ebook img

Criminal Law in Malaysia and Singapore PDF

590 Pages·2012·155.293 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Criminal Law in Malaysia and Singapore

Criminal Law in Malaysia and Singapore Second Edition Stanley Yeo LLB (Singapore), LLM (Wellington), LLM, PhD, LLD (Sydney) Barrister (New South Wales), Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore) Professor National University of Singapore Neil Morgan BA (Oxon), MA (Sheffield), PhD (UWA) Inspector of Custodial Services, Western Australia Professor University of Western Australia Chan Wing Cheong MA (Oxen), LLM (Cornell) Barrister (Cray's Inn), Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore) Attorney and Counsellor (New York State) Associate Professor National University of Singapore lexisNexis Singapore • Malaysia • Hong Kong • India. 2012 The Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide Foreword to the Second Edition Singapore LexisNexis, Singapore 3 Killiney Road #08-08 Winsland House I Singapore 239519 Malaysia LexisNexis Malays\a Sdn Bhd Tl-6, Jaya 33 3, Jalan Semangut, Seksyen 13 46100 Petaling Jaya It is with great pleasure that I write this foreword to the second edition of this Selangor Darul Ehsan textbook-on the criminal law in Malaysia and Singapore. In my foreword Hong Kong LexisNexis, HONG KONG to the first edition, l had expressed the hope that the reception accorded 39/F, Hopewell Centre, to the work would give the authors a gratified sense of achievement in 183 Queen's Road, East having produced it, and my confidence that the book would stand out as India Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur the most authoritative work on the criminal law in Malaysia and Singapore 14"' Floor, Building No 10, DLF Cyber City, Phase-11, Gurgaon, Haryana, for many years to come. India 122002 In the Preface. to this edition, the authors have expressed their gratification Argentina LexisNexis Argentina, BUENOS AIRES that it is because the first edition has been so well received by the courts, Australia LexisNexis Butterworths, Chatswood, New Soui·tt WALES Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG. VIENNA the criminal bar, scholars and law students that a second edition is called . Canada LexisNexis Butterworths, Markham, ONTARIO for. to take into account the development in criminal law jurisprudence and Chile LexisNexis Chile Ltda, SANTIAGO DE CHILE legislation in the last four years in Malaysia and Singapore. Czech Republic Nakladatelstvl Orac sro, P.RAGUE France Editions du Juris-Classeur SA, PARIS What is commendable and useful about this work is that, as l have said lrelang Butterworths (lreland) Ltd, DUBLIN in my first foreword, the authors have explained the und~rlying concepts Italy Giuffre Editore, MILAN . and principles of criminal liability clearly in the offence·s discussed, and New Zealand Butterworths of New Zealand, WELLINGTON have urged criminal law practitioners to 'use the ... arguments made in PRC LexisNexis Beijing Representative Office, BEu1NG Poland Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, WARSAW the book to articulate legal principles and to develop and improve up~m the current law'. As the authors have pointed out in the Preface, they South Africa Butterworihs SA, DuR.BAN Switzerland Stlimpfii Verlag AG, BERNE have achieved partial success in persuading the courts to their points of United Kingdom LexisNexis Butterworths Tolley, LONDON and EDINBURGH view, and where they have not they continue to defend their ground. A USA LexisNexis, Dayton, 01t10 good example i$ the decision of the Court of Appeal in Daniel Vl)ay slo Katherasan v Public Prosecutor (20 I O] 4 SLR 1119 which has narrowed the scope of application of the concept of common intention in section 34 ~ LexisNexis 2012 of the Penal Code (Cap 224) which another Court of Appeal had decided All rights reserved. No part oft his publication may be reproduced, or transmitted in any form in Lee Chez Kee v.Public Prosecutor (2008] 3 SLR(R) 447, in line with or by any means, including photocopying and recording, without the written permission the position espoused by the authors in the first edition. of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such Another example is the·continuing critique on the unduly restrictive scope written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a of duress as a defence in requiring that, inter alia, the threat must be one of retrieval system of any nature. instant death, a defence that can only be of very limited utility. The High ISBN 978-981-236-927-7 Court's decision in Public Prosecutor v Nagaenthran all K Dharmalingam Printed by C.O.S Printers Ptl! Ltd, Singapore (2011] 2 SLR 830 (which the authors see as a notable decision) on the applicability of duress as a defence in a drug trafficking situation (which Publisher's Note was affirmed on aP.peal in Nagaenthran al/. K Dharmalingam v Public The publisher, authors, contributors and endorsers of this publication each excludes Prosecutor (2011) SGCA 49) arguably provides a public policy perspective liability for loss suffered by any person resulting in any way from the use ot: or reliance as to why relaxing the elements of duress as a defence may create problems 011, this publication. in other areas of the law. More pertinent, and more crucial, to the fate of defendants facing drug trafficking charges are the comments of the Court vi Foreword to the Second Edition of Appeal on the role of actual knowledge and wilful blindness in the Foreword to the First Edition context of section 18(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185), following some uncertainty arising_f rom an earlier judgment of the Court in Tan Kiam Peng v Public Pro'Secut<~r (2008) I SLR(R) I. . Nevertheless, in spite of such differences, the authors' considered and detaiied analysis and evaluation of the law as enacted by Parliament or laid down by the courts undoubtedly continues to enrich the marketplace lt is my pleasure to provide a foreword for this new textbook on the of ideas on criminal Jurisprudence, and to encourage more lawyers to criminal law of Malaysia and Singapore and to congratulate the authors specialise in criminal law practice. · for their comprehensive and impressive work. Once again, I congratulate the authors for provi.ding students, legal This book is more than timely. It should be ~agerly awaited as it is close to practitioners, scholar.s· and jupges with _an updated and authoritative two decades since the last truly local and~.niajor criminal law textbook was reference point on the'principles of substantive crlnfinal law in Malaysia written, viz., Criminal Law in Singapore and Malaysia: Text and Materials and Singapore. (Malayan Law Journal, 1989). This prolonged vacuum has only been partially filled by the recent publication consisting of a collection of cases and materials on selected aspects of the criminal law, viz., Fundamental CHAN SEK KEONG Principles ofC riminal Law: Cases and Mq.terials (LexisNexis, 2005). ChiefJustice Singapore Since 1990, there has been an exponential increase in the number ofw ritten decisions in the area of criminal law in Singapore. A cursory search of the 23 November 2011 database in Lawnet 2 reveals a staggering statistic. Between 1965 and 2007, there were a total number of 1,282 written judgments reported in the Singapore Law Reports on the subjects of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure & Sentencing.' Out of this number, 1,088 judginents were delivered between 1990 and 2007. This represents more than a five-fold increase in the number of such judgments in the time between the last major criminal law textbook published locally and the present time. In Malaysia, while the experience is not the same, the increase in the number of written judgments during this period is equally significant for criminal law jurisprudence in that jurisdiction, quantitatively and qualitatively. Whilst such a crude numerical count does not and cannot adequately capture the qualitative improvement in Si't1gapore's criminal case law, there is no doubt that Singapore now has a massive corpus of case law on practically all asP,ects and all areas of criminal jurisprudence. This is due to the work of the former Chief Justice Yong Pung How in writing the judgments giving detailed reasons for his dpcisions, not only to clarify and explain, but also-to consolidate the basic principles of the law. This corpus of case law is of great benefit and importance to the public and, in particular, to the criminal bar, the public prosecutors and the law enforcement agencies. Equally significant during this period is the perceptible shift of the judicial attitude towards the role of the criminal law ·in combating crime, from one The count was compiled from the total number of cases listed under the 'Browse by Subject' function in relation to these two subjects. viii Foreword to the First Edition of according excessive due process to defendants to that of giving greater Preface leeway to crime control processes. Similarly, criminal legislation has also moved in this direction. More than any other area of law, it is the criminal law that needs to be explained in clear terms to the public, particularly its underlying concepts, principles aod rules, including its evidentiary and procedural branches. This will instil the confidence tQ.at the people must have in the efficacy and fairness of the criminal justice system. This book aims to meet the interests of several groups - legal practitioners Although I am confident that our courts will always strive to render the and judges, scholars and students. Criminal law has always been a best decision in each case, their task will undoubtedly be made easier with mainstay of a law school curriculum. It provides an opportunity to develop the assistance of counsel with access to this textbook, whose stated aim is the fundamental legal skills of statutory interpretation, case law analysis to meet the interests of legal practitioners, judges, scholars and students. and problem solving. It also prov.iges students with the forum to explore Having browsed through the pages of this textbook and perused its table such fascinating issues as the relationship between morality and the law, of contents, I have no doubt that the authors accomplished their aim. the factors that influence the determination of criminal responsibility In closing, I can only hope that, as David Marshall did in writing the and of punishment, and the interplay between statute and judge~made foreword to The Penal Codes of Singapore and States of Malaya: Cases, law. Often, criminal law is taught in the first year of a law program.me Materia/s·and Comments (Law Book Company of Singapore & Malaysia, and for good reason since its subject matter is bound to engage students' 1974), the reception accorded to this work will give the auttlors a gratified interest. However, without a book that analyses the detail, intricacies and sense of achievement in producing it. I have no doubt that, when published, complexities oft he law, students may have difficulty coping.Unfortunately, this book will stand out as the most authoritative work on the criminal law there have been all too few such books on Malaysian and Singaporean of Malaysia and Singapore for many years to come. criminal law, which was the main reason for writing the first edition of this book. The very positive reception of that edition by judges, academics and students has led to this new edition. CHAN SEK KEONG This book seeks to bring together in one volume an analysis of the major ChiefJ ustice cases, academic commentary and law reform perspectives on the criminal Singapore law of Malaysia ~nd Singapore. In the preface to the first edition, we expressed the hope that other academics and members of the local criminal law fraternity,- judges, legal practitioners and legal services personnel - would use the information and arguments made in the book to articulate legal principles and to develop and improve upon the current law. That hope has been fulfilled many times over by frequent references to the book in legal proceedings, judgments and scholarly journals. Looking beyond local needs and usage, we believe that this work will provide a useful sourc;e of comparative law for lawmakers and scholars in other jurisdictions. Foremost among these would be those from countries where the Indian Penal Code forms part of the Jaw, who should find helpful the discussion of how Malaysian and Singaporean judges have interpreted and applied the Code provisions. Lawmakers and scholars from elsewhere should also find the discussion of interest. With over 150 years of service, the Indian Penal Code is the oldest criminal code in operation. That fact alone provides strong evidence that its provisions contain much that is good and effective. And where the Code has been found to be deficient, readers of this work will discover that there have been many occasions ix x Preface where the Malaysian and Singaporean courts have found innovative just Acknowledgements and workable solutions. Where appropriate, we have also sought to' map the issues that arise with respect to law reform. Over the ~ast four years since the-first edition, there has been a steady stream of JUdgments from Malaysia and Singapore. These have clarified uncertain aspects of the law highlighted in this work. Jn several cases, the courts have considered our views, adopting them in some instances Extracts from the Singapore legislation herein are reproduced by and rejecting them in others. Notable among these are Lee Chez Kee v permission of the Attorney-General's Chambers of Sing~pore. Readers PP [2008] 3 SLR(R) 447 (on joint liability); Tan Chor Jin v PP (2008) 4 are to consult http://statutes.agc.gov.sg or http://www.lawnet.com.sg for SLR(R) 306 (on accident, intoxication and private defence); PP v fryan bin the latest version of the legislation. Abdul Karim (2010) 2 SLR 15 (on consent); and PP V. Nagaenthran all K Dharmalingam [2011] ~ SLR 830 (on duress.). Jn this-pew edition, we have Extracts froth the cases reported in the Singapore Law Reports (SLR) responded to the judicial criticisms of our views, and also·i ncorporated all and Singapore Law Reports (Reissue) (SLR(R)) and extracts from the the significant Malaysian and Singaporean cases which have dealt with unreported Supreme Court and Subordinate Court cases founq on LawNet issues covered in this work. Additionally, we have, wherever possible, are reproduced with permission from the Singapore Academy of Law. drawn ideas from Chan. Wright and Yeo (eds) Codification, Macaulay All rights reserved. No portion of the cases may be used or reproduced and the Indian Penal Code (Ashgate, 2011) comprising edited papers of a without the prior written consent of the Singapore Academy of Law. symposium on modernising the Indian Penal Code which was hosted by Extracts from the Appeals Cases, Chancery (and Family) Division, King's the National University of Singapore in June 2010. Bench, Queen's Bench and Weekly Law Reports are reproduced with While all three authors share joint responsibility for the whole work, the permission from the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England principal author for each chapter was as follows: Stanley for chapters 3 to and Wales. 6, 16 to 33, and 38; Neil for chapters I, 2, 8 to 15; and Wing Cheong for Extracts from the article 'Intoxication and Mental Disorder Defences' chapters 7 and 34 to 3 7. (2004) 16 SAcLJ 488 are reproduced with p.ermission from the author, We would like to thank Nuraziah Aziz for her excellent editing of this Stanley Yeo and the Singapore Academy of Law © 2004 Contributor and book. Singapore Academy of Law. We have sought to state the law as at 30 June 2011. Extracts from the article 'Improving the Determination of Diminished Responsibility Cases' [I 999] SJLS 27 are reproduced with permission from the contributor, Stanley Yeo and the Singapore Joumar of Legal Studies. Stanley Yeo Extracts from the article 'Common Intention and the Enterprise of Neil Morgan Constructing CrimiQal Liability' [ 1999] SJLS 494 are reproduced with Chan Wing Cheong permission from the author. Michael Hor and the Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. · Singapore Extracts from the article 'Revitalising the Penal Code with a General Part' 30 September 2011 (2004] SJLS l are reproduced with permission from the author, Stanley Yeo and the Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. Extracts from the article 'Causing Deat!'i under the Indian Penal Code: A Comparative Analysis' (1992) 14 Delhi Law Review 68 are reproduced with permiss'ion from the author, Stanley Yeo and the Delhi Law Review. "' xii Acknowledgements Extracts from the article, 'A Feminist Critique of Domestic Violence Contents Laws in Singapore and Malaysia" (Asian Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 2003) are reproduced with permission from auth9r, Kumaralingam Amirthalingam and the Asian Research Institute. Extracts from the article, •Automatism in the Penal Codes of Malaysia and Singapore' (2003/2004) LAWASIA Journal 103 are reproduced with Foreword to the Second Edition ................................................................ v permission from the author, Stanley Yeo and the publisher. Foreword to t h e F1. rst Ed1't·1 on ................................................................ . vii Extracts from 'Chapter 16: Infanticide' in Fairall and Yeo, Criminal Preface ............................................................................... · .. :. . · .. ·····. ... ···· ix_ Defences in Australia (Sydney: LexisNexis, 2005) are reproduced· with Acknowledgements ................................................................................... xr permission of the authors and the publisher. Table ofC ases .................................................................................... xxxiii .. We acknowledge the partial funding of research for this work by the Table ofS tatutes ............................................................................ ·· ... · .. ~~ Singaporean Ministry of Education's Academic Research Fund Tier l (WBS No R-241-000-084-·l 12). CONTEXT, HISTORY AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES The painti~g reproduced on the cover of this book was created by an inmate in Changi Prison for the Yellow Ribbon Art Competition 2011. Chapter 1 The Criminal Law: Context, The painting is entitled 'Thumbs Up'and is accompanied by the following Sources and History 1 explanation: 'The "thumbs up" sign was a positive symbol that the artist held close when he first stepped into prison. It meant a lot to him, as a first Context and Scope of this Book 1 timer in prison. The graphics in the background represent the challenges What is a crime? 2 of life and the Tree of Life. The padlock on the skull's eye is meant to say Harm and blame 3 that we need to unlock our stereotypical view of life so that we nj'ay find The contours of the criminal law 5 the positive in the negative, because a life without problems is not a life Historical Background 5 at all.' · The Straits Settlements, Malaysia and Singapore 5 The Straits Settlements Penal Code and its successors 9 The Penal Code: Values and Structure 12 Codification ~nd common law 12 14 Codification: core values Structure of the Penal Code 15 Interpretation and Precedent 16 Role of explanati9ns and illustrations 16 Other principles 18 Purposive interpretati.on and the principle of strict construction 20 Caselaw precedents 21 Chapter 2 The Criminal Process, Harm and Punishment 25 Introduction 25 26 Pre-Trial Decision Making 26 Investigation Prosecution 28 Compounding 31 Sununary 33 xiii xiv Contents Contents xv Proof and the Presumption of Innocence 34 Chapter 4 Fault Elements of Crimes 85 Offence elements 34 Introduction 85 Defences 35 Historical and theoretical perspectives 85 Drug law presumptions 37 The Primary Fault Terms 87 Harm and Blame 39 Intention 88 Harmful behaviour: the physical element 40 Knowledge 94 Designating blame; the fault element 44 Wilful blindness 95 The role of the defences 44 Reason to believe 96 Threatened Harms and Preventive lnterventit>ns 46 Voluntarily 97 The criminal law 46 Rashness 99 The Internal Security Acts ...... 48 Recklessi:i~ss ,, .... 101 The Malaysian Dangerous Drugs Negligence 104 (Special Preventive Measures) Act 50 Reforming the Law 107 The Singaporean Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act 51 The Singaporean Misuse of Drugs Act 52 Chapter S Causation 109 Theories of Punishment 52 Retribution and desert 53 Introduction 109 Deterrence 54 Historical developments 109 Incapacitation 56 Theoretical perspectives 111 Rehabilitation 56 The Tests for Causation 116 Reparation and compensation 57 The test for factual causation 116 Theories of Punishment and Sentencing Options 58 The test for imputable causation 117 Singapore: 'community sentences' and 'home detention' 61 The substantial cause test 119 Malaysia: parole 64 The foreseeability test 122 Punishment and corrections 65 Handling cases of intervening causes 124 Where the Victim Contributed to His or Her own Death 125 V's ignorance in causing his or her own death 126 PRrNCIP:LES OF CULPABILITY V under pressure to take action causing his or her own death 128 V's voluntary contribution to his or her own death 131 Chapter 3 Physical Elements of Crimes 67 V having unusual sensitivity which contributes to his Introduction 67 or her own death 136 Crimes Involving Conduct 68 Where a Third Party or Event Contributed to the Victim's Death 139 Acts 69 Where a third party contributes to V's death 140. Omissions 70 Where medical treatment contributes to V's death 143 Crimes Involving Conduct and Circumstances or Results 76 Where a natural event contributes to V's death 147 Crimes Involving a State of Affairs 77 Reforming the Law . 149 Voluntariness 78 Causation 79 Chapter 6 The Concurrence Principl~ 153 Crimes without a Subjective Fault Element 81 Introduction 153 Crimes of negligence 81 Competing Approaches f55 Crimes of strict liability 82 The same transaction approach 156 Reforming the Law 82 The causation approach 158 The moral congruence approach 160 xvi Contents Contents xv ii Specific Matters Concerning the Concurrence Principle 163 Infanticide 207 No need for a preconceived plan 163 Abortion . 209 No need for the most culpable form of fault to be present 164 Causing the mother's death when intending to cause Reforming the Law 166 a miscarriage 211 Assaulting a pregnant woman and causing the death of her child 212 Chapter 7 Strict Liability 167 Death 215 Time of death 215 Introduction 167 Causation and coincidence 217 Historical developments 168 Culpable Homicide and Murder: the Fault Element 218 Theoretical perspectives 169 Proving intention and knowledge 218 Presumption of Mens Rea Approach 171 Intention and knowledge distinguished from premeditation, Criticisms 173 desire and motive · 222 Due Diligence Approach 175 Intention, knowledge and risk taking 223 Criticisms 176 Section 300 (a) and the first limb of s 299 225 Chapter IV Approach 178 Section 300(b) and s 299 225 Assimilation of due diligence and Chapter IV approaches? 179 Section 300(d) and the third limb of s 299: degrees Comparison with Crimes of Negligence 179 of knowledge 226 Reforming the Law 180 Section 300(d): 'without excuse' . 231 Section 300(c) and the second limb of s 299: basic principles 233 OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON Section 299, 300(c) and 'egg shell skull' cases 234 Section 300(c): intention and the natUre of the injuries 236 Chapter 8 Homicide: Structure, Principles and Punishment 183 Section 300(c) and 'escape' cases 244 Interim Conclusions 245 Structure of Homicide Offences 183 Introduction 183 Chapter 10 Other Homicide Offences and Homicide Historical developments 184 Law Reform 247 ·Culpable homicide and. murder 187 Transferred intent or knowledge 191 Structure and General Principles 247 No felony murder rule 192 Structure of offences 247 Causing death by rash or negligent conduct 194 Rashness, negligence and 'direct' violence 250 Vehicular homicide 195 Causation 251 Illustrations 196 Rashness 253 Punishment 197 Definition: subjective 253 Structure of punishments 197 Risk of what? 255 The death penalty for murder 200 Ruling out or averting risk 256 Mandatory penalties and prosecutorial discretion 202 Relationship to culpabie homicide 258 Penalties for culpable homicide not amounting to murder 202 Negligence 258 Life imprisonment 205 Definition: objective 258 Section 304A and road traffic legislation 205 The 'reasonable person' 259 Standard of negligence 261 Chapter 9 Culpable Homicide and Murder 207 Distinguishing rashness and negligence 264 Road Traffic Legislation 265 'Life' and Offences at the Start of Life 207 Structure of offences 265 'Life' and homicide 207 Speeding, careless driv,ing and Penal Code negligence 267 xvi ii Contents Contents xix Dangerous driving and s 304A negligence 270 Words and assaults 319 Reckless driving and s 304A rashness 270 Future and conditional threats 320 Summary 272 Criminal Intimidation 321 Homicide: Mapping out Law ~efonn 274 Definition and punishment 321 Structure and physical element 274 Elements of the offence 322 Culpable homicide not amounting to murder and murder 276 Aggravated Assault and Criminal Force 325 Rashness, negligence and related offences 279 Offences of Rashness and Negligence 327 Spreading Disease 329 Chapter 11 The Non-Fatal Offences: Structure, Principles Sexual offences 329 and Punishment 281 Non-fatal offences 330 Specially designed offences 331 Structure and General Principles 281 Wrongful Restraint and Wrongfiil Confinement 332 Introduction 281 Historical developments 282 Chapter 12 The Non-Fatal Offences: Offences and penalties 284 Consent, Provocation, Family Vio.lence and The slight harm defence 287 Sexual Offences 335 Voluntarily Causing Hurt 288 Offence elements 288 Introduction 335 Fault element 289 Consent 335 Relationship with criminal force 290 Criminal force and assault 336 Symmetry: aligning physical and fault elements 291 Other offences 337 Hurt: pivotal, serious but not arrestable/seizable 291 Hurt 338 Bodily pain, disease and infirmity 292 Grievous hurt 339 Aggravated hurt offences 295 Provocation 339 Public servants 297 Introduction 339 Domestic maids (Singapore) 297 Hurt and grievous hurt 340 Racial or religious aggravation (Singapore) 298 Assault and criminal force 342 Dangerous weapons or means 299 Summary and reform 343 Causing hurt to extort a confession 300 Reforming the Non-Fatal Offences 343 Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt 301 Structure and general principles 343 Offence elements 301 Hurt 344 Symmetry: aligning physical and fault elements 303 Grievous hurt 345 Grievous hurt involving perrnanent bann 303 Criminal force arid assault 346 Non-pennanent forms of grievous hurt 305 Aggravated offences 346 Aggravated grievous hurt offences 309 Criminal intimidation 347 of Grievous hurt and hurt where the victim dies 310 Offences rashness and negligence 347 Assault and Criminal Force 311 Wrongful restraint'and wrongful confinement 347 Introduction 311 Consent 347 Criminal force: definition 312 Provocation 348 Criminal force: physical element 314 Stalking and Other Harassment 348 Criminal force: fault element 316 Context and c4rrent laws 348 Assault: definition : 317 Reform 352 Int~nding to cause apprehension 318 Family and Domestic Violence Laws 353 Context and principles 353 xx Contents Contents xxi Protection orders in Singapore 356 Theft 4ll 411 Protection orders in Malaysia 359 Definition Issues and reform 363 Physical and fault elements: Interpreting the Code 413 Sexual Offences: Introduction 364 Movement 416 Sexual Offences where Lack of Consent is not an Element 365 Movable property 417 Offences against animals 365 Consent 418 Incest 366 Possession 420 421 Carnal intercourse against the order of nature Theft or criminal breach of trust? (now only Malaysia) . 367 Dishonesty and 'borrowing' 422 423 Outraging decency (gross indecency) 368 Punishment and aggravated offences Sexual Offences against Children 370 Reforming the Law 425 Malaysia 370 . Singapore 372 Chapter 14 Misappropriation, Breach of Trust Sexual Offences Requiring Proof of Lack of Consent 374 and Cheating 427 Outrag~ng modesty 374 427 Introduction Rape: definition and scope 376 Criminal Misappropriation 427 Rape: punishments 380 .Offence elements 427 Sexual connection by an object (Malaysia only) 382 Misappropriation and convet:sion 431 Sexual assault by penetration (Singapore only) 382 433 Dishonesty Other 2007 amendments: Malaysia 384 Proving dishonesty 435 Other 2007 amendments: Singapore 384 Criminal Breach ofTrust 436 Review of the new laws and their impact on marital rape 385 Offence elements 436 Consent in the Context of Sexual Offences 386 439 Entrustment Meaning of consent 386 Misappropriation of Lhe entrusted property 442 Mistake as to consent 388 Dominion 442 Consent and sexual activity involving people with a mental Use or disposal in violation of law 443 impairment 390 Use or d_isposal in violation of contract 444 Partnership property 445 OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY Dishonesty 446 CBT by wilful suffering 448 Chapter 13 Property Offences: Structure, Principles Punishment and aggravated offences . 451 and Theft, 393 Reforming the law: criminal misappropriation and CBT 452 Cheating 454 Structure and Core Concepts 393 Introduction 454 Introduction 393 Offence Elements 455 Property: basic concepts and terminology 393 Deception 457 The Core Penal Code Property Offences 397 Deception by concealment 459 Relationship between the offences 400 The causal link 460 Dishonesty and the Defences: General Principles 403 Cheating by dishonest or fraudulent inducement 460 Definition and proof 403 Fraudulently 462 Intention to cause wrongful gain or loss 405 Cheating by intentional inducement 464 Concurrence 407 Dishonoured cheques 466 Slight harm 407 Mistake and claim of right 408

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.