ebook img

Comparative Activity of the Codling Moth Granulovirus Against Grapholita molesta and Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) PDF

2005·1.3 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Comparative Activity of the Codling Moth Granulovirus Against Grapholita molesta and Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

J. Entomol. Soc.Brit. Columbia 102,December2005 79 SCIENTIFIC NOTE Comparative Activity of the Codling Moth Granulovirus Against Grapholita molesta and Cydiapomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) LAWRENCE A. LACEY^ ^ STEVEN P. ARTHURS^ and HEATHER HEADRICK^ — ABSTRACT The granulovirus ofcodling moth, Cydiapomonella L., CpGV, is nowcom- merciahzed for codling moth control in pome fruit in the USA and Canada. It is highly spe- cific for codling moth and related species. Comparative assays of CpGV against neonate larvae ofanotherintroduced tortricidpest, the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta Busck, revealed a 557 and 589 fold lower susceptibility ofneonate larvae compared with the LC50 andLC95 valuesderivedforC.pomonella. Since its introduction into North America, (1969) (BioServ, Frenchtown, NJ, USA) was the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta used forboth species. Busck, has become a widely establishedpest of Following initial bioassays to determine peach,nectarine, apricot, and apple (Rothschild mortality ranges, five concentrations ofCyd-X and Vickers 1991). There is little information that produced mortality in neonate larvae rang- regarding naturally occurring disease of the ing from 10 to 96.7% in oriental fruitmoth and oriental fruit moth, with the exception of mi- 36.7 to 96.7% in codling moth were bioassayed crosporidia in adults (Simchuk and Komarova against 30 neonates per concentration. Bioas- 1983) and Bacillus thuringiensis in larvae says were conducted on artificial diet in 2-ml (Grassi and Deseo 1984). Although field trials plastic conical autosampler vials (Daigger, with various formulations of B. thuringiensis Lincolnshire, IL, USA). A 2-mm diameterhole have been reported for oriental fruit moth, re- in the cap of each vial covered with stainless sults indicate that it is relatively ineffective steel screen (0.16 mm mesh size) eliminated (RothschildandVickers 1991). condensation. Ten \x\ ofaqueous virus suspen- Following its initial discovery in infected sions or 10 1^1 ofwaterforcontrols was applied codling moth Cydia pomonella L. larvae in to the surface of 1 ml of artificial medium Mexico in 1964, numerous laboratory and field (approximately 100 mm^) in the autosampler studies have confirmed the virulence of the vials. The label specified virus concentration of codling moth granulovirus (CpGV), against its Cyd-X is 3 X 10^^ granules per liter. After the homologous host (Falcon et al. 1968, Laing surface of the medium had dried, one neonate and Jaques 1980, Arthurs and Lacey 2004, larva was added to each vial. The vials were Cossentine and Jensen 2004). In early host incubated for 7 d at 25 ± 1.7 °C and then as- specificity studies, CpGV was also noted to sessed for larval mortality. The study was re- have larvicidal activity against the pea moth, peated for each species on four separate dates. Cydia nigricana (Fabricius) (Payne, 1981) and Each date was treated as an individual replicate oriental fruit moth (Falcon et al. 1968), but ofeach concentration (i.e. datawerenotpooled quantitative assays ofthe virus have not been beforeprobitanalysis). reported for the latter species. We conducted The results of the assays clearly indicated bioassays ofthe Cyd-X formulation of CpGV that oriental fruit mothneonates are susceptible (Certis USA, Columbia, MD) against oriental to CpGV, butat a significantly lowerlevel than fruit moth and codling moth neonates from that observed in codling moth neonates (Table coloniesmaintained atthe YakimaAgricultural 1). The oriental fruit moth were 557 and 589 Research Laboratory using the materials and times less susceptible to CpGV compared with methods described by Lacey et al. (2002). The codling moth, based on probit (normal sig- codling moth diet described by Brinton et al. moid) analysis of the LC50 and LC95, respec- 'YakimaAgricultural ResearchLaboratory,USDA-ARS, 5230KonnowacPassRd., Wapato, WA98908 ^Authortowhomcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressed 80 J.Entomol. Soc.Brit.Columbia 102,December2005 tively (StatsDirect Ltd, v. 2.4). Based on our estimated that the LD50 for neonate larvae methods, the calculated LC50 and LC95 of couldbe as lowas 1.2 granulesperlarva. CpGV for oriental fruit moth are 35 and 540 First generation oriental fruit moth often granules per mm", respectively, but only 0.06 feed on shoots andyoung foliage. Althoughnot and 0.9 granules per mm"for codling moth. as active against oriental fruit moth as against Although CpGV must be ingested in order to codling moth in laboratory bioassays, field infect a larva, Ballard et al. (2000) demon- activity of Cyd-X against oriental fruit moth strated that the point ofentry ofcodling moth neonates at label rates used for codling moth larvae into fruit may not necessarily be where control (0.07-0.44 L/ha) could potentially re- virus is acquired; larvae could become infected duce oriental fruit moth populations if signifi- by walking orbrowsing on CpGV-sprayed leaf cant feeding ofearly instars ofthe first genera- surfaces in as little as 3.5 min. Ostensibly virus tion occurred on treated foliage. Because natu- pickedup on legs ormouthparts in the absence ral feeding behavior will influence their sus- of browsing leaf surfaces could contaminate ceptibility to CpGV, further field studies are the initial point ofentry. In ourbioassays, neo- warranted. nates of both species may wander over the We are grateful to Rob Fritts Jr. (Certis) for surface ofthe medium before boring into it. In Cyd-X samples and the Washington Tree Fruit the case of codling moth larvae this would Research Commission for financial support. provide ample opportunity to acquire virus We thank Don Hostetter and Joel Siegel for even at the lower concentrations. Huber (1986) helpful reviewsofthemanuscript. Table L LC50 and LC95 values for CpGV bioassayed against Grapholita molesta and Cydiapomonella neo- nates. The number ofgranules per 10 |il is based on dilutions ofCyd-Xwith a label specified virus concentration of3 x 10^^ granules/L. All probit comparisons were significantly different, P< 0.001 basedondosagelog(io+i) andadjusted forcontrol mortality (< 7.1%). Species n LC50 ( 95% CI) LC95(95% CI) Slope C.pomonella 714 6.30 (4.74-7.91) 91.62 (63.00- 155.68) 1.41 G. molesta 708 3.51 x 10^(2.72-4.42 x 10^) 5.40x10^(3.66-9.04 x 10^) 1.39 REFERENCES Arthurs, S.P. andL.A. Lacey. 2004. Fieldevaluationofcommercial formulationsofthecodlingmothgranulovi- rus (CpGV): persistence ofactivity and success ofseasonal applications against natural infestations in the PacificNorthwest. BiologicalControl31: 388-397. Ballard,J., D.J. Ellis,andC.C. Payne. 2000. Uptakeofgranulovirus fromthesurfaceofapplesandleavesbyfirst instar larvae ofthe codling moth Cydiapomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 10: 617-625. Brinton, F.E., M.D. Proverbs, and B.E. Carty. 1969. Artificial diet formassproductionofthecodlingmoth, Car- pocapsaepomonella(Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae).TheCanadianEntomologist 101:577-584. Cossentine, J.E. and L.B.M. Jensen. 2004. Persistence ofa commercial codling moth granulovirus product on applefruitandfoliage.Journalofthe EntomologicalSocietyofBritishColumbia 101: 87-92. Falcon, L.A., W.R. Kane, andR.S. Bethell. 1968. Preliminaryevaluationofagranulosisvirus forcontrol ofcod- lingmoth.JournalofEconomicEntomology61: 1208-1213. Grassi, S. and K.V. Deseo. 1984. Distribution oiBacillus thuringiemis Bed. and prospects ofusing it in plant protection.AttiGiomateFitopatologiche2:425-433(inItalian). ReviewofAppliedEntomology73: 361. Huber, J. 1986. Use ofbaculoviruses in pest management programs, pp. 181-202. In R.R. Granados and B.A. Federici (eds). The BiologyofBaculoviruses, Vol. II: Practical Application forInsectControl. CRC Press, BocaRaton,FL. Lacey,L.A.,P.V. Vail,andD.F. Hoffmann.2002.Comparativeactivityofbaculovirusesagainstthecodlingmoth, Cydiapomonella,andthreeothertortricidpestsoftreefruit.JournalofInvertebratePathology80: 64-68. Laing,D.R. andR.P.Jaques. 1980. Codlingmoth: Techniquesforrearinglarvaeandbioassayinggranulosisvirus. JournalofEconomicEntomology73: 851-853. Payne, C.C. 1981. The susceptibility ofthepeamoth, Cydianigricana,to infectionbythe granulosisvirusofthe codlingmoth,Cydiapomonella.JoumalofInvertebratePathology38:71-77. Rothschild, G.H.L. and R.A. Vickers. 1991. Biology, ecologyandcontrolofthe oriental fruitmoth,pp. 389-412. In L.P.S. van der Geest and H.H. Evenhuis (Eds.), Tortricid Pests, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control.ElsevierSciencePublishers,Amsterdam,TheNetherlands. Simchuk, P.A. and GF. Komarova. 1983. Microsporidiosis in the oriental peach moth. Zashchita Rasteni 29 (in Russian);ReviewsofAppliedEntomology72:471 (inEnglish).

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.