ebook img

Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions PDF

380 Pages·2007·10.49 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions

M e t h o d o l o g i e s a n d w o r k i n g p a p e r s Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges Proceedings of the EU-SILC conference (Helsinki, 6-8 November 2006) 2007 edition EUROPEAN C OMMISSION How to obtain EU publications Our priced publications are available from EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu), where you can place an order with the sales agent of your choice. The Publications Office has a worldwide network of sales agents. You can obtain their contact details by sending a fax to (352) 29 29-42758. Europe Direct is a service to help you f nd answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Of ce for Of cial Publications of the European Communities, 2007 ISBN 978-92-79-04717-6 Cat. No. KS-RA-07-007-EN-N Theme: Population and social conditions Collection: Methodologies and working papers © European Communities, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword page 7 I General presentation of EU-SILC 9 Chapter 1 EU-SILC (community statistics on income and living conditions: general presentation of the instrument) Anne CLEMENCEAU and Jean-Marc MUSEUX 11 Chapter 2 EU-SILC (community statistics on income and living conditions: challenges for member states) Martin BAUER 37 II EU-SILC and recommendations of the “Expert Group on Household Income Statistics” 43 Chapter 1 The Income Concept in EU-SILC: Relevance, Feasibility, Challenges Paul VAN DER LAAN 45 Chapter 2 Comparability of income data across households/individuals and over time Rolf AABERGE, Erik FJAERLI, Audun LANGøRGEN and Magne MOGSTAD 57 Discussion Richard HAUSER 75 III EU-SILC and welfare measurement 81 Chapter 1 Extreme incomes and the estimation of poverty and inequality indicators from EU-SILC Philippe VAN KERM 83 IV EU-SILC complex income components 95 Chapter 1 Measurement of property income in EU-SILC Veli-Matti TÖRMÄLEHTO 97 Chapter 2 Assessing the distributional impact of “imputed rent” and “non-cash employee income” in micro-data Joachim R. FRICK, Jan GOEBEL and Markus M. GRABKA 117 Annex Tables 135 Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges 3 Chapter 3 Self-Employment Incomes in the Italian EU-SILC: Measurement and International Comparability Marco Di MARCO 143 Chapter 4 Income in EU-SILC – Net/Gross Conversion Techniques for Building and Using EU-SILC Databases Carlos FARINHA RODRIGUES 157 Discussion Stephen P. JENKINS 173 V Non-income dimensions in EU-SILC 179 Chapter 1 Unmeet need for health care in europe Xander KOOLMAN 181 Chapter 2 “Material deprivation and poor housing” What can be learned from the EU-SILC 2004 data? How can EU-SILC be improved in this matter? Anne-Catherine GUIO and Isabelle ENGSTED MAQUET 193 Annex Annexes 215 Chapter 3 The differential access of women and men to employment and income: evidence from the EU-SILC Terry WARD 229 Annex Tables 247 Chapter 4 Social class variation in income poverty, deprivation and consistent poverty: an analysis of EU-SILC Christopher T. WHELAN, Dorothy WATSON and Bertrand MAITRE 259 Discussion Brian NOLAN 279 VI Data quality and comparability in EU-SILC 283 Chapter 1 Issues in data quality and comparability in EU-SILC Vijay VERMA 285 4 Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges Chapter 2 The EU-SILC in comparative income distribution research: design and defi nitions in international perspective Markus JÄNTTI 311 Discussion Andrea BRANDOLINI 335 VII EU-SILC to be used for national and comparative EU monitoring of some key aspects of social protection and social inclusion 343 Chapter 1 Using the EU-SILC for policy simulation: prospects, some limitations and some sugestions Francesco FIGARI, Horacio LEVY and Holly SUTHERLAND 345 Annex Appendices 369 Conference conclusions: users’ recommendations and needs 378 Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges 5 FOREWORD Since 2005, the new EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) covers 25 European Union (EU) countries as well as several non EU countries. EU-SILC, which replaces the EU-15 European Community Household Panel (ECHP), has now become the EU reference source for comparative statistics on income, poverty and social exclusion, particularly in the context of the Open Methods of Coordination on pensions and on social inclusion. On the one hand, EU-SILC raises some new issues regarding the EU common indicators already in use - especially with regard to the income concept(s) to be used for calculating the income-based indicators (as it follows closely -though not strictly- the recommendations of the Canberra Group and therefore provides detailed information on income components, in both gross and net). On the other hand, EU-SILC should allow to (better) address some policy areas that have not been (satisfactorily) covered to date. From 6 to 8 November 2006, a conference entitled “Comparative EU-Statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges” was held in Helsinki. This meeting, which was followed by a methodological workshop, was jointly organised by Eurostat and Statistics Finland. It brought together about 120 participants, producers as well as institutional and academic users of the SILC instrument. The conference can be seen as a follow-up of the EU Luxembourg Presidency Conference on “Taking forward the EU Social Inclusion Process” (Luxembourg, 13-14 June 2005) recommendation for 1 in-depth methodological studies around EU-SILC . The Conference and the Methodological Workshop were a joint event by Eurostat and Statistics Finland. Statistics Finland hosted the Conference and the Workshop, and was responsible for the local organisation. This event was prepared together with a Scientifi c Committee which consisted of Tony Atkinson (Oxford University, UK), Michel Glaude (EUROSTAT, European Commission), Markus Jäntti (Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland) and Eric Marlier (CEPS/INSTEAD Research Institute, Luxembourg) and of a Programming Committee composed of Anne Clémenceau (EUROSTAT, European Commission), Martin Bauer (Statistics Austria), Jean-Marc Museux (EUROSTAT, European Commission), Hannele Sauli (Statistics Finland) and Paloma Seoane (Statistics Spain). Academic experts in the fi eld of income measurement, social exclusion and living conditions analysis made substantive contribution on the basis of their analysis of the EU-SILC micro database. Papers and presentations of the conference and workshop are available on www.stat.fi /eusilc/ . The Conference sessions covered the following topics: 1. General presentation of EU-SILC, giving a general overview of the state of the art of the EU-SILC project. 2. Income measurement in EU-SILC 1 See http://www.ceps.lu/eu2005_lu/default.cfm for more information on this Conference (programme, interventions, conclusions and list of partici- pants) and on the book The EU and Social Inclusion: Facing the Challenges [Marlier, Atkinson, Cantillon and Nolan, Bristol (2006), The Policy Press] that was subsequently published. This session put the focus on conceptual papers discussing pros and cons of the EU-SILC approach in various dimensions of income measurement in the framework of policy assessment (Open Method of Coordination...) and academic research. 3. Non-income dimensions in EU-SILC Non-income dimensions of EU-SILC were reviewed in assessing their ability to fulfi l the EU and country needs in terms of other EU indicators for social inclusion. This session was oriented towards the recommendation of new/ revised EU indicator(s) for social inclusion and the possible need to adjust the variables to be collected/ produced under EU-SILC... building on the existing EU work. 4. Data quality and comparability in EU-SILC This session concentrated on the several dimensions of quality, accuracy, coherence and comparability (main focus of the session); both comparability between countries (trade-off between comparability and best national practice) and comparability over time (transition from ECHP to EU-SILC) were considered. 5. EU-SILC to be used for national and comparative EU monitoring of some key aspects of social protection and social inclusion The purpose of this session was to identify the needs of institutional and academic users for monitoring and modelling purposes (esp. in the context of the EU Social Protection and Social Inclusion Process), and to “benchmark” these needs against the data currently available in EU-SILC. An outcome of this session was a set of concrete recommendations to suggest ways of improving the EU-SILC instrument. Panellists reacted to the recommendations made in the previous sessions and addressed the issue of the use of EU-SILC as an aid to making social protection and social inclusion policy. The conference has proved to be of great value for discussing stakeholders’ needs and for providing directions for improving the relevance of the instrument. Eurostat drafted an action plan for the next few years summarizing the main recommendations of this Conference in order to be able to produce data of better quality, mainly in terms of comparability, and to better fulfi ll the needs of the different users, i.e. Commission DGs, the scientifi c community and other international organizations. This event has been a success thanks to the active contribution of all actors, speakers, discussants, chairs of the different sessions, panelists and all participants. 8 Comparative EU statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges General presentation of EU-SILC I

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.