Critical English for Academic Purposes: Theory, Politics, and Practice Critical English for Academic Purposes: Theory, Politics, and Practice Sarah Benesch LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS Mahwah, New Jersey London This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2008. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.” Copyright © 2001 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the book may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microform, retrieval system, or any other means, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers 10 Industrial Avenue Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 Cover design by Robert Attansio Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Benesch, Sarah. Critical English for academic purposes: theory, politics, and practice/Sarah Benesch. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8058-3433-8 (cloth: alk. Paper) ISBN 0-8058-3434-6 (pbk.: alk. Paper) 1. English language—Study and teaching—Foreign speakers. 2. English language—Rhetoric—Study and teaching. 3. Critical thinking—Study and teaching. 4. Ac- ademic writing—Study and teaching. I. Title. PE1128.A2 B457 2001 428’.0071—dc21 00–060981 ISBN 1-4106-0180-3 Master e-book ISBN TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by Tony Dudley-Evans ix Preface xiv Background xv Theoretical Underpinnings xvi Complexities of Practice xvii Structure and Contents of the Book xviii Acknowledgments xix PART I: THEORY AND POLITICS 1. A History of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Theoretical Influences 4 Historical Trends 4 Summary 21 2. Political and Economic Roots of EAP Political and Economic Roots of ESP/EAP 23 Summary 33 3. Debating EAP Issues: Pedagogy and Ideology L2 Compositionists’ Critique 34 Responses to L2 Compositionists Critique 37 Critical Theorists’ Critique 38 Responses to Critical Theorists 43 Summary 45 4. Critical EAP: Theoretical Influences Freire: Hope and Dialogue 46 Foucault: Power Relations 50 Feminist Pedagogy 53 v vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Freire, Foucault, and Feminist Critics: Influences on Critical EAP 56 Needs Analysis and Rights Analysis: Relating Traditional and Critical EAP 57 Reflexivity: Problematizing Critical Theory and Practice 59 Summary 60 PART II: PRACTICE 5. Topic Choice in Critical EAP: Revisiting Anorexia Instructional Context 64 Critique of Critical EAP and Critical Thinking 65 Topic Choice in Critical and Writing Process Approaches 66 Topic Choice in Traditional EAP 68 Teacher Imposition and Student Resistance 69 Teacher Imposition and Responses of Female Students 72 StudentsStudent-Selected Topics in Critical EAP 76 Alternatives to Anorexia 78 Summary 78 6. Building Community With Diversity: A Linked EAP/Anthropology Course Background: What is an ESL Student? 82 Research on Tracking 83 Community and a Pedagogy of Difference 84 Setting: A Linked EAP Writing/Anthropology Course 85 Community Formation in the EAP Class 87 The Delegation 93 The Museum Visit: Miranda’s Questions 94 Access and Community 97 Summary 98 7. Rights Analysis in a Paired EAP/Psychology Lecture Class Needs Analysis 100 TABLE OF CONTENTS vii Problematizing Needs 101 Rights Analysis 102 Problematizing Rights 103 The Target as a Site of Struggle 103 Coverage as Control 108 Needs and Rights Analyses in the Linked Course 110 Questions: Conflict Between Coverage and Comprehension 111 The Role of a Critical EAP Teacher 113 Summary 114 8. A Negotiated Assignment: Possibilities and Challenges The Context 116 What Confuses you About U.S. Society? A Negotiated Assignment 118 Dissent in an EAP Writing Class 122 Relating Teaching and Learning 125 Preparation for What? 126 Summary 128 9. What is and What Might Be: Implications for EAP, Content, and Critical Teaching Toward an Ethics of EAP 130 Implications for EAP Teachers 133 Implications for Content Teachers 134 Implications for Critical Teachers 134 References 136 Author Index 146 FOREWORD English for specific purposes (ESP) has tended to be a practical affair, most interested in investigating needs, preparing teaching materials, and devising appropriate teaching methodologies. Perhaps because of the early British influences on its development, it has avoided broad questions of theory, and, as Swales (1994) suggests in his final editorial in ESP’s flagship journal, English for Specific Purposes, articles published in that journal are “strikingly unengaged” (p. 201) by controversial issues of ideology. ESP practice has thus remained essentially pragmatic; practitioners have interpreted their role as attempting to provide the maximum possible support in the limited time available. Although the worldwide role of English may be recognised at one level, at the day-to-day level, ESP teachers often find themselves in situations where they have to compete for timetable slots and students’ attention. In these circumstances, priority has been given to discovering the expectations of the academic or professional community of which the students of the ESP class aspire to become full members and then reducing that information to teachable units taught over a specified and often limited time period. This tendency to pragmatism was also considerably justified in the early days of the ESP movement by the need to justify its approach to those sceptical of its focus on selected specific features of the language. ESP defended its approach through the claim that it was more efficient and cost-effective than more traditional teaching approaches based on a general coverage of the language system. ESP has not, however, been unwilling to consider more ideological issues: The role of English in international publications has been much discussed (and criticised) in recent years and the burgeoning influence of social constructionism on ESP has raised important questions about its approaches to genre analysis. Indeed, the very pragmatic nature of ESP has, I believe, led to a readiness to draw on new ideas, and review its practices where necessary. The rise of critical theory and critical approaches to discourse and to pedagogy has raised much more fundamental questions about ESP practice. Issues such as the role of English in publication and social constructionism are important but do not interrogate the fundamental tenets of ESP. These critical approaches, on the other hand, question the assumptions of traditional needs analysis and pragmatism that underpin the whole of ESP activity. ESP and, in particular, English for academic purposes (EAP) are criticised for adopting an unquestioning stance toward the departments and disciplinary practices that students encounter. The traditional mainstream EAP approach has been described as “accommodationist” (Benesch, 1993, p. 714) and it has been ix
Description: