Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons Anarchism and the Specter of Bakunin in Twentieth-Century Russia J G A M E S O O D W I N Middlebury Studies in Russian Language and Literature Although criticized at one time for its highly tendentious spirit, Dostoevsky’sDemons(1871–1872)hasproventobeanovelofgreat polemicalvitality.Originallyinspiredbyaminorconspiratorialepisode ofthelate1860s,wellafterDostoevsky’sdeath(1881)theworkcon- tinuedtoearnbothacclaimandcontemptforitsscathingcaricature of revolutionists driven by destructive, anarchic aims. The text of DemonsassumednewmeaninginRussianliteraryculturefollowingthe Bolsheviktriumphof1917,whenthereestablishmentandexpansion of centralized state power inevitably revived interest in the radical populisttendenciesofRussia’spast,inparticulartheanarchistthought of Dostoevsky’s legendary contemporary, Mikhail Bakunin (1814–1876). Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons is the first book to explore the life of Dostoevsky’s novel in light of disputes and controversies over Bakunin’stroublinglegacyinRussia.Contrarytothetraditionalview, which assumes the obsolescence of Demons throughout much of the Communist period (1917–1991), this book demonstrates that the potentialresurgenceofBakuninistthoughtactuallyencouragedreassess- mentsofDostoevsky’snovel.Byexploringthedifferentideasandcrit- icalstrategiesthatmotivatedopposinginterpretationsofthenovelin post-revolutionary Russia, Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons reveals howthepotentialresurrectionofBakunin’santi-authoritarianethosfos- tered the return of a politically reactionary novel to the canon of Russianclassics. James Goodwin is Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the UniversityofFlorida.HereceivedhisPh.D.inSlavicliteraturesfrom theUniversityofSouthernCalifornia,LosAngeles. www.peterlang.com Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons Middlebury Studies in Russian Language and Literature Thomas R. Beyer, Jr. General Editor Vol. 33 PETER LANG New York (cid:121) Washington, D.C./Baltimore (cid:121) Bern Frankfurt (cid:121) Berlin (cid:121) Brussels (cid:121) Vienna (cid:121) Oxford James Goodwin Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons Anarchism and the Specter of Bakunin in Twentieth-Century Russia PETER LANG New York (cid:121) Washington, D.C./Baltimore (cid:121) Bern Frankfurt (cid:121) Berlin (cid:121) Brussels (cid:121) Vienna (cid:121) Oxford Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Goodwin, James. Confronting Dostoevsky’s demons: anarchism and the specter of Bakunin in twentieth-century Russia / James Goodwin. p. cm. — (Middlebury studies in Russian language and literature; v. 33) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821–1881—Criticism and interpretation. 2. Anarchism in literature. 3. Russia—Intellectual life—1801–1917. 4. Bakunin, Mikhail Aleksandrovich, 1814–1876—Influence. 5. Russian literature—19th century—History and criticism. I. Title. PG3328.Z6G58 891.73’3—dc22 2009039772 ISBN 978-1-4331-0883-9 ISSN 0888-8752 Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the “Deutsche Nationalbibliografie”; detailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de/. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council of Library Resources. © 2010 Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York 29 Broadway, 18th floor, New York, NY 10006 www.peterlang.com All rights reserved. Reprint or reproduction, even partially, in all forms such as microfilm, xerography, microfiche, microcard, and offset strictly prohibited. Printed in Germany TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments. ............................................ vii A Note on Transliteration, Dates, Translation and References............ ix Introduction: Dostoevsky’s Demons as Polemic....................... 1 1. “The Worse, the Better…”: Dostoevsky’s Demons and the Politics of Despair........................................ 9 A Conspiracy of Non-Equals............................... 10 The Nechaev “Type” and the New Nihilism................... 17 From Herzen to Bakunin: Demons and the Russian Revolutionary Emigration. ................................ 22 2. Demons and the “Bakuninist” Context of the Bolshevik Revolution. ................................... 33 Sacred Flame of Revolt: Bakunin as Hero and Demon........... 34 Bakunin’s Legacy in Revolution, 1905–1921.................. 42 Bakunin Prostrate........................................ 50 3. Leonid Grossman’s Art of Scholarly Provocation. ................ 65 Post-revolutionary Demons. ............................... 65 Grossman on Stavrogin and Bakunin......................... 71 Demons under Scrutiny. .................................. 81 Grossman’s Discoveries in Retrospect. ...................... 87 4. In Defense of Bakunin: Aleksei Borovoi and the Anarchist Conception of Demons.......................... 101 Russian Anarchism and the Bakuninist Legacy after 1917....... 102 Liberating Bakunin from Demons.......................... 109 Anarchism’s Last Stand: The Bakunin Jubilee of 1926. ........ 116 vi Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons 5. Viacheslav Polonsky and the Marxist Struggle over Bakunin’s Legacy. .................................... 129 Stavrogin, Dostoevsky and Political Acumen................. 130 Bakunin as Revolutionary Romantic........................ 136 At the Gates of the Bolshevik Pantheon. .................... 147 6. Suppressing Demons in Stalin’s Russia. ....................... 157 Grossman Vindicated.................................... 158 Vigilance Toward Dostoevshchina ......................... 163 Anarchism and the Triumph of Demons in Late Soviet Analysis .................................... 175 7. Toward New Confrontations................................. 183 Notes. ..................................................... 189 Index. ..................................................... 243 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support of many individuals and institutions, all of whom deserve my sincere gratitude and appreciation. The University of Florida College of Arts and Sciences granted me a semester of research leave in 2006 and funded two summers of research in Russia with Scholarship Enhancement awards (2004, 2007). In Russian archives and libraries I was given access to rare material that proved essential to this book. In Moscow, time spent at the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art (RGALI), the Russian State Archive and Social and Political History (RGASPI), the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF), the Russian State Library, and the State Public Historical Library was especially fruitful and rewarding. For assistance with accommodations in Moscow I thank the International Program at the Russian State University of the Humanities (RGGU). In St. Petersburg, the Russian National Library, the Institute of Rus- sian Literature at the “Pushkin House,” and the Book Fund of the All-Russian Museum of A. S. Pushkin all granted access to valuable material for the found- ation of this study. Among some of the individuals who helped facilitate my work in those places, Tat’iana Chernikovskaia, Head of the Reading Room at the Pushkin House, deserves special thanks for her generous assistance, particularly in locating post-Soviet editions of Dostoevsky’s Demons. I am es- pecially indebted to Marina Bokarius, Head of the Book Funds of the Pushkin Museum, for kindly granting permission to view some of its holdings. In addi- tion to her vast knowledge, Marina Vital’evna’s immense appreciation, respect and love of Russia’s cultural heritage have been a source of great inspiration for me throughout this project. Libraries in the U.S. also provided me with a wealth of source material for this study. For its efforts to locate and obtain rare publications I would like to thank the staff of the Interlibrary Loan division of the University of Florida Libraries. Alena Aising fulfilled numerous requests from me to acquire much- needed titles for the library’s collection. Beyond the University of Florida, libraries and staff at the University of Southern California, the University of California at Los Angeles, the Hoover Institution in Stanford, California, and the University of North Carolina all provided access to their holdings. Among my mentors, colleagues and friends who contributed in one way or another to the development of this study, I would like to express my great appreciation to fellow faculty members in the Department of Literatures, Lan- guages and Cultures at the University of Florida. The enthusiastic support and advice I have received throughout this project, particularly from associates in Russian Studies and German Studies, has been of enormous help. I am espe- cially grateful to Land Barksdale, Galina Rylkova, Alexander Burak and Eric Kligerman for their constant encouragement and insightful observations on viii Confronting Dostoevsky’s Demons questions relevant to my topic. Each of them kindly read all or part of the manuscript and offered many excellent suggestions for improvement. From Alexander Zholkovsky, Marcus Levitt, Thomas Seifrid and John Bowlt at the University of Southern California I have received invaluable feedback and remarks on the idea for this book. Without their efforts, my knowledge of Russian literature and language would not have reached the level required for productive research. Along with Marcus Levitt, I thank Tat’iana Novikova of the University of Nebraska for supporting my contribution to their book Times of Trouble: Violence in Russian Literature and Culture (University of Wis- consin Press, 2007). One aspect of the present study reiterates, in modified form, part of my article in that collection. To Michael David-Fox of the University of Maryland and his co-editors at Kritika I extend many thanks for seeking the publication of my article “Russian Anarchism and the Bolshevi- zation of Bakunin” (Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, Summer 2007), portions of which were revised for this book. I am also grateful to many other personal associates and friends, both in Russia and in the United States, whose support and assistance have been so important. Irina Men’shova provided indispensable help in resolving the countless cultural, linguistic, bibliographic and technical problems that arose throughout my research. For years of hospitality and generosity I would also like to thank Elena Druzhnikova and especially Aleksei Shchedrovitsky, who offered unique insight into some fundamental ideas, issues and texts pertaining to my research. Antonina Men’shova, Fedor Konovalov, Ol’ga Gerleman, Dar’ia Zamakhina, Galina Savel’eva, Irina Ivanova, Alena Spitsina, Aleksei Vdovin and other friends in St. Petersburg also graciously offered their time and energy to help expedite my research in Russia. The late Evgenii Simonov deserves special mention and gratitude for his thoughtful assistance and expert advice on computing and other technical matters. His interest in this project and its requirements provided me with important inspiration, especially during my months of research in Russia. To Fred Choate I extend sincere thanks for reading the entire manuscript and unmasking many elusive fleas. On many occasions he kindly shared his translation expertise and knowledge of Soviet culture to help shed light on obscure moments in several key Russian texts. For their conscientious efforts to advance my manuscript to print as care- fully and rapidly as possible I thank Caitlin Lavelle and Jackie Pavlovic at Peter Lang Publishers, along with Thomas Beyer, editor of Middlebury Stud- ies. Needless to say, the book would not have been possible without them. To Irina and the rest of my family I am particularly grateful for their support and patience throughout the entire enterprise.
Description: