The London School of Economics and Political Science Competing Rationalities: The Evolution of Arbitration in Commercial Disputes in Modern Jordan. Aseel Al-Ramahi A thesis submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, July 2008 UMI Number: U615945 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615945 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 £3iS Library ' ■ J Library of Po . end Economic Scseno nn.ro In dedication to My teacher, inspiration and ideal Dr Fahmi Zimmo The only Dad that I ever knew 2 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that frill acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. 3 Abstract International commercial arbitration is recognised as the most widely accepted form of dispute resolution in international trade in both the Middle East and the West. But in the Middle East divergent, competing rationalities are constantly close to the surface and repeatedly collide in arbitration cases of international commercial disputes. The Islamic Middle East focus is on maintaining tradition and safeguarding relationships, features that both stand at the heart of the dispute resolution culture of the region. By contrast, in the West, international commercial arbitration is adversarial and individualistic, following the neo-classical model of law. In recent times when the western model has been superimposed on this deeply entrenched dispute resolution culture, hostility and dissatisfaction have resulted. In addition, instances of perceived or actual Western ignorance and bias against Shari ’ah have led to even more resentment on the part of the Arab players. Both Islamic law and tribal customs impose a duty of reconciliation on any intervener in a dispute. This third party must attempt to help the disputing parties reach a settlement that is just and fair. This clash of cultures is explored in detail in this thesis which uses Jordan as the case study. Jordan has a rich and embedded tribal history and traditions, which remain very much a part of contemporary society. The tribes of Jordan are critical stakeholders of the state and their customs are presented as key pillars of the identity of a Jordanian. Reconciliation is a positive feature of Middle Eastern dispute resolution dimensions of which this thesis suggests could be incorporated in the international commercial arbitration model, making it more representative of, and responsive to, a wider variety of cultural traditions. 4 Acknowledgements I would like to start by thanking my doctoral supervisor, Professor Simon Roberts for all his support and advice. Professor Roberts taught me to look at the law in context and introduced me to the inspiring, fascinating world of anthropology and more specifically ethnography. I also want to thank Dr Hamza Haddad, Jordanian lawyer and Professor for encouraging me to fall in love with arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. I want to thank my friends and colleagues, especially Alpa Ghelani, Marina Brilman and Filipinna Marziano who stood by me, helped me and supported me throughout this long journey. Without them this journey would have been even more difficult. My gratitude to: David Hicks; Pramod Reddy and Debbie DeGirolamo, colleagues in the PhD program at the LSE; Dr David Kershaw, a lecturer in law at the LSE for criticisms, challenges and questioning of my arguments and views; and Najeeb Maa’bra for his assistance with the Arabic literature. The Central Research Fund of the University of London, the Arab-British Chamber of Commerce and the law department at the LSE contributed financially. I also want to note my appreciation to the Jordanian lawyers and engineers who gave me their time, wisdom and granted me an insight into the world of arbitration in Jordan. Also, I am grateful for the support of the academic community in London and from all across the world, and especially the many Arab lawyers and academics, who helped shape my views on this subject through conference papers, comments and informal discussions. I also would like to thank my family for keeping me firmly grounded and focused on the bigger picture. I note my appreciation for my mother, Mrs Tuhama Zimmo, who kept pushing me when it was easier to comfort me. I also want to thank my aunt Mrs Haifa Sabi-Aish for her support and love. 5 Table of Contents Declaration..................................................................................................................3 Abstract.......................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................5 Table of Contents.......................................................................................................6 Chapter One: Introduction...................................................... 9 1.1 Two Arbitration Cases................................................................................10 1.1.1 An international Dispute.....................................................................11 1.1.2 Commentary........................................................................................13 1.1.3 A Local Arbitration.............................................................................15 1.2 Thesis Outline.............................................................................................18 1.3 The Growth of International Commercial Arbitration................................19 1.4 Arbitration in Jordan...................................................................................20 1.5 Legal Culture...............................................................................................26 1.6 Methodology...............................................................................................35 Chapter Two: The International Commercial Arbitration World..............................38 2.1 The Players..................................................................................................42 2.2 The Practice................................................................................................46 2.3 The Discourse.............................................................................................48 2.4 The Culture............................................................... 59 Chapter Three: Sulh: The Essence of Islamic Dispute Resolution............................66 3.1 Reconciliation in Pre-Islam.........................................................................72 3.1.1 Duty to Reconcile (Sulh) in Islam...............................................................76 3.1.2 Is Sulh an Unequivocal Duty?....................................................................78 3.2 Sulh in Arbitration.......................................................................................81 3.2.1 Qur’an.................................................................................................81 3.2.2 Sunna...................................................................................................82 3.2.3 The Hanafi School...............................................................................84 3.2.4 The Shafi School................................................................ 84 3.2.5 The Maliki School...............................................................................85 3.2.6 The Hanbali School.............................................................................85 3.2.7 The Medjella of Legal Provisions.......................................................85 3.3 ‘Arbitration is Part of Our Culture’.............................................................88 6 Chapter Four : Arbitration in the Middle East During the 20th Century....................93 4.1 The Hostility...............................................................................................95 4.2 The Shift in Attitudes..................................................................................99 4.3 The Reality.................................................................................................105 4.5 The Crisis...................................................................................................108 4.6 International Commercial Arbitration through the eyes of Jordanian Arbitrators................................................................................................................110 4.6.1 International Arbitration....................................................................Ill 4.6.2 International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).....................................112 Chapter Five: Jordan and its Tribes..........................................................................115 5.1 The Tribal Foundations of the Jordanian State.........................................117 5.2 Tribal Justice and Dispute Resolution......................................................126 5.3 The Tribal Legal System...........................................................................133 5.4 Tribal Justice after the Jordanian State.....................................................142 5.5 Tribes and Dispute Resolution..................................................................145 5.5.1 Jala’...................................................................................................148 5.5.2 Atweh................................................................................................150 5.5.3 The Negotiations...............................................................................152 5.5.4 Sulh...................................................................................................153 Chapter Six: Formal Dispute Resolution Mechanisms............................................158 6.1 The Judiciary.............................................................................................158 6.1.1 The Judicial Institute of Jordan.........................................................160 6.1.2 Case Management in Jordanian Civil Courts....................................162 6.2 Jordanian Lawyers....................................................................................163 6.3 Arbitration Act 2001.................................................................................165 6.4 Foreign Awards.........................................................................................170 6.4.1 Enforcement of Foreign Judgements Act..........................................170 6.4.2 The Riyadh Convention....................................................................171 6.4.3 The New York Convention 1958...........................................:.........173 6.5 The Mediation Act....................................................................................174 6.6 The Commercial Chamber........................................................................176 6.7 Arbitration in Amman as Seen by the Arbitration Players.......................177 6.7.1 Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages of Arbitration.................178 6.7.2 Lawyers and Arbitration...................................................................179 6.7.3 Arbitration is a Business...................................................................182 6.7.4 The Story of the Courts and Arbitration............................................183 6.7.5 Advantages of Arbitration Compared to the Court...........................184 Chapter Seven: Informal Dispute Mechanisms.......................................................194 7.1 Wasta and the Tribes..................................................................................194 7.2 Wasta in Modem Jordan..........................................................................201 7.3 The Changing Face of Wasta....................................................................205 7.4 Partisan Arbitrators and Wasta..................................................................212 7.5 Differences between East and West Embodied in the Use of Wasta 216 7.5.1 Wasta and Transaction Formation....................................................217 7.5.2 Wasta and Conflict Resolution..........................................................221 Concluding Remarks.............................................................................................230 The Competing Rationalities as Described in this Thesis........................................230 The Paradox of Competing Rationalities.................................................................233 Bibliography...........................................................................................................239 8
Description: