ebook img

Crabs Of The Family Homolodromiidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), V-Dicranodromia Spinosa, A New Species From The Western Atlantic PDF

7 Pages·1994·2 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Crabs Of The Family Homolodromiidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), V-Dicranodromia Spinosa, A New Species From The Western Atlantic

PROC. BIOL. SOC. WASH. 107(3), 1994, pp. 451-457 CRABS OF THE FAMILY HOMOLODROMIIDAE (CRUSTACEA: DECAPODA: BRACHYURA), V. DICRANODROMIA SPINOSA, A NEW SPECIES FROM THE WESTERN ATLANTIC Joel W. Martin Abstract.—A new species ofthe primitive homolodromiid crab genus Di- cranodromia, D. spinosa, is described from amongthe specimens examinedby M. J. Rathbun (1937) and previously considered to belong to the species D. ovata A. Milne Edwards. The new species is represented by 10 known speci- mens, one ofwhich was formerly a paratype ofD. ovata A. Milne Edwards, all collected in the western Atlantic. The species is easily distinguished from the other two American species, D. ovata and D.felderi, bythe overall size, by the spination and setation ofthe carapace and pereiopods, and by the relative lengths ofthe terminal segments ofpereiopod 5. At the time ofpublication ofM. J. Rath- tion, Washington, D.C. (USNM), and were bun's fourth and final volume on the crabs previously labeled Dicranodromia ovata. ofAmerica (Rathbun 1937), the genus Di- Type material of D. ovata was borrowed cranodromiaA. MilneEdwards, 1880, con- fromtheMuseumofComparativeZoology, tained four species: D. ovata A. Milne Ed- Harvard University (MCZ) (the holotype MCZ wards, D. mahieuxii A. Milne Edwards, D. female, 6510, and two female para- MCZ doederleiniOrtmann,andD. baffini(Alcock types, 6511 [herein reassigned to the &Anderson). Only one ofthese species was new species] and MCZ 2745), and the Mu- known from the Americas: Dicranodromia seumnationald'Histoirenaturelle,Paris(the MNHN ovataA. MilneEdwards, 1880,thetypespe- third female paratype, MP- cies ofthegenus. Thetotal numberofspec- B24324). Illustrations were made with the imens ofD. ovata known to Rathbun, in- aid of a Wild M5APO dissecting stereo- cluding the four specimens that comprised scope and drawing arm. The abbreviation thetypeseries(seeMartin 1990),apparently CL indicates carapace length. was 14. In my description of a second American species of Dicranodromia from Dicranodromia spinosa, new species the westernAtlantic, D.felderi, I noted that Figs. 1, 2 several lots among those labeled D. ovata Dicranodromiaovata.—MiXne.Edwardsand in the collections ofthe National Museum Bouvier, 1902 (in part) [see discussion]. of Natural History appear to contain un- Dicranodromia ovafa.—Rathbun 1937:60, recognized species (Martin 1990). One of tsheonsteedsbpeycimeoss,tcuorfitohueslsypeocniemetnhsateixsamreipnreed- f1i3g,. 1fi5g,s.ta3b,le4.1N6o(tinDpiacrrtaonnoldy)r,omainadopvlaattae A. Milne Edwards, 1880. and discussed by Rathbun, is described herein. Maleholotype.-USNM68887,male,CL Specimensuponwhichthisreportisbased (carapace length) = 6.1 mm. State Univer- areintheholdingsoftheNationalMuseum sity ofIowa Biological Expedition to Flor- of Natural History, Smithsonian Institu- ida Keys and the West Indies, Station 63. 452 PROCEEDINGSOFTHEBIOLOGICALSOCIETYOFWASHINGTON Handwritten labels state "26767" and "abd. mature female, CL = 6.5 mm. Florida, off drawn" [abdomen drawn; the telson ofthis Key West, 24°15'00"N, 82°13'00"W, 152- specimen was figured on p. 61 ofRathbun 229 fm (278-419 m), 1877-1878, "Blake" 1937]. Station 5. Accordingto Rathbun (1937, 64: Type locality.—There are no additional table 16) this is a figured paratype of D. USNM data in the vial containing 68887. ovata, although not figured by her. This However, in Rathbun's (1937) table ofma- specimen is herein reassigned to Dicrano- terial ofD. ovata (p. 64), there is only one dromia spinosa. — male listed as being from the State Univer- Diagnosis. ^vcidiW species, known speci- mm sity of Iowa collections, and the station mensnotexceeding 10.1 totalcarapace numbergiven in the table is 63, which cor- length (including rostral horns). Carapace USNM responds to the label in 68887. covered with small spinules interspersed Therefore,thetypelocality,fromRathbun's with simple, short setae; spinules often lon- table 16, is "Off American Shoal Light gerand sharperalonganterolateralborders. [Horida, U.S.A.], N. by E. Vi E. about 8 Rostral horns broad, blunt, with spinules mi.," from a depth of 85-95 fm (156-174 dorsally and occasionally extending ven- m), 29 Jun 1893, from "under simple as- trally (not visible in dorsal view). Postor- cidian" (Rathbun 1937:64). bital tooth small, usually compound. Che- Designated paratypes.—USiNyi 57068, lipeds andpereiopods 2 and 3 coveredwith female, CL = 6.9 mm, clearly mature (but minute spinules and long, plumose setae. notovigerous). StateUniversityofIowaBi- Propodus of pereiopod 5 extremely short, ological Expedition toFlorida Keys andthe less than twice length ofdactylus. West Indies, Station 35, 21 Jun 1893, 5 mi Description.—Carapace (Fig. lA-C) in- N.N.W. Sand KeyLight, 90 fm (165 m), off flated, strongly convex in cross section and Key West, Florida. USNM 68914, female lesssofromfronttoback;coveredwithsmall (not ovigerous, as indicated on label and in blunt-tip spines, among which are short, table 16 ofRathbun 1937, so possibly eggs simple, amber-colored setae. Rostral teeth lost at some time in past), CL = 7.1 mm, broad and spinose dorsally; some speci- State University of Iowa Expedition, Sta- mens with spines extending ventrally from tion 64, offAmerican ShoalLight, N. byW. midpoint between rostral teeth. Carapace about 8 mi, "about 1 10 fathoms" (201 m), spines becoming slightly smaller posteri- USNM 29 Jun 1893. 57069, female (ovi- orly,andmoreorlessabsentinbroadregion gerous), CL = 9.2 mm [9.8 mm according just posterior to cervical groove, presum- to Rathbun 1937:61], State University of ably because fourth and fifth pereiopods Iowa, Station 52, American Shoal Light, 10 contact carapace here. Postorbital tooth mi. N by W 1/2 W., 105 to 1 10 fm (192-201 small, extending laterally to just beyond m), 27 Jun 1893. This specimen photo- cornea, andusuallybifid orcompound(Fig. graphed as D. ovata in Rathbun (1937, pi. IC). Region between rostral horns slightly 13, figs. 3,4). depressed. Eyes large relative to carapace; Additional material (not paratypic).— eyestalk with several blunt spines on fron- USNM 68917, female (damaged), oviger- todorsalsurface. Thirdmaxillipedswithnu- ous, CL =7.8 mm [label states "2 females merous spines, especially on external sur- (1 ovig)" but only 1 crab, an ovigerous fe- face ofmerus. Chelipeds (Fig. 2A) covered male, found]. USNM 68862, 2 females, CL with spines and with long, lightly plumose = 5.4 mm (juvenile); CL =10.1 mm (ma- setae; each setaextendingoutward forsome USNM ture female). 68917, female (dam- distance before bending rather abruptly to aged), CL = 7.8 mm. USNM 68877, female create protective layer of horizontally-ori- (ovigerous),CL= 9.8 mm. MCZ6511,small ented setae around chela. Dactylus with VOLUME 107, NUMBER 3 453 '":'.;/'Cv;^^-l, :^:52^^v:?^ '.' ''' :-''-^f-ff^ <4. T'- '' / '^'''< i" '"-'•''"*• \:i-'^'% J- r--^ ' / • . .\.--^i' :'::^-'4^:;^ Fig. 1. Dicranodromia spinosa, new species, holotype male, USNM 68887. A, dorsal view ofcarapace, spination illustrated for right side only; B, lateral view of frontal region of carapace and orbit; C, higher magnification ofanteriorright side ofcarapace showingdetails ofspination ofpostorbital tooth and carapace along lateral surface; D, anterior part ofcarapace ofDicranodromia ovata A. Milne Edwards, 1880, female holotype(MCZ6510); E, dorsal viewofholotypemale ofDicranodromiaspinosa, illustratedatsame magnifi- D cation as forsizecomparison. smallbasaltooth.Fixedfingerwith4round- midpoint ofdactylus and to approximately edteeth,distalmostofwhichisbifidtoallow basal V4 offixed finger. Pereiopods 2 and 3 insertion of opposing tip of dactylus (Fig. (e.g..Fig. 2B)similarlyspinose,coveredwith 2A).Tipsoffingersbonewhite,glossy; hand same lightly plumose setae seen on che- light brown or tan, with color extending to lipeds. Dactylus (Fig. 2C) stout, recurved, 454 PROCEEDINGSOFTHEBIOLOGICALSOCIETYOFWASHINGTON Fig. 2. Dicranodromiaspinosa, new species: A, rightchela, outerview; B, third pereiopod(secondwalking leg) [noteorientationofdactylustopropodusandcoveringofspinesand plumosesetae]; C, samepereiopodas B,turnedapproximately90°toshowventralmarginofdactylus;D,firstpleopod,rightside,posteromesialview; E,dactylusandpropodusofleftfourthpereiopod;F,dactylusandpropodusofleftfifthpereiopod.Dicranodromia ovata A. Milne Edwards, 1880, female holotype (MCZ 6510): G, dactylus and propodus offifth pereiopod (setation omitted) [note relative lengthsofpropodusanddactylusascomparedtothosein F]. VOLUME 107, NUMBER 3 455 with 6-7 sclerotized spines along ventral (the holotype is in poor condition, making border. Pereiopods 4 (Fig. 2E) and 5 (Fig. further measurements difficult; see Martin 2F) short, stout. Dactylus of pereiopods 4 1990), and D. felderi reaches a carapace mm and 5 strong, recurved, distally sclerotized, length of32 (Martin 1990). with 3-4 teeth along formerventral border. The possibility that the new species con- Propodus ofpereiopods 4 and 5 relatively sists merely ofyoung or juvenile forms of short, clearly less than twice length ofdac- either ofthe previously recognized species, tylus, and with distal circlet ofstrong, dis- with a loss ofspination and setation as the tally sclerotized spines; these spines more crabs grow larger, was considered. It is true numerous, andmore similarly sized, onpe- that the larger ofthe specimens listed here reiopod 5 (Fig. 2F). Male abdomen andtel- as D. spinosa have relatively smaller and son spinose [not smooth as indicated in fewercarapacialspines. However, the small mm Rathbun's (1937) fig. 15], and without ter- (6.1 CL) holotype of D. spinosa is a minal setae showninthatillustration. Male mature male, as evidenced by the form of first pleopod (Fig. 2D) two-jointed, heavy, the first male pleopod (Fig. 2D). Addition- with deep groove along most of length of ally, several ofthe D. spinosa females are distalmost article, which bears densetuft of clearly mature, despite their size, with well setae distally; entire pleopod more or less developed pleopods bearing eggs in some typicalforthefamily(e.g., seeMartin 1990, cases, lending support to recognition of a Baez& Martin 1989). small species as opposed to a series ofju- Etymology. —From the Latin "spina" veniles. In contrast, one ofthe MCZ para- (thorn) inreference to theratherdense cov- types ofD. ovata(MCZ 2745) (andthe only ering of small spines on the carapace and MCZ paratype that is, in my estimation, pereiopods. truly D. ovata) is an immature female, the abdomenandpleopodsnotyethavingtheir adult shape or setation, although the cara- Discussion pace length ofthat crab is 10.4 mm, larger All four species ofthe genus Dicranodro- than any specimen of D. spinosa. Finally, mia known to Rathbun (1937) were de- therelativelengthsofthedactylusandprop- scribed prior to 1890; a fifth species ofDi- odus of the fifth pereiopod differ rather cranodromia was described 100 years later markedly between D. spinosa and eitherD. (Martin 1990). Only two of these species, ovata (compare Fig. 2F to fifth pereiopod D. ovata A. Milne Edwards and D. felderi ofD. ovata holotype, Fig. 2G) or D.felderi Martin, were previously known from the (see Martin 1990). An error exists in my western Atlantic. Recently, Guinot (1993) 1990 paper, where thefourth pereiopod of described two more species ofDicranodro- the holotype female of D. ovata (Martin mia: D. karubar, from Indonesia, and D. 1990: fig. 5f) was incorrectly referred to in foersteri, from the Chesterfield Islands. the figure legend as the fifth pereiopod. Dicranodromia spinosa is rather easily Although a decrease in overall spination separated from the other two western At- of the carapace and pereiopods might be lantic species, D. ovataandD.felderi, by its explained as an ontogenetic phenomenon, relatively small size and by the spination itislesslikelythatallometricchangesinthe andsetationofthecarapaceandpereiopods. relativelengthsofpereiopodsegmentscould The largest specimen attributable to D. spi- beexplainedasnormalontogeneticchanges. nosa is but 10.1 mm total carapace length Milne Edwards & Bouvier(1902) includ- USNM (the larger of two individuals in edtextfigures(theirfigs. 5 and 6)andplates 68862). Incontrast,theholotypeof£). ovata (pi. 2 figs. 1-16; pi. 3 figs. 1^), but it is mm was originally measured as being 26 difficult to determine which figures were L 456 PROCEEDINGSOFTHEBIOLOGICALSOCIETYOFWASHINGTON taken from which specimens, and their il- viously believed, is known from only two lustrations are too stylized to determine specimens (possibly three; the paratype whether a given drawing is ofD. ovata or housed at the Museum national d'Histoire D. spinosa. naturelle, Paris, France [MNHN MP- In light ofthe morphological differences B24324], from offHavana, Cuba, is dam- andnearlythreefoldsizedifferencebetween aged and can notwith certaintybe assigned specimens of D. spinosa and the holotype to either species), and is known only from of D. ovata (MCZ 6510), it is somewhat deeper waters (greater than 274 m) in the surprisingthatRathbun(1937)madenoref- Lesser Antilles. erence to morphological variation orto dif- ferencesinlifehistoryparameters(i.e.,mat- Acknowledgments uration at a very small size). Indeed, in the type series alone, the difference in CL be- I thank R. B. Manning for the loan of tween mature specimens is more than four- specimens, Daniele Guinot for advice and mm MCZ encouragement, and Cora Cash-Clark for fold (26 for the holotype, 6510, vs. 6.1 mm for MCZ 6511). Because Rath- assistance in the laboratory. This publica- bun referred to several specimens ofZ). spi- tionisthe fifth inaseriesonhomolodromi- nosa in her written description ofD. ovata id crabs that was facilitated by a Smithson- (e.g., Rathbun 1937:61, where she treated ian Institution Office of Fellowships and USNM 57069 [now a paratype of D. spi- Grants Short-Term Visitor Award I re- nosa] as a mature female ofD. ovata), it is ceivedinJuly 1989.1thankG.andS. Graves clear that her description of D. ovata in- for their kind assistance with logistics dur- cludesaconglomerateofcharactersofthese ing that visit. twospecies,andisthusofverylimitedvalue in identification of species of Dicranodro- Literature Cited umrieas. oTfheMislanmeeEidswtarruedsfor&thBeouevxiceelrle(n1t90fi2g:- BaezR.H,oPm.,ol&oJd.rWo.mMiairdtaien,.I.1D9e8s9c.riCprtaibosnooffthtehefammailley plate II, figs. 1-16), which included figures ofHomolodromia robertsi Garth, 1973, based ofthe holotype as well as the paratypes, at onspecimensfrom deepwatersoffthecoastof least one ofwhich is now attributable to D. Chile.—Journal ofCrustacean Biology 9:492- 500. spinosa. Guinot, D. 1993. Donnes nouvelles sur les crabes In addition to the specimens described primitifs(CrustaceaDecapodaBrachyuraPodo- herein as D. spinosa, all ofwhich were part tremata).—ComptesRendusde1'Academicdes ofthe seriesavailableto Rathbun, there are Sciences, Paris 316:1225-1232. at least two more lots housed at the USNM Martin,J.W. 1990. CrabsofthefamilyHomolodro- currently labeled D. ovata but belonging to miidae, II. Dicranodromiafelderi, new species, fromthewesternAtlantic,withnotesonthetype undescribed species (see Martin 1990). series ofD. ovata A. Milne Edwards, 1880.— Itisinterestingtonotethatallofthespec- Journal ofCrustacean Biology 10:708-720. imens I have herein referred to D. spinosa MilneEdwards,A. 1880. Etudespreliminairessurles arefromoffFlorida. Thus, notonlyarethey Crustaces, 1"" partie. In Reports on the results ofdredgingunderthesupervisionofAlexander morphologically different from trueD. ova- Agassiz, in the GulfofMexico, and in the Ca- ta, but they are rather far removed geo- ribbean Sea, 1877, '78, '79, by the U.S. Coast graphically as well, the holotype ofZ). ovata SurveySteamer"Blake,"Lieut.-CommanderC. being from Barbados, and the MCZ 2745 D.Sigsbee,U.S.N.,andCommanderJ.R.Bart- paratype being from Guadeloupe, Lesser lett, U.S.N., Commanding. Bulletinofthe Mu- seum ofComparativeZoologyat HarvardCol- Antilles. Thus, as far as is presently known, lege 8(1):1-68. D. spinosa is restricted to the Florida Keys, , & E.-L. Bouvier. 1902. Les Dromiaces et while D. ovata, much rarer than was pre- Oxystomes. In Reportson theresultsofdredg- VOLUME 107, NUMBER 3 457 ing,underthesupervisionofAlexanderAgassiz, Rathbun, M. J. 1937. The oxystomatous and allied in the GulfofMexico (1877-78), in the Carib- crabsofAmerica.—UnitedStatesNationalMu- beanSea(1878-79),andalongtheAtlanticcoast seum Bulletin 166:1-278. ofthe United States (1880), by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer "Blake," Lieut.-Com. C. D. Natural History Museum ofLos Angeles Sigsbee,U.S.N.,andCommanderJ.R.Bartlett, County,900ExpositionBoulevard,LosAn- U.S.N., Commanding, 39.—Memoirs of the Museum ofComparative Zoology at Harvard geles, California 90007, U.S.A. College27(1):1-127.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.