13/16” ★★ nicholas khoo Although the Chinese and the Praise for Collateral Damage Vietnamese were Cold war allies in wars against the French and the Americans, their “Khoo returns to the roots of international relations theory alliance collapsed and they ultimately fought to explain Chinese, Soviet, and Vietnamese behavior toward a war against each other in 1979. More than one another during the 1960s and 1970s on the basis of real- thirty years later the fundamental cause of ist factors of power distribution and balancing. He uses the alliance’s termination remains contested new information released in China in the form of memoirs, c o l l at e r a l among historians, international relations the- scholarly works, and archival publications to tell a dramatic orists, and Asian studies specialists. nicholas and in some ways tragic story with insight and vividness.” Khoo brings fresh perspective to this debate. Andrew J. nAtHAn ddd aaa mmm aaa ggg eee niCHolAS KHoo is a lecturer in the Class of 1919 Professor of Political Science Using Chinese-language materials released department of Politics at the University of Columbia University since the end of the Cold war, Khoo revises otago, new Zealand. He received a Ph.d. existing explanations for the termination from Columbia University in 2006 and an “Collateral Damage offers both a sophisticated analytical of China’s alliance with Vietnam, argu- MA from Johns Hopkins University in 1998. treatment and a comprehensive history of Sino-Vietnamese ing that Vietnamese cooperation with Chi- He specializes in Chinese foreign policy, the relations in the 1960s and 1970s, thus presenting a persua- na’s Cold war adversary, the Soviet Union, international relations of Asia, the interna- sive explanation of the emergence of Sino-Vietnamese fric- was the necessary and sufficient cause for tional politics of the Cold war, and interna- tion in the 1960s and the emergence of Sino-Vietnamese the alliance’s termination. He finds alterna- tional relations theory. animosity and war in the 1970s.” tive explanations to be less persuasive. these emphasize nonmaterial causes, such as ide- robert S. roSS ology and culture, or reference issues within professor of political science the Sino-Vietnamese relationship, such as boston College land and border disputes, Vietnam’s treat- ment of its ethnic Chinese minority, and Vietnam’s attempt to establish a sphere of influence over Cambodia and laos. sino-soviet rivalry and Khoo also adds to the debate over the rele- vance of realist theory in interpreting China’s the termination of the international behavior during both the Cold war and post–Cold war eras. while others sino-vietnamese alliance see China as a social state driven by non- jacket design: chang jae lee material processes, Khoo makes the case for viewing China as a quintessential neorealist state. From this perspective, the focus of neo- columbia university press ISBN 978-0-231-15078-1 realist theory on security threats from mate- new york rially stronger powers explains China’s for- www.cup.columbia.edu eign policy toward not only the Soviet Union printed in the u.s.a. columbia but also its Vietnamese allies. COLLATERAL DAMAGE C5407.indb i 12/21/10 8:20:34 AM C5407.indb ii 12/21/10 8:20:34 AM COLLATERAL DAMAGE Sino-Soviet Rivalry and the Termination of the Sino-Vietnamese Alliance ★ NICHOLAS KHOO columbia university press new york C5407.indb iii 12/21/10 8:20:35 AM columbia university press publishers since 1893 new york chichester, west sussex Copyright © 2011 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Khoo, Nicholas. Collateral damage : Sino-Soviet rivalry and the termination of the Sino-Vietnamese alliance / Nicholas Khoo. p. cm . Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-231-15078-1 (cloth : alk. paper) — isbn 978-0-231-52163-5 (ebook) 1. China—Foreign relations—Soviet Union. 2. Soviet Union—Foreign relations—China. 3. China—Foreign relations—Vietnam. 4. Vietnam—Foreign relations—China. 5. Sino-Vietnamese Confl ict, 1979. I. Title. ds740.5.s65k46 2011 327.5104709′—dc22 2010027352 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Th is book is printed on paper with recycled content. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 References to Internet Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared. C5407.indb iv 12/21/10 8:20:35 AM CONTENTS List of Tables vii Acknowledgments ix 1. China’s Cold War Alliance with Vietnam: Historical and Th eoretical Signifi cance 1 2. Breaking the Ring of Encirclement: Sino-Soviet Alliance Termination and the Chinese Communists’ Vietnam Policy, 1964–1968 15 3. A War on Two Fronts: Th e Sino-Soviet Confl ict During the Vietnam War and the Betrayal Th esis, 1968–1973 45 4. Th e Politics of Victory: Sino-Soviet Relations and the Road to Vietnamese Unifi cation, 1973–1975 78 5. Th e End of an “Indestructible Friendship”: Soviet Resurgence and the Termination of the Sino-Vietnamese Alliance, 1975–1979 103 6. When Allies Become Enemies 137 Notes 165 Bibliography 223 Index 251 C5407.indb v 12/21/10 8:20:36 AM C5407.indb vi 12/21/10 8:20:36 AM TABLES Table 2.1. China’s Military Aid to North Vietnam, 1964–1968 29 Table 2.2. China’s Economic Aid to North Vietnam, 1965–1975 30 Table 4.1. Estimates of Soviet Economic Aid to Vietnam, 1965–1975 86 Table 4.2. Estimates of Soviet Military Aid to Vietnam, 1965–1975 87 Table 5.1. Estimates of Soviet Economic Aid to Vietnam, 1975–1979 112 Table 5.2. Estimates of Soviet Military Aid to Vietnam, 1975–1979 113 C5407.indb vii 12/21/10 8:20:36 AM C5407.indb viii 12/21/10 8:20:37 AM ACKNOWLEDGMENTS During the course of my graduate studies, it quickly became clear that the impact of the Sino-Soviet confl ict on Cold-War-era Southeast Asia was underresearched, and a fruitful area for investigation. Th is book, which is largely based on my Ph.D. dissertation, examines what is argu- ably one of the most underappreciated subplots of the Cold War; specifi cally, how the Sino-Soviet confl ict infl uenced Beijing’s and Moscow’s relationships with their comrades in Hanoi, and how those relationships, in turn, intensi- fi ed the confl ict. While Cold War history may strike some as an uninterest- ing retreat into the past, with little relevance for the contemporary era, I have found the opposite to be true. Th is narrative is alive with forceful personalities, friction between alliance partners, wars between former communist comrades, and much more. Arguably, China’s behaviour during the period under exami- nation also provides us with an insight into how it might conduct its foreign policy in the twenty-fi rst century. I would like to use this opportunity to thank all of those who have, in vari- ous ways, played a part in this book. Both of my dissertation advisers at Colum- bia deserve particular mention. As my primary dissertation adviser, Andrew Nathan encouraged me to rigorously pursue the various arguments contained in the text. His probing questions and wise counsel were critical in shaping the fi nal product in myriad ways. Th omas Bernstein’s encyclopedic knowledge C5407.indb ix 12/21/10 8:20:37 AM
Description: