Table Of Content

INDEX to CRIME & DELINQUENCY Volume 46 Number 1 (January 2000) pp. 1-144 Number 2 (April 2000) pp. 145-288 Number 3 (July 2000) pp. 289-440 Number 4 (October 2000) pp. 441-568 Authors: AEBI, MARCELO F., see Killias, M BONTA, JAMES, SUZANNE WALLACE-CAPRETTA, and JENNIFER ROONEY, “Can Electronic Monitoring Make a Difference? An Evaluation of Three Canadian Programs,’ 61. BORUCH, ROBERT, BROOKE SNYDER, AND DOROTHY DEMOYA, “The Importance of Randomized Field Trials,” 156 BORUCH, ROBERT F.,, JOE S. CECIL, and TIMOTHY VICTOR, “Resolving Ethical and Legal Problems in Randomized Experiments,” 330 BORUCH, ROBERT F., see Feder, L CECIL, JOE S., see Boruch, R. F CHANDEK, MEGHAN S., see Robinson, A. L. CORDRAY, DAVID S., “Enhancing the Scope of Experimental Inquiry in Intervention Studies,” 401. CULLEN, FRANCIS T., see Moon, M. M DEMOYA, DOROTHY, see Boruch, R. DOBASH, R. EMERSON, and RUSSELL P. DOBASH, “Evaluating Criminal Justice Interven- tions for Domestic Violence,” 252. DOBASH, RUSSELL P., see Dobash, R. E DUNFORD, FRANKLYN W., “Determining Program Success: The Importance of Employing Experimental Research Designs,” 425 FAGAN, JEFFERY, see Zimring, F. E FARR, KATHRYN ANN, “Classification for Female Inmates: Moving Forward,” 3. FARRINGTON, DAVID P., see Short, J. F. FEDER, LYNETTE, ANNETTE JOLIN, and WILLIAM FEYERHERM, “Lessons From Two Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings,” 380. FEDER, LYNETTE, and ROBERT F. BORUCH, “The Need for Experiments in Criminal Jus- tice Settings,” 291. FEYERHERM, WILLIAM, see Feder, L. FINCKENAUER, JAMES O., see Petrosino, A GEIS, GILBERT, ALAN MOBLEY, and DAVID SHICHOR, “Letter to the Editor,” 443. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, Vol. 46 No. 4, October 2000 564-567 © 2000 Sage Publications, Inc 564 INDEX to CRIME & DELINQUENCY Volume 46 Number 1 (January 2000) pp. 1-144 Number 2 (April 2000) pp. 145-288 Number 3 (July 2000) pp. 289-440 Number 4 (October 2000) pp. 441-568 Authors: AEBI, MARCELO F., see Killias, M BONTA, JAMES, SUZANNE WALLACE-CAPRETTA, and JENNIFER ROONEY, “Can Electronic Monitoring Make a Difference? An Evaluation of Three Canadian Programs,’ 61. BORUCH, ROBERT, BROOKE SNYDER, AND DOROTHY DEMOYA, “The Importance of Randomized Field Trials,” 156 BORUCH, ROBERT F.,, JOE S. CECIL, and TIMOTHY VICTOR, “Resolving Ethical and Legal Problems in Randomized Experiments,” 330 BORUCH, ROBERT F., see Feder, L CECIL, JOE S., see Boruch, R. F CHANDEK, MEGHAN S., see Robinson, A. L. CORDRAY, DAVID S., “Enhancing the Scope of Experimental Inquiry in Intervention Studies,” 401. CULLEN, FRANCIS T., see Moon, M. M DEMOYA, DOROTHY, see Boruch, R. DOBASH, R. EMERSON, and RUSSELL P. DOBASH, “Evaluating Criminal Justice Interven- tions for Domestic Violence,” 252. DOBASH, RUSSELL P., see Dobash, R. E DUNFORD, FRANKLYN W., “Determining Program Success: The Importance of Employing Experimental Research Designs,” 425 FAGAN, JEFFERY, see Zimring, F. E FARR, KATHRYN ANN, “Classification for Female Inmates: Moving Forward,” 3. FARRINGTON, DAVID P., see Short, J. F. FEDER, LYNETTE, ANNETTE JOLIN, and WILLIAM FEYERHERM, “Lessons From Two Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings,” 380. FEDER, LYNETTE, and ROBERT F. BORUCH, “The Need for Experiments in Criminal Jus- tice Settings,” 291. FEYERHERM, WILLIAM, see Feder, L. FINCKENAUER, JAMES O., see Petrosino, A GEIS, GILBERT, ALAN MOBLEY, and DAVID SHICHOR, “Letter to the Editor,” 443. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, Vol. 46 No. 4, October 2000 564-567 © 2000 Sage Publications, Inc 564 INDEX 565 GRAEBSCH, CHRISTINE, “Legal Issues of Randomized Experiments on Sanctioning,” 271 HEMMENS, CRAIG, and DANIEL LEVIN, “Resistance Is Futile: The Right to Resist Unlaw- ful Arrest in an Era of Aggressive Policing,” 472 JOLIN, ANNETTE, see Feder, L KILLIAS, MARTIN, MARCELO F. AEBI, AND DENIS RIBEAUD, “Learning Through Con- trolled Experiments: Community Service and Heroin Prescription in Switzerland,” 233 KRISBERG, BARRY, and KARL F. SCHUMANN, “Introduction,” 147 LANE, JODI, and JAMES W. MEEKER, “Subcultural Diversity and the Fear of Crime and Gangs,” 497 LANZA-KADUCE, LONN, KAREN F. PARKER, AND CHARLES W. THOMAS, “The Devil in the Details: The Case Against the Case Study of Private Prisons, Criminological Research, and Conflict of Interest,’ 92 LOFTIN, COLIN, see McDowall, D LU, HONG, see Miethe, T. D MACKENZIE, DORIS LAYTON, “Evidence-Based Corrections: Identifying What Works,” 457 MAXWELL, SHEILA ROYO, “Sanction Threats in Court-Ordered Programs: Examining Their Effects on Offenders Mandated Into Drug Treatment,” 542 McDOWALL, DAVID, COLIN LOFTIN, and BRIAN WIERSEMA, “The Impact of Youth Curfew Laws on Juvenile Crime Rates,” 76 MEEKER, JAMES W., see Lane, J MIETHE, TERANCE D., HONG LU, and ERIN REESE, “Reintegrative Shaming and Recidi- vism Risks in Drug Court: Explanations for Some Unexpected Findings,” 522 MOBLEY, ALAN, see Geis, G MOON, MELISSA M., JODY L. SUNDT, FRANCIS T. CULLEN, and JOHN PAUL WRIGHT, “Is Child Saving Dead? Public Support for Juvenile Rehabilitation,” 38 OAKLEY, ANN, “A Historical Perspective on the Use of Randomized Trials in Social Science Settings,” 315 ORTMANN, RUDIGER, “The Effectiveness of Social Therapy in Prison—A Randomized Experiment,” 214 PARKER, KAREN F., see Lanza-Kaduce, L PETROSINO, ANTHONY, CAROLYN TURPIN-PETROSINO, and JAMES O FINCKENAUER, “Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons From Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight,” 354 REESE, ERIN, see Miethe, T. D RIBEAUD, DENIS, see Killias, M ROBINSON, AMANDA L., and MEGHAN S. CHANDEK, “The Domestic Violence Arrest Decision: Examining Demographic, Attitudinal, and Situational Variables,” 18 ROONEY, JENNIFER, see Bonta, J SHICHOR, DAVID, see Geis, G SCHUMANN, KARL F.,, see Krisberg, B SHERMAN, LAWRENCE W., “Reducing Incarceration Rates: The Promise of Experimental Criminology,” 299 SHORT, JAMES F., JR.. MARGARET A. ZAHN, and DAVID P. FARRINGTON, “Experimen- tal Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?,” 295 SNYDER, BROOKE, see Boruch, R SUNDT, JODY L., see Moon, M. M TILLEY, NICK, “Experimentation and Criminal Justice Policies in the United Kingdom,” 194 THOMAS, CHARLES W. see Lanza-Kaduce, L 566 CRIME & DELINQUENCY / OCTOBER 2000 TURPIN-PETROSINO, CAROLYN, see Petrosino, A. VICTOR, TIMOTHY, see Boruch, R. F. WALLACE-CAPRETTA, SUZANNE, see Bonta, J. WEISBURD, DAVID, “Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Policy: Prospects and Problems,” 181. WIERSEMA, BRIAN, see McDowall, D. WRIGHT, JOHN PAUL, see Moon, M. M. ZAHN, MARGARET A., see Short, J. F. ZIMRING, FRANKLIN E. and JEFFERY FAGAN, “The Search for Causes in an Era of Crime Declines: Some Lessons From the Study of New York City Homicide,” 446. Articles: “Can Electronic Monitoring Make a Difference? An Evaluation of Three Canadian Programs,” Bonta et al., 61. “Classification for Female Inmates: Moving Forward,” Farr, 3. “Determining Program Success: The Importance of Employing Experimental Research Designs,” Dunford, 425. “The Devil in the Details: The Case Against the Case Study of Private Prisons, Criminological Research, and Conflict of Interest,” Lanza-Kaduce et al., 92 “The Domestic Violence Arrest Decision: Examining Demographic, Attitudinal, and Situa- tional Variables,” Robinson and Chandek, 18. “The Effectiveness of Social Therapy in Prison—A Randomized Experiment,” Ortmann, 214 “Enhancing the Scope of Experimental Inquiry in Intervention Studies,” Cordray, 401. “Evaluating Criminal Justice Interventions for Domestic Violence,” Dobash and Dobash, 252. “Evidence-Based Corrections: Identifying What Works,” MacKenzie, 457. “Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?,” Short et al., 295 “Experimentation and Criminal Justice Policies in the United Kingdom,” Tilley, 194. “A Historical Perspective on the Use of Randomized Trials in Social Science Settings,” Oakley, 315. “The Impact of Youth Curfew Laws on Juvenile Crime Rates,” McDowall et al., 76 “The Importance of Randomized Field Trials,” Boruch et al., 156. “Introduction,” Krisberg and Schumann, 147. “Is Child Saving Dead? Public Support for Juvenile Rehabilitation,” Moon et al., 38. “Learning Through Controlled Experiments: Community Service and Heroin Prescription in Switzerland,” Killias et al., 233. “Legal Issues of Randomized Experiments on Sanctioning,” Graebsch, 271. “Lessons From Two Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings,” Feder et al., 380 “Letter to the Editor,” Geis et al., 443 “The Need for Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings,’ Feder and Boruch, 291. “Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Policy: Prospects and Problems,” Weisburd, 181. “Reducing Incarceration Rates: The Promise of Experimental Criminology,” Sherman, 299. “Reintegrative Shaming and Recidivism Risks in Drug Court: Explanations for Some Unex- pected Findings,” Miethe et al., 522. “Resistance Is Futile: The Right to Resist Unlawful Arrest in an Era of Aggressive Policing,” Hemmens and Levin, 472. “Resolving Ethical and Legal Problems in Randomized Experiments,” Boruch et al., 330. INDEX “Sanction Threats in Court-Ordered Programs: Examining Their Effects on Offenders Man dated Into Drug Treatment,’ Maxwell, 542 ‘The Search for Causes in an Era of Crime Declines: Some Lessons From the Study of New York City Homicide,” Zimring and Fagan, 446 “Subcultural Diversity and the Fear of Crime and Gangs,” Lane and Meeker, 497 “Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons From Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight,” Petrosino et al., 354