AnalyticalandBioanalyticalChemistry(2018)410:5353–5371 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0989-7 REVIEW Consumer-friendly food allergen detection: moving towards smartphone-based immunoassays GeorginaM.S.Ross1&MoniqueG.E.G.Bremer1&MichelW.F.Nielen1,2 Received:29December2017/Revised:14February2018/Accepted:26February2018/Publishedonline:26March2018 #TheAuthor(s)2018 Abstract Inthiscriticalreview,weprovideacomprehensiveoverviewofimmunochemicalfoodallergenassaysanddetectorsinthecontextof theiruser-friendliness,throughtheirconnectiontosmartphones.Smartphone-basedanalysisiscenteredaroundcitizenscience,putting analysisintothehandsoftheconsumer.Foodallergiesrepresentasignificantworldwidehealthconcernandconsumersshouldbeable toanalyzetheirfoods,wheneverandwherevertheyare,forallergenpresence.Owingtotheneedforascientificbackground,traditional laboratory-baseddetectionmethodsaregenerallyunsuitablefortheconsumer.Therefore,itisimportanttodevelopsimple,safe,and rapidassaysthatcanbelinkedwithsmartphonesasdetectorstoimproveuseraccessibility.Smartphonesmakeexcellentdetection systems because of their cameras, embedded flash functions, portability, connectivity, and affordability. Therefore, this review has summarized traditional laboratory-based methods for food allergen detection such as enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay, flow cytometry, and surface plasmon resonance, and the potential to modernize these methods by interfacing them with a smartphone readoutsystem,basedontheaforementionedsmartphonecharacteristics.Thisisthefirstreviewfocusingonsmartphone-basedfood- allergendetectionmethodsdesignedwiththeintentionofbeingconsumer-friendly. Keywords Foodallergen .Immunoassay.Smartphone .Consumer.Multiplex .Citizenscience Abbreviations FC Flowcytometry AA AllergyAmulet FDA FoodandDrugAdministration ABA AllergenBureauofAustraliaandNewZealand FO-SPR Fibreopticsurfaceplasmonresonance ALARA Aslowasreasonablyachievable GPS Globalpositioningsystem CCD Chargecoupleddevice HRP Horseradishperoxidase CIP Cleaninplace Ig Immunoglobulin EC EuropeanCommission LED Lightemittingdiode ELISA Enzymelinkedimmunosorbentassay LFIA Lateralflowimmunoassay FARRP FoodAllergyResearchandResourceProgram LOAEL Lowestobservableadverseeffectlimit MFC Miniaturizedflowcytometry MIP Molecularlyimprintedpolymers PublishedinthetopicalcollectionFoodSafetyAnalysiswithguesteditor NOAEL Noobservableeffectlimit StevenJ.Lehotay. PAL Precautionaryallergenlabelling Electronicsupplementarymaterial Theonlineversionofthisarticle PDMS Polydimethylsiloxane (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0989-7)containssupplementary PoC Point-of-care material,whichisavailabletoauthorizedusers. PPE Personalprotectiveequipment * GeorginaM.S.Ross ppm Partspermillion [email protected] QD Quantumdots ROI Regionofinterest 1 RIKILT,WageningenUniversityandResearch,P.OBox230,6700 (i)SPR (imaging)Surfaceplasmonresonance AEWageningen,TheNetherlands USB Universalserialbus 2 LaboratoryofOrganicChemistry,WageningenUniversity,Helix UV-VIS Ultravioletvisiblespectrophotometry Building124,Stippeng4,6708WEWageningen,TheNetherlands VITAL Voluntaryincidentaltraceallergenlabelling 5354 RossG.M.S.etal. Introduction simpletoperform,linkingtheseteststoasmartdetectorwill make them more accessible for the general public. As the An allergen is a protein capable of eliciting an immune majority of the population already owns a smartphone, with response in sensitized individuals. Food allergies repre- thenumberrising,smartphonesrepresentasourceofanalyti- sent a significant international health problem. calequipmentthatcanreacheventhemostdesolateareasof Worldwide, allergies toward foods affect 2% of the adult theglobe,makingthemidealforsensors[12]. population and 5%–8% of the children population [1, 2]. Smartphonesareidealtouseasdetectorsystemsbecauseof There are many existing methods for food allergen de- theirpowerfulinternalcomputers,opticalsensors,globalpo- tection, which can be split into two general categories: sitioningsystems(GPS),andmostimportantly,theirabilityto protein-based and DNA-based detection. For a general connecttotheinternet,throughBluetoothandWiFi[13–15]. and in-depth explanation on all in-vivo and in-vitro al- Connectivity is a key benefit of smartphones as results can lergen assays, the review by Poms et al. can be referred instantaneously be uploaded to Cloud databases and results to [3]. General and quantitative methods for allergen de- canbedisseminatedasspatio-temporalmapsacrosstheglobe tection have been reviewed by Kirsch et al. and Walker [16].Sincetheirdevelopmentin1992andfirstuseasanalyt- et al. [2, 4]. Additionally, an overview on commercially icaldevicesin2008,smartphoneshavealreadybeenusedas available rapid immuno-analytical allergen detectors has sensors, for light microscopy, single-molecule microscopy, been presented by Schubert-Ulrich et al. [5]. All immu- cell imaging, bacteria detection, colorimetric detection, en- nochemical and DNA-based methods were reviewed by zymelinkedimmunosorbentassay(ELISA),andlateralflow Monaci and Visconti and by Slowianek [6, 7]. Further immunoassays(LFIA),whichexemplifiestheircapabilitiesas discussion into allergen detection methods with a partic- detectors in rapid diagnostics [12, 17–26] . For an in-depth ular focus on proteomic mass-spectrometry has been giv- reviewintoallexistingsmartphone-baseddiagnosticdevices, en by Prado et al. [8]. The most recently published food Quesada-GonzalezandMerkoçicanbereferredto[27].Fora allergen review [9] focused on the use of biosensors for morefocusedreviewconcerningbiosensorsandbioelectron- detection, so only limited attention will be paid to them ics on a smartphone see Zhang and Liu [28]. General ap- in this review. proachestosmartphone-basedfooddiagnosticshavebeenre- Although analytical methods such as mass spectrometry cently reviewed by Rateni et al. [29] and Choi [12], which canprovideawealthofinformationwhenusedcomplemen- addressedthenecessityandmarket-gapforuser-friendlyfood tarilywithimmuno-methods;currentallergenanalysistrends detection. This is particularly important in the field of food aremovingawayfromlabmethodsandtowardpoint-of-care allergenanalysiswheredetectionmethodsmustbeconsumer- diagnostics(PoC)andacitizenscienceapproach[10].Point- friendly so that the allergic individuals can apply analysis of-carediagnosticsallowinstanton-sitetestingforfoodaller- themselvesinthecomfortoftheirhomeand/oratarestaurant. gens