ebook img

Components of resistance to late leafspot of peanut and studies on healthy leaf area duration PDF

93 Pages·1991·2.8 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Components of resistance to late leafspot of peanut and studies on healthy leaf area duration

COMPONENTS OF RESISTANCE TO LATE LEAFSPOT OF PEANUT AND STUDIES ON HEALTHY LEAF AREA DURATION By VERMANDO MASINSIN AQUINO A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1991 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my adviser and major professor, Dr. Fred M. Shokes, for his advice, encouragement and support throughout my studies at the University of Florida. I would like to thank Dr. Richard D. Berger, cochairman of my committee, for his support and guidance during the course of my studies. Dr. Daniel W. Gorbet provided valuable assistance in the conduct of field experiments. His support and guidance are greatly appreciated. Thanks are also expressed to Dr. Kenneth J. Boote and Dr. Thomas A. Kucharek for their guidance as members of my committee. Thanks are also due to Don Berger and Dale Weeks for their valuable assistance, and to the staff of NFREC, Quincy and AREC, Marianna, Florida. Finally, I would like to thank my friends and my family for their support and encouragement. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Rage ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF FIGURES vii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Partial Resistance to Late Leafspot 2 Disease-induced Yield Loss and Healthy Leaf Area Duration 4 2 EFFECT OF COMPONENTS OF RESISTANCE ON PROGRESS OF LATE LEAFSPOT 7 Introduction 7 Materials and Methods 9 Peanut Genotypes 9 Field Experiments 11 Components of Partial Resistance 11 Disease Assessments 14 Results 16 Components of Partial Resistance 16 Disease Progression and Pod Yield 21 Discussion 25 3 RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SEVERITY OF LATE LEAFSPOT, RADIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS, HEALTHY LEAF AREA DURATION, AND POD YIELD IN TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS 28 Introduction 28 Materials and Methods 30 Field Experiments 30 Disease Assessments 33 Radiometric Measurements 34 iii Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Healthy Leaf Area Duration (HAD) 34 Results 35 Disease Progression 35 Leaf Area Index 39 Green Leaf Area and Percent Reflectance ... 43 Healthy leaf Area Duration (HAD) and Pod Yield 50 Discussion 50 4 SUMMARY 55 APPENDICES A WEATHER DATA 57 B LEAF AREA INDEX DATA 66 C CANOPY REFLECTANCE DATA 69 D TOTAL DISEASE SEVERITY DATA 73 LITERATURE CITED 75 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 81 IV LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1 Peanut genotypes evaluated for components of resistance in 1988 and 1989 9 2-2 C19o8m8parison of 12 selected genotypes based on various components of resistance 10 2-3 Mean values of components of resistance to late leafspot estimated under field conditions during 17 2-4 Mean values of components of resistance to late leafspot estimated under field conditions during 1989 18 2-5 Mean areas under disease progress curve, rates of disease progress, and pod yield from field tests in 1988 and 1989 22 2-6 Pearson correlation coefficients relating components of resistance to AUDPC and rate. . . . 24 A-l Weather data during summer 1988 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 57 A-2 Weather data during summer 1989 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 61 A-3 Daily rainfall during summer 1988 at Dozier Boy's School, Marianna, Florida 64 A-4 Daily rainfall during summer 1989 at Dozier Boy's School, Marianna, Florida 65 B-l Leaf area index data collected on Florunner in 1988 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 66 B-2 Mean leaf area index for Florunner and Southern Runner in 1989 at AREC, Marianna, Florida .... 68 C-l Percent reflectance at 800 nm for Florunner in 1988 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 69 v C-2 Percent reflectance at 800 nm for Florunner in 1989 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 71 C-3 Percent reflectance at 800 nm for Southern Runner in 1989 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 72 D-l Total disease severity (%) data for Florunner in 1988 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 73 D-2 Total disease severity (%) data for Florunner and Southern Runner in 1989 at AREC, Marianna, Florida 74 vi 2- LIST OF FIGURES 3- Figure page 1 Weekly accumulation of rain at the Dozier Boy's School, Marianna, FL during summers of 1988 and 1989 12 1 Weekly accumulation of rain at the AREC, Marianna, FL during summers of 1988 and 1989. Irrigation is included in 1989 31 3-2 Progression of late leafspot in Florunner in 1988 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, four spray rates initiated at 1% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 36 3-3 Progression of late leafspot in Florunner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, three spray rates initiated at 0.5% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 37 3-4 Progression of late leafspot in Southern Runner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, three spray rates initiated at 0.5% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 38 3-5 Leaf area index over time for Florunner in 1988 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, four spray rates initiated at 1% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 40 3-6 Leaf area index over time for Florunner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, three spray rates initiated at 0.5% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 41 vn 3-7 Leaf area index over time for Southern Runner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, three spray rates initiated at 0.5% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 42 3-8 Percent Reflectance at 800 nm for Florunner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, four spray rates initiated at 1% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 44 3-9 Percent reflectance at 800 nm for Florunner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, three spray rates initiated at 0.5% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 45 3-10 Percent reflectance at 800 nm for Southern Runner in 1989 under different fungicide treatments (an unsprayed control, three spray rates initiated at 0.5% incidence where x = 1.75 L/ha, and GS or growers schedule initiated at 35 DAP) 46 3-11 Relationship between percent reflectance at 800 nm and green leaf area (GLA) of Florunner in 1988. . 47 3-12 Relationship between percent reflectance at 800 nm and green leaf area (GLA) of Florunner in 1989. . 48 3-13 Relationship between percent reflectance at 800 nm and green leaf area (GLA) of Southern Runner in 1989 49 3-14 Relationships between healthy leaf area duration (HAD) and pod yield for Florunner in 1988 and 1989 and Southern runner in 1989 51 viii Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy COMPONENTS OF RESISTANCE TO LATE LEAFSPOT OF PEANUT AND STUDIES ON HEALTHY LEAF AREA DURATION By Vermando Masinsin Aquino May 1991 Chairman: Dr. Frederick M. Shokes Cochairman: Dr. Richard D. Berger Major Department: Plant Pathology Late leafspot, causedbyCercosporidiumpersonatum (Berk, and Curt.) Deighton, is one of the most economically significant diseases of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Florida. The pathogen frequently causes severe defoliation and reduction in pod yield. The objectives of this research were i) to determine the relationship between components of partial resistance to late leafspot and disease progression, and ii) to examine the relationships of disease severity, canopy reflectance, healthy leaf area duration (HAD) and pod , yield. Components of partial resistance to late leafspot were quantified and late leafspot disease progression were monitored on 14 peanut genotypes in field experiments at Marianna, Florida, during 1988 and 1989. Inoculated target leaves were used to determine various components such as, incubation period, latent period, maximum percentage of ix lesions that sporulated (MPLS) lesion size, lesion number, , degree of sporulation, and percent necrotic leaf area. Genotypes included a resistant breeding line, (UF 81206) a , moderately resistant cultivar, (Southern Runner) susceptible , cultivar, (Florunner) and eleven breeding lines with various , levels of resistance. Lowest AUDPC (area under the disease progress curve) rate of disease progress, and final level of , disease were observed on genotypes UF81206, PI 261893, US 29-b3-B, and US 202-b2. Rate of disease progress and AUDPC were more highly correlated with MPLS and latent period than with lesion size, degree of sporulation, and percent necrotic area. MPLS and latent period were the resistance components that contributed most towards the reduction of disease progress in the field. Field studies on healthy leaf area duration (HAD) were conducted in 1988 and 1989 for peanut cultivars Florunner and Southern Runner. Spray treatments of chlorothalonil were applied to establish different levels of disease. Leaf area index (LAI) was measured eight times during the season and disease progression and percent reflectance were monitored. Healthy leaf area duration and green leaf area were calculated from LAI and the total amount of disease. Linear relationships were obtained between green leaf area index and percent reflectance at 800 nm for both cultivars. Pod yields for all treatments increased with HAD. Results support the concept that HAD can be used to predict yield and yield loss due to late leafspot disease. x

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.