Civil appeals & judicial review : analysis, process and strategy in civil proceedings

8 Pages·1999·0.27 MB·English

by  Campion, John A

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
FACULTY OF LAW
CIVIL APPEALS & JUDICIAL REVIEW
Analysis, Process and Strategy
in Civil Proceedings
Casebook
VOLUME II
JOHN A. CAMPION
ALANL. W. D’SILVA
FASKEN CAMPBELL GODFREY
Toronto, Ontario
[phone]
Spring 1999
Prepared with the Assistance of
Jennifer F. Holland, Student-at-Law,
Fasken Campbell Godfrey 1998-1999
BORA LASffl LAW LIBRA**
m
jan 21 •
S LAW
t-HMN.II
UNIVERSITY B TEOJiTB
bora laskin law library
OF
1 imivfrsTTY TORONTO
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
FACULTY OF LAW
CIVIL APPEALS & JUDICIAL REVIEW
Analysis, Process and Strategy
in Civil Proceedings
Casebook
VOLUME II
JOHN A. CAMPION
ALANL. W. D’SILVA
FASKEN CAMPBELL GODFREY
Toronto, Ontario
[phone]
Spring 1999
Prepared with the Assistance of
Jennifer F. Holland, Student-at-Law,
Fasken Campbell Godfrey 1998-1999
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2018 with funding from
University of Toronto
https://archive.org/details/civilappealsjudi02camp_0
CIVIL APPEALS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW
CASEBOOK - VOLUME II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART II-JUDICIAL REVIEW
CHAPTER 1 - Jurisdiction Tab No.
Judicial Review, Ontario Manual of Civil Litigation, (Carswell), 42
(1994), pp. 2-135-2-161
Administrative v. Judicial or Quasi-Judicial Decisions
Re Robertson et al. and Niagara South Board of Education 43
(1973), 1 O.R. (2d) 548 (Div. Ct.)
Constitutional Validity versus Exercise of Statutory Power
Re Service Employees International Union, Local 204 and 44
Broadway Manor Nursing Home et al. (1984), 48 O.R. (2d)
225 (C.A.)
CHAPTER 2 - Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies
Brode, P. “When it is Premature to Apply for Judicial 45
Review? ” case comment (1993), Advocates Quarterly,
Vol. 15, p. 352.
Re Woodglen and Co. Ltd. and City of North York et al. (1983), 46
42 O.R. 385 (Div. Ct.)
Re Gage and Attorney-General for Ontario (1992), 90 D.L.R. 47
(4th) 537 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
The Wellesley Central Hospital and Health Services 48
Reconstructuring Commission (Reasons of the Ontario
Divisional Court, July 1997)
CHAPTER 3 - Evidence
Re Keeprite Workers ’ Independent Union et al. and Keeprite 49
Products Ltd. (1980), 29 O.R. (2d) 513 (C.A.)
2
_ —
Re Ontario Public Service Employees Union et al and The 50
Queen in Right of Ontario (1984), 45 O.R. (2d) 70
(H.C.J.).
Securicor Investigations & Security Ltd. v. Ontario Labour 51
Relations Board (1985), 10 Admin. L.R. 189 (Div. Ct.).
CHAPTER 4 - Scope of Review
Nicholson v. Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Board of Commissioners 52
of Police, No. 2 (1978), 88 D.L.R. (3d) 671 (S.C.R.).
limit Tapirisit of Canada v. Leger el al (1979), 95 D.L.R. (3d) 665 53
(Fed. C.A.).
Mullan, David J. “Natural Justice - The Challenges of Nicholson, 54
Deference Theory & The Charter" in Neil R. Finkelstein
and Brian MacLeod Rogers eds.. Recent Developments in
Administrative Law. Toronto: Carswell, 1987. pp. 1 -52.
Chaplin, Ann M. “Who is best suited to decide? The recent 55
Trend in standards of judicial review” [1994] Ottawa Law
Review, Vol. 26:2. pp. 321-355
Canada (Attorney General) v Mossop (1993), 100 D.L.R. (4th) 658 56
(S.C.C.)
Pezim v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers) (1994), 57
114 D.L.R. (4th) 385 (S.C.C.)
National Corn Growers v. Canadian Import Tribunal (1990), 58
74 D.L.R. (4th) 449 (S.C.C.)
Paccar of Canada Ltd. v. Canadian Association of Industrial, 59
Mechanical and Allied Workers, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 983
Lovett, Deborah “That Curious Curial deference just gets couriouser 60
and curiouser - Canada (Director of Investigation and Research)
v. Southam Inc. The Advocate, July 4, 1997
Canada (Director of Investigation and Research) v. Southam Inc., 61
144 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (S.C.C.)
3
- -
CHAPTER 5 - Exceeding Jurisdiction
Hyreiuk v. Ontario, [1996] O.J. No. 3831 (C.A.) 62
CHAPTER 6 - The Charter of Rights & Freedoms and Judicial Review
Beatty, D. and Kenneth, S. “Striking Back: Fighting Words, Social 63
Protest and Political Participation in Free and Democratic
Societies ” (1988) 67 Can. Bar Rev. pp. 573-621.
Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General) (1998), 48 C.R.R. 64
(2d) 212 (Ont. Gen. Div.).
Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Ontario (Minister of) 65
Education (1990), 71 O.R. (2d) 341 (C.A.).
CHAPTER 7 - Injunctive Relief
Peerless (Guardian ad litem of) v. B.C. School Sports (1998), 66
157 D.L.R. (4th) (B.C.C.A.)
Clark (litigation guardian of) v. Ontario Federation of School 67
Athletic Association (1997), 22 O.T.C. 152; [1997] O.J.
No. 94. (Gen. Div.)
i +
§