Table Of Content

COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 0 8 5 3 3 6 8 4 0 1 6 7 1 3 RELIGION Volume I Course Materials 2002 Professor David M. Beatty Faculty of Law University of Toronto *** These Materials are for the sole use of students of the University of Toronto Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/comparativeconst01beat_2 COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW RELIGION Volume I Course Materials 2002 Professor David M. Beatty Faculty of Law University of Toronto *** These Materials are for the sole use of students of the University of Toronto TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPARATIVE CONST’L LAW VOLUME I - RELIGION 1. INTRODUCTION: RELIGION AND RIGHTS.1 2. AMERICAN INTERPRETIVISM.7 Lee v. Weisman, 112 S.Ct. 2649; 505 U.S. 577 .28 Note:.47 Oregon v. Smith, (1990) 110 S. Ct. 1595 496 U.S. 913.51 Note:.65 3. GERMAN PRAGMATISM.71 School Prayer Case, (1979) 52 BverfGE 223.71 Note:.76 Classroom Crucifix II Case, (1995) BVerfGE 1.79 Note:.88 Blood Transfusion Case, (1971) 32 BverfGE 98.90 Note: .94 4. FREEDOM FROM CONFORMISM AND ORTHODOXY.97 (a) Religious Ceremonies & Displays.97 Kaunaga v. Sekiguchi, (1977) (The Shinto Groundbreaking Ceremony Case).98 Note:.109 Japan v. Nakaya, (1988) (The Serviceman Enshrinement Case).113 Note:.121 (b) Secular Ideas.126 Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen & Pedersen v Denmark, (1976) 1 E.H.R.R. 711.127 Note:.133 Valsamis v. Greece, (1996) 24 E.H.R.R. 294.135 Note:.139 Bijoe Emmanuel v. The State of Kerala, A.I.R. 1987 S.c. 748 Supreme Court of India.143 Note:.147 (c) Sabbatarian Laws.149 Lior Horev v. Minister Communication/Transportation, (Supreme Court of Israel).151 Note:.168 Lawrence, Negal & Solberg v. The State, (Constitutional Court of South Africa) [1997] 4 S.A.L.R. 1176.175 Note:. 190 5. FREEDOM TO PRACTICE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.193 (a) Blood Transfusions.194 B. (R.) v. Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, (1995) 122 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (Canada).194 Note:.202 Re J (An Infant): B and B v Director General of Social Welfare, [1996] 2 NZLR 134 (New Zealand).203 Note:.207 Amezqueta v. Health Ser\hce of Navarre, (Const’l Court of Spain).210 Note:.215 (b) Proselytizing.217 Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v. Minister for Information, (1997) 2 BHRC 129 (Singapore).218 Rev. Stanislaus v. State (Madhya Pradesh), A.I.R. (1977) Supreme Court 908 (India).220 Note:.223 Kokkinakis v. Greece, (1993) 17 E.H.R.R. 397.224 Note:.238 Roy Murphy v. Independent Radio and Television Commission and the Attorney General, [1998] 2 ILRM 360 (Ireland).241 Note:...248 6. STATE FUNDING.251 (a) Permitted or Proscribed.253 A.G. (Victoria) Ex. Rel. Black v. CTH, (1981) A.L.J.R. 154 (Aus.).253 Note:.268 Zalman v, Simmons-Harris, Supreme Court of the U.S. (June 27, 2002) ....270 Note:.281 Campaign to Separate Church and State Lts. Et al. v. Minister for Education et al., [1998] 2 ILRM 81 (Ireland).283 Note:.291 (b) Constitutionally Required.293 Adler v. Ontario, (1996) 140 D.L.R. (4th) 385.293 Note:.315 Resettlement of Church Property Case, Decision #4/1993 (II. 12), Constitutional Court of Hungary (1994) 1 E.E.C.R. 57.317 Note:.328 Mendelssohn v. The Attorney-General, Decision 04/05/99.331 Interdenominational School Case, (1975) 41 BverfGE 29 (Germany).332 Note:.336 (c) Constitutional Conditions.337 In RE Gauteng School Education Bill, (1996) 3 S.A. 165 (South Africa).338 Note:.344 St. Stephen’s College v University of New Delhi, (1991) Supp 3 S.C.R. 121 (India).346 Note:.355