Computational Protein-Ligand Modelling of the Enzymes DNA gyrase and IcaB Ahmad Alaa-El-Din Abd-El-Aziz Master of Science by Research University of York Biology March 2015 Abstract Computational modelling of proteins and their interactions with small molecule ligands is a growing field of research. Such studies provide an understanding of how protein structure relates to mechanism and function as well as informing drug discovery and design. This thesis had two main aspects: computational modelling of ciprofloxacin derivatives binding to DNA gyrase and homology modelling of the protein IcaB based on sequence alignment with a related protein, PgaB. The inhibitory activity of synthetic ciprofloxacin derivatives (with various linkage to citrate groups) was experimentally assessed by gel electrophoresis to examine the effect on DNA gyrase binding to a target DNA strand. Overall, the derivative which possessed the greatest inhibition compared to the unmodified ciprofloxacin was the c-gly- ciprofloxacin derivative, which had a 2 atom linker between the ciprofloxacin and citrate groups. This correlated with the change in interactions seen between ciprofloxacin derivatives as computationally modelled by molecular mechanics methods. The second aspect of the thesis was to generate a model of the protein IcaB to test the hypothesis that it is a deactylase of poly-N-acetyl-glucosamine (PNAG) during maturation of the poly-glycan in the extracellular matrix responsible for biofilm generation for bacteria. An initial review of deacetylase enzyme structures identified the conserved features required for activity. A homologous protein, Pga,B was then used as a template to generate a homology model of IcaB. The model maintained the orientation and positioning of the metal-binding and catalytic residues critical for proper deacetylase function. However, the PNAG binding groove, believed to be involved in the transport of the PNAG to the active site of PgaB, was not properly replicated in the IcaB model. Further modelling would require improved characterization of the binding groove of IcaB. ii Table of Contents Abstract ii List of Figures vi List of Tables x List of Schemes xi List of Equations xii Acknowledgements xiii Author’s Declaration xiv Chapter 1: Introduction and Methods 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Protein Structure 2 1.3 Protein-Ligand Interactions 6 1.4 Computational Modelling of Protein Structure 9 1.5 Computational Modelling of Protein-Ligand Interactions 10 1.6 Molecular Mechanics Modelling 13 1.7 Homology Modelling 14 1.8 Outline of Thesis Contents 16 Chapter 2: Modelling of Citric Acid-Ciprofloxacin Conjugates 17 2.1 Cystic Fibrosis and Opportunistic Infections 17 2.2. DNA Gyrase and Ciprofloxacin Activity 19 2.3 Structure of Ciprofloxacin Derivatives 23 2.4 DNA Gyrase Inhibition Assays 24 2.4.1 Methodology 25 2.4.2 Results 25 2.4.3 Discussion 29 iii 2.5. Energy Minimization of Gyrase-Ciprofloxacin Complexes 29 2.5.1 Methodology 31 2.5.2 Results 32 2.5.3 Discussion 40 Chapter 3: Review of Deacetylase Enzymes 43 3.1 Introduction 43 3.2 Histone Deacetylases and Sirtuins 45 3.2.1 Histone Deacetylases 46 3.2.2 Sirtuins 47 3.3 Carbohydrate Esterases 48 3.3.1 CE-2 49 3.3.2 CE-3 50 3.3.3 Carbohydrate Esterase Family 4 51 3.3.3.1 Chitin Deacetylase 51 3.3.3.2 GlcNAc Peptidoglycan Deacetylase 52 3.3.3.3 MurNAc Peptidoglycan Deacetylase 54 3.3.3.4 Chitooligosaccharide Deacetylase 54 3.3.3.5 Poly-N-acetylglucosamine deacetylases (PgaB and IcaB) 56 3.3.4 CE-7 59 3.3.5 CE-8 61 3.3.6 CE-9 64 3.3.7 CE-10 66 3.3.8 CE-11 66 3.3.9 CE-12 and CE-13 (Pectin acetylesterases) 68 3.3.10 CE-14 69 3.3.11 CE-15 72 iv 3.3.12 CE-16 73 3.4 Citrulline Deacetylase 73 3.5 Common Features of Deacetylase Enzymes 74 3.6 Discussion of deacetylase review with focus on IcaB 76 Chapter 4: Homology Modelling Of IcaB 79 4.1 Biofilm Formation In staphylococcus Infections 79 4.2 Structure and Activity of Partially Deacetylated Poly-N-acetylglucosamine 79 4.3 The ica Operon of staphylococcus 80 4.4. Structure and Function of IcaB and PgaB 81 4.4.1 IcaB and PgaB domain structure 81 4.4.2 Structures of PgaB 82 4.5 IcaB Alignment with PgaB 85 4.5.1 Methods 86 4.5.2 Sequence Alignment 86 4.6. Homology Model of IcaB 88 4.6.1 Methods 91 4.6.2 Results 91 4.7 Discussion and Analysis of IcaB Model 92 Chapter 5: Conclusions 102 References 105 v List of Figures Figure 1.1: Peptide α-helix, β-sheet, and β-turn in stick diagrams 3 Figure 1.2: Structure of haemoglobin (colours represent individual monomers and haem prosthetic groups are shown in stick format) pdbID: 1GZX 4 Figure 1.3: Structure of adenosine, a nucleotide consisting of a deoxyribose sugar, phosphate, and nitrogenous base (adenine) 8 Figure 2.1: Top view of structure of Staphylococcus aureus DNA gyrase complexed to ciprofloxacin 20 Figure 2.2: Side view of structure of Staphylococcus aureus DNA gyrase complexed to ciprofloxacin 20 Figure 2.3: The ciprofloxacin-binding site with annotated adjacent amino acid and nucleotide residues 20 Figure 2.4: Sequence alignment, derived using ClustalX 2.1, of S. aureus DNA gyrase with E. coli DNA gyrase 22-23 Figure 2.5: DNA gyrase assay electrophoresis gel a) ciprofloxacin; b) c- ciprofloxacin; c) c-gly-ciprofloxacin; d) c-ava-ciprofloxacin 25-26 Figure 2.6: Effect of ciprofloxacin concentration on gyrase activity 27 Figure 2.7: Effect of c-ciprofloxacin concentration on gyrase activity 27 Figure 2.8: Effect of c-gly-ciprofloxacin concentration on gyrase activity 28 Figure 2.9: Effect of c-ava-ciprofloxacin concentration on gyrase activity 28 Figure 2.10: Computationally derived structure of the ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 33 Figure 2.11: Hydrogen bonding interactions of ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 33 Figure 2.12: Computationally derived structure of the c-ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 34 vi Figure 2.13: Hydrogen bonding interactions of the c-ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 34 Figure 2.14: Computationally derived structure of the c-gly-ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 35 Figure 2.15: Hydrogen bonding interactions of the c-gly-ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 35 Figure 2.16: Computationally derived structure of conformation 1 of the c- ava-ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 36 Figure 2.17: Hydrogen bonding interactions of the conformation 1 of c-ava- ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 37 Figure 2.18: Computationally derived structure of conformation 2 of the c- ava-ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 38 Figure 2.19: Hydrogen bonding interactions of the conformation 2 of c-ava- ciprofloxacin-DNA gyrase complex 39 Figure 3.1: Histone deacetylase 4 bound to a triflouromethylketone inhibitor 46 Figure 3.2: Structure of CjCE2B at 2.0Å resolution (pdbID: 2W9X) 49 Figure 3.3: Structure of the CtCes3 N-terminal domain at 2.0Å resolution (pdbID: 2VPT) 50 Figure 3.4: Structure of SpPgdA from S. pneumoniae at 1.75Å from (pdbID: 2C1G) 53 Figure 3.5: Structure of the chitooligosaccharide deacetylase homodimer from Vibrio cholerae at 1.88Å (pdbID: 4NY2) 55 Figure 3.6: Structure of PgaB with Ni2+ as the active site metal from E. coli from pdbID: 4f9d 57 Figure 3.7: Hydrophobic PgaB binding groove surface 59 Figure 3.8: Structure of the cephalosporin C deacetylase dimer from Bacillus subtilis with acetate in the active site at 1.9Å resolution (pdbID: 1ODT) 60 vii Figure 3.9: Structure of pectin methylesterase from Erwinia chrysanthemi containing a hexamer of D-galacturonic acid in stick form (green) and binding site residues (grey)(pdbID: 2NTB) 62 Figure 3.10: Binding cleft residues with labelled D-galacturonic subunit positions set to +1 at the position adjacent to Gln177 63 Figure 3.11: Structure of NAG-6-P deacetylase from Bacillus subtilis at 2.05Å resolution (pdbID: 1UN7) 65 Figure 3.12: Structure of LpxC homotrimer from Pseudomonas aeruginosa containing inhibitor BB-78485 (sticks) and zinc ions (balls) in the active site at 1.9Å resolution (pdbID: 2VES) 67 Figure 3.13: Structure of pectin acetylesterase at 2.1Å resolution from B. subtilis (pdbID: 2O14) 69 Figure 3.14: Structure of MshB at 1.85Å (pdbID: 4EWL) 70 Figure 3.15: Active site of MshB containing glycerol and acetate to simulate mycothiol binding 71 Figure 3.16: Structure of citrulline deacetylase from Xanthomonas campestris at 1.75Å (pdbID: 2F7V) 73 Figure 4.1: Proposed functions of gene products of the ica Operon 80 Figure 4.2: a) IcaB domain structure from Staphylococcus epidermidis; b) PgaB domain structure from Escherichia coli (strain K12). The domains are represented by Yellow = signal sequence, light green = coiled coil, green = deacetylase domain, GHL13 = Glycoside Hydrolase-Like C-terminal domain 82 Figure 4.3: Alignment of all sequences of PgaB in Protein Databank (3vus, 4f9d, and 4f9j) 83 Figure 4.4: Comparison of PgaB structures available in the Protein Data Bank (3vus in blue, 4f9d in green, and 4f9j in red) 84 Figure 4.5: Active site and N-terminal binding groove of PgaB from 4f9d 84 viii Figure 4.6: a) Sequence alignment of IcaB with 4f9d N-terminal domain; b) Sequence alignment of IcaB aligned with PgaB N-terminal domain NCBI sequence and truncated to match 4f9d (residues 1-42 removed); c) Sequence alignment from b) manually adjusted to preserve α7 helix 87 Figure 4.7: Active site and N-terminal groove residues in the final alignment 88 Figure 4.8: Homology model of IcaB using manually adjusted 4f9d NCBI alignment as a template 92 Figure 4.9: a) Charge surface of IcaB homology model (left) and 4f9d template (right) in which red indicates regions of negative charge and blue indicates regions of positive charge b) Charge surface from a) rotated by 180° 93 Figure 4.10: a) Hydrophobic moments in IcaB model (left) and PgaB (pdbID: 4f9d, right); b) Hydrophobic moments from a) rotated 180° 94 Figure 4.11: Regions of PgaB (red, 4f9d) that differed most from the IcaB model (blue) 95 Figure 4.12: Overlap between active site residues of PgaB (red, 4f9d) and the IcaB homology model (blue) 96 Figure 4.13: Comparison of manually adjusted IcaB alignment with PSIPRED predicted secondary structure 97 Figure 4.14: Structure of IcaB from Ammonifex degensii at 1.70Å reproduced from pdbID: 4WCJ 98 Figure 4.15: Alignment of IcaB sequences from S. epidermidis (top) and A. degensii (bottom) (* = identical, : = conserved, .= semiconserved) 99 Figure 4.16: Comparison of S. epidermidis IcaB homology model (blue) and A. degensii IcaB crystal structure from pdbID: 4WCJ (green) 100 Figure 4.17: IcaB active site residue overlap. Numbering is in the format S. epidermidis structure (blue)/A. degensii structure (green) 100 ix List of Tables Table 2.1: IC calculated for each ciprofloxacin derivative based on 50 electrophoresis gel assay data 29 Table 2.2: Computationally determined energies of minimized DNA gyrase- ciprofloxacin derivative complexes 40 Table 3.1: Sequences and structures of known families of deacetylase enzymes as of June 8, 2015 45 Table 3.2: Deacetylase enzyme summary 77 Table 4.1: RMSD comparison between multiple models of IcaB with manually adjusted 4f9d template 92 x
Description: