Co-opetition and Strategic Business Alliances in telecommunications: the cases of BT, Deutsche Telekom and Telefonica de Espana Raymond Cairo London School of Economics Interdisciplinary Institute of Management (IIM) Doctor in Philosophy (PhD) UMI Number: U21B645 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U213645 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F rr Abstract As a relatively new phenomenon compared to other ways of executing an international strategy, Strategic Business Alliances (SBAs) lack the theoretical support that most of their longer-established counterparts enjoy. Yet, it is our belief that the widespread use of SBAs in a large number of manufacturing and service sectors necessitates the development of a theoretical foundation. One of the contributions of this thesis is the assessment of the suitability of an established theoretical framework: Nalebuff and Brandenburger ’s game theoretical “Co- opetition”. Whilst the authors had a much wider domain than SBAs in mind when they developed their theory, we will argue that Co-opetition can be an extremely suitable theory to assess deciding developments with regard to SBAs. Our empirical analysis of the major telecommunication SBAs does, thereto, not only provide a comprehensive overview of the most prominent alliance activities in this sector but it also serves as input to assess Co-opetition’s suitability as a theoretical framework on developments related to SBAs. Besides the overall suitability of Co-opetition we will further assess which of the two extremes of the theory’s central notion of the new Mindset, peace and war, best represents developments we witness in the telecommunication industry. In order to achieve that we have selected two theories that provide a clear representation of the two extremes. The comparison of the applicability of these two representing theories leads us to conclude that regarding SBAs in telecommunications the “peace element” of Co- opetition’s Mindset is more applicable than the “war element”. 2 Chapter 1 ______________________________________________________________6 Research interest and research objective___________________________________ 6 Introduction_________ 6 Research interest 6 Thesis set-up__________________________________________________________7 Research objectives and methodology____________________________________ 16 Changes in the global economy___________________________________________18 Introduction_________ ___________________ 18 Reasons for the running of industrial sectors by the state_______________________ 18 The liberalisation wave 19 The privatisation wave__________________________________________________21 Consequences for regulation_____________________________________________22 Technology’s role in the globalization process________________________________23 Operational distance_____________________________________________________________24 Operational complexity___________________________________________________________24 Geographical complexity__________________________________________________________24 Operational capacity_____________________________________________________________25 Summary on globalisation_________________________________________________________25 Ways of executing an international strategy_____________________ 26 Serving foreign markets from the company’s home country__________________ 26 Building and buying overseas operations_____________________________________________27 Cooperative contractual agreements________________________________________________ 28 Strategic Business Alliances________________________________________________________29 Introduction__________________________________________________________________ 29 Prominent reasons for firms to enter into SBAs______________________________________31 Ownership__________________________ . 43 Control_____________ 45 From contract to status 47 Chapter 2 _____________________________________________________________49 The theories_________ 49 Co-opetition_________________________ 49 Introduction____________________________ 49 The potential contribution ofNalebujf and Brandenburger’s Co-opetition to our thesis_______50 The new mindset: war and peace____________ ‘_____________________________________51 Understanding the Value Net_______________________________________________________52 Special role of the government___________________________________________________ 55 . The new mindset and the Value Net_______________________________________________ 55 The Value Net, the new mindset and cartels________________________________________57 Introducing game theory___________________________________________________________57 Introducing PARTS_______________________________________________________________ 58 Players_______________________________________________________________________58 Added Value 62 % ■ " ■ Rules_________________________________.______________________________________ 66 Perceptions___________________________________________________________________ 67 Boundaries or Scope of the game ________________________________________________ 71 Hypotheses______________________________________________________________________74 Classification of alliances_______________________________________________75 3 The Mindset___________________________________________________ 79 Mindset I: “War” ________________________________________________________________79 Hamel’s model on inter-partner learning _________________________________________79 Hamel’s model________________________________________________________________82 Hypotheses______________________________________________________________________89 Mindset II: “Peace”_______________________________________________________________93 Introduction__________________________________________________________________ 93 Madhok’s theory: introduction___________________________________________________ 95 Hypotheses____________________________________________________________________ 102 Instability and high failure rate of SBAs_______ 105 Different agendas on the development of the alliance________ 106 The variables__________________________ 107 The issue of different agendas___________________________________________________110 Chapter 3 ___________________________________________________________ 115 Telecommunication cases .____________________________________115 BT’s international strategy: three stages of Concert ___________________115 BT’s European operations_______________________________________________________ 115 The role of Concert in BT’s international operations________________________________ 118 Concert’s first stage__________________________________________________________ 118 A wave of liberalisation in telecommunication markets__________________________ 119 Concert’s second stage_______________________________________________________ 121 Concert’s third stage_________________________________________________________ 127 BT’s current international strategy: strategic change in BT’s conception of the European market after the demise of Concert_________ 135 Deutsche Telekom and its SBAs___________________________________________________ 138 Beyond a European partnership: Global One_______________________________________ 140 Deutsche Telekom, France Telecom and the Italian job____________________________ 143 Consequences of the Telecom Italia merger failure_____________________________, 146 Deutsche Telekom’s international strategy after Global One________________________ 150 Deutsche Telekom’s current international strategy_________________________________ 152 Telefonica de Espana and its SBAs______________________________________ 154 Telefonica’s international strategy________________________________________________ 154 Telefonica’s first stage: Building a Latin American presence__________________________ 156 Telefonica’s second stage: Adopting an SBA-strategy_________________________________ 157 Telefonica’s current international strategy_________________________________________ 169 Chapter 4 ___________________________________________________________ 172 Cases and theory_____________________________________________________ 172 PARTS’ contribution: an interpretation of PARTS applied to the telecommunication industry____________________________________________________________173 Two types of contribution________________________________________________________ 174 Co-opetition and BT____________________________________________________________177 Co-opetition and Deutsche Telekom______________________________________________ 194 Co-opetition and Telefonica_______________________________________________________199 Conclusion of PARTS’ contribution________________________________________________ 205 War versus Peace: assessing our expansions of Nalebuff and Brandenburger’s mindset against our cases______________________________________________208 Assessing Hamel’s theory against our cases_________________________________________208 Assessing Madhok’s theory against our cases________________________________________213 Conclusions 221 The issue of Different Agendas on the development of the alliance______________ 221 Conclusions on the war and peace mindset_________________________________223 4 Conclusion on Co-opetition Bibliography____________ Chapter 1 Research interest and research objective Introduction In today’s world businesses co-operating is so common that it largely escapes our attention. So is the computer that I am currently using to write this thesis undoubtedly the product of at least a few partnerships and, very likely, depending on several Strategic Business Alliances (SBAs). Such forms of co-operation may refer to the hardware part (i.e. the computer and its component) or to the software. But not only computers and their software are to a large extent the result of corporate partnerships. It seems that daily attributes as cars, medicine and even simple foodstuffs nowadays cannot emerge without high level co-operation between companies that some decades ago were able to produce these products on their own. Moreover, it is not only in the case of products that this silent revolution is taking place all around us yet managing to escape our perception. The service sector is also laden with examples of strategies that lean heavily on cross-cofporate partnerships. This is most obvious when the airline company where we book our plane ticket with is not the same as the one that we are offered a seat on. The connecting flight may be with yet another company and, with a little luck, the return flight can be handled by company number four. Whilst such alignment can be detected by the consumer similar partnerships between banks and insurance companies or in the telecommunication industry are completely off our individual radar screens. Research interest It is particularly that last industry that has caught our interest in relation to the subject of SBAs. Not very long ago, telecommunications meant little more than making expensive calls from home, office or a booth in the street and sending a fax was the high end of the industry. Nowadays it is hard to find any relatively sophisticated product or service that does not have some sort of link to 6
Description: