Y R A R B LI W A L N KI S A L A R O B COMPARATIVE ANTI-TERRORISM LAW AND NATIONAL SECURITY LAW VOLUME 2 Professor Kent Roach 2006 Faculty of Law University of Toronto Comparative Anti-Terrorism and National Security Law Professor Roach [email protected] 416 946 5645 Table of Contents: Volume 2 6. American Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy Patriot Act. 1 John Whitehead and Stephen Aden “Forfeiting ‘Enduring Freedom for Homeland Security’” (2002) 51 American University Law Review 326, pp 1081-1133 .33 Ronald Dworkin “The Threat to Patriotism” New York Review of Books Feb 28, 2003 pp. 1-10.60 Ronald Dworkin “Terror and the Attack on Civil Liberties”, pp. 1-11.70 Rasul v. Bush.81 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.85 Hamdan v. United States.87 Roach and Trotter “Miscarriages of Justice in Terrorism Cases” (2005) 109 Penn. State L.Rev., pp. 967-1041.107 Expert Reports from the Arar Commission.149 New York Times extracts.217 William Banks “United States Response to September 11”.235 7. Australia and New Zealand George Williams “The rule of Law and the regulation of terrorism in Australia and New Zealand,” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy.245 Human Rights Defender.255 Anti-Terrorism Bill (no 2) of 2005 (Aust).277 8. Singapore and Malaysia Internal Security Act.345 Victor Ramraj “Terrorism, Security and Rights: A New Dialogue” [2002] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 1..353 Michael Hor “Terrorism and the Criminal Law: Singapore’s Solution” [2002] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 30, 30-55..361 Therese Lee “Malaysia and the Internal Security Act” [2002] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 56, pp. 56-72.374 9. Hong Kong and China Young “Enacting security laws in Hong Kong”in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy, pp. 368-395.383 Roach ‘Old and New Visions of Security: Article 23 Compared to Post-September 11 Security Laws” in Hualing, Petersen and Young eds National Security and Fundamental Freedoms (Hong Kong University Press, 2005), pp. 119-148.397 Fu Hualing “Counter-Revolutionaries, Subversives and Terrorists: China’s Evolving National Security Law” in National Security and Fundamental Freedoms.413 10. Indonesia Indonesian Anti-Terrorism Law.428 Leonard Sebastian “Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Regulatons”.443 Hikmahanto Juwana “Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Law” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy.446 Kent Roach “Some Eastern and Western Responses to September 11” in A. Sajo Militant Democracy (Eleventh Publishing, 2005), 171-207.453 11. India and Arab states Prevention of Terrorism Act of 2002 at http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/POTA.htm Repeal of Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2004 at http://\y\v\v.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/PTO.htm Unlawful Activities Act, 2004 at http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/the unlawful activities amendord2004.htm Unlawful Activities Act, 1967 at http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/the_unlawful_ activities_act 1967.htm V. Vijayakumar, “Legal and institution responses to terrorism in Indian, in Global Anti- Terrorism Law and Policy, pp. 351- 367...490 C. Raj Kumar “Human Rights Implications of National Security Laws in India” (2005) 33 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 195, pp. 1-32.499 Chris Gagne “POTA Lessons Learned From India’s Anti-Terror Act” (2005) 25 Boston College Third World Law Journal 261.531 Lynn Welchman “Rocks, hard places and human rights: anti-terrorism law and policy in Arab states, Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy pp. 581-608.576 12. South Africa Protection of Constitutional Democracy Act, 2004.591 Cathy Powell “Terrorism and Governance in South and Eastern Africa “ in Global Anti- Terrorism Law and Policy.611 Kent Roach “A Comparison of South African and Canadian Anti-Terrorism Legislation” (2005) South African Journal of Criminal Justice.624