by individuals, whilst citizen science centers around The present review specifically focuses on how successful consumer-friendly devices thatallow users tocarry out their lab-based methods can be based on smartphones to enable ownPoCallergenanalysis.Itisofparticularimportancethat consumer-friendlyallergendetection. foodallergendetectiondevicesareconsumer-friendlyasaller- Up until now, the literature has lacked specific focus on gic individuals will need to carry out testing at home or in consumer-friendly food allergen detection devices. To that restaurants prior to eating. Many allergic individuals suffer end,literaturehasbeenreviewedfromtheperiodof2002to from more than one food allergy, due to cross-reactivity, the end of 2017 using the SciFinder, Scholar, Scopus, and whereantibodiesagainstoneallergenrecognizeastructurally WebofSciencedatabasesandkeywordssuchas:foodaller- relatedepitopeofanothersimilarallergen[11].Owingtoal- gen, detection, smartphone or cell phone, multiplex, lateral lergensbeingcross-reactive,itisnecessarytodevelopmulti- flow, immunoassay, cross-flow, microfluidics, strip reader, plexdevicesthatcandetectarangeofallergenswithinasingle and ELISA. Section 1 of the review will provide a general sample, saving time and money and making sure that the backgroundoffoodallergensandthelegislationsthatcontrol consumersareconfidentthattheirfooddoesnotcontainany thelabellingprocedures.Thestudywillthendiscussthecon- undesiredallergens.Forthepurposeofthisreview,aconsum- ceptofconsumerfriendlinessinSection2.InSection3there ercanbeconsideredastheend-useroftheassay/detector,and willbefocusontraditionallaboratory-basedmethodsforfood thusthetermsconsumeranduserareusedsynonymously.The allergenanalysisandhowthesemethodscouldimprovetheir authors define consumer friendly to mean that any adult of consumerfriendlinessthroughcouplingtoasmartphoneasa averageintelligencewouldbeabletoperformtheassaysafely detector.Section4willdiscussassays/devicesthathavebeen andeffectivelywithminimalinstruction.Onewayofmaking designed with the intention of being consumer-friendly, in- allergentestingmoreuser-friendlyistolinktheassayswitha cluding commercial consumer-friendly allergen detectors. smart-detectorsuchas:asmartphone,tablet,orwearablede- Finally, the conclusion will summarize the findings of the vice.Althoughsomeoftheexistingallergenassayformatsare review. Consumer-friendlyfoodallergendetection:movingtowardssmartphone-basedimmunoassays 5355 Background on food allergens of. Many traditional allergen analysis methods use environ- mentally harmful reagents, which contain additives that im- Typesoffoodallergens Table1 Themainallergenicproteinsinfoodswithinthe‘Big8’plus ‘gluten’ Food allergies can be debilitating, and food requires proper monitoringtoensuresensitizedindividualsarenotexposedto Food Majorallergenicprotein Reference allergens.Symptomsoffoodallergycaninclude:itching,di- Cow’sMilk B-lactoglobulin(Bosd5) [34] arrhoea,stomachpains,eczema,shortnessofbreathaswellas Casein(Bosd8) [35] more significant effects such as loss of consciousness and α-lactalbumin(Bosd4) [36] anaphylactic shock, which can be fatal [30]. The prevalence Egg Ovomucoid(Gald1) [37] of food allergies is increasing, but awareness of allergies is Ovalbumin(Gald2) [37] growing even faster with dedicated events such as ‘Food Ovotransferrin(Gald3) [38] Allergy Awareness Week’ in the USA [31]. The Codex Lysozyme(Gald4) [39] AlimentariusStandardlistedeightallergenswithinternational α-livetin(Gald5) [40] variants, which require mandatory labelling [32]. These are Crustacean Tropomyosin(Pena1) [41] referredtoastheBig8andconsistof:peanuts,tree-nuts,milk, Fish Β-parvalbumin(Lepw1;Pon [42] eggs,fish,crustacean,soya,andwheat[33].Wheatcontainsa 14;Pon17;Sebm1;Xipg1) varietyofproteinsthathavebeenimplicatedasallergens(see Peanut Arah1 [43] Table 1). In addition to wheat allergy, other wheat-related Arah2 [44] disorders include the autoimmune disorder, celiac disease. Arah3 [45] Celiac disease is triggered by gluten, a protein mixture of Arahh4-9 [46] prolamins and glutelins, which can be found in wheat, rye, Treenuts barley,andtheircross-breeds[58].Allergicreactionsarepro- Hazelnut Cora1;Cora2;Cora8;Cora9; [47] vokedbymanydifferentproteinswithintheallergenicfoods. Cora11;Cora12;Cora13;Cora14 Those allergenic proteins which have been repeatedly refer- Brazilnut Bere1;Bere2 [48] enced in the literature and databases (e.g., allergen.org) as Cashew Anao1;Anao2;Anao3 [49] causing an allergic reaction in the majority of sensitised Almond Prudu3;Prudu4;Prudu5;Prudu6 [50] individualsaredescribedinTable1below. Walnut(Black) Jugn1;Jugn2;Jugn4 [42] Allergenic proteins can result in hypersensitivity of the Walnut Jugr1-6 [42] immunesystem,arbitratedbyallergen-specificimmunoglob- (English) Pecan Cari1;Cari2;Cari4 [42] ulin E (IgE) (type I allergies); but allergies can also be cell- Pistachio Pisv1;Pisv2;Pisv3;Pisv4;Pisv5 [42] mediated (non-IgE) (type II allergies) [9, 59]. Disruption of Soybean GlymBd30K [51] the structure of allergens by food processing can lead to an GlymBd60K [52] increaseordecreaseintheirimmunogenicity,alteringhowan GlymBd28K [52] allergicindividualmightreacttotheprotein[60].Themodi- Wheat Tria12 [53,54] ficationofallergenicproteinsisdependentontheprocessing Tria14 [53,55] procedureapplied.Forexample,byhydrolyzingorthermally treatinganallergen,thestructureisaltered,whichcanresultin Tria18 [53,56] either a reduction in immunogenicity of the allergen, or the Tria25 [53,56, 57] formationofaneo-allergen.Themethodusedforprocessinga Gluten* Gluten(Tria26&Tria36) [42,53] food will affect the extractability of the allergens from their Gliadin(Tria19&Tria20) [42,53] matrix[61].Whenextractinggluten,forexample,itiscrucial to have a homogenized sample so that particulates can be *Althoughnotanallergen,glutenhasbeenincludedinthistabletoshow extracted. As ethanol-based extractions result in the incom- the toxic portion of the protein responsible for gluten’s autoimmune pleteextractionofgluten,itisdesirabletouseacocktailex- effects. traction solution that contains a reducing agent and alcohol, whichiscapableofextractingmonomericandpolymericpro- proveallergensolubility/extractabilityandreducebackground teinsfromgluten[62–64].Extractionprocedureshavebeena interference from the food matrix [66]. It is desirable to use detriment in the past, where hazardous and environmentally eco-friendly extraction buffers, but these must first be com- damagingextractionsolutionssuchas2-mercaptoethanol(2- pared and validated against traditional buffers to ensure that ME) have been applied in food allergen extraction [65]. In theyareaseffectiveinallergenextraction. order to step toward consumer-friendliness it is necessary to Allassaysanddetectorsneedtobeeffectivelyvalidatedby haveextractionbuffersthataresafetouseandeasytodispose standardizedprocedures.Certifiedreferencematerialsinraw 5356 RossG.M.S.etal. andprocessedfoodsneedtobedevelopedforfoodallergens contamination, that pose the biggest risk to the consumer as well as reference methods for allergen analysis [67, 68]. [76].TheEUdoesnotcurrentlyprovideguidanceonlabelling Currentlackofstandardizedreferencematerialsforallergens for allergens that may have unintentionally been introduced in foods means that there is a lack of consistency between intotheproductviasharedfacilities[72]. differentallergendetectionmethodsaseachtestkitiscalibrat- edinadifferentway.Referencematerialsarecriticalforqual- Precautionarylabellingandthresholds ityassuranceofallergendetectionmethods,buttheirproduc- tion is complicated in food allergen analysis owing to the TheEUhasazerotolerancepolicyforallergenlabelling,and changes in allergen protein structure during food processing anyfoodslistedinthelegislation(seeESMTableS1)mustbe procedures[6].Whenstandardizedreferencematerialsarede- statedonthe foodpackagingwhentheyareusedasingredi- veloped, they should be based on a whole protein extract as entsorprocessingaidsinthefood.However,theEUhasno allergens are a mixture of non-defined proteins in complex obligationtolabelanyallergensthatarenotpartoftherecipe matrices [69]. Having a set of standards for allergen testing and may have accidentally been introduced by cross- deviceswillensurethateffectiveandsmartdetectiondevices contamination[67].Somecountrieshavesetthresholdlevels, canbecreated,validated,andbenchmarkedagainsteachoth- andanyfoodcontainingallergensabovethoselevelsrequire er, allowing consumer science to be achieved by providing labelling.Forexample,inJapan,anyfoodscontaininganyof individuals with personalized smart-detection platforms for the legislated allergens (see ESM Table S1) above 10 ppm foodallergens. mustbedeclaredonthepackaging,meaningthatthemajority of the allergic population are protected from exposure [70]. Worldwidelegislationandmandatorylabelling However,duetoindividualdifferencesinsensitivitiestoaller- gens, having such a low labelling threshold may further re- Worldwide,dietarydifferencesandtheBig8influencewhich strict the diet of individuals who are less sensitive to those allergensrequiremandatorylabelling.Somecountriesinclude allergens.Switzerlandhastakenanalternative approach,not additionalmandatoryandrecommendedallergensforlabelling mandating allergen labelling for any product containing less depending on the staple diet of that particular country [70]. than1000ppm ofallergen [77].TheSwiss approachcan be Despiteworldwidecommunication,significantvarianceexists detrimental to the allergic individual, with many people indifferentcountries’regulatorylabellingframework.Thiscan experiencingallergicreactionsatlevelsfarlowerthan1g/kg beproblematicduetothehighpercentageofinternationalfood forparticularallergens[78].TheSwissallergenlabellingleg- tradeandindividualpeople’stravellingpatterns[71]. islationilluminatestherequirementforconsumerstobeable The European Commission (EC) produced legislation in totesttheirownfoodsforallergenpresencesothattheydonot 2003 (Directive 2003/89/EC) covering a list of 14 allergens havetosolelyrelyonlabellinglegislations. thatrequiremandatorylabelling;thelegislationiscommonly In addition, it is also common practice for food manufac- referredtoastheBallergen-labelling-directive^[72].Ifaman- turerstoincludeprecautionaryallergenlabelling(PAL)ontheir ufacturer uses any of the allergens listed, it must be stated, foodsforprotectionagainstunintentionalpresenceofallergens. with clear labelling, on the packaging [73]. This is a crucial ThereisalackofconsistencyinthewordingofPAL,whichcan amendment,aslabellingofthepresenceofallergenicingredi- be confusing to the allergic consumer and reduces the con- ents is currently the only way allergic individuals can effec- sumer’s ability to make informed food choices [68]. Labels tivelymaintainstrictavoidancediets[74].Properlabellingof such as Bmay contain nuts^ are used if there is any risk the allergensiscrucialasitinformsconsumerswhatproductsare product may have come into contact with an allergen [77]. safetoeat.In2014,theEURegulationamendment1169/2011 Food manufacturing companies have highlighted their desire came officially into effect. This amendment stipulated that forstandardisedPALonfoodpackagingtoavoidmisinterpre- evennon-prepackagedfoodsrequireallergenlabelling,mean- tation [79]. Although advisory labelling is well-intentioned, ing in practice that all food retailers must provide allergen excessiveuseofwarningscanleadtoindividualstakingrisks information [72, 75]. Food manufacturers and retailers are with what they eat by ignoring the labels [80–82]. Currently, responsible for the proper labelling of their products; when most countries’ PAL is not on threshold-based criteria, and anallergenhasbeenlabelled,itthenbecomestheconsumer’s manufacturersincludelabelsforanypotentialallergen. responsibility to avoid this food [68]. As a large amount of Thereisanevidentrequirementforthreshold-basedaction food allergic reactions happen to individuals when they are levels,toproperlyassesstheriskofanunintentionalallergen abroad,itisvitalthatconsumersareawareofthedifferences beingintroducedtoafood,andtoestablishwhenandwhere in which allergens require labelling in other countries (see advisory labelling is necessary and beneficial to the allergic Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM) Table S1). consumer. These action levels should be science-based. However,itisundeclaredfoodallergensthatareaccidentally Clinical information regarding minimum eliciting doses has introduced into non-allergenic foods, through cross- been translated into lowest-observed adverse effect levels Consumer-friendlyfoodallergendetection:movingtowardssmartphone-basedimmunoassays 5357 (LOAEL) and no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) Criteriaforconsumer-friendliness [78,83,84].DevelopingeffectivethresholdsusingLOAELs isasafetyassessment-basedapproachthatprotectsthemajor- Astheworldmovestowardspersonalizedtestinganddiagno- ity of the allergic population. The Allergen Bureau of sis,theneedforuser-friendlydevicesbecomesmoreapparent. AustraliaandNewZealand(ABA)isagloballeaderinregu- Whilstmanyproductsclaimtobe‘fortheconsumer’,inreality lationoflabellingandhasalreadyestablishedvoluntarylabel- onlyalowpercentageofthesedevicesactuallyare.Itisuseful ling thresholds for the major allergens, based on LOAELs, to consider the parameters that make an assay usable for the which protect 95% of allergic population from severe reac- generalpopulation.Recently,stakeholderguidanceintothede- tions[82,85].VoluntaryIncidentalTraceAllergenLabelling velopment of consumer-orientated allergen analytical devices (VITAL)aimstolimittheuseofexcessive,unnecessaryPAL hashighlightedtheneedforstandardizationofinstructionsfor infoods;andhasalsoincorporatedreferencedoseinformation assayuseandfortransparencyinvalidationproceduresincon- intotheLOAELactionlevelsforallergenlabelling[82,86]. sumerassays[95].Foratrulyuser-friendlyassay,themajority ThereferencedoseinVITALisdefinedasmilligramsoftotal oftheadultpopulationshouldbeabletoperformitsuccessful- protein from an allergenic food from which only the most ly;usingthedeviceshouldbeself-explanatoryorrequiremin- sensitiveindividualwouldbelikelytoexperienceanadverse imalinstruction.Whenlinkinganassaytoasmartphoneappit reaction[87].Iftheindividualreferencedoseisexceededinan is possible to include safety information and instructions for unlabelledfood,VITALrecommendsprecautionarylabelling applicationwithintheapp,limitingtheneedforaninstruction [67].In2011,ascientificexpertcommitteeincludingthefood manual.Alongsidebeingeasy-to-use,theassayshouldbesafe allergy research and resource program (FARRP), revised and not contain toxic chemicals; it should also not be able to VITALtodevelopVITAL2.0,whichusesactionlevelsbased staintheuser/damageclothingandthereforeshouldnotrequire on reference doses [88]. The action levels provide a clear theuseofpersonalprotectiveequipment(PPE).Thereshould indication on when Bmay contain^ labelling should be ap- benotoxicwasteproduced,andpreferablytheassayshouldbe plied. Despite Australia and New Zealand being at the fore- environmentally friendly and recyclable; there should be in- front ofallergen labelling regulation, further implementation structions on how to dispose any waste that does come from andstandardizationinPALisrequired[85]. theassay[95]. Regardless of dedicated labelling procedures, presence of The assay/detector should require minimal external equip- undeclaredallergensstillremainsthegreatestcauseforfood- ment.Byhavingtousescientificequipmentsuchasprecision basedrecallsglobally[31,89].Largescalerecallscanhavea pipettesandcentrifuges,themanufacturerintroducestheneed significant socio-economic burden on a country [90]. The forfurthertraining/explanationtonegatehumanerror.Inaddi- Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) is a tion, requiring basic laboratory skills (such as pipetting), pre- Europeanfoodsafetyriskassessmentsystemthathasexperi- vents individuals with no scientific background from being enced an increased volume of notifications regarding unde- abletousethedevice.Externalequipmentincreasestheoverall clared allergens in recent years [91]. When an allergen has cost of the assay, and affordability is a prerequisite for user- beenmislabelled,itmustbereportedtothecompetentauthor- friendlyassays.Pre-containingreagentswithintheassayelim- ity as well as recalled in the notifying country and then inates pipetting steps and allows waste to be minimized and RASFF issuesanalert informing thatthe product containsa costreduced.Astheconsumercannotrelysolelyonthevisual mislabelled allergen [92]. It is an option to notify RASFF readoutofascreeningassay,anothermajorcostinmanyassays aboutallergensthatmayhavebeenunintentionallyintroduced istherequirementforaspecializeddetector/reader[95].Next- into a product by cross-contamination; however, this is not generation citizen science detectors such as smartphones re- mandatoryasitisnotregulatedbytheEU.Riskcommunica- duce cost significantly, as most people already own at least tionisexpectedwithinthefoodindustry,butitisnotmanda- onesmartphone.Oftentheassaycanbeperformedwithrelative tory, so providing the industry with sensitive tests that can ease(e.g.,LFIA)butitistheresultinterpretation,suchasdif- detectallergensatconcentrationsaslowasreasonablyachiev- ferentiatingbetweenlighteranddarkerlines,whichisdifficult able (ALARA) is the best way to ensure that unintentional for the consumer and can be negatively affected by personal allergenpresenceinfoodismonitored.Inorderforconsumers bias.Ingeneral,LFIAreadersareexpensiveandarenotsome- tobeentirelyconfidentthattheirfoodisfreefromallergens,it thingthatconsumerswouldownandcarryaroundwiththem, is necessary to manufacture easy to use assays to detect un- whereassmartphonesareuniversallypresentacrosstheglobe. wanted allergen presence so that consumers do not have to Thesmartphoneasareadoutsystemmakesmostassaysmore relyonrecallornotificationdatatomaintaintheiravoidance consumer-friendlyasthemajorityofpeopleareaccustomedto diets [93, 94]. A consumer-friendly allergen test that can be using smartphone applications. A significant benefit of using basedona smart-detector could provideconsistent,essential thesmartphoneisthattheresultscanbeinstantlyuploadedto informationfortheallergicindividual,regardlessofthequal- Cloud databases/sent to relevant stakeholders, which can be ityofproductlabelling. particularly useful for remote quality control. Conversely, it 5358 RossG.M.S.etal. shouldbeconsideredthatwhenusingasmartphone-basedan- It is critical for user-friendly assays to be reproducible so alytical device in a low resource setting, the wireless system thatthe userisconfidentinthe result.Inorder for thistobe maysufferwithlowconnectivity,andsothesmartphoneappli- achieved, assays should be validated by intra- and inter- cationmustbeabletosupportasynchronousdatatransmission laboratory testing and benchmarked against successful com- [12]. Linking an assay to a smartphone detector goes a long mercialallergenassays.Bypropervalidation,thereliabilityof wayinmakingtheassaymoreportable.Portabilitymeansthat the assay can be proved and consumer confidence can be the assay can be taken anywhere and applied under in-field attained.Poppingetal.suggestthatconsumerdevicesshould conditions,suchasinarestaurant. firstgothrough single laboratoryvalidation, followedbyin- Anotherkeycomponentofauser-friendlydeviceisthatit dependentlaboratoryvalidationandproficiencytestinginpar- shouldprovideresultsquickly.Consumersdonotwanttowait allel, including being tested by untrained personnel/ for extended periods for results, so rapid tests are desirable. consumers[95].Itwouldimprovetheaffordabilityoftheas- The assay should provide results as quickly as reasonably sayiftheassaywerereusablesuchaswhenusingaSPRchip; possible without compromising the sensitivity or reliability however,iftheassaycannotbereused(LFIA)thesmartphone of the test. The speed of an assay can be optimized by first attachmentandappshouldbeabletobereusedforanumber carryingoutdetailedkineticsstudiestoselectantibodieswith ofcyclesandtheassayshouldberecyclable.Theidealdevice rapid association rates and high affinities to the allergen of forconsumerswouldthereforebe:easytouse,safe,recycla- interest, for use in the assay. The reaction rate can also be ble, affordable, a smartphone-based detector or other smart increased byproperorientation ofthe antibodies, so that the device with connectivity possibilities, portable, rapid, sensi- relevant binding sites are directed away from the surface, tive, multiplexed where appropriate, and properly validated wheretheycanbetterinteractwiththetargets.Assayscanbe andbenchmarked. further sped up by using internal microfluidics, which also limits the necessity for excessive sample handling/ preparationasmixingcanbeachievedinthefluidicssystem. Methods for food allergen detection using Microfluidicsoftenincreasethespeedoftheassayasmixing, a smartphone readout system pumping, and directional flow can be carried out at precise locations in the assay itself, limiting the need for operator Immunochemicalmethodsforallergendetectionfocusaround interaction [96]. Proper mixing can also speed up the assay the complementary interaction of an allergen-specific anti- by increasing the rate of diffusion of the sample. The assay body and an allergen. An overview of commercial shouldnot havesignificant cross-reactivitywithdifferental- laboratory-based allergen assays is provided in ESM lergens,sothatuserscanbecertainthattheirresultsarecor- Table S3. Lab-based methods are highly sensitive, selective, rect. Proper characterization of antibodies ensures that the and accurate. However, lab-based methods require trained assayisselectivefor thetargetallergen.Inadditiontobeing personnel, scientific knowledge, and often expensive equip- selective, the assay should be sensitive and able to detect ment. By linking traditional lab-based methods with a allergensattheirLOAEL. smartphonereadout system, theybecomemoreuser-accessi- Multiplexingallowsmultipleallergenstobedetectedina ble.A comparisonoflab-and smartphone-basedmethods is singlesample,whichisdesirable,savingtimeand moneyin giveninESMTableS4.Themostpopularopticalapproachto comparison with using several singleplex assays [97]. smartphonedetectorsisbasedoncolorimetricreactionssuch Furthermore, a proportion of the allergic population suffers as in LFIA or ELISA [28]. Colorimetric smartphone-based frommorethanoneallergy,duetocross-reactivitywithsim- sensing conventionally reliesonthe phone’s complementary ilarlystructuredallergens,soitisattractivetotestmorethan metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) filters to assign red, oneallergenatatime[96–99].Anindividualwhosuffersfrom green, blue (RGB) values to light. Therefore, smartphone- multipleallergiesshouldbeabletotestforallofthemusinga basedsensorsareabletodetectchangesinopticaldensityor singular device. As allergens are structurally different pro- intensityofanalyte–reagentcomplexesoverarangeofwave- teins,theymayrequiredifferentextractionprocedures;when lengths[12].Themajorityofthepopulationhasandisfamiliar testing formultipleallergenstheextractionbufferwilllikely with smartphones, so interfacing a scientific method with a beacompromisebetweenmaximumextractionefficiencyand simplesmartphoneappimprovesconsumerfriendliness. the ability to co-extract different allergens from the matrix. Truly personalized allergen testing where consumers select Lateralflowimmunoassays theallergenpaneltheywantincludedintheassaywouldcome at an expense, but this could be lowered if companies start Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) are immuno-chromato- including more allergens in multiplex assays. The current graphic test strips designed to be easy to use, as has proof-of-concept allergen multiplex assays are displayed in been exemplified by their success as pregnancy tests [100]. ESMTableS2. Many food manufacturers utilize LFIA to test their clean-in- Consumer-friendlyfoodallergendetection:movingtowardssmartphone-basedimmunoassays 5359 place(CIP)proceduresandtoensurethattheirproductionlines to-use, safe, affordable, portable, rapid, sensitive, and can be are free from allergens. Cross-contamination can be monitored quantitative when linked with a dipstick reader such as a forinstanceusingLab-2-go,auser-friendlytesttoolkitdeveloped smartphone. byZeulab(Zaragoza,Spain)toprovegoodmanufacturingprac- tice(GMP)[101].ThestandardcomponentsofaLFIAare:the Smartphonelateralflowimmunoassayreaders samplefilterpad,theconjugatepad,themembrane,theabsorp- tionpad,andthetest/controllines[102]. AlthoughLFIAresultscanbevisuallydetectedwiththenaked Ina sandwichformatLFIA, the conjugate pad containsa eye,byintegratingLFIAwithasmartphonedetectorsystem,a pre-sprayedantibodythatisspecifictotheallergenofinterest. quantitativeresultcanbeachieved.Owingtotheirsimplestruc- Thisspecificantibodyislabelledwithcoloredorfluorescent ture,LFIAsarefairlysimpletointerfacewithsmartphones,asthe moieties. The test line contains an immobilized allergen- results can be easily detected via the phone’s camera. specific antibody, which binds to a different epitope on the Smartphone dipstick readers can be categorized based on their allergenthanthelabelledantibody.Thecontrollinecontains lightsource;somerelyonLEDastheexternallightsourcewhilst an antibody raised against the animal species of the labelled othersutilizetheinternalflashinthephone. antibody. When a sample containing the target allergen is Mudanyali et al. described a smartphone readout system added to the sample pad, the target binds with the labelled termedrapiddiagnostictestreader(RDS)[25].Thereaderis antibody in the conjugate pad, forming a labelled complex. madeupofa3D-printed65gmechanicalattachment,which Thelabelledcomplexflowsviacapillaryaction,drivenbythe consists of: a LFIA strip holder, an inexpensive lens, three absorptionpad,laterallyupthemembrane.Whenthetestline LEDs,andthreeAAAbatteries.Thedevicecapturedimages is reached, the complex is captured by the immobilized oftheLFIA,whichweredigitallyprocessedwithintherelated allergen-specific antibody. The target analyte is sandwiched smartphone app. The linked central database received and between the labelled and the captured antibodies, which re- stored the processed results in a world map through geo- sultsintheappearanceofacoloredlineinthetestregion.The timestamping. This devicewas validatedbyusing commer- remaininglabelledantibodybindswiththeimmobilizedanti- cially available malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV LFIA [25]. speciesantibodyatthecontrolline,resultingintheappearance Another example applying LED as an external light source ofasecondcoloredlineinthisregion.Inasandwichassay,the was described by Lee et al. for using a smartphone-based color intensity of the test line is directly proportional to the readoutsystemintegratedwithaLFIAreaderforthedetection concentrationofthetargetallergeninthesample.Whilstthe of aflatoxin B1 [23]. The device described a LFIA reader test line informs the user of the relative concentration of the consisting of: a close-up lens, white LEDs, and batteries. A allergeninthesample,thecontrollineprovesthattheassayis smartphonecamerawaspositionedoverthelensoftheLFIA functioningcorrectly. readerwherethecamerarecordedimagesoftheopticalden- sityoftheLFIAtestandcontrollines.Leeetal.furtherrefined Multiplexdipsticktests this LED-based format of LFIA reader and smartphone app forimagecaptureanddataacquisitionforSalmonelladetec- Lateral flow immunoassays can also be multiplexed through tion [24]. This format of LFIA strip readers utilize LEDs as theadditionofmultipletestlines.Eachtestlinecorrespondsto lightsources,whichrequiresexternalbatterypacksforpower. the target analytes to be detected [103]. Detecting a range of Another format of smartphone LFIA readers utilizes the allergensinasampleisattractiveasitreducesanalysistimeand smartphone’s embedded camera flash as the light source. reagent waste, as multiple analytes can be assessed under the Oncescu et al. developed a smartphone readout system for same conditions. Structures other than simple strip tests can thecolorimetricdetectionofchangesofpHinsweatandsaliva alsobeappliedinmultiplexing.Fentonetal.haveshownthat [106].Thedeviceuseda3Dprintedphonecase,whichhoused two-dimensionalshapingofcapillarydrivenmembraneassays aslotfortheindicatorpHstrip,areferencestrip,androomto intocandelabraorotherstructurescanimprovethespatialdis- store up to six spare pH test strips. The attachment applied criminationoftheassay[104].Assaysfordifferentanalytescan PDMSlightdiffuserstoallowreproducibleilluminationfrom be positioned on separate arms of the device, which can be thecameraflash.ThestripswerephotographedandtheRGB directlylabelledtominimizeuserconfusion.Currently,much (red,green,blue)valueswereanalyzedandconvertedtoahue of the attention of multiplex flow assays has been focused spectrum. Hue moreappropriately fitsthe range of color for towards mycotoxin analysis [105]. It is expected that future pHstrips.Inanotherstudy,Oncescuetal.advancedtheuseof research will focus on incorporating multiplex into the food theinternalflashofaphonecameraforreadingofLFIAfor allergen field in order to make food allergen analysis more cholesterol testing [107]. This device is referred to as the user-friendly. When multiplex dipsticks are constructed for smartCARDanditmonitorsthecolorimetricchangeresulting food allergens, they should be designed to fit the criteria of from a cholesterol enzymatic interaction on a test strip. The consumer-friendliness. Lateral flow immunoassays are easy- phoneflashandcameraarethenusedtorecordimagesofthe 5360 RossG.M.S.etal. colorimetricreaction,whichisthendigitallyprocessedinthe ELISA relatedapp.Theattachmenthasaslotfortheteststripanda PDMS light diffuser. The device converts recorded RGB Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) is the most values to hue, luminosity, and saturation values within the routinelyusedmethodofallergenanalysisinthefoodindustry appandiscapableofquantifyingcholesteroloverallphysio- [5,114].CommerciallyavailableallergenELISAsarelistedin logicalvalues[106,107].Afurtherexampleofanembedded ESMTableS3.ELISAsexistinbothcompetitiveformat(suit- flash-based LFIA smartphone reader for screening thyroid ableforlowmolecularweightproteins)andsandwichformat, stimulating hormone (TSH) was described by You et al. which is the prominent choice for food allergens [83]. Both [108].Thisdeviceusedanopto-mechanical3Dprintedattach- formatsofELISAarebasedontheinteractionofanenzyme ment that directed the light from the phone camera, via an labelled allergen-specific antibody with an antigen. An anti- optical fiber, to a collimating lens to illuminate the LFIA. bodyislabelledwithanenzyme,whichinitiatesameasurable The study emphasized the importance of minimizing the colorimetric change upon the addition of the substrate. The Mie scattering of the nitrocellulose membrane particles and reactionismeasuredbyanELISAplatereader[115].Insand- maximisingtheRaleighscatteringofthegoldnanoparticlesof wichELISA,themeasuredresponseisdirectlyproportionalto the test/control lines, increasing the signal in these regions. the concentration of allergen in the sample. Owing to the The improved signal to noise ratio allowed a very sensitive laboratory-basednatureofELISA,whichinvolvesfollowing LODtobeachievedwiththisreadoutsystem.Althoughthese astandardoperatingprocedureandtechnicalinstructions,the examples have not yet been applied to allergen testing, the requirementforscientificequipment/trainedpersonnelandthe technologycouldeasilybetranslatedforallergenanalysis. longincubationsteps,ELISAcannotbeconsideredconsumer- Commercial companies are now finding ways to advance friendly [116]. Nevertheless, a few smartphone interfaces their traditional LFIAs by interfacing them with smartphone havebeendesignedforuseinresourcelimitedsettings. technology. R-Biopharm’s (Darmstadt, Germany) RIDA QUICK lateral flow assays are compatible with the RIDA Smartphone96-wellmicroplatereaders SMARTApp, which acts as an embedded flash smartphone- based lateral flow strip reader. Currently, the mycotoxin strip Microplate readers are one of the most used instruments in test range has been converted for use with the app but it is routineimmunochemicalanalysis.However,theyarerelative- expected that soon all RIDA QUICK assays (including the lyexpensive,requiremaintenance,andarenon-portable,mak- extensive allergen range) will be compatible with the app ingtheminaccessibleforin-fieldtesting[117].Itispossibleto [109]. Once a sample has been tested with the LFIA, a strip create smartphone-based spectrophotometers using the cover withthecolorcalibrationrequiredbytheapptodistin- smartphonecamera[25,117–119].Ina2016study,Fuetal. guishthedifferencesintest/controllineintensity,isplacedover describedthedevelopmentofasmartphone-basedmicroplate thestrip.Thestripandcoverareplacedinacardboardenclo- reader capable of detecting biomarkers in the absorbance sure;thisboxistocontrolambientlightconditionsandensure range of 340–680 nm [120, 121]. This research relied upon that consistent results are achievable. The app uses the establishedcommercialELISAandcomparedtheresultswith smartphonecameratocaptureaphotoofthestrip.Theresults microplatereaderSynergyH1HybridMulti-modeMicroplate areautomaticallystoredwithintheappdatabase/andorcanbe Reader(BioTekInstruments;Winooski,VT,USA)forvalida- exportedto e-mail orprinted viaa WiFi connected/Bluetooth tion. Once the assay was complete, the 96-well plate was printer.Themajorbenefitoftheappistheabilitytoquantify introducedtothesmartphone-basedmicroplatereader,which results; however, when testing for food allergens, a semi- wasattachedtothecameraofthesmartphone.Therelatedapp quantitative result would be sufficient as there are currently storescalibrationcurvesthatconvertthetransmittedlightin- no set threshold levels for allergens EU legislation. Although tensity to absorbance values and then to analyte concentra- the company also makes quantitative readers, using a tions[120].Theresultsobtainedwereslightlylowerthanwith smartphone is significantly more affordable and user-friendly thecommercialmicroplatereader. forthegeneralconsumer.Amajorlimitationforthisset-upis AnotherexamplewasdescribedbyBergetal.fromOzcan’s thatitiscurrentlyonlysuitableforusewiththeAndroidplat- groupofUniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles(UCLA),which form (5.1-8.0 OS) and on a limited number of smartphone describes a microplate reader based on a Windows phone models(GoogleNEXUS6,NEXUS6P,andPixelXL)[109]. (Lumia 1020, Nokia) with 3D printed attachment and a data Lateral flow fits the criteria of being affordable, portable, processorconnectedtotheCloud[117].Thecolorimetricreader disposable,andrapid.Thepopularityofusingsmartphonesas useda3Dprintedopto-mechanicalattachmentwithalightemit- LFIAreadershasalsobeenhighlightedbycommercialcom- tingdiode(LED)toilluminate96-wellplates.Thelightfromthe panies, such as Novarum and Mobile Assay, which develop LEDistransmittedthrough96individualopticalfibersthatre- bespokesmartphoneappsforthereadingofestablishedLFIAs direct the light to a collection lens, which then transmits the [110–113]. capturedimagesofthesamplestothecustom-designedappfor Consumer-friendlyfoodallergendetection:movingtowardssmartphone-basedimmunoassays 5361 signalreading.Theprocessingalgorithmfocusesonfindingtwo appthatconvertstransmissionimagesreceivedfromthecam- centroids to use as references in the 96-well plate and pixel era torelativeabsorptionvalues,whichcanberelatedtothe intensitythresholdingtoseparatewellsforindependentanalysis. concentrationofallergenpresentwithinthesample[122].The The device was successful and was able to match the perfor- attachment weighs around 40 g and is made up of: a plano- mance of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved convexlens,twoLEDs,twolightdiffusers,andcircularaper- microplatereader[117]. tures to allow control of the field of view. Once the peanut The use of smartphones as microplate readers will make assayhasbeenperformed,transmissionintensitiesarerecord- ELISAtechnologiesmoreaccessible;bymakingthemporta- edusingthesmartphonecamera,andtheimagesaredigitally ble,abletoconnecttoWiFi,anduploadresultstotheCloudin processed. The digital processing in the app occurs by real-time. This adaptation will be significantly beneficial in converting the transmission images of the light through the low resource settings such as in developing countries. As testtubesintobinarymaskimages.Thedetectorissemi-quan- ELISA requires multiple reagent handling steps, it is neces- titative, giving a positive signal for samples containing over saryfortheusertobeabletoutilizeapipette.Longincubation 1 ppm peanut and negative results for lower concentrations. steps and multiple washing steps prevent the method from Anotherexampleofasingle-strip3Dprintedsmartphonemi- beingconsumer-friendly.Evenifasmartphoneapphadastep croplatereaderwassuccessfullyexploredbyWangetal.for bystepguideshowingwhichreagentstouseateachinterval, the detection of herbicide 2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, the method would still not be that consumer-friendly. The which further clarifies that in some situations only a limited detectionmethodonthesmartphoneis,however,moreuser- number of samples require analysis [119]. Like most friendly in the sense that it is affordable, portable, and can smartphone-basedanalyticaldevices,theiTubehastheability connectwirelesslysoitissuitableforin-fieldconditions. touploadresultstoserversthroughitsapp.Thismeansthata personalizedallergentestingdatabasecanbeconstructedand users can monitor tests they have carried out on different Smartphone8-wellstripmicroplatereader foods,invariedlocations,creatingaspatio-temporalallergen map.Usinganonymized‘bigdata’inthiswaynotonlyassists Insomescenarios,theusermayonlywanttoanalyzeasmall allergic sufferers, but also helps those involved in food numberofsamplesratherthanawhole96-wellplate;inthese manufacturing,productdesign,andofficialregulatorstobet- circumstances a smartphone detector that analyzes a strip of terunderstandallergensfromaconsumerpointofview. eight microwells may be more appropriate. The iTube is a novel allergen testing platform also developed by Ozcan’s laboratory at UCLA. The device is a 3D printed opto- FlowCytometry:BeadSuspensionArray mechanicalattachmentthatisconnectedtotheexistingcam- eraofasmartphone(Fig.1)[122].Theapproachisbasedona Flow cytometry (FC) in suspension array format uses 8 well strip of the commercial Neogen peanut ELISA. The microbeadsassolidphasesupportsystemsforcaptureantibod- platform consists of a 3D printed attachment that holds the iestobeimmobilizedonto.Thebead–antibodycomplexcanbe microwells and the smartphonereader, and a related‘iTube’ identifiedbyitsfluorescent/coloredprofilebyaflowcytometer Fig.1 (a)AnimageoftheiTube platform,usingaNeogenPeanut ELISA8-wellstripanda smartphone-baseddigitalreader, isdisplayed.(b)The3Dprinted opto-mechanicalattachment, whichisconnectedtotherear- facingcameraonthesmartphone. (c)AschematicoftheiTubeis shown.Reproducedfrom[122] withpermissionofTheRoyal SocietyofChemistry 5362 RossG.M.S.etal. [123].Flowcytometrycanbeusedforbothin-vivoandin-vitro ambientlight[133].Thesmartphonecamerawasusedtore- quantitativeallergenanalysis[124,125].Garberetal.andCho cord images of the fluorescence emitted from the QD. This etal.haveshownthatbyusingmagneticbeadsetsitispossible assay still takes a substantial amount of time to carry out todetect14foodallergens(andgluten)in12differentsamples, owingtoincubationstepssoitcannotbeclassifiedasarapid within6h,withasimilarLODtoexistingELISAmethods(<5 assay.Anevenmoresophisticatedmultiplexsmartphoneap- ng/mL)[97,126].However,theirmethodsrequiredtwoextrac- proach based on the original rbST microsphere assay was tion procedures, so although the assay could be multiplexed, presentedforbiomarkersinmilk(Fig.2)[134].Althoughthis the extraction could not. Otto et al. combined a competitive technologyhas currently onlybeenappliedtofooddiagnos- formatELISAwithflowcytometry(BDAccuriC6apparatus, tics,focusingthisapproachcouldallowittobeappliedmore Becton-Dickinson, Vianen, The Netherlands) to develop an specificallytofoodallergens. assay capable of detecting five different allergens in a cookie matrix[127].Theassaycoulddetectintherangeof2–10ppm Multiplexsurfaceplasmonresonance-basedfood all the allergens in the test. Cho et al. further described the allergenbiosensor usefulness of FC for cross-reactivity profiling between 23 le- gumesand12treenuts[128]. Thisreviewhasavertedbiosensors,duetothein-depthreview on using biosensors for food allergen analysis published in Miniaturizedflowcytometers 2016 and another 2016 review focusing specifically on smartphone-basedbiosensors[9,28].Onlybriefattentionwill Despitetheirsuccess,flowcytometers(FCs)arenotportable, bepaidheretobiosensors.Surfaceplasmonresonance(SPR) are relatively expensive, require trained personnel, and are monitorschangesintherefractiveindexbasedonthedielec- thereforenotsuitableforin-fieldanalysis.Inresponsetothis, tric properties of a thin layer of sample containing solution, FCwasminiaturized.MiniaturizationofFCinvolvesfocusing nearthegoldmetalsurfaceofthesensorregion.The energy the flow of the particles to be analyzed within a microfluidic transfer from polarized light to surface plasmon results in channel, reducing the size of both the microfluidics and the characteristic reflected light patterns that can be monitored optics,andintegratingthemwithasignalreadoutdevice[129]. label free, in real-time through a sensorgram (the angle at The portability of miniaturized flow cytometry (MFC) which the dip is observed versus time) [135]. Analyte- makes it an attractive technique for in-field routine analysis. specific antibodies are immobilized onto the metal layer of Connecting MFC to a smartphone readout system further thesensorchip,mountedontoaglassprismwithanintegrated strengthensitsportability.Ozcan’sUCLAgrouphaveworked flowcellthatisthenplacedintheinstrument.Whenpolarized since2008todevelopon-chipcytometersthatarecapableof light shines through the prism, the light is reflected by the interfacingwithsmartphonesasthedetector[130].Zhuetal. metal layer, resulting inanangle ofincidence capable ofin- have further substantiated the ability to combine MFC and ducing surface plasmon resonance and causing a dip in the optical microscopy with a smartphone interface [131]. The reflected light intensity [136]. The refractive index near the studyintegratedamicrofluidicchipwithasyringepumpthat metal surface will change as proteins are adsorbed onto the controlledthetransportofsampletotheimagingfield,where metalsurfaceandtheamountofadsorbedproteincanthenbe aphotowascapturedbyasmartphonecamera.Thisexample determined. Unfortunately, current ‘portable’ SPRs still re- usesanopto-mechanicalattachment,featuring:simplelenses, quirealaptoporsmallcomputertooperate[137]. plasticcolorfilters,LEDs,andbatteries.Furtherdevelopment ImagingSPR(iSPR)hasthebenefitofbeingabletosimul- on this study yielded a smartphone-based MFC interfaced taneously detect multiple analytes in a single sample. Raz with an optical-microscope for the counting offluorescently etal.describedaniSPRlinkedwithanallergen-antibodyarray labelled blood cells [132]. Despite these examples being for forthedetectionof12foodallergenswithin12min[138].The thehealthcaresector,theyprovideanexcellentbasisforfuture rapid, multi-analyte method is quantitative and detects food designofsmartphonebasedcytometersforapplicationtofood allergensat2mg/kg.Theprocedureallowedfortotalallergen allergen analysis. Similarly, MFChas beenusedincontami- profilingwithinfood,providingauniquefingerprintforwhich nantandresiduemonitoringinmilksamples[133].Anassay allergens each commercially available food contained. The wasdesignedtodetectgrowthpromotorbovinesomatotropin opticaldeviceslaboratoryofLinköpingUniversity(Sweden) (rbST). Biomarker-specific antibodies (anti-rbST) were described a smartphone-based angle resolved localized SPR coupled with quantum dots (QD), which were immobilized device [139]. The device used the phone screen as the light on paramagnetic microspheres. The device relied on an source,thephonecameratorecordimages,andadisposable optical-mechanical attachment consisting of a phone holder optical coupler made of PDMS/epoxy, which matched the (for alignment of optics), a sample tray to hold the cover refractiveindexofglass[139].Thepolymersurfacecontained slides,12UVexcitationLEDs,whiteLEDs,anopticalfilter, glass coated with a layer of gold, as the thin metal surface, a de-magnifying lens, and a lid to prevent introduction of withwhichsimpleormorecomplexmicrofluidicsystemsare
Description: