Clinical Issues in AIP: When to Suspect and How to Proceed CME/CE Supported by an independent educational grant from Recordati Rare Diseases. www.medscape.org/roundtable/aip Clinical Issues in AIP: When to Suspect and How to Proceed CME/CE This article is a CME/CE certified activity. To earn credit for this activity visit: www.medscape.org/roundtable/aip CME/CE Released: 3/25/2016; Valid for credit through 3/25/2017 Target Audience This activity is intended for gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, emergency medicine physicians, and nurses. Goal The goal of this activity is to improve recognition, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of patients with acute intermittent porphyria. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: 1. Identify key factors used to diagnose acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) 2. Select appropriate treatment and management strategies in patients with AIP Credits Available Physicians - maximum of 0.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ Nurses - 0.50 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (1 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology) All other healthcare professionals completing continuing education credit for this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. Accreditation Statements For Physicians Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships. For Nurses Medscape, LLC is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation. Awarded 0.50 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology. Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected] Pg.2 www.medscape.org/roundtable/aip Instructions for Participation and Credit There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board. This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test. Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*: 1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures. 2. Study the educational content online or printed out. 3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming. You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker. *The credit that you receive is based on your user profile. Pg.3 Clinical Issues in AIP: When to Suspect and How to Proceed CME/CE Faculty and Disclosures As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines “relevant financial relationships” as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest. Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content. Angelika L. Erwin, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Genetics and Pediatrics, Lerner College of Medicine; Clinical Geneticist, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio Disclosure: Angelika L. Erwin, MD, PhD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: Served as an advisor or consultant for: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Genzyme Corporation Dr Erwin does not intend to discuss off-label uses of drugs, mechanical devices, biologics, or diagnostics approved by the FDA for use in the United States. Dr Erwin does not intend to discuss investigational drugs, mechanical devices, biologics, or diagnostics not approved by the FDA for use in the United States. Manisha C. Balwani, MD, MS Associate Professor, Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York Disclosure: Manisha C. Balwani, MD, MS, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: Served as an advisor or consultant for: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Genzyme Corporation; Recordati Rare Diseases, Inc. Received grants for clinical research from: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Genzyme Corporation; Synageva BioPharma Dr Balwani does not intend to discuss off-label uses of drugs, mechanical devices, biologics, or diagnostics approved by the FDA for use in the United States. Dr Balwani does not intend to discuss investigational drugs, mechanical devices, biologics, or diagnostics not approved by the FDA for use in the United States. Editor Susan L. Smith, MN, PhD Lead Scientific Director, Medscape, LLC Disclosure: Susan L. Smith, MN, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. CME Reviewer/Nurse Planner Amy Bernard, MS, BSN, RN-BC Lead Nurse Planner, Medscape, LLC Disclosure: Amy Bernard, MS, BSN, RN-BC, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Peer Reviewer This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Pg.4 www.medscape.org/roundtable/aip Angelika L. Erwin, MD, PhD: Hello, I am Dr Angelika Erwin. I am a clinical geneticist and an associate professor at the Lerner Collage of Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. Welcome to this program titled, “When to Suspect and How to Proceed Clinical Issues in AIP.” Joining me today is Dr Manisha Balwani, an associate professor of genetics and medicine and codirector of the Porphyria Center at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City. Manisha Balwani, MD, MS: Thank you for having me, Angelika. Dr Erwin: Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is 1 of 4 acute porphyrias, all of which are characterized by recurrent, acute attacks of neurovisceral symptoms. Pg.5 Clinical Issues in AIP: When to Suspect and How to Proceed CME/CE AIP is caused by a defect in the HMBS gene, which leads to a partial deficiency in porphobilinogen (PBG) deaminase, the third enzyme of the heme biosynthetic pathway.