SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration Paolo Tenuta Domenico Rocco Cambrea Corporate Sustainability Measurement, Reporting and Effects on Firm Performance SIDREA Series in Accounting and Business Administration SeriesEditors StefanoMarasca,UniversitàPolitecnicadelleMarche,Ancona,Italy AnnaMariaFellegara,UniversitàCattolicadelSacroCuore,Piacenza,Italy RiccardoMussari,UniversitàdiSiena,Siena,Italy EditorialBoardMembers StefanoAdamo,DipartimentodiStudiAziendali,G,UniversitàdeglistudidiLecce, LECCE,Italy LucaBartocci,UniversityofPerugia,Perugia,Italy AdeleCaldarelli,UniversityofNaplesFedericoII,Naples,Italy BettinaCampedelli,UniversityofVerona,Verona,Italy NicolaCastellano,UniversityofPisa,Pisa,Italy DenitaCepiku,UniversityofRomeTorVergata,Rome,Italy LinoCinquini ,Sant'AnnaSchoolofAdvancedStudies,Pisa,Pisa,Italy MariaSerenaChiucchi,DM,MarchePolytechnicUniversity,Ancona,Italy VittorioDell'Atti,UniversityofBariAldoMoro,Bari,Italy FrancescoDeLuca ,UniversityofChieti-Pescara,PESCARA,Pescara,Italy Anna Maria Fellegara, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, PIACENZA, Pia- cenza,Italy RaffaeleFiorentino,UniversityofNaplesParthenope,Naples,Italy FrancescoGiunta,UniversityofFlorence,Florence,Italy AlbertoIncollingo ,UniversityofCampania"LuigiVanvitelli,Caserta,Italy GiovanniLiberatore,UniversityofFlorence,Florence,Italy AndreaLionzo ,Economic&BusinessManagementScience,UniversitaCattolica delSacroCuore,MILANO,Milano,Italy RosaLombardi,LawandEconomicsofProductiveActiviti,SapienzaUniversityof Rome,Roma,Italy DavideMaggi,UniversityofEasternPiedmontAmadeoAv,Novara,Italy Daniela Mancini , Campus "Aurelio Saliceti", University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy FrancescaManesRossi,UniversityofNaplesFedericoII,Naples,Italy LucianoMarchi,DiptodiEconomiaeMgmt,UniversityofPisa,Pisa,Italy RiccardoMussari,UniversityofSiena,Siena,Italy Marco Maria Mattei, Department of Management, University of Bologna, Forlì, Italy AntonellaPaolini,UniversityofMacerata,Macerata,Italy MauroPaoloni,UniversityofRomeTorVergata,ROMA,Roma,Italy Paola Paoloni, Dept Law & Econ of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome,Rome,Roma,Italy MarcantonioRuisi,DeptSEAS,Buiding13,UniversityofPalermo,Palermo,Italy ClaudioTeodori,UniversityofBrescia,Brescia,Italy SimoneTerzani,UniversityofPerugia,Perugia,Italy stefaniaveltri,DISCAG,UniversitàdellaCalabria,RENDE,Cosenza,Italy This is the official book series of SIDREA - the Italian Society of Accounting and BusinessAdministration.ThisbookseriesisprovidedwithawideScientificCom- mittee composed of Academics by SIDREA. It publishes contributions (mono- graphs, edited volumes and proceedings) as a result of the double blind review process by the SIDREA’s thematic research groups, operating at the national and internationallevels.Particularly,theseriesaimstodisseminatespecializedfindings on several topics – classical and cutting-edge alike – that are currently being discussed by the accounting and business administration communities. The series authorsarerespectedresearchersandprofessorsinthefieldsofbusinessvaluation; governance and internal control; financial accounting; public accounting; manage- mentcontrol;gender;turnaroundpredictivemodels;non-financialdisclosure;intel- lectualcapital,smarttechnologies,anddigitalization;anduniversitygovernanceand performancemeasurement. (cid:129) Paolo Tenuta Domenico Rocco Cambrea Corporate Sustainability Measurement, Reporting and Effects on Firm Performance PaoloTenuta DomenicoRoccoCambrea UniversityofCalabria UniversityofModenaandReggioEmilia ArcavacatadiRende,Italy ReggioEmilia,Italy ISSN2662-9879 ISSN2662-9887 (electronic) SIDREASeriesinAccountingandBusinessAdministration ISBN978-3-031-11490-8 ISBN978-3-031-11491-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11491-5 ©TheEditor(s)(ifapplicable)andTheAuthor(s),underexclusivelicensetoSpringerNatureSwitzerland AG2022 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsaresolelyandexclusivelylicensedbythePublisher,whether thewholeorpartofthematerialisconcerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseof illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similarordissimilarmethodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped. Theuseofgeneraldescriptivenames,registerednames,trademarks,servicemarks,etc.inthispublication doesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfromtherelevant protectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. The publisher, the authors, and the editorsare safeto assume that the adviceand informationin this bookarebelievedtobetrueandaccurateatthedateofpublication.Neitherthepublishernortheauthorsor theeditorsgiveawarranty,expressedorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinorforany errorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.Thepublisherremainsneutralwithregardtojurisdictional claimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations. ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Acknowledgements We thank the Società Italiana dei Docenti di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale (SIDREA) and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. We also would like to thank Professor Franco Ernesto Rubino for his helpful advice and Dr. Tonia Tassone for the support in researching the data used in the empirical analysis. Finally, a warm thank you to the Springer staff, particularly Rocio Torregrosa, for her great availability and professionalism. This book is published in SIDREA Book Series “Accounting and Business Administration” edited by Springerasaresultofthedouble-blindreviewprocess. v Contents 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 PrinciplesandPracticesofSustainability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1 BusinessEthics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2 CorporateSocialResponsibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3 SustainabilityandSustainableDevelopment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4 CorporateSustainability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5 CircularEconomyandSustainability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3 ESGMeasuresandNon-financialPerformanceReporting. . . . . . . . . 27 1 SustainabilityIndicators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2 TheESGRating. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3 TheMainESGRatingAgencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 4 TheMainESGIndexes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 5 Non-financialPerformanceReporting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 6 TheSocialandEnvironmentalBalance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 7 TheSustainabilityReport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 8 TheIntegratedReport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 9 Directive2014/95/EUandProposalfortheDirectiveCSRD 2021/0104. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . 50 10 TheSustainabilityDisclosureStandards(ISSBStandards). . . . . . . . 51 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4 CorporateSustainabilityandFinancialPerformance. . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 2 LiteratureReviewandResearchHypotheses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 2.1 SustainabilityPerformanceandFinancialPerformance. . . . . . . 61 2.2 SustainabilityPerformanceandFinancialPerformanceinFamily andNonfamilyFirms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 vii viii Contents 2.3 CollegialLeadership. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 3 Methodology. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . 66 3.1 DataCollectionandSample. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.2 DependentVariable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3 IndependentandModeratingVariables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.4 ControlVariables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.5 Model. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 67 4 AnalysisandResults. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 4.1 DescriptiveAnalysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 4.2 HypothesesTesting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5 Discussion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5 FutureResearchDirections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 6 Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 Chapter 1 Introduction Abstract Thispartillustratesthemainthemesdiscussedinthebook.Specifically, the topics developed in the three chapters are reviewed, highlighting the most significant aspects for business administration scholars and the main results that willbeanalyzedindetailinthesectionsofthebook. In recent years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Sustainability (CS)practiceshavebeenatthecenterofadebate.TheincreasedinterestinCSRand CSissueshasnotablyincreasedstudiesintheseareas(Chatterjietal.,2009). ThetermsCSR,Environmental,SocialandGovernment(ESG)andCSareoften used alternatively (Khattak, 2021). The expressions “sustainable development” or “sustainability”(Waasetal.,2011)andCSRandESG,althoughbasedondifferent theories, are considered standard terms in the literature (do Prado et al., 2020). Previous studies have discussed the convergence or autonomy of the two terms CSRandCS(Ashrafietal.,2018).Montiel(2008)reviewsthedifferentdefinitions ofCSRandCSandclarifiesthatthemanagerialliteratureusesthetwotermstorefer to “issues to social and environmental management issues, but there is no clear distinction.” Although there are points of difference between the two constructs, conceptualizationsandmeasuresofCSRandCSseemtoconverge.Boththeaspects share the same vision to balance the economic sphere with the social and environ- mentalone. However, CSscholars argue that economic,social, and environmental factorsareinterrelated,whilearelevantpartoftheempiricalresearchonCSRtreats economic and social performance as independent components. In CSR, environ- mental issues are a subset of social performance, whereas in CS, they represent an independentelement.TheconceptualizationofCSRandthatofthetriplebottomline of CS are very similar. “Both show that companies need to balance the three elements to achieve sustainability and social responsibility results. Both CSR and CSaimtobalanceeconomicprosperity,socialintegrity,andenvironmentalrespon- sibility,regardlessofwhethertheyconceptualizeenvironmentalissuesasasubsetof socialissuesorasthethirdelementofsustainability.” ThispaperwillconsiderthetriplebottomlineandCSRassimilarapproachesto thesamephilosophyofsustainability(doPradoetal.,2020). ©TheAuthor(s),underexclusivelicensetoSpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG2022 1 P.Tenuta,D.R.Cambrea,CorporateSustainability,SIDREASeriesinAccounting andBusinessAdministration,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11491-5_1 2 1 Introduction Inrecent decades, thenotionof CSR hasgiven rise toa competing institutional logicthathasledcompaniestocomplywithrulesotherthanthoserequiredbylawor by the market (Mintzberg, 1983), modifying the role of investors. Investors who traditionally were seen as interested only in profit act as the engine of institutional changetowardsCSR(Huttonetal.,1998). The spread of sustainable and responsible investment (SRI), which requires reliabledataontheESGperformanceofvariouscompanies,changestheinstitutional context for companies, allowing investors to favor socially responsible ones to the detriment of those that are not (Avetisyan & Hockerts, 2017; Hockerts & Moir, 2004).Therequestforaccurateinformation,notonlyfromafinancialpointofview but also from an ESG point of view, has become part of companies’ competitive strategy (Galbreath, 2013). Furthermore, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)haveamacro-approachthatmakestheirapplicationdifficultatthecompany level. All this has led to the proliferation of indexes and ratings that measure sustainability, often expressed in terms of environmental, social and governance (ESG)(Diez-Cañameroetal.,2020). Forthesereasons,itisbecomingincreasinglyessentialforcompaniestomeasure andreportontheirnon-financialperformance. Basedonthesepremises,weanalyzethetheoriesrelatedtotheconceptsofCSR, CS,sustainabledevelopment,andcirculareconomy(CE).Subsequently,weverify thepracticesrelatedtotheratingandtheformationofESGindexesandthetoolsfor reporting non-financial performance and, finally, using the ESG rating of a recog- nized agency, we verify the link between CS and corporate financial performance alsoconcerningthedistinctionbetweenfamilyandnonfamilyfirms. Thebookisdividedintothreechaptersinwhichthetheoreticalaspectsaretreated firstandthenthepracticalimplicationsrelatingtoCSpractices. In the first chapter, we mainly analyze the issues of CSR and CS as they are driving factors of sustainability and general well-being (Moon, 2007; Montiel, 2008), focusing on the concept of circular economy (CE) as a critical element in the transition towards a more sustainable future. The idea of CSR appears to be interconnected with that of sustainable development, as social responsibility is nothing more than the contribution that companies make to sustainable develop- ment.Leadingbusinessestowardssustainabilityrequireachangeinconceivingand measuring one’s performance. “The transition to a circular economy is a step towards sustainability” (Aboulamer, 2018). To do this, it is necessary to think in termsoftriplebottomlines,thatis,toadoptmanagementmethodsaimedatjointly maximizing the three economic, social, and environmental dimensions (Eccles & Krzus, 2010). Millar et al. (2019) believe that the CE approach is central to the debateonsustainabilitypolicy.TheCE,infact,helpstoattainthethreedimensions (economic,social,andenvironmental)ofsustainabledevelopment(Korhonenetal., 2018; Schroeder et al., 2019). CE innovations are seen as a component in compa- nies’ broader attempt to move towards CSR and sustainability (Reif & Rexhäuser, 2018).Forthesereasons,theCEhasgainedincreasingattention(Lieder&Rashid, 2016)andacademicarticlesandpracticalproposalsaroundtheconceptofCEhave increasedsignificantly(Geisendorf&Pietrulla,2018).