Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2005: Vol 5 Table of Contents

2005·0.71 MB·English

Contents of Volume 5
Abulafia, D. P. See Tafet, G. E. DeBuse, C. See Wong, A. C.-N.
Alain, C. See Dyson, B. J. de Oliveira, L. See Erthal, F. S.
Alkire, M. T. See Haier, R. J. D’ Esposito, M. See Gibbs, S. E. B.
Alpert, N. M. See Kosslyn, S. M. Destrebecqz, A. See Bierman, D. J.
Altmann, R. See Kopp, B. Dyson, B. J., Alain, C., & He, Y. Effects of visual attentional
Aron, A. See Omura, K. load on low-level auditory scene analysis ......... 319
Bierman, D. J., Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. Intuitive Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Satpute, A. B. Personal-
decision making in complex situations: Somatic markers ity from a controlled processing perspective: An fMRI study
in an artificial grammar learning task ........... 297 of neuroticism, extraversion, and self-consciousness 169
Botvinick, M. M. See Ullsperger, M. Epstein, R. A. See Gauthier, I.
Braver, T. S. See: Erthal, F. S., de Oliveira, L., Mocaiber, I., Pereira, M. G.,
Gray, J. R. Machado-Pinheiro, W., Volchan, E., & Pessoa, L. Load-
Thompson-Schill, S. L. dependent modulation of affective picture processing
Bregman, A. S. See Sussman, E. S.
Brinkmann, M. See Czernochowski, D.
Feder, D. J. See Tafet, G. E.
Brown, V. R. See Coleman, S. L.
Fox, E., Russo, R., & Georgiou, G. A. Anxiety modulates the
Burgess, G. C. See Gray, J. R.
degree of attentive resources required to process emotional
Bylsma, L. M. See Ullsperger, M.
Canli, T. See Omura, K. Gabrieli, 3. D. E. See Ray, R. D.
Carpenter, P. A. See Koshino, H. Ganis, G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. Understanding
Clavagnier, S., Falchier, A., & Kennedy, H. Long-distance feed- the effects of task-specific practice in the brain: Insights
back projections to area V1: Implications for multisensory from individual-differences analyses
integration, spatial awareness, and visual consciousness Gauthier, I., Curby, K. M., Skudlarski, P., & Epstein, R. A. In-
(Vol.4 , pp. 117-126) dividual differences in FFA activity suggest independent
PN OE oln asec elvis where 4.6 .0 aca % eadess ovew.e.t.wlalecey processing at different spatial scales
Cleeremans, A. See Bierman, D. J. Gauthier, I. See:
Cohen, M. X, & Ranganath, C. Behavioral and neural predictors James, K. H.
of upcoming decisions Wong, A. C.-N.
Coleman, S. L., Brown, V. R., Levine, D. S., & Mellgren, R. L. Georgiou, G. A. See Fox, E.
A neural network model of foraging decisions made under Gibbs, S. E. B., & D’ Esposito, M. Individual capacity differ-
predation risk ences predict working memory performance and pre-
Conroy, M. A., Hopkins, R. O., & Squire, L. R. On the contri- frontal activity following dopamine receptor stimulation
bution of perceptual fluency and priming to recognition
memory Gray, J. R., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Yarkoni, T., Larsen, R. J.,
Cook, C. A. See Zorawski, M. & Braver, T. S. Affective personality differences in neural
processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI
Cooper, J. C. See Ray, R. D.
Greene, E. J. See Johnson, M. K.
Cunningham, W. A., Raye, C. L., & Johnson, M. K. Neural
correlates of evaluation associated with promotion and Gross, J. J. See Ray, R. D.
prevention regulatory focus
Cunningham, W. A. See Johnson, M. K. Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T.
Curby, K. M. See Gauthier, I. Structural brain variation, age, and response time . . . 246
Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. Dissociations among tasks
Curran, T. See Wong, A. C.-N.
involving inhibition: A single-case study
Czernochowski, D., Mecklinger, A., Johansson, M., & Brink-
He, Y. See Dyson, 3. J.
mann, M. Age-related differences in familiarity and rec-
ollection: ERP evidence from a recognition memory Head, K. See Haier, R. J.
study in children and young adults Hopkins, R. O. See Conroy, M. A.
Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. The influence of processing objec- Ochsner, K. N. See Ray, R. D.
tives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and Omura, K., Aron, A., & Canli, T. Variance maps as a novel
gender perception tool for localizing regions of interest in imaging studies of
individual differences
James, K. H., James, T. W., Jobard, G., Wong, A. C.-N., & Gau-
thier, I. Letter processing in the visual system: Different
Pereira, M. G. See Erthal, F. S.
activation patterns for single letters and strings .... 452
Pessoa, L. See Erthal, F. S.
James, T. W. See James, K. H.
Polk, T. A. See Vannest, J.
Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. Imaging the past: Neural
activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular
and irregular past-tense processing.............. 282 Ranganath, C. See Cohen, M. X
Jobard, G. See James, K. H. Ray, R. D., Ochsner, K. N., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R.,
Johansson, M. See Czernochowski, D. Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. Individual differences in trait
Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Mitchell, K. J., Greene, E. J., Cun- rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive
ningham, W. A., & Sanislow, C. A. Using fMRI to investigate reappraisal
a component process of reflection: Prefrontal correlates of Raye, C. L. See:
refreshing a just-activated representation ......... 339 Cunningham, W. A.
Jonides, J. See: Johnson, M. K.
Thompson-Schill, S. L. Robertson, E. R. See Ray, R. D.
Wager, T. D.
Roffman, S. S. See Tafet, G. E.
Jung, R. E. See Haier, R. J.
Russo, R. See Fox, E.
Just, M. A. See Koshino, H.
Sanislow, C. A. See Johnson, M. K.
Keller, T. A. See Koshino, H.
Satpute, A. B. See Eisenberger, N. I.
Khan, F. J. See Sussman, E. S.
Schaefer, A. See Gray, J. R.
Knight, R. T. See Simon-Thomas, E. R.
Kopp, B., & Altmann, R. Neurocognitive effects of phobia- Scott, L., Shannon, R. W., & Nelson, C. A. Behavioral and
related stimuli in animal-fearful individuals ......373 electrophysiological evidence of species-specific face
processing
Koshino, H., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., & Just, M. A. Inter-
actions between the dorsal and ventral pathways in mental Seidenberg, M. S. See Joanisse, M. F.
wetaison: Am GVIMRE SONNY... weee e ceeeee 54 Shannon, R. W. See Scott, L.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Sukel, K. E., & Alpert, N. M. Simon-Thomas, E. R., & Knight, R. T. Affective and cognitive
Two types of image generation: Evidence from PET .. 41 modulation of performance monitoring: Behavioral and
Kosslyn, S. M. See Ganis, G. PM OUMNOMOE on oon be oka Heenan dene ee DOR
Kuhn, C. M. See Zorawski, M. Skudlarski, P. See Gauthier, I.
Smith, E. E. See Wager, T. D.
LaBar, K. S. See Zorawski, M. Squire, L. R. See Conroy, M. A.
Lambon Ralph, M. A. See Welbourne, S. R. Sukel, K. E. See Kosslyn, S. M.
Larsen, R. J. See Gray, J. R. Sussman, E. S., Bregman, A. S., Wang, W. J., & Khan, F. J. At-
Levine, D. S. See Coleman, S. L. tentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in au-
Lewis, R. L. See Vannest, J. ditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream
auditory environments .....................0050. 93
Lieberman, M. D. See Eisenberger, N. I.
Machado-Pinheiro, W. See Erthal, F. S. Tafet, G. E., Feder, D. J., Abulafia, D. P., & Roffman, S. S. Reg-
ulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity in re-
Marois, R. See Todd, J. J.
sponse to cognitive therapy in patients with generalized
Martin, R. C. See Hamilton, A. C. DURICIVIGISOEUIEE 6 6k ke siive eases vn ceucn scar
Mecklinger, A. See Czernochowski, D.
Thompson, W. L. See:
Mellgren, R. L. See Coleman, S. L. Ganis, G.
Mitchell, K. J. See Johnson, M. K. Kosslyn, S. M.
Mocaiber, I. See Erthal, F. S. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Braver, T. S., & Jonides, J. Individual
differences: Editorial 115
Nelson, C. A. See Scott, L. Thompson-Schill, S. L. See Novick, J. M.
Nichols, T. E. See Wager, T. D. Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. Posterior parietal cortex activity pre-
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. dicts individual differences in visual short-term memory
Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of capacity
Broca’s area in sentence comprehension ......... . 263 Trueswell, J. C. See Novick, J. M.
Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. The conflict Wong, A. C.-N., Gauthier, I., Woroch, B., DeBuse, C., & Cur-
adaptation effect: It’s not just priming ran, T. An early electrophysiological response associated
Urland, G. R. See Ito, T. A. with expertise in letter perception ............... 306
Wong, A. C.-N. See James, K. H.
Vannest, J., Polk, T. A., & Lewis, R. L. Dual-route processing Woroch, B. See Wong, A. C.-N.
of complex words: New fMRI evidence from derivational
suffixation Yarkoni, T. See Gray, J. R.
Volchan, E. See Erthal, F. S. Yeo, R. A. See Haier, R. J.
Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., & Nichols, T. E. Toward Zorawski, M., Cook, C. A., Kuhn, C. M., & LaBar, K. S. Sex,
a taxonomy of attention shifting: Individual differences stress, and fear: Individual differences in conditioned
in fMRI during multiple shift types learning ..
Wang, W. J. See Sussman, E. S.
Welbourne, S. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. Exploring the im-
pact of plasticity-related recovery after brain damage in GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS
a connectionist model of single-word reading General Information, Computer Disks, Tables, Figures ... 111