BLMi LI 880538 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service in partnership with UUSSDPAA N RCS © U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 7 and Local [@oyrvesttivistes ati We ome “ | : and Management QH RATIVE f S41.5 juion R52 N386 2002 c.2 The Riparian Coordination Network consists of: National Riparian Service Team Agency Riparian Program Coordinators State Cadres (including agency and nonagency individuals) Production services provided by: National Science gat Technology Center Bureak co f Land : Managc ement Information and Communications Staff 303-236-6547 Linda Hill: Editing Jennifer Kapus: Layout and Design Lee Barkow, Director National Science and Technology Center P.O. Box 25047 Denver, Colorado 80225-0047 The Bureau of Land Management’s National Science and Technology Center supports other BLM offices by providing a broad spectrum of services in areas such as physical, biological, and social science assessments; architecture and engineering support; library assistance; mapping science; photo imaging; geographic information systems applications; and publications support. Copies available from: National Riparian Service Team 3050 NE 3rd Street Prineville, OR 97754 or on the Web at: hetp://www.or.blm.gov/nrst BLM/WO/GI-03/004+6740 ee Creeks and Communtities: A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management Prepared by the Riparian Coordination Network December 2002 Suggested citation: Riparian Coordination Network. 2002. Creeks and communities: A continuing strategy for accelerating cooperative riparian restoration and management. Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado. BLM/WO/GI-02/014+6740. 16 pp. jeO) N OMN Manlnnela 5.45 Ae Me Gor iio ted ee kin ae ee 1 ily (CRBS Sele MCoymniilises cou Mea ee hoes oe ore eee 5 Le cokinosbackstowercate tie Cutie mie eee vse. e5 fret ricinaltstratccy mer iaeine ean meen rec ae. 5 sere EG sccssiiciitny cLiOc meitner ieae nce e 6 heRiparians oor ihationgiNetwotkom nn nen i, pines Evaluationgkrocessanee (icin sma nner eee: 8 [iEex. Community-Based landscape Strateoy meme ee 11 SOAR Be get eee Meee cena ON re ee etre PCE 12 Objectives] Bre sey eis eee nee ere ee eres 12 Stratcoy Avian Gite ae Sen ae ee eee eee e ic Stratee ya wexeetg eee earner enn eee we 1 Strategy: Gseh cee eey okt pee oe anne oee ee 13 COD IECtIV CIE nse cteet eae) eer arenee te eee 1B Stratee yA ciek. a apegons Bene mene Mmee nce 14 Stratecys Doe noe peyarantee renee te Caen er ee 14 SUrateoy s( Om sites evi ee oer ee eer 14 Objectives 75. seen. ee ee en heen ees IS Strarepy (AS pvc tae yer ya nnn, ene 15 RolesrancencsPOnsibi ities any eeem i ele een 15 State adres. 5.t e suscep area eon eee nen 15 Agency Riparian Program Coordinators ........ 15 INavional Riparian Service: eatie years nn 16 BLM National Science and flecunelocyentcre Denvch) Sram. newer ak. 16 BLM National Training Center (Phoenix) ...... 16 ll Successful riparian restoration and management are the result of cooperation among all interests in a watershed. A strategy for accelerating cooperative riparian appropriate treatments. This disagreement has restoration and management was initiated in led to an environment of lawsuits and 1996 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture regulatory approaches, often leaving out the (USDA) Forest Service and the U.S. people most affected by the decisions. However, Department of the Interior (USDI) Bureau of there is increasing evidence that effective Land Management, in partnership with the solutions arise from the workings of citizens and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. stakeholders. This strategy was designed to The strategy was designed to integrate the facilitate collaborative approaches, which take physical, biological, and social dimensions of time and are greatly influenced by human riparian-wetland management to achieve results dynamics, yet offer the greatest opportunity for for resources and communities. It was based on managing conflict and reducing excessive the premise that as demands on our natural process and expense. resources increase, the only effective way to ensure the sustainable production of values and The goals of the original strategy were to benefits is through strong, lasting, public and achieve riparian restoration through private partnerships. collaboration and to reduce process requirements for restoration and maintenance of Healthy watersheds and riparian-wetland areas riparian-wetland areas. It addressed the need to are critical to providing communities with the bring communities of people together and use economic, ecological, and social benefits that common vocabulary and definitions for come from the reliable availability of adequate evaluating the health and condition of riparian- supplies of clean water. The storage of water in wetland areas. It incorporated fundamental riparian-wetland areas is important to ensuring a concepts from both the biophysical and social life-sustaining supply of this precious resource. dimensions of riparian-wetland management, as Riparian-wetland areas are also unique features reflected in the use of the Proper Functioning that connect landscapes and communities, Condition assessment method by the Riparian providing unlimited opportunities to bring Coordination Network. Through extensive people together to create a common vision for outreach, effort was focused on laying a productive and sustainable conditions. While foundation of understanding across a large there is growing agreement regarding the number of people, over a broad geographic area importance of watershed and riparian-wetland and at multiple organizational scales, with the function, there continues to be considerable intent of building capacity for better disagreement about existing conditions and decisionmaking and collective action. Program Creeks and Communities: A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management evaluation results indicate success in terms of more specific objectives, strategies, and bringing people together and high levels of activities. Combined, they reflect the satisfaction with the products and services recognition that while teaching riparian-wetland provided. However, the degree to which the function to a broad spectrum of people is outreach, training, and assistance have fundamental to meeting the goal of this strategy, influenced cooperative restoration and additional emphasis must be placed on management is less evident. Barriers to both strategically building the individual, community, implementation and effectiveness have been and institutional capacity needed to achieve identified and provide the basis for adaptations coordinated management. Extended services focused on those aspects of the approach that will include activities that both precede and will ensure the achievement of intended results follow specific assistance. Additional focus on as this strategy continues. restoration, management, and monitoring will address a broader range of issues along with In response to the results of the evaluation, drawing on tools designed for situation elements of the original strategy have been assessment, conflict management, and consensus redefined and refined to improve the strategy’s building. Emphasis will be placed on effectiveness. The original goals have been diversifying the existing skill base of the blended into a more focused overarching goal, Riparian Coordination Network through which is to develop a critical mass of people training and recruitment from various who interact with and manage riparian-wetland disciplines, as well as from private organizations resources based on shared knowledge of the and communities. Finally, the revised strategy attributes and processes that constitute addresses program management and sustainability. In an effort to better guide accountability by outlining specific activities program decisionmaking and evaluation in the that guide overall operations. future, the revised plan outlines a number of Healthy riparian areas provide for the sustainable production of multiple benefits. “,..collaborative approaches can lead to better decisions...” ade ee” oa «eet . =. Pos. 9 = *; = = = + Concern for the environment has been growing legacy of programs and practices that are now for a number of years and, consequently, the considered unwise or even harmful. number of conflicts involving environmental issues and the management of natural resources Riparian-wetland areas have been a focal point has grown as well. As we head into this for the past several decades, which is evident century, we are faced with an increasing human from both increased litigation over the values population and a corresponding increase in the they produce as well as a rise in the number of demand on natural resources, which indicates conservation programs designed to improve that conflicts over the management of these them. While there is growing agreement about resources will continue. Nowhere are such the importance of watershed and riparian- conflicts more evident than in the escalating wetland function for providing many benefits, demand for water. Reliable supplies of water such as long-term water supplies and for domestic, agricultural, and industrial maintenance of water quality, there continues consumption are essential to community well- to be considerable disagreement about the being and economic stability. existing conditions of these resources, the types of uses that are appropriate, and the treatment Riparian-wetland areas play an important role and tools that can be successfully employed to in water conflicts. The storage of water in restore and maintain them. As a result, riparian-wetland areas is critical to ensuring a riparian-wetland management has been life-sustaining supply of this precious resource. characterized by lawsuits and regulatory In addition, riparian-wetland areas and their approaches, which often leave out the people associated streams and wetlands are valuable who must implement the solutions and who are indicators of watershed health. They are most directly affected by the consequences of among the first landscape features to reflect the decisions. damage from improper management or natural events. Yet they are also resilient due to the A better approach to managing riparian- presence of water, which creates opportunities wetland areas is to facilitate efforts designed to for restoration and recovery. Riparian-wetland build capacity within communities to confront areas comprise a relatively small percentage of and resolve the complex and contentious the total land base, but when they are healthy, problems surrounding these resources. People they provide tremendous public benefits. are now recognizing that using the best science However, many of these systems are currently to make management decisions is not enough. functioning below their potential. Although Successful management of these resources is improvement can be found in some riparian- dependent upon bringing communities of wetland areas, many have been subject to a people together, working at the landscape level Creeks and Communities: A Continuing Strategfyo r Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management and beyond political boundaries, to create a take time. Effective partnerships recognize the common vision for productive and sustainable need to build and sustain productive riparian-wetland conditions. ‘There is relationships and take steps to establish and increasing evidence that effective solutions arise maintain them. Building relationships, from the workings of citizens and stakeholders, developing understanding, and networking are who in addition to using technically correct complicated processes that are greatly information, engage in processes that address influenced by human dynamics. However, an the human and social dimensions of resource initial investment of working collaboratively up management issues. front, with the scope of interested parties, offers the greatest opportunity for managing conflict Although collaborative approaches can lead to and reducing excessive red tape, which is often better decisions that are more likely to be cited as a barrier to effective, efficient, riparian- implemented and help prepare agencies and wetland restoration and management. communities for future challenges, they also aaa USHER USI RIISIE RE NE What is a Community? The concept of community is fundamental to the understanding of people and how they interact with the environment. However, community is not easily defined because various types of communities exist. The following concepts of 10) community are adapted from “Community Participation in Ecosystem . Management,” by Timothy P. Duane, which appeared in Ecology Law Quarterly we 24(4):771-798: © Ss 0 Communities ofp lace are tied to a physical space through geography. se ¥ Communities of identity are tied to each other through social characteristics, but ® they may transcend place. WY Communities of interest may have commonalities in how they relate to a Ico particular ecosystem or resource as beneficiaries of that place or contributors to its condition. Members of these communities are often described as @ stakeholders. W Finally, the term “community” can also speak to the quality of relationships between groups of people. OO