity and Social Justice 65 Dorothy E. Aguilera-Black Bear 4 Weaving Spiritualities into Culturally Responsive Pedagogies 85 Nadjwa E. L. Norton 5 Staying Fat: Moving Past the Exercise-Industrial-Complex 103 Joshua I. Newman, Carolyn Albright, and Ryan King-White iii 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb iiiiii 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM iv Contents 6 Putting “Culturally Relevant” into Professional Development 125 Charnita V. West 7 Overcoming (Under)Lying Assumptions: Approaching Language Education from a Freirean Perspective 141 Miguel Mantero Index 151 About the Editors 157 About the Contributors 159 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb iivv 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM Foreword The Legitimacy of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy: Resolved or Unresolved Alfred W. Tatum, University of Illinois at Chicago I penned the following poem on a Sunday evening following a dinner con- versation during which I was asked to generate an oral script to convince teachers that having students write for their lives is a legitimate educational practice. I refused to provide a script devoid of urgency and connected to the status quo. Instead, I wrote Its odd shape stared at me Seeming bothered by my troubled stance And strange position In a place reserved for rocks and losers I was out of place for sure Not knowing exactly how I ended up here But the rock tempted me to talk Sharing a conversation reserved for a gOD I had long since abandoned Silly I know, but the rock opened its mouth And asked, “What?” I kneeled beside it and whispered my most sacred thoughts “I am scared to go on.” “Too weak to surrender.” “Can you help me?” That damn rock just stared at me For six hours and fourteen minutes Until the sun went down I walked out of the desert never to return With a rock that forced me to listen to my own voice Renewed with a vision to find all that was lost (“The Desert Rock”) v 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb vv 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM vi Foreword Reading the chapters in this volume reminded me of this poem and the need for an unwavering commitment to protect the rights of children and expand the vision of educators to embrace some form of pedagogy that yields the most promising outcomes and addresses the nation’s most urgent needs. What is less clear are the conversations and necessary action steps required to move these pedagogies from the margins to a deep anchoring that governs teaching, professional development, school/parent/community relationships, and other educational-related practices. Particularly striking was the breadth of the issues in this volume and their associated framings within culturally relevant practices. Topics of discussion include culturally relevant, “border” kinesiology, theoretical forms of culturally relevant pedagogy, the relevance of spirituality, the use of visual media, culturally relevant professional development, hybrid communities of practice where “collective culturally relevant pedagogy” is performed by teachers and parents, and responsive education with urban, native youth. While some chapters seem more urgent than others in terms of the im- mediate need to address socially important issues, other chapters seem to argue against a “pedagogical paralysis” that traps schooling within age-old practices or modern-day limitations propagated by policy dictates. Briefly, I want to address three broad questions that emerged as I read the chapters: 1. What is the legitimacy of culturally relevant pedagogy? 2. What are the challenges and dilemmas of culturally relevant pedagogy? 3. What remains elusive about culturally relevant pedagogy? It is important to note that I have framed my research and advocacy over the past 14 years on instructional, curricular, and cultural-ecological variables that speak to the educational needs of students from multiple contexts (Tatum 2000, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009). More recently, I have become concerned about feelings of learned pow- erlessness by administrators and teachers who are responsible for providing a high-quality education to students of color, namely the students struggling to navigate schools, and in some cases, struggling to navigate tenuous life experiences precipitated by a wide range of factors that include, but are not limited to, poverty, community destabilization, limited English proficiency in predominantly English-speaking environments, and single-parent rearing. These feelings of learned powerlessness, as I have stated elsewhere (Tatum 2009), are connected to the following: 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb vvii 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM Foreword vii 1. E ducators not fully understanding the continually shifting experiences of students of color in the United States and how to respond to these shifts within schools ruled by stifling educational mandates and age-old tradi- tions of curriculum. 2. E ducators not understanding or accepting historical forces and the residual effects of race-based disenfranchisement and oppression and the inten- tional suppression of identities of people of color perpetuated by White hegemonic practices inside and outside of schools. 3. E ducators not understanding shifting educational policy mandates and the resulting destabilization of many urban and rural centers. 4. E ducators not being aware of educational practices that have been, and continue to be, effective with students of color. As a result, many attempts by educators to advance the educational needs of students of color have taken the “usual path,” that is, using pedagogical practices that have failed to close the gaps between academic high perfor- mance and academic low performance on standardized and informal mea- sures. In short, educational practices have been woefully inadequate for many students of color and White students. The inadequacies are painfully clear when examining disparities in ACT and SAT scores, the attainment of bachelor’s degrees from U.S. colleges and universities among the ethnic groups, housing patterns, high school drop- out rates, poverty rates, and incarceration rates among African Americans, American Indians, Latinos, and other ethnic groups. The usual path’s approach, although well intentioned, has suffered from underestimation and oversimplification in at least three major areas: 1. Pedagogy is rooted in the idea that all children are the same with a failure to accept that all children are not the same and do not receive the same treatment in schools. 