[1] Alcohol use, exposure to certain medications, or other factors that increase demand for heme lead to upregulation of heme biosynthesis in the liver. This results in increased production of certain heme precursors — especially delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and PBG. Patients who have a partial deficiency in the PBG enzyme cannot sufficiently metabolize these heme precursors. The precursors accumulate in the liver and cause the symptoms seen in patients with an AIP attack [hereafter referred to as “acute attack”]. Both ALA and PBG are neurotoxic, which explains the neurologic nature of symptoms associated with AIP. AIP is an autosomal dominant disorder. Affected persons have a 50% chance of passing the genetic mutation that causes AIP to their children. Pg.6 www.medscape.org/roundtable/aip Although AIP is the most common acute porphyria, it is nevertheless a rare disorder. Therefore, it is often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed. Due to the nonspecific presentation of AIP, healthcare providers need to have a high initial index of suspicion to recognize the classic symptoms and make the diagnosis. Manisha, how does a patient who is experiencing an acute attack typically present to the healthcare system? Dr Balwani: This is best illustrated using a case. A 24-year-old woman went to the emergency department (ED) after having a tonic-clonic seizure at home. She had a recent history of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, which had worsened over the past 3 days; she also had back and chest pain. A physical examination showed her heart rate was 160 to 170 beats per minute, indicating tachycardia. She was hypertensive and had significant proximal muscle weakness. She was afebrile. This is a classic presentation of AIP, in which the patient arrives at the ED with severe symptoms. Pg.7 Clinical Issues in AIP: When to Suspect and How to Proceed CME/CE AIP is much more common in women than in men. In women, AIP typically presents during the reproductive years (20 to 49 years of age). More than 90% of patients with AIP present with severe, acute abdominal pain, which is a classic symptom of the disorder. The pain is usually so severe that patients will rate it as a 10 on a scale of 0 to 10. Abdominal pain is often accompanied by pain in the back, chest, or extremities, as was the case with our patient. Patients also typically have nausea and vomiting. Some patients have constipation, but diarrhea is rare. Acute onset of tachycardia and hypertension are also classic features of AIP and typically result from increased catecholamine production. The appearance of hypertension in a patient who has no history of this condition may point to AIP as a diagnosis. Patients with AIP may also experience headaches, confusion, or altered mental status. They may present with a seizure, as our patient did. Pg.8 www.medscape.org/roundtable/aip Severe muscle weakness is another common feature of AIP, as was seen in our patient. Muscle weakness is typically proximal, with the upper extremities more commonly affected than the lower extremities. Dr Erwin: In my experience, patients with muscle weakness who have very severe acute attacks can develop paralysis and respiratory failure. If they are not treated appropriately, they can die. Dr Balwani: That is correct. Muscle weakness can be progressive, so it is important to carefully monitor patients who present with muscle weakness. Dr Erwin: When patients like the woman in our case present to the ED, what are the first steps in assessing them? Dr Balwani: The first thing to do, of course, is to stabilize the patient. The next step is to obtain a thorough patient history with the goal of determining what might have precipitated the attack. Did the patient recently begin taking any new drugs or increase her alcohol intake? Was anything else going on — such as fasting, dieting, surgery, or an illness — that could have precipitated the event? Pg.9 Clinical Issues in AIP: When to Suspect and How to Proceed CME/CE The physical examination is not always helpful. Patients typically have hypertension and tachycardia. Their abdominal pain is neuropathic and presents differently than abdominal pain due to other causes. It is diffuse, with no tenderness, rebound tenderness, or rigidity. Patients typically have no signs of infection. Dr Erwin: What about laboratory test results? Dr Balwani: Our patient had a normal complete blood count, which is what is usually seen during an acute attack. Although liver enzymes are typically elevated during an acute attack, the increases are usually transient. The most striking laboratory feature is hyponatremia. Our patient’s critically low sodium level of 130 mg/L is probably what caused her seizure. Hyponatremia may be a clue to the diagnosis of AIP. The patient was suspected of having hematuria, probably because her urine was dark or reddish in color, but her urinalysis results were normal. Obviously, this means the patient did not have blood in her urine. The presence of porphyrins in her urine likely turned it dark or reddish in color. Porphyrins in the urine can also provide a clue to the diagnosis. Patients should undergo a complete gastrointestinal workup to rule out other causes of their symptoms. The results of our patient’s gastrointestinal workup were normal. Pg.10
Description: