ebook img

Cotton varieties planted PDF

16 Pages·2003·2.7 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Cotton varieties planted

Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. L / />3 17. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service - Cotton Program Memphis, Tennessee September 2003 Cotton Varieties Planted, United States 2003 Crop The Deltapine brand of upland cottonseed was the most popular planted in the United States for the 2003-2004 season, according to the USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service’s Cotton Program. The Paymaster brand was the second most popular followed by Bayer CropScience Fibermax, Stoneville, Sure-Grow, All-Tex, Phytogen, and CPCSD. Transgenic varieties - genetically engineered varieties resistant to worms, herbicides, or both - accounted for about 76 percent of the upland cotton planted in the United States in 2003. This was down about one percentage point from the 2002 crop and about two percentage points from the 2001 crop. Usage of transgenic varieties in 2003 varied from a high of 100 percent in Florida to a low of 42 percent in California. Texas producers planted transgenic varieties to 56 percent of their 5.8 million cotton acres. Deltapine brand varieties were the most popular planted in 2003, accounting for 33.0 percent of the United States acreage. This brand accounted for 69.8 percent of the acreage planted in the southeastern states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia). It accounted for 29.6 percent of the acreage planted in the south central states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee), 16.6 percent in the southwestern states (Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas), and 25.7 percent of the acreage planted in the western states (Arizona, California, and New Mexico). Deltapine’s most popular varieties were DP 555 BG/RR, DP 451 B/RR, DP 458 B/RR, DP 5415RR, and DP 436 RR, accounting respectively for 8.7, 6.5, 4.6, 3.0, and 1.9 percent of the U.S. cotton acreage. Paymaster brand varieties were the second most popular planted in 2003, accounting for 21.3 percent of the United States acreage. These varieties accounted for 3.1 percent of the acreage planted in the southeastern states, 19.4 percent in the south central states, 35.1 percent in the southwestern states, and 0.2 percent in the western states. The most popular Paymaster varieties were PM 1218 BG/RR, PM 2326 RR, PM 2379 RR, and Paymaster HS 26, accounting respectively for 5.9, 4.3, 1.9, and 1.9 percent of the U.S. acreage. Bayer CropScience Fibermax brand varieties were the third most poplar planted in 2003, accounting for 15.6 percent of the United States acreage. They accounted for 7.8 percent of the acreage planted in the southeastern states, 5.2 percent of the acreage in the south central states, 28.0 percent in the southwestern states, and 1.3 percent in the western states. The most popular Bayer CropScience Fibermax varieties were FM 958, FM 832, FM 989BR and FM 989RR, accounting respectively for 4.5, 3.1, 2.3, and 2.1 percent of the United States acreage planted to cotton. Stoneville brand varieties were the fourth most popular planted in 2003. These varieties accounted for 13.6 percent of the acreage planted. They accounted for 8.8 percent of the acreage planted in the southeastern states, 33.8 percent of the acreage in the south central states, 5.0 percent in the southwestern states, and 5.1 percent in the western states. The most popular Stoneville varieties were ST 4892BR and ST 4793R, accounting respectively for 7.9 and 2.2 percent of the United States acreage planted to cotton. Suregrow brand varieties were the next most popular and accounted for 5.4 percent of the U.S. acreage planted in 2003. All-Tex varieties, planted primarily in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, were the sixth most popular and accounted for 3.1 percent of the 2003 cotton acreage. Phytogen was the most popular brand of American Pima planted in 2003. Phytogen variety PHY 76 Pima accounted for 56.4 percent of the United States Pima acreage and was the most popular variety planted in California (67.5 percent of California Pima acreage). Deltapine’s DP 744 Pima was the second most-planted American Pima variety and accounted for 15.4 percent of the U.S. crop. Deltapine’s DP 340 Pima was the next most popular variety and accounted for 11.8 percent of the U.S. Pima acreage. The most popular Pima variety in Arizona was Deltapine DP HTO (90.1 percent). 1 - - Estimates of the percentage of the various varieties of cotton planted in the United States for 2003 were based on informal surveys made by the Cotton Program Classing Offices. Those surveyed included ginners, seed dealers, extension agents, and other knowledgeable sources. Estimated percentage of upland cotton planted to leading specified varieties, by growth area, 2003 crop DELTAPINE DELTAPINE DELTAPINE DELTAPINE STONEVILLE DELTAPINE DELTAPINE DP 555 BG/RR DP 458 B/RR DP 451 B/RR DP 5415RR ST 4892BR DP 5690RR DP 436 RR Southeastern 22.89 13.66 12.59 6.47 4.75 4.52 3.78 STONEVILLE PAYMASTER DELTAPINE DELTAPINE SURE-GROW STONEVILLE STONEVILLE ST 4892BR PM 1218 BG/RR DP 451 B/RR DP 555 BG/RR SG 215 BG/RR ST 4793R ST 5599BR South Central 22.21 18.23 12.08 9.96 8.51 6.68 2.94 PAYMASTER BAYER CROP BAYER CROP PAYMASTER PAYMASTER PAYMASTER BAYER CROP PM 2326 RR SCI-FIBERMAX SCI-FIBERMAX PM 2379 RR Paymaster HS 26 PM 2280 BG/ RR SCI- Southwest FM 958 FM 832 FIBERMAX FM 989RR 9.77 9.64 6.91 A..2)1 4.35 3.76 3.41 PHYTOGEN CPCSD CPCSD DELTAPINE CPCSD DELTAPINE DELTAPINE PHY 72 ACALA ACALA RIATA ACALA SIERRA DP 449 BG/RR Acala MAXXA DP 422 B/RR DP 555 BG/RR RR RR West 27.76 12.63 11.30 10.76 6.49 4.13 1.94 DELTAPINE STONEVILLE DELTAPINE PAYMASTER DELTAPINE BAYER CROP PAYMASTER DP 555 BG/RR ST 4892BR DP 451 B/RR PM 1218 BG/RR DP 458 B/RR SCI-FIBERMAX PM 2326 RR United States FM 958 8.68 7.88 6.50 5.94 4.55 4.49 4.30 Estimated percentage of upland cotton planted to leading specified brands, by growth areas, 2003 crop DELTAPINE STONEVILLE SURE-GROW BAYER CROP PAYMASTER PHYTOGEN AGRIPRO SCI-FIBERMAX Southeastern 69.79 8.78 8.31 7.84 3.12 0. 74 0.28 STONEVILLE DELTAPINE PAYMASTER SURE-GROW BAYER CROP PHYTOGEN SCI-FIBERMAX South Central 33.80 29.60 19.41 11.53 5.19 0.41 PAYMASTER BAYER CROP DELTAPINE ALL-TEX STONEVILLE ASSOCIATED BELTWIDE SCI-FIBERMAX FARMERS COTTON DELINTING GENETICS Southwestern 35.07 28.01 16.62 6.99 4.99 1.60 1.58 CPCSD PHYTOGEN DELTAPINE STONEVILLE ACALA BAYER CROP AZ COTTON SCI-FIBERMAX GROWERS 30.91 28.73 25.66 5.07 2.70 1.29 0.78 West DELTAPINE PAYMASTER BAYER CROP STONEVILLE SURE-GROW ALL-TEX PHYTOGEN SCI-FIBERMAX 33.04 21.33 15.61 13.55 5.44 3.07 2.07 United States 2 - - q (m LU HI iw CO r- o to-; oO cro- oCO ^r oCM CoO oCM ^CO cCMn cm o o' 3 <n S § OT CO T- o , oOT CM , T- ▼CD- CD O CM CD SoT-orti(n\| ®rTOfi-iTn-i(DOaoi icno cod ccmd cod 8 odN. dCM o— oT- 'dCO dCM « dds^OddooicN codoo toO dTf oN do . - 3 CM O 0 0 2 of . 8o CCOODT CIQO hO- COCMDT , p o r c , * . 2 . s o e t a t S ed § i o' i « dto dcm dmo ' om cm o o t i n U d . s . n o ^ ot a s e t o a CO 1- f- st ^ CM o y b es, c/) § dCO oCOMT , COrOT ComM dTCtO rCND oOs , , i t e i r a v r^f -Si -t-d dCdD ooo ooo d e i f ci o cm o e O CoM' , I , , I COO I I I I I I • • p s o d t oCM CohO- OOOOOt- cm o o e t n a l p o n o' o t t o c d n a l p u f • •III oOT Socm' Tdco dO5T itOo- io(On ■CdoD; , o e g a t i n CoM' e c r e p d o ooo e t a m i t s E . 1 e Tabl i nfaCN-D: NO«nT oSOTt oTCD- SST- ^^ CO' Or<yC /)Cw l)Ca«CC/:L) UQ(>j i<D<</>D i<n TJ PCO PC{[O> odoQ) ICLMQ CUM.Q CILMQi SCUM.Q SUC*c>Or. 2OCOT 2OCatTrO:T -2CGcOMo 20cC0oM 2iOCnTO 2iOCCnDTO c5OCaOpDT: C 2cOOoT2O cOToT2O ~tc~Tcd' O28aoT; 82am8: 2Sacc:> Q2inn C 2inn5 25mCmTMt a: 6oaC_M: C6o.O 6oCM. C68oM cOc28m Or^2c8-’ 8Cmm2c2D in m to Q<. Q<_ CX/3 <I/) -<UxJxLU'5O§h-Xq.Xqfo- q:q:q:<<<<< • 1 ||. H jl II l| H U U- LL Li U Li 11. U- CD CD CD CD CD CD CD S 8 8 5 S S 1111illsli 11 i 11 § 8 8 8 $ 8 221.2.2.22.1 II 211121 - 23 X3 — 25 ».2 .+2= .’.2£= .♦2= .»2 .»2 .w2 S» iZiZu-iZiZu_iZu-ii_Li_ i<ib_ <ub -i&r iid.>L di). ud-> I i Qa)'O5j'Qa5'Q53"QQ5‘Qaj"QQjQ"0Q'o5 o <bd)d)<bd)<v<i><i)<b<v O OOOO cccc^ccccc c§ c5 co c5 c5 co3 ^Q)fl5d)fl)<DOd)(l) Wau) Wc_> Woa) Wu<D Woa) W"ooj Wooj Woa)W ua;W oa) (o0 (‘o/) (o/) (/o) (oQ o SC SC 2C 2C _ § I § § I I § i Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.CLQ.Q.Q.Q. Q. Q Q. Q. Q. — 3336 cococdcocococdcdcd 02620202020202020220 a2 o2 o2 o2 o2 oE 222 <OCCDD <OCCOO <OCCOO <OCO <- <•O_c) ( -<LO2c) Q<Oc2.) 0<Cc2'.T' < SSx<' <-D <hxCD <hx<D <h<xU <hx<D <hx<D <hx0> o(_/) otoo (_/) o- ooto tooo otoo o(o0 tooo CCDDCC<DDDCC<DDI>CCaDD5aCCDD3aCCDD)CCaDD3QCCDO>CCaDD3CCoDO3 CaC>OOjs CaC>OD3s CoCDD5 CC>aDD)s C<C>DDd» CCc>DuD CiBD CiDl Cf1D 1COD ”1 2CID 2CID2 ICD NITED TATES II* Ca *COM- 6C0 uo 890 horo- ocro- • bo▼4T-- otv-- * ccooo’ . 6ocp wriQ Tdio-orc-M fcfii QltionO iifif ndicr o-d^r rto-o'c ©coo , oc’o * <dcmo op 'rtcm-- hc^m- .. « • bcOo’*"- 33.04 soo OO'O 0.07 • 0.13 0.55 1.92 0.20 • 0.50 5.94 • 0.06 1.14 US >< • 000 III! 0.00 0.19 14.95 0.16 34.11 0.09 1.84 0.09 51.43 • • 000 OO'O 3.76 2.13 TX 045 OS'O .... 0.00 1.83 0.18 0.12 0.64 0.06 0.16 0.67 1.87 0.55 1.06 0.81 1.01 3.23 2.48 1.49 0.25 0.06 16.58 800 0.11 OO'O 0.16 0.23 1.33 4.60 0.48 0.22 1.11 1.29 TN • i 000 0.00 0.07 1.27 • • 1868 0.78 coC0Mo0’ • • 000 OO'O 3.72 54.56 SC • • 000 ( • • I 0.00 0.14 0.17 0.09 3.16 11.76 0.09 0.24 0.11 35.15 1.93 0.35 8.52 2.44 64.15 • 1 OO'O OO'O 0.18 2.25 0.20 OK • i ©o©’ . . . . u.uu • 1.79 1.41 1.83 8.39 13.23 0.13 0.51 1.34 28.67 • ' 000 000 4.83 4.02 ON ■ • 000 . . . . U.UU 0.09 0.07 6.89 0.06 0.17 24.82 7.23 0.06 0.21 0.13 11.55 0.59 5.73 1.64 59.30 1 • 000 OO'O _ 1.59 1.26 0.08 2z • ■ 000 , , , , U.UU 2.67 8.00 2.00 3.33 2.00 2.08 7.94 28.02 1 1 000 CS'O 1.97 MO • • 000 , , , , cU.UU 0.19 * 2.93 6.13 9.33 • • 000 OO'O 1.28 2.23 13.82 MS • • 000 , , , , cccU.UU 0.32 0.29 4.49 1.15 0.22 8.97 1.96 13.06 0.13 30.59 ■ • OO'O 000 11.17 LA ■ ■ 000 , 1 I • cccw.ww 4.27 0.60 0.29 0.26 0.12 1.91 1.23 0.60 10.12 9.03 0.45 0.41 1.22 30.79 0.12 2.34 0.78 64.56 ■ ■ OO'O OO'O • 8.42 0.06 KS • • 000 • 1 I « ccc • I . . . . ..till.Ill 0.00 • • OO'O OO'O 2.89 58.34 GA • ■ 000 1 1 t 1 ccC 0.99 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.33 1.76 0.47 4.74 19.42 1.44 0.37 33.52 0.29 1.42 6.00 0.66 5.95 2.60 0.27 80.62 • • OO'O OO'O .... 8o . FL • • 000 . . . . CcC 1.89 0.42 10.30 33.47 0.49 34.42 1.40 6.09 9.35 97.83 • 1 000 OO'O • • • • • • i • • i • i CA • • 000 9.62 18.72 16.74 0.73 45 ftl . i . • <cMo i cot—m' , , , , o' c^r^o. ^o^' m-oIt' , , , m^CM noT- noT-' , t my- , , tT-- , , oCcMo' « 8.64 1 • OO'O OO'O • •• i i i i i i i i • AR i i 0.00 , « « « oca 0.16 1.41 0.34 0.15 15.51 0.06 0.08 3.86 0.26 21.86 1 « OO'O ooo' 0.69 12.65 ZV • • ooo' . . . . aoo 0.21 0.29 1.59 15.70 0.83 * 0.71 37.09 1.63 0.07 4.26 0.25 2.87 0.05 0.68 1.74 0.09 1.50 69.60 • • OO'O OO'O 0.15 AL • • oo© 00 0 0.86 0.27 0.27 0.45 3.98 0.34 13.59 9.42 0.89 11.10 2.89 1.09 8.86 0.27 6.31 0.23 0.05 0609 ■ ■ 0.00 OO'O 0.21 10.05 0.59 0 2 257 287 Total Acaia maxxa Acala Riata RR Acaia Sierra RR Acala Ultima Total DeltaPEARL DELTAPINE 50 Deltapine Acala 9DP 20 B DP 388 DP 420 RR DP 422 B/RR DP 424 BGII/RR DP 425 RR DP 436 RR DP 444 BG/RR DP 448 B DP 449 BG/RR DP 451 B/RR DP 458 B/RR DP 468 BGII/RR DP 491 DP 493 DP 555 BG/RR DP 565 DP 655 B/RR DP 5111 DP 5415 DP5415RR DP 5690 DP 5690RR DP 6207 Acala DPLX 01X99R DPLX03X177R NuCOTN 33 B NuCOTN 35 B Total GP 74+ GP 1005 A Total Acala GC-535 145 RR DP 237 B DP 2379 HS 200 Paymaster HS 26 PM 280 PM 330 PM 1199 RR PM 1218 BG/RR PM 1560 BG PM 1560 BG/RR PM 2145 RR 0) *c d (TJ e > u n i t n o C . 1 Table Concho Concho 2Jso) CPCSD CPCSD CPCSD CPCSD Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine Deltapine O2OcQ0:) . G&P G&P G&P Germain's Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster Paymaster d e u n i t n o C . 1 e l b a T o<h- oodo oooo dooo oo©_ TOTAL PCT. 100.00 100.00 100.00 o<H Hy0- Oooo TOTAL PCT. 100.00 100.00 100.00 FocLXUl IC0DM0 CIC^DMD SITDf rr^^ OTHER PCT. 17.29 1.40 15.53 LaXU: OTHER PCT. 7.95 9.10 8.79 F sICDO. Tc0o0f roCM-o OC<O0) Stoneville ST 4793R PERCENT 2.74 0.10 2.45 o*0IQ?3) m0TCoaaLf.: Sure-Grow ure-Grow 52I PERCENT 0.16 1.68 1.27 S R CL Q£^T©QO . QCOICoDDL) ooO’ dCO m0q5- nO) Sure-Grow G215BG/R PERCENT 2.75 0.70 2.52 2Qt00? “0iCTQnLlf Stoneville ST 469 IB PERCENT 3.33 0.64 1.36 S co 2003 3iQQ)- J°oC>Df C0zLOL1UL.J Ooo tIoD- OCD) oo CoCoMO Delta pine DP 655 B/RR PERCENT 2.89 2.00 2.79 nowao II q2q0Q=3q °tCTD-Of fOOO BCS Fibermax FM 960BR PERCENT 2.10 1.57 1.71 2 CM ified varieties, crop of 0m0ii0Vf333)) sO<CQ(CQccM3OOl.l. ooOOCOO) TcoSCTooDff TCTTCDMftf <TrT0_o0ff £■’.*i>uVa>rooio2ancne5m Sure-Grow Delta pine Sure-Grow 521R DP 436 RR PERCENT PERCENT 4.79 3.98 0.00 2.70 4.26 3.84 3■c”.*o0ioor>aitt2>n3nett) iCJ-t00?EO9Ol3C 0I0o0ocLD03oo3) s■«oaoitr>ttcnettti Stoneville BCS Fibermax FM 989BR ST 5599BR PERCENT PERCENT 3.74 2.65 4.13 1.57 2.15 3.73 nted to spec Qa003) CoQ8oL.: oOO Cc•«oO- (iTDdf STidf Vw*crrot&»ee*t Deltapine DP 5690RR PERCENT 6.31 0.50 5.66 ■+rocraoO0ee■)>) ii0?§ CL ■ocuaittntt Deltapine DP 436 RR PERCENT 1.31 4.80 3.86 is cotton acreage pla 0»00E>0E0_0w0>_3330333>s C CCKCoo^Cr«cOcM^M«NoLLl)-r (TTOOODff rTCOCC*OMM^t) oTcIoIDDdof ^scCTfoO-f *+00eoo0r2or0»*ee)1 Deltapine Stoneville DP5415RR ST 4892BR PERCENT PERCENT 8.86 6.22 8.70 2.20 8.84 5.77 «*uotcr2orcoo■eet■n>> Cj~sI0—-0Q<XQ1333 oCC0Q0OmO33LL **craasroroo2>aee•ii. Paymaster Stoneville ST 4793R 1218 BG/RR PERCENT PERCENT 4.34 14.20 9.31 5.20 4.97 10.62 ercentage of 085? S Od !I CTCMDf ^hO*) ■*2oa0rc0f0l<e»))1 Paymaster PM 1218 BG/RR PERCENT 10.05 0.00 8.93 ■*«(atoc2t0*tt 2i«cQS. e *CmOQCsOL ct2oot0rett) Sure-Grow SG 215 BG/RR PM PERCENT 9.93 11.61 11.16 p «r*e E a0 Estimated Q£s0(/3-) 'x!0I o OOd OOd CcTdD- TCo>Ojf 310oEi13n1) Deltapine DP 458 B/RR PERCENT 9.42 37.10 12.50 U§■tow t■J 8CI|O sC=D ■oEMrtet Deltapine DP 555 BG/RR PERCENT 7.02 13.80 11.98 i UJ ng Office; *wfIfl S2circ I0D0 COM C0M0 CrM- cIir0nne) Deltapine DP 451 B/RR PERCENT 13.59 4.00 12.53 0ciirnne1 8C.(0Q§TO3 “00o2>30- I■o0ct t■) Deltapine DP 451 B/RR PERCENT 25.11 7.29 12.06 ding. Abilene Classi IfSI o OOo OOo CToOo- co(Oo>’ orrcE0e) Deltapine DP 555 BG/RR PERCENT 11.10 40.60 14.38 aar£3iiaonn 8f'c “ CC02-MO0 aawirirE3nnee Stoneville ST 4892BR PERCENT 18.16 29.32 26.33 ay not add due to roun Table 2. UcILo-J ¥St OiF^ li-o lHoHo< IC2rt-Oet STATE Alabama Florida OFFICE TOTAL *HS0(0>■ Uh2to~J 1£ra0a; STATE Arkansas Mississippi OFFICE TOTAL NOTE: Totals m

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.