2. U ndergraduate and graduate education programs do not sufficiently pre- pare administrators and teachers to understand the interdisciplinary nature of providing a legitimate education for students of color with the peda- gogical know-how to avoid failing larger numbers of students of color. 3. T he language used to discuss the education of students of color often ig- nores the broader context of their lives. For example, the field of reading is trapped behind productive catchphrases that function as politically ex- pedient clarion calls. Phrases such as “every teacher is a reading teacher,” “close the racial reading achievement gap,” and “no child left behind” are often used; however, pessimism related to teaching many students of 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb vviiii 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM viii Foreword color, namely African American and Latino children—the largest sub- groups of students of color in U.S. schools—continues to grow despite the prevalent use of these catchphrases. LAYING OUT THE LANDSCAPE Three major trends shape the landscape for a needed culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP). They are (1) the rapidly and continually shifting demo- graphics in the United States, (2) an ahistorical approach to education that fails to pay attention to the rich historical precedent that exists for educating peoples of color, and (3) the difficulties of penetrating educational policy in ways that yield serious, systematic efforts for advancing the education of students of color who enter schools wrapped in their cultural and linguistic cloths. The outcome of not addressing these trends is an educational system in the United States that remains steeped in a Westernized tradition and an over- reliance of scholarship conducted and informed by a Westernized tradition. This steeping and overreliance contribute to a de-racialized, de-languaged, de-ethnicized, de-genderized, de-sexualized, and a de-legitimate view of edu- cation for students who enter educational spaces with their multiple identities. The demography of the United States continues to change. We now live in a nation with more than 29 million foreign-born citizens. In 2006, 12.5 percent of the U.S. population was foreign born compared to 6.2 percent in 1980. Eighteen states have a population of more than 10 percent of foreign- born citizens. This compares to only five states in 1990. California, the state with the largest foreign-born population, is at 27 per- cent, with more than 9.9 million foreign-born residents. Hispanics and Lati- nos continue to be the fastest growing population. The Hispanic and Latino population grew 53 percent between 1980 and 1990 and another 58 percent between 2000 and 2009. Between 1980 and 2006, the number of Hispanics nearly tripledgrowing from 14.6 million to 43.2 million. African Americans and Latinos are now 27.9 percent of the U.S. population representing more than one-quarter of the total population. With more than 55 million students enrolled in public and private schools in the United States and 3.3 million teachers, it is inconceivable that any ap- proach to education that fails to account for cultural, historical, linguistic, sociological, and psychological factors of the students will be effective. A failure to become astute about these factors and how they impact educational outcomes becomes inimical not only to students of color, but to the nation and our national imagination as a whole. 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb vviiiiii 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM Foreword ix THE LEGITIMACY OF CULTURAL RESPONSIVE PEDAGOGY What makes pedagogy legitimate? To answer this question, I borrow from Hill- iard (1998), who characterizes a legitimate education as one in which teachers 1. Expect and demand excellence from children. 2. Conceptualize education as an indispensable prerequisite for liberation. 3. Engage students in a reawakening that focuses on deep thought. 4. S hape an agenda for transformation, self-acceptance, and self-determination. These historical orientations of a legitimate education, in this case for children of African descent, stand in stark contrast to modern-day iterations of educational outcomes that focus on efficiency characterized by meeting national norms or education standards devoid of cultural significance and meaning. Efficiency (cid:2) legitimacy. Many traditional educators question ef- ficiency whereas culturally relevant educators question legitimacy. The authors of the manuscripts provide strong foundational knowledge and theoretical knowledge for CRP. It becomes clear from the chapters that 1. Learners view themselves as powerful or powerless according to how they are positioned in the classrooms by the instructors and their peers. 2. Teachers’ beliefs and approaches distinctly shape the identities of students. 3. I dentities of students come to life as they are involved in meaning-driven discourse in authentic contexts. 4. Using students’ and families’ sociocultural histories and cultural resources will empower them to negotiate educational contexts. 5. F ocusing on a critical social consciousness will lead students to see the importance of traditional academic achievement. One of the major challenges for proponents of culturally relevant pedagogy is providing more illustrative examples to penetrate the educational discourse and interrupt the status quo. These chapters make a positive step in that direction. CHALLENGES AND DILEMMAS OF CULTURALLY RELEVANT PEDAGOGY The authors provide a host of challenges for a culturally relevant pedagogy. The challenges, writ large, are ones that require some form of reconciliation, both practical and intellectual. It becomes clear from reading the chapters that 99778811660077009988888811__pprriinntt..iinnddbb iixx 11//1177//1111 77::0044 AAMM
The list of books you might like
