Table Of Content

UNIVERSITY OF nm TORONTO L 1 1 1 1 FACULTY OF LAW Comparative Anti-Terrorism Law & Policy Fall 2010 Volume 2 Professor Kent Roach For Student Use Only Comparative Anti-Terrorism Law & Policy Fall 2010 Volume 2 Professor Kent Roach For Student Use Only Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/comparativeantit02roac Contents Volume One Chapter 1: The Role of the United Nations UN Security Council Resolutions 1373, 1566, 1624 and 1904 .1 UN General Assembly Counter-Terrorism Action Plan .26 Kent Roach “Sources and Trends in Post 9/11 Anti-Terrorism Laws” in Goold and Lazurus eds. Human Rights and Terrorism (2007) .35 Christopher Michaelson “The Security Council AQ and Taliban Sanctions Regime: ‘Essential Tool’ or Increasing Liability in the UN’s Counterterrorism Efforts?” (2010) 33 Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 448 ..51 Chapter 2: Business as Usual? Singapore and Egypt Michael Hor “Terrorism and the Criminal Law: Singapore’s Solutions” [2002] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 30 .67 Singapore Internal Security Act (extracts) .93 Singapore White Paper on the Jemaah Islamiya Arrests and Threats of Terrorism (2003) (pp.1-24).100 Lynn Welchman “Rocks, hard places and human rights: Anti-Terrorism Laws and Policy in Arab States” in Ramraj et al Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy (2005). 125 Special Rapporteur on Respecting Human Rights While Countering Terrorism Report on Mission to Egypt (2009) .140 Chapter 3: Indonesia Government Regulation in Lieu of Legislation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1/2002 on Combating Criminal Acts of Terrorism.159 Leonard Sebastian “Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Regulations”.174 Hikmahanto Juwana “Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Law” in Ramraj et al. Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy.177 Kent Roach “Militant Democracy and Terrorism: Some Eastern and Western Comparisons” in A. Sajo ed. Militant Democracy (2005) .184 Simon Butt “Indonesian Terrorism Law and Criminal Process’ Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09/30 (2009) .203 Chapter 4: Israel i Mordechai Kremnitzer “The Landau Commission Report - Was the Security Service Subordinated to the I Law, or the Law to the “Needs” of the Security Service?” (1989) 23 Israel Law Review 216.229 I Aharon Barak “The Supreme Court and the Problem of Terrorism” (2002).236 I Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. The State of Israel (1999) HCJ 5100/94 .243 Public Committee Against Torture in Israel “Accountability Denied: The Absence of Investigation and I Punishment of Torture in Israel” (2009).261 l Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel (2006). .269 I Amichai Cohen and Yuval Shany “A Development of Modest Proportions: The Application of the Principle of Proportionality in the Targeted Killings Case” (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 310....272 i A v. State of Israel (2008) .284 Matthew Waxman and Daphne Barak-Erez “Secret Evidence and the Due Process of Terrorist Detentions” I (2009) 48 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. .358 Chapter 5: General Considerations: Rights, Security, Balance and Courts Eminent Jurists Panel Assessing Damage, Urging Action Report of the Eminent Jurists Panel on Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights Executive Summary (2008).420 Richard Posner Not A Suicide Pact (2006) at 147-158.443 Irwin Cotier, “Towards a Counter-Terrorism Law and Policy” (Summer 1998) 10 Terrorism and Political Violence 1-14.449 Kent Roach “Must We Trade Rights for Security?” (2006) 27 Cardozo L.Rev. 2151 at 2151-2157, 2218-2221 .463 ICD Ewing & Joo-Cheong Tham, “The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act” [2008] Public Law (Winter) 668-93 ...474 Kent Roach “Judicial Review of the State"s Anti-Terrorism Activities” (2009) 3 Indian Journal of Constitutional Law 138. .500 Chapter 6: The United States Oren Gross “Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional?” (2003) 112 Yale L.J. 1011 (extracts).530 Foreign Policy “The Torture Timeline”.534 Executive Summary of the 9/11 Commission Report.539 Norman Abrams “The Major Legislative Packages” in Anti-Terrorism and Criminal Enforcement 2nded (2005).566 William Banks “United States’ Response to September 11” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy.579 David Cole Enemy Aliens (2003) at 1-14, 228-233 .589 Ronald Dworkin “The Threat to Patriotism” New York Review of Books Feb 28, 2003 pp. 1-10.600 Militaty Commissions Act of2009.612 Volume 2 Chapter 7: British Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy Terrorism Act, 2000. 1 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act, 2001.12 Adam Tomkins, “Legislating Against Terror” [2002] Public Law 205.20 A v. Secretaiy of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56.29 Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2005 .31 Terrorism Act, 2006.39 Baroness Hale “Human Rights in the Age of Terrorism: The Democratic Dialogue in Action” (2008) 39 Geo.J. Int.L. 383 .51 Joint Committee on Human Rights Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights: Bringing Human Rights Back In (2010) pp 3-45.63 Gillan v. United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights).106 Clive Walker “The UK"s Anti-Terrorism Legislation” in Andrew Lynch et al eds Law and Liberty in the War on Terror (2007).154 Chapter 8: Australian Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy Hon. Philip Ruddock “Australia'^ Legislative Response to the Ongoing Threat of Terrorism” (2004) 27 U.N.S.W.L Rev. 254.162 George Williams “The rule of Law and the regulation of terrorism in Australia and New Zealand,” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy.170 Kent Roach “A Comparison of Australian and Canadian Anti-Terrorism Legislation” (2007) 30 U.N.S.W.L.J. 53.179 Andrew Lynch & George Williams, What Price Security? Taking Stock of Australia’s Anti-Terrorism Laws (2006), 29-58.212 David Dyzenhaus and Rayner Thwaites “Legality and Emergency- the Judiciary in a Time of Terror” in Lynch et al Law and Liberty in the War on Terror (2007).228 Justice AG Whealy, Difficulty in obtaining a fair trial in terrorism cases” (2007) 81 ALJ 743-759 238 ^ Andrew Lynch & George Williams, What Price Security? Taking Stock of Australia‘s Anti-Terrorism Laws 1 (2006) 59-84. 255 | Nicola McGarnty “‘Testing’ our counter-terrorism laws: The prosecution of individuals for terrorism I offences in Australia” (2010) 34 Criminal Law Journal 92 92-127 . 269 I Chapter 9: Canadian Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy Air India Report Extracts .. ^ Kent Roach Canada s Response to Terrorism” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy revised for 2nd ed | . 376 Irwin Cotier Tenorism, Security and Rights: The Dilemmas of Democracies” (2002) 14 National Journal of I Constitutional Law 13. ^9 • David Jenkins In Defence of Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Laws: A Comparative Analysis” (2003) 66 Sask i, L.Rev. 419. 42J | R. v. Khawaja (2006) 214 C.C.C.(3d) 399 (Ont. Sup Ct.) (headnote). 457 I Suresh v. Canada [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3. 4^ Charkaouiv. Canada [2007] 1 S.C.R. 350 (headnote)... 455 j Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar Report of the Events Relating to Maher Arar: Analysis and Recommendations (2006) at 13-16..... 472 Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar A New Review> Mechanism for the RCMP’s National Security Activities (2006) at 17-22 ....476 Kent Roach The Eroding Distinction between Intelligence and Evidence in Terrorism Investigations” in Lynch et al Counter-Terrorism and Beyond (2010). 433 « Khadr v. Canada 2008 SCC 28 (headnote). 5Q7 ® Khadrv. The Prime Minister of Canada 2010 SCC 3 .... 509 || Khadr v. The Prime Minister of Canada 2010 FC 715. 539 Amnesty International v. Canada 2008 FCA 401. 5gj |