ebook img

characterizing binding affinity of somatropin and derived structures to hghab by surface acoustic PDF

113 Pages·2013·7.38 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview characterizing binding affinity of somatropin and derived structures to hghab by surface acoustic

FACULTY OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis Drug Quality and Registration Academic Year 2012-2013 CHARACTERIZING BINDING AFFINITY OF SOMATROPIN AND DERIVED STRUCTURES TO HGHAB BY SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVES AND SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY Apr. Evelyn Buyst Master of Industrial Pharmacy Promotor Prof. dr. Apr. Bart De Spiegeleer Mentor Nathalie Bracke Board of commissioners Prof. Erwin Adams Prof. Roger Kemel Prof. Ann Van Schepdael Prof. Sandra Apers Prof. Ann Van Eeckhaut Prof. Yvette Michotte FACULTY OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis Drug Quality and Registration Academic Year 2012-2013 CHARACTERIZING BINDING AFFINITY OF SOMATROPIN AND DERIVED STRUCTURES TO HGHAB BY SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVES AND SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY Apr. Evelyn Buyst Master of Industrial Pharmacy Promotor Prof. dr. Apr. Bart De Spiegeleer Mentor Nathalie Bracke Board of commissioners Prof. Erwin Adams Prof. Roger Kemel Prof. Ann Van Schepdael Prof. Sandra Apers Prof. Ann Van Eeckhaut Prof. Yvette Michotte COPYRIGHT "The author and the promoters give the authorization to consult and to copy parts of this thesis for personal use only. Any other use is limited by the laws of copyright, especially concerning the obligation to refer to the source whenever results from this thesis are cited." April 22, 2013 Appreciations First of all, I would like to enounce my appreciations towards Prof. dr. Apr. Bart De Spiegeleer. He gave me the opportunity to work in the DruQuaR laboratory. He arranged an internship at the very last moment, offered me a very interesting and defiant topic to work on, and he was always available for questions and his professional and expansive view on many things. Secondly, I want to thank tremendously my mentor, Nathalie Bracke, who was always and at every time available for questions and good advice. It was really a pleasure to work with her. Another word of thanks is for all other colleagues in the laboratory for their daily help and the positive atmosphere they created to work in. Thanks to all other students for the good company and pleasant leisure time during this last year. Last but not least, I thank my parents and my family for all the opportunities they gave me, their never ending support and encouraging words. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1. BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE AND ITS ROL IN CANCER .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1. Neuro-endocrine tumors ....................................................................... 1 1.1.2. Growth hormone ................................................................................... 2 1.2. PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE THERAPEUTICS .................................................................. 3 1.2.1. Protein scaffolds .................................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Peptide therapeutics .............................................................................. 4 1.3. BIOSENSORS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 5 1.3.1. What are biosensors? ............................................................................. 5 1.3.2. Surface acoustic waves biosensors ......................................................... 6 1.3.3. Sensorgram of surface acoustic wave biosensors .................................... 7 1.3.4. Other tools for the characterization of binding events ........................... 8 1.3.4.1. Surface plasmon resonance............................................................. 8 1.3.4.2. Quarz crystal microbalance ............................................................ 8 1.3.4.3. Isothermal titration calorimetry ..................................................... 9 1.3.5. Comparison of biosensors and other techniques .................................... 9 2. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 11 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................... 12 3.1. SENSOR CHIP .......................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1. Cleaning sensor chips ............................................................................. 12 3.1.1.1. Pre-cleaning .................................................................................... 12 3.1.1.2. Chemical etching with AMP ............................................................ 12 3.1.2. Coating sensor chip with dextran ........................................................... 12 3.2. LIGAND IMMOBILIZATION ...................................................................................... 13 3.3. SAM5 BINDING EXPERIMENTS ............................................................................... 14 3.3.1. Screening for a regeneration condition .................................................. 14 3.3.2. Analytes (modified) somatropin ............................................................ 14 3.3.2.1. Binding experiment between hGHAb and (modified) somatropin with regeneration ................................................................................... 14 3.3.3. Somatropin derived peptides ................................................................. 15 3.3.3.1. QC analysis of somatropin derived peptides ................................... 15 3.3.3.2. Binding experiments with somatropin derived peptides ............... 15 3.3.4. Data processing of SAW binding experiments for (modified) somatropin and peptides ................................................................................................ 16 3.4. SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY .................................................................... 18 4. RESULTS AND DISCISSION ....................................................................................... 19 4.1. LIGAND IMMOBILIZATION ...................................................................................... 19 4.2. SOMATROPIN ......................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1. Screening for regeneration conditions ................................................... 21 4.2.2. SAM5 binding experiments .................................................................... 22 4.2.2.1. Binding experiment between hGHAb and somatropin .................. 22 4.2.3. SEC experiments .................................................................................... 24 4.2.3.1. Calibration curve of the SEC column .............................................. 24 4.2.3.2. SEC analysis of hGHAb .................................................................... 25 4.2.3.3. SEC analysis of somatropin ............................................................. 25 4.2.3.4. SEC analysis of mixtures of hGHAb and somatropin ...................... 27 4.3. MODIFIED SOMATROPIN ........................................................................................ 30 4.3.1. 1:1 NOTA-somatropin ............................................................................ 30 4.3.1.1. SAM5 binding experiment with regeneration ................................ 30 4.3.1.2. SEC experiments ............................................................................. 31 4.3.1.2.1. SEC analysis of 1:1 NOTA-somatropin ............................ 31 4.3.1.2.2. SEC analysis of mixtures of hGHAb and 1:1 NOTA-somatropin ..................................................... 32 4.3.2. 1:3 NOTA-somatropin ............................................................................ 33 4.3.2.1. SAM5 binding experiment with regeneration ................................ 33 4.3.2.2. SEC experiments ............................................................................. 34 4.3.2.2.1. SEC analysis of 1:3 NOTA-somatropin ............................ 34 4.3.2.2.2. SEC analysis of mixtures of hGHAb and 1:3 NOTA-somatropin ..................................................... 35 4.3.3. 1:10 NOTA-somatropin .......................................................................... 36 4.3.3.1. SAM5 binding experiments ............................................................. 36 4.3.3.1.1. Binding experiment with regeneration ........................... 36 4.3.3.1.2. Duplication of binding experiment with regeneration ... 37 4.3.3.2. SEC experiments .............................................................................. 38 4.3.3.2.1. SEC analysis of 1:10 NOTA-somatropin .......................... 38 4.3.3.2.2. SEC analysis of mixtures of hGHAb and 1:10 NOTA-somatropin ................................................... 39 4.3.4. Comparison of the modified somatropin structures ............................... 41 4.4. SOMATROPIN DERIVED PEPTIDES .......................................................................... 45 4.4.1. Choise of peptides ................................................................................. 45 4.4.2. QC analysis somatropin derived peptides .............................................. 45 4.4.3. SAM5 binding experiments .................................................................... 46 4.4.3.1. Feasability calculations ................................................................... 46 4.4.3.2. Binding experiments ....................................................................... 47 4.4.4. SEC experiments .................................................................................... 50 4.4.4.1. SEC analysis of P0320 ...................................................................... 50 4.4.4.2. SEC analysis of mixtures of hGHAb and P0320 ............................... 52 5. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES ............................................................................ 53 6. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 54

Description:
SEC analysis of mixtures of hGHAb and somatropin chemistry. When the ligand has multiple copies of the functional group (-NH2) that mediates immobilization, proteins are coupled heterogeneously and As a final conclusion, we can state that the SAW biosensor is a very promising instrument to.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.