ebook img

Crisis Management by Apology: Corporate Response to Allegations of Wrongdoing PDF

261 Pages·2006·2.64 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Crisis Management by Apology: Corporate Response to Allegations of Wrongdoing

Crisis Management by Apology Corporate Response to Allegations of Wrongdoing LEA’s COMMUNICATION SERIES nings Bryant/Dolf Zillmann, General Editors Selected titles in Public Relations (JamesGrunig, Advisory Editor) include: Austin/Pinkleton • Strategic Public Relations Management: Planning and Managing Effective Communication Programs Dozier/Grunig/Grunig• Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management Fearn-Banks• Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach, Second Edition Grunig/Grunig/Dozier • Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries Lamb/McKee• Applied Public Relations: Cases in Stakeholder Management Ledingham/Bruning• Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations Mickey •DeconstructingPublic Relations: Public Relations Criticism Millar/Heath • Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication Spicer• Organizational Public Relations: A Political Perspective For a complete list of titles in LEA’s Communication Series, please contact Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers at www.erlbaum.com. Crisis Management by Apology Corporate Response to Allegations of Wrongdoing Keith Michael Hearit Western Michigan University LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS 2006 Mahwah, New Jersey London Copyright © 2006 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthisbookmaybereproducedinany form,byphotostat,microform,retrievalsystem,oranyothermeans, without prior written permission of the publisher. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers 10 Industrial Avenue Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 www.erlbaum.com Cover design by Kathryn Houghtaling Lacey Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hearit, Keith Michael. Crisismanagementbyapology:corporateresponsetoallegationsof wrongdoing / Keith Michael Hearit. p. cm—(LEA's communication series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN0-8058-3788-4(c:alk.paper)—ISBN0-8058-3789-2(alk.paper) 1. Corporateimage. 2. Crisismanagement. 3. Apologizing. 4. Cor- porations—Publicrelations. 5. Businesscommunication. I. Title. II. Series. HD59.2.H43 2005 659.2—dc22 20050740114 CIP BookspublishedbyLawrenceErlbaumAssociatesareprintedonacid- free paper, and their bindings are chosen for strength and durability. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Preface vii About the Author/About the Contributor viii 1 Introduction 1 2 Apologia, Social Drama, and Public Ritual 19 3 Legality and Liability 40 4 Apologetic Ethics (written with Sandra L. Borden) 58 5 Apologia and Individuals: Politicians, Sports Figures, 79 and Media Celebrities 6 Apologia and Organizations: Retail, Manufacturing, 121 and Not-for-Profits 7 Institutional Apologies: Institutional, Religious, and 165 Governmental 8 Conclusions: Corporate Apologia, Ideology, and Ethical 204 Responses to Criticism References 219 Author Index 241 Subject Index 247 v This page intentionally left blank Preface Whetheritisapresidentwhomustapologizetothenation,acompanythat hasdevelopedaproductthathascausedagrievousharm,oracelebritytrying torepairadamagedimage,apologiaandapologiesarefrequentlyinthenews. Thestudyofapologeticcrisismanagement,particularlyfromtheperspec- tivetakenhere,isonethatviewsmostcrisestobeself-generated.Thisbook hasgrownoutofadesiretoaccountforthemanywaysindividuals,organiza- tions,andinstitutionstryto“saveface”astheyseektoextricatethemselves fromdifficultstraights.Althoughthistexttriesnottofeatureonlycorpora- tionsandtheircrisismanagement,itdoesnotethatthehegemoniceffectof for-profitcorporationsoncrisisdiscourseisnothingshortofdramatic. Theguidingassumptiontakenhereisthatcrisisresearchersarewiseto payparticularlycloseattentiontothelanguageusedbythosewhowouldex- tricatethemselvesfromtheirwrongdoing—totrytouncoverthelexiconof thelie.Asaresult,thisbooktakesanunabashedlyrhetoricalapproachto thestudyofcrisismanagement,andspecificallyexaminesthatgenreofcri- seswherebyindividualsandorganizationsarebelievedtobeguiltyofanof- fenseandhavetoenterintothepublicconfessionalinordertorepairtheir damaged reputations. Theneedforcloseattentiontothenatureoflanguageusedbyapologists isevidenteveninthetwomajortermsofthisstudy:apologiaandapology.Ap- ologiareferstotheactofgivingadefense,whereasapologytypicallymeans theofferingofameaculpa.Yet,evenhere,theconfusionastothedifference betweenapologiaeandapologieshastremendousrhetoricalbenefitforan apologist.Discerningpartiesthatfacecriticismoftencapitalizeonthisam- biguitybyofferinganapologiathatsoundslikeanapology:Auditorsarethen placated by therhetor’sapparent act of contrition. Twoothercommentsareneeded.First,thereferencesatthebeginningof eachchaptertoScripturearebydesign,andarerootedinKennethBurke’s writings,especiallyhisbookTheRhetoricofReligion(1970),inthatreligious terminologyoffersahelpfulentranceintothecommonlanguageandscripts that human actors use as a vehicle to situate their actions. Second, when possible,thisbookusesTheNewYorkTimesasaprimarysourceforpublic vii viii PREFACE statements on the part of apologists. This is intentional for two reasons. First, the Times is the United States’ “newspaperof record.” As such, it is viewed as a highly credible if not authoritative source (although one not without imperfections).Second,the Timesalso has beenshown tohave a significanteffectonsubsequentbroadcastandnewspapercoverage(Batulis, 1976;Beniger&Westney,1981;Charles,Shore,&Todd,1979).Assuch, this book has emphasizedthe public statementsof apologistsin the Times withtheideathattheyarethestatementslikelytobemediatedbyjournal- ists throughout the nation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IwouldberemissifIdidnotthankthemanypeoplewhoplayedaroleinthe publicationofthisbook.Inparticular,Iwishtothankthosewhohelpedin the collection of data and research materials: Jennifer Brown, Candace Dixon,andespeciallyLaurenTeal.TomycolleagueSandraBorden,Iespe- ciallythankyouforyourhelpindevelopingtheroleofethicsintheapolo- getic exchange as well as your participation in writing chapter 4. To my departmentchair,SteveRhodes,thanksforallyoursupportandencourage- ment.Finally,Iwouldliketosayanoteofthankstoanumberoffriendsfor their encouragement at critical times in the writing of this book: Dan Darnley,foryourconfidentassurancethatthisprojectwouldbecompleted; JoeandRudy,foraquietplacetowrite;andMattSeeger,whoseinterestand encouragementinthisprojectwereimmeasurable.Finally,Iwishtothank my editor, Linda Bathgate, for her indefatigable support, copyeditor Gale Miller, as well as senior production editor Providence Rao and the entire LEAstafffortheirworkinbringingthisbooktopublication. Last,Iwouldliketothankmyfamily,towhomIdedicatethiswork.With- out your support, this project would never have reached completion. You are the reason why I go to work and come home every day. —KeithHearit November 2004 About the Author KeithMichaelHearitisanassociateprofessorofcommunicationanddirec- tor of undergraduate studies at Western Michigan University. Professor Hearitteachescoursesinorganizationalcommunication,publicrelations, corporateadvocacy,andcrisismanagement.Hisresearchfocusesonnon- commercial forms of external organizational communication by corpora- tions, particularly in those instances when companies are accused of wrongdoing.HehaspublishedarticlesintheHandbookofPublicRelations, Communication Studies, and Public Relations Review, as well as contributed chaptersinanumberofeditedbooks.HearitisactiveintheNationalCom- municationAssociation,AssociationforJournalismandMassCommuni- cationEducation,andtheCentralStatesCommunicationAssociation.He receivedhisdoctoraldegreeinPublicAffairsandIssueManagementfrom PurdueUniversity. About the Contributor Sandra L. Borden is an associate professor of communication at Western Michigan University, where she also is codirector of the Center for the StudyofEthicsinSociety.Borden’sresearchinmediaethicshasbeenpub- lishedinCommunicationMonographs,TheJournalofMassMediaEthics,the JournalofCommunicationInquiry,TheInternationalJournalofAppliedPhilos- ophy,andSouthernCommunicationJournal.Shealsoisacontributortotwo editedbooksonjournalismandprofessionalethics.Bordenisactiveinthe AssociationforEducationinJournalismandMassCommunicationandthe AssociationforPracticalandProfessionalEthics.Borden,aformernewspa- perjournalist,hasaPhDinmasscommunicationsfromIndianaUniversity andaMAinjournalismfromTheOhioStateUniversity. ix

Description:
Hearit (communication, Western Michigan U.) examines the ways in which individuals, organizations, and institutions seek to respond to criticism of an ethical nature. The author argues that, due to today's multimediated environment, apologia has changed from a private matter to a public one, and fro